Constitutional History of England by Henry Hallam - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

with the public faith, Henry seemed to prepare the road for the still

more radical changes of the reformers. These, a numerous and

increasing sect, exulted by turns in the innovations he promulgated,

lamented their dilatoriness and imperfection, or trembled at the

reaction of his bigotry against themselves. Trained in the school of

theological controversy, and drawing from those bitter waters fresh

aliment for his sanguinary and imperious temper, he displayed the

impartiality of his intolerance by alternately persecuting the two

conflicting parties. We all have read how three persons convicted of

disputing his supremacy, and three deniers of transubstantiation,

were drawn on the same hurdle to execution. But the doctrinal

system adopted by Henry in the latter years of his reign, varying

indeed in some measure from time to time, was about equally

removed from popish and protestant orthodoxy. The corporal

presence of Christ in the consecrated elements was a tenet which no

one might dispute without incurring the penalty of death by fire; and

the king had a capricious partiality to the Romish practice in those

very points where a great many real catholics on the Continent were

earnest for its alteration, the communion of the laity by bread alone,

and the celibacy of the clergy. But in several other respects he was

wrought upon by Cranmer to draw pretty near to the Lutheran creed,

and to permit such explications to be given in the books set forth by

his authority, the Institution, and the Erudition of a Christian Man, as,

if they did not absolutely proscribe most of the ancient opinions, threw

at best much doubt upon them, and gave intimations which the

people, now become attentive to these questions, were acute enough

to interpret.[114]

81

Progress of the reformed doctrine in England. —It was natural to

suspect, from the previous temper of the nation, that the revolutionary

spirit which blazed out in Germany should spread rapidly over

England. The enemies of ancient superstition at home, by frequent

communication with the Lutheran and Swiss reformers, acquired not

only more enlivening confidence, but a surer and more definite

system of belief. Books printed in Germany or in the Flemish

provinces, where at first the administration connived at the new

religion, were imported and read with that eagerness and delight

which always compensate the risk of forbidden studies.[115] Wolsey, who had no turn towards persecution, contented himself with ordering

heretical writings to be burned, and strictly prohibiting their

importation. But to withstand the course of popular opinion is always

like a combat against the elements in commotion; nor is it likely that a

government far more steady and unanimous than that of Henry VIII.

could have effectually prevented the diffusion of protestantism. And

the severe punishment of many zealous reformers, in the subsequent

part of his reign, tended, beyond a doubt, to excite a favourable

prejudice for men whose manifest sincerity, piety, and constancy in

suffering, were as good pledges for the truth of their doctrine, as the

people had been always taught to esteem the same qualities in the

legends of the early martyrs. Nor were Henry's persecutions

conducted upon the only rational principle, that of the inquisition,

which judges from the analogy of medicine, that a deadly poison

cannot be extirpated but by the speedy and radical excision of the

diseased part; but falling only upon a few of a more eager and

officious zeal, left a well-grounded opinion among the rest, that by

some degree of temporising prudence they might escape molestation

till a season of liberty should arrive.

One of the books originally included in the list of proscription among

the writings of Luther and the foreign Protestants, was a translation of

the New Testament into English by Tindal, printed at Antwerp in

1526. A complete version of the Bible, partly by Tindal, and partly by

Coverdale, appeared, perhaps

82

at Hamburgh, in 1535; a second edition, under the name of

Matthews, following in 1537; and as Cranmer's influence over the

king became greater, and his aversion to the Roman church more

inveterate, so material a change was made in the ecclesiastical policy

of this reign, as to direct the Scriptures in this translation (but with

corrections in many places) to be set up in parish churches, and

permit them to be publicly sold.[116] This measure had a strong tendency to promote the Reformation, especially among those who

were capable of reading; not surely that the controverted doctrines of

the Romish church are so indisputably erroneous as to bear no sort

of examination, but because such a promulgation of the Scriptures at

that particular time seemed both tacitly to admit the chief point of

contest, that they were the exclusive standard of Christian faith, and

to lead the people to interpret them with that sort of prejudice which a

jury would feel in considering evidence that one party in a cause had

attempted to suppress; a danger which those who wish to restrain the

course of free discussion without very sure means of success will in

all ages do well to reflect upon.

