COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
by Wikibooks contributors
Developed on Wikibooks,
the open-content textbooks collection
© Copyright 2004–2006, Wikibooks contributors.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free
Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the
section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
Image licenses are listed in the section entitled "Image Credits."
Main authors: Aschoeke (C) Tbittlin (C) LanguageGame (C) Itiaden (C) Pbenner (C) · Mheimann (C)
Jkeyser (C) Ddeunert (C) Marplogm (C) · Pehrenbr (C) Ifranzme (C) FlyingGerman (C) Sspoede (C) ·
Asarwary (C) Lbartels (C) Smieskes (C) Apape (C) · Ekrueger (C)
The current version of this Wikibook may be found at:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cognitive_Psychology_and_Cognitive_Neuroscience
Contents
CHAPTERS..............................................................................................................................4
ABOUT THE BOOK............................................................................................................... 177
Chapter 1
1 COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND THE BRAIN
live version • discussion • edit lesson • comment • report an error
Introduction
magine a young man, Knut, sitting at his desk, with his tired eyes staring at a monitor, surfing
Iaround, trying to find some worthy articles for his psychology homework. A cigarette rests between
the middle and index fingers of his left hand. Without looking, he stretches out his free hand and grabs
a cup of coffee located on the right of his keyboard. While sipping some of the cheap discounter blend,
he suddenly asks himself: "What is happening here?"
Around the beginning of the 20th century, psychologists would have said, "Take a look into
yourself, Knut, analyse what you're thinking and doing," as analytical introspection was the method of
that time.
A few years later, J.B. Watson published his book Psychology from the Standpoint of a
Behaviorist, from which began the era of behaviourism. Behaviourists claimed that it was impossible to
study the inner life of people scientifically. Their approach to psychology, which they assumed to be
more scientific, focussed only on the study and experimental analysis of behaviour. The right answer to
Knut's question would have been: "You are sitting in front of your computer, reading and drinking
coffee, because of your environment and how it influences you." Behaviorism was the primary means
for American psychology for about the next 50 years. One of the primary critiques and downfalls of
behaviorism was Noam Chomsky's 1959 critique of B.F. Skinner's "Verbal behaviour". Skinner, an
influential behaviourist, attempted to explain language on the basis of behaviour alone. Chomsky
showed that this was impossible, and by doing so, influenced enough psychologists to end the
dominance of behaviorism in American psychology.
As more researchers were once again concerned with processes inside the head, cognitive
psychology arose on the landscape of science. Their central claim was that cognition was information
processing of the brain. Cognitive psychology did not dispose the methods of behaviourism, but rather
widened their horizon by adding levels between input and output.
Modern technology and new methods enabled researchers to combine examinations of public
actions (latencies in reaction time, number of recalls) with physiological measurements (EEG and
event-related potentials, fMRI). Such methods, in addition to others, are used by cognitive science to
collect evidence for certain features of mental activity. From this, references and correlations between
action and cognition could be made.
These correlations were inspiration and thenceforwards the main challenge for cognitive
psychologists. To answer Knut's question the cognitive psychologist would probably first examining
Knut’s brain in that specific situation. So let's try this!
Knut has a problem, he really needs to do his homework. To solve this problem, he has to perform
loads of cognition. The light is gleaming into his eyes, transducing it from his retina into nerve signals
by sensory cells. The information is passed on through the optic nerve, crosses the brain at the lateral
geniculate nucleus to arrive at the central visual cortex. On its journey, the signals get computed over
complex nets of neurons; the contrast of the picture gets enhanced; irrelevant information gets filtered
4 | Cognitive Psychology and Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology and the Brain
out; patterns are recognized; stains and lines on the screen become words; words get meaning, the
meaning is put into context, analyzed on its relevance for Knut's problem, maybe stored in some part of
memory. At the same time an appetite for coffee is creeping from Knut's hypothalamus, a region in the
brain responsible for controlling the needs of an organism. The appetite, encoded in patterns of neural
information, makes its way to the motor cortex where it is passed on to the muscles into Knut's arm.
A lot more could be said about this, and Knut's question remains unanswered, but this should be
enough to point out the complexity of cognition and the brain's importance. In this chapter, we are
going to dig deeper into the question of what cognitive psychology is and how it became this way, and
then draw connections to the brain and explain some of its most important parts.
Defining Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology is a psychological science which is interested in various mind and brain related subfields such as cognition, the mental processes that underlie behavior, reasoning and decision
In the early stages of Cognitive Psychology, the high-tech measuring instruments used today were
unavailable. The idea of scientifically scrutinizing what was going on in a human mind was first
established during the late 19th century.
Psychology Laboratories were based on measuring observable features such as reaction time.
Nonetheless, there was a technique developed called analytic introspection. The latter is a method that
focusses on the subject’s inner processes. Here, the subject has to give precise reports about his or her
mental activity.
During the first half of the 20th century and naturally parallel to behaviorism, the behavioristic
approach became the main issue in psychology. The main emphasis was the examination of outer
expression of inner processes, rather than the mind itself.
Even though behaviorism had established itself as the mainstream, curiosity about the mind was
not diminished. In the 1950s, this inquisitiveness was released in a new science named Cognitive
Science. Cognitive Psychology became one of its subfields. The interdisciplinary approach of
Cognitive Science enabled the use of modern technology and new methods to combine examinations of
public actions (latencies in reaction time, number of recalls) with physiological measurements (EEG
and event-related potentials, fMRI).
