President's Cancer Panel Meeting: Environmental Factors in Cancer, Transcript of Proceedings, Indianapolis, in, Oc by National Cancer Institute - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Key Points

The World Bank estimates that occupational exposure to pesticides may exceed 1 billion

people and other surveys have indicated that nearly every person in the United States is either directly or indirectly exposed to pesticides. This includes 50 million Americans—as

estimated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)—who drink water that is

intermittently contaminated with pesticides or other agricultural chemicals.

IARC has labeled agricultural insecticides as probable human carcinogens, but only identified two pesticides—arsenic and dioxin—as known human carcinogens. There is a vital public

health need to identify the human carcinogens in the group of pesticides/insecticides that are currently on the market.

The AHS found that 16 percent of farmers had experienced a high-exposure pesticide event, however, 95 percent of these events were not reported to public health authorities. It is

estimated that 25,000 agricultural workers worldwide experience unintentional pesticide

poisoning each year. Seasonal farm workers tend to be at the greatest risk for this type of

exposure, as they do not always receive training in the safe use, storage, and disposal of

pesticides.

Studying pesticides and their resulting health effects has proven to be difficult. To ascertain exposures, their relation to the onset of disease, and eliminate false positives requires a large prospective cohort with frequent exposure to pesticides and other chemicals of interest.

Further, comprehensive exposure assessment requires gathering field toxicity measurements,

as well as medical and family history, occupational history, demographic profiles, and

biologic tissue samples.

The AHS is evaluating 82 of the world’s most frequently used pesticides for exposure-

response associations. The study is focusing on occupationally exposed pesticide applicators

in two important agricultural states—North Carolina and Iowa. As of September 2008, 12

pesticides were observed to show an increased risk of some cancer with increasing use of the

pesticide. Significant associations were observed for prostate, lung, bladder, pancreas, and

colon cancer, as well as for leukemia and multiple myeloma. However, these associations

were based on a limited number of cases and replication of these first-time findings are

needed.

Indianapolis, IN

2

October 21, 2008

Pesticide carcinogenicity extends beyond lymphomas, leukemias, multiple myeloma, and

prostate cancer, but the lifestyle of farmers may mask some of these associations. Farmers

smoke less and exercise more than the general population and consequently have lower rates

of lung and colon cancer.

Most pesticides are observed to have an exposure response linked to some human cancers,

but are not genotoxic. Therefore, epigenetic events—heritable associations with gene and

chromatin expression without the accompanying change in the DNA sequence—need to be

explored. Current premarket regulatory testing of pesticides may need to be reevaluated due

to the heavy reliance on genotoxicity testing, and postmarket surveillance of the adverse

effects of pesticides needs to be enhanced.

DR. PEGGY REYNOLDS:

AGRICULTURAL EXPOSURES AND CHILDHOOD CANCER