83

The great change of religious opinions was not so much effected by

reasoning on points of theological controversy, upon which some are

apt to fancy it turned, as on a persuasion that fraud and corruption

pervaded the established church. The pretended miracles, which had

so long held the understanding in captivity, were wisely exposed to

ridicule and indignation by the government. Plays and interludes were

represented in churches, of which the usual subject was the vices

and corruptions of the monks and clergy. These were disapproved of

by the graver sort, but no doubt served a useful purpose.[117] The press sent forth its light hosts of libels; and though the catholic party

did not fail to try the same means of influence, they had both less

liberty to write as they pleased, and fewer readers than their

antagonists.

Its establishment under Edward. —In this feverish state of the public

mind on the most interesting subject, ensued the death of Henry VIII.,

who had excited and kept it up. More than once, during the latter part

of his capricious reign, the popish party, headed by Norfolk and

Gardiner, had gained an ascendant and several persons had been

burned for denying transubstantiation. But at the moment of his

decease, Norfolk was a prisoner attainted of treason, Gardiner in

disgrace, and the favour of Cranmer at its height. It is said that Henry

had meditated some further changes in religion. Of his executors, the

greater part, as their subsequent conduct evinces, were nearly

indifferent to the two systems, except so far as more might be gained

by innovation. But Somerset, the new protector, appears to have

inclined sincerely towards the Reformation, though not wholly

uninfluenced by similar motives. His authority readily overcame all

opposition in the council: and it was soon perceived that Edward,

whose singular precocity gave his opinions in childhood an

importance not wholly ridiculous, had imbibed a steady and ardent

attachment to the new religion, which probably, had he lived longer,

would have led him both to diverge farther from what he thought an

idolatrous superstition, and to have treated its adherents with

severity.[118] Under

84

his reign accordingly a series of alterations in the tenets and homilies

of the English church were made, the principal of which I shall point

out, without following a chronological order, or adverting to such

matters of controversy as did not produce a sensible effect on the

people.

Sketch of the chief points of difference between the two religions. —1.

It was obviously among the first steps required in order to introduce a

mode of religion at once more reasonable and more earnest than the

former, that the public services of the church should be expressed in

the mother tongue of the congregation. The Latin ritual had been

unchanged ever since the age when it was familiar; partly through a

sluggish dislike of innovation, but partly also because the

mysteriousness of an unknown dialect served to impose on the

vulgar, and to throw an air of wisdom around the priesthood. Yet what

was thus concealed would have borne the light. Our own liturgy, so

justly celebrated for its piety, elevation, and simplicity, is in great

measure a translation from the catholic services; those portions of

course being omitted which had relation to different principles of

worship. In the second year of Edward's reign, the reformation of the

public service was accomplished, and an English liturgy compiled not

essentially different from that in present use.[119]

2. No part of exterior religion was more prominent, or more offensive

to those who had imbibed a protestant spirit, than the worship, or at

least veneration, of images, which in remote and barbarous ages had

given excessive scandal both in the Greek and Latin churches,

though long fully established in the practice of each. The populace, in

towns where the reformed tenets prevailed, began to pull them down

in the very first days of Edward's reign; and after a little pretence at

distinguishing

85

those which had not been abused, orders were given that all images

should be taken away from churches. It was perhaps necessary thus

to hinder the zealous Protestants from abating them as nuisances,

which had already caused several disturbances.[120] But this order was executed with a rigour which lovers of art and antiquity have long

deplored. Our churches bear witness to the devastation committed in

the wantonness of triumphant reform, by defacing statues and

crosses on the exterior of buildings intended for worship, or windows

and monuments within. Missals and other books dedicated to

superstition perished in the same manner. Altars were taken down,

and a great variety of ceremonies abrogated; such as the use of

incense, tapers, and holy water; and though more of these were

retained than eager innovators could approve, the whole surface of

religious ordinances, all that is palpable to common minds, underwent

a surprising transformation.

3. But this change in ceremonial observances and outward show was

trifling, when compared to that in the objects of worship, and in the

purposes for which they were addressed. Those who have visited

some catholic temples, and attended to the current language of

devotion, must have perceived, what the writings of apologists or

decrees of councils will never enable them to discover, that the

saints, but more especially the Virgin, are almost exclusively the

popular deities of that religion. All this polytheism was swept away by

the reformers; and in this may be deemed to consist the most specific

difference of the two systems. Nor did they spare the belief in

purgatory, that unknown land which the hierarchy swayed with so

absolute a rule, and to which the earth had been rendered a tributary

province. Yet in the first liturgy put forth under Edward, the prayers for

departed souls were retained; whether out of respect to the

prejudices of the people, or to the immemorial antiquity of the

practice. But such prayers, if not necessarily implying the doctrine of

purgatory (which yet in the main they appear to do), are at least so

closely connected with it, that the belief could never be eradicated

while they remained. Hence, in the revision of the liturgy, four years

afterwards, they were laid aside;[121] and several other changes made, to eradicate the vestiges of the ancient superstition.