Hereby, references and correlations between action and cognition could be made. Cognitive
Psychology is using these methods and additional ones such as Single and Double Dissociation and
brain lesioning to collect evidence for certain features of mental activity. Because of those correlations
that were found, the examination of the human brain and its functions has become one of the main
challenges to Cognitive Psychology.
Chapter 1
The role of the brain
Examination of brain damage has a long tradition.
The Ancient Romans observed that gladiators with head injuries often lost their mental skills, whereas injuries to
other parts of the body did not have such an effect. It
was inferred that there was a possible link between the
mind and brain. Today, the assumption that the mind is
somehow implemented in the brain is taken for granted,
and even the common-sense understanding presupposes
a relation between mental and neuronal processes.
Subsequently, research on the brain became more and
more important, and the psychological methods being
used shifted to systematic scientific examination of the Figure 1.1 - The resting potential is initially around -70
brain. The crucial question then became: How is this mV relative to the outside of the cell. Once the
relation realized, and what properties of the brain are threshold (-55 mV) is passed, the cell depolarizes and
capable of causing mental and cognitive events?
the polarity reverses up to +40 mV. Subsequently the
cell hyperpolarizes and the voltage becomes more
As it is not possible, in this introductory passage, to negative than the resting potential for a short period.
cover the entire configuration of the brain in an appropriate manner, we will just give a brief summary
of the concepts behind neural signal transduction, and smoothly switch over to the anatomy of the
brain. This in turn will then serve as background information in the attempt to link cognitive functions
to brain structure.
In principle, there are two classes of cells in the human brain: neurons and glia. Both are
approximately equal in distribution, though neurons seem to play the main role in information
processing. The actual signal transduction takes place in different ways. On the one hand, there is mean
electrical conduction, and on the other hand, there are complicated biochemical cascades which
transmit the data. Both variants can be subsumed to the concept of action potentials (Figure 1.1), which
generally carry out the signal transduction from one nerve cell to another.
For better conduction, the axons of the neurons are insulated by a so-called myelin sheath. The
myelin in the human brain is produced by a certain class of glial cell, the oligodendrocytes. This is
important because the decomposition of the myelin sheath is involved in diseases, such as as multiple
sklerosis.
Once the information perceived by the sensory organs is transformed into a sequence of action
potentials the data is, in a way, neutral, since it has no specific qualitive properties which indicate from
which sense the signal was original initiated. But how is the information encoded? In other words, how
can the variety of our conscious experience be caused by simple inhibition and excitation of nerve cells
embedded in an admittedly complex system? Because of the lack of better metaphors, the answer is
often given by comparing the brain to a modern digital computer. Parsing the world into objects,
making inferences, having associative memory and the like can be analyzed by developing
computational models. The underlying paradigm is that the information is represented by the rate of
action potential spikes. How this is exactly realized is the aim of research of biophysics, a subdiscipline
of neurobiology.
In cognitive psychology, however, the methods used differ. This is because the main interest is not devoted to the organization of single neuron circuits, but rather to the larger, functional units in the
6 | Cognitive Psychology and Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology and the Brain
network.
References
• M. S. Gazzaniga, R. B. Ivry, and G. R. Mangun, Cognitive Neuroscience, Norton &
Company, 1998, ISBN 0393972194
• E. Br. Goldstein, Cognitive Psychology, Wadsworth, 2004, ISBN 0534577261
• M. W Eysenck, M. T. Keane, Cognitive Psychology, Psychology Press, 2005, ISBN
• M. T. Banich, The Neural Bases of Mental Function, Houghton Mifflin, 1997, ISBN 0-395-
• E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, Principles of neural science, 2000, ISBN 0-07-
Links
• PDF file of the "ethics code" of the American Psychological Association
• Cognitive Psychology miniscript by Fabian M. Suchanek
• Famous papers in the history of cognition
live version • discussion • edit lesson • comment • report an error
Chapter 2
2 PROBLEM SOLVING FROM AN EVOLUTIONARY
PERSPECTIVE
live version • discussion • edit lesson • comment • report an error
Introduction
estalt psychologists approach towards problem solving was a perceptual one. That is, for them,
Gthe questions about problem solving were:
• how is a problem represented in a persons mind, and
• how does solving this problem involve a reorganisation or restructuring of this
representation?
Restructuring is basically the process of arriving at a new understanding of a problem situation -
changing from one representation of a problem to a (very) different one. The following story illustrates
this:
Two boys of different age are playing badminton. The older one is a more skilled player, and
therefore it is predictable for the outcome of usual matches who will be the winner. After some time
and several defeats the younger boy finally loses interest in playing, and the older boy faces a problem.
The usual suggestions, according to M. Wertheimer (1945/82), at this point of the story range from
'offering candy' and 'playing another game' to ' not playing to full ability' and 'shaming the younger boy
into playing'. And this is what the older boy comes up with:
He proposes that they should try to keep the bird in play as long as possible - and thus changing
from a game of competition to one of cooperation. They'd start with easy shots and make them harder
as their success increases, counting the number of consecutive hits. The proposal is happily accepted
and the game is on again.
Insight
There are two very different ways of approaching a goal-oriented situation. In one an organism
readily reproduces the response to the given problem from past experience. This is called reproductive
thinking.
The second way requires something new and different to achieve the goal, prior learning is of little
help here. Such productive thinking is (sometimes) argued to involve insight. Gestalt psychologists
even state that insight problems are a separate category of problems in their own right.
Tasks that might involve insight usually have certain features - they require something new and
nonobvious to be done and in most cases they are difficult enough to prevent that the initial solution
attempt is successful.