86

4. Auricular confession, as commonly called, or the private and

special confession of sins to a priest for the purpose of obtaining his

absolution, an imperative duty in the church of Rome, and preserved

as such in the statute of the six articles, and in the religious codes

published by Henry VIII., was left to each man's discretion in the new

order; a judicious temperament, which the reformers would have

done well to adopt in some other points. And thus, while it has never

been condemned in our church, it went without dispute into complete

neglect. Those who desire to augment the influence of the clergy

regret, of course, its discontinuance; and some may conceive that it

would serve either for wholesome restraint, or useful admonition. It is

very difficult, or perhaps beyond the reach of any human being, to

determine absolutely how far these benefits, which cannot be

reasonably denied to result in some instances from the rite of

confession, outweigh the mischiefs connected with it. There seems to

be something in the Roman catholic discipline (and I know nothing

else so likely) which keeps the balance, as it were, of moral influence

pretty even between the two religions, and compensates for the

ignorance and superstition which the elder preserves: for I am not

sure that the protestant system in the present age has any very

sensible advantage in this respect; or that in countries where the

comparison can fairly be made, as in Germany or Switzerland, there

is more honesty in one sex, or more chastity in the other, when they

belong to the reformed churches. Yet, on the other hand, the practice

of confession is at the best of very doubtful utility, when considered in

its full extent and general bearings. The ordinary confessor, listening

mechanically to hundreds of penitents, can hardly preserve much

authority over most of them. But in proportion as his attention is

directed to the secrets of conscience, his influence may become

dangerous; men grow accustomed to the control of one perhaps

more feeble and guilty than themselves, but over whose frailties they

exercise no reciprocal command! and, if the confessors of kings have

been sometimes terrible to nations, their ascendency is probably not

less mischievous, in proportion to its extent, within the sphere of

domestic life. In a political light, and with the object of lessening the

weight of the ecclesiastical order

87

in temporal affairs, there cannot be the least hesitation as to the

expediency of discontinuing the usage.[122]

5. It has very rarely been the custom of theologians to measure the

importance of orthodox opinions by their effect on the lives and hearts

of those who adopt them; nor was this predilection for speculative

above practical doctrines ever more evident than in the leading

controversy of the sixteenth century, that respecting the Lord's

supper. No errors on this point could have had any influence on

men's moral conduct, nor indeed much on the general nature of their

faith; yet it was selected as the test of heresy; and most, if not all, of

those who suffered death upon that charge, whether in England or on

the Continent, were convicted of denying the corporal presence in the

sense of the Roman church. It had been well if the reformers had

learned, by abhorring her persecution, not to practise it in a

somewhat less degree upon each other, or by exposing the

absurdities of transubstantiation, not to contend for equal nonsense

of their own. Four principal theories, to say nothing of subordinate

varieties, divided Europe at the accession of Edward VI. about the

sacrament of the eucharist. The church of Rome would not depart a

single letter from transubstantiation, or the change, at the moment of

consecration, of the substances of bread and wine into those of

Christ's body and blood; the accidents, in school language, or

sensible qualities of the former remaining, or becoming inherent in

the new substance. This doctrine does not, as vulgarly supposed,

contradict the evidence of our senses; since our senses can report

nothing as to the unknown being, which the schoolmen denominated

substance, and which alone was the subject of this conversion. But

metaphysicians of later ages might enquire whether material

substances, abstractedly considered, exist at all, or, if they exist,

whether they can have any specific distinction except their sensible

qualities. This, perhaps, did not suggest itself in the sixteenth century;

but it was strongly objected that the simultaneous existence of a body

in many places, which the Romish doctrine implied, was

inconceivable, and even contradictory. Luther, partly, as it seems, out

of his determination to multiply differences with the church, invented a

theory somewhat different, usually called consubstantiation, which

was adopted in the confession of Augsburgh, and to which, at least

88

down to the end of the seventeenth century, the divines of that

communion were much attached. They imagined the two substances

to be united in the sacramental elements, so that they might be

termed bread and wine, or the body and blood, with equal

propriety.[123] But it must be obvious that there is merely a scholastic distinction between this doctrine and that of Rome; though, when it

suited the Lutherans to magnify, rather than dissemble, their

deviations from the mother church, it was raised into an important

difference. A simpler and more rational explication occurred to

Zuingle and Œcolampadius, from whom the Helvetian Protestants

imbibed their faith. Rejecting every notion of a real presence, and

divesting the institution of all its mystery, they saw only figurative

symbols in the elements which Christ had appointed as a

commemoration of his death. But this novel opinion excited as much

indignation in Luther as in the Romanists. It was indeed a rock on

which the Reformation was nearly shipwrecked; since the violent

contests which it occasioned, and the narrow intolerance which one

side at least displayed throughout the controversy, not only

weakened on several occasions the temporal power of the protestant

churches, but disgusted many of those who might have inclined

towards espousing their sentiments. Besides these three hypotheses,

a fourth was promulgated by Martin Bucer of Strasburgh, a man of

much acuteness, but prone to metaphysical subtlety, and not, it is

said, of a very ingenuous character. His theory upon the sacrament of

the Lord's supper, after having been adopted with little variation by

Calvin, was finally received into some of the offices of the English

church. If the Roman and Lutheran doctrines teemed with unmasked

absurdity, this middle system (if indeed it is to be considered as a

genuine opinion, and not rather a politic device),[124] had no advantage but in the disguise of unmeaning terms; while it had the peculiar

infelicity of departing as much from the literal sense of the words of

institution, wherein the

89

former triumphed, as the Zuinglian interpretation itself. It is not easy

to state in language tolerably perspicuous this obsolete metaphysical

theology. But Bucer, as I apprehend, though his expressions are

unusually confused, did not acknowledge a local presence of Christ's

body and blood in the elements after consecration—so far concurring

with the Helvetians; while he contended that they were really, and

without figure, received by the worthy communicant through faith, so

as to preserve the belief of a mysterious union, and of what was

sometimes called a real presence. It can hardly fail to strike every

unprejudiced reader that a material substance can only in a very

figurative sense be said to be received through faith; that there can

be no real presence of such a body, consistently with the proper use

of language, but by its local occupation of space; and that, as the

Romish tenet of transubstantiation is rather the best, so this of the

Calvinists is the worst imagined of the three that have been opposed

to the simplicity of the Helvetic explanation. Bucer himself came to

England early in the reign of Edward, and had a considerable share

in advising the measures of reformation. But Peter Martyr, a disciple

of the Swiss school, had also no small influence. In the forty-two

articles set forth by authority, the real or corporeal presence, using

these words as synonymous, is explicitly denied. This clause was

omitted on the revision of the articles under Elizabeth.[125]

6. These various innovations were exceedingly inimical to the

influence and interests of the priesthood. But that order obtained a

sort of compensation in being released from its obligation to celibacy.

This obligation, though unwarranted by Scripture, rested on a most

ancient and universal rule of discipline;

90

for though the Greek and Eastern churches have always permitted

the ordination of married persons, yet they do not allow those already

ordained to take wives. No very good reason, however, could be

given for this distinction; and the constrained celibacy of the Latin

clergy had given rise to mischiefs, of which their general practice of

retaining concubines might be reckoned among the smallest.[126] The German Protestants soon rejected this burden, and encouraged

regular as well as secular priests to marry. Cranmer had himself

taken a wife in Germany, whom Henry's law of the six articles, one of

which made the marriage of priests felony, compelled him to send

away. In the reign of Edward this was justly reckoned an

indispensable part of the new Reformation. But the bill for that

purpose passed the Lords with some little difficulty, nine bishops and

four peers dissenting; and its preamble cast such an imputation on

the practice it allowed, treating the marriage of priests as ignominious

and a tolerated evil, that another act was thought necessary a few

years afterwards, when the Reformation was better established, to

vindicate this right of the protestant church.[127] A great number of the clergy availed themselves of their liberty; which may probably have

had as extensive an effect in conciliating the ecclesiastical

profession, as the suppression of monasteries had in rendering the

gentry favourable to the new order of religion.

Opposition made by part of the nation. —But great as was the number

of those whom conviction or self-interest enlisted under the protestant

banner, it appears plain that the Reformation moved on with too

precipitate a step for the majority. The new doctrines prevailed in

London, in many large towns, and in the eastern counties. But in the

north and west of England, the body of the people were strictly

Catholics. The clergy, though not very scrupulous about conforming

to the innovations, were generally averse to most of them.[128] And, in sp