29 RACIAL QUALITIES
In reality, and although nowadays they do not want to accept it, each race is different and with different qualities, some better and others worse. It is absurd to say that each race has differences between them but at the same time deny that these differences can produce an evolutionary advantage that differentiates them. In this chapter I will try to study those differences.
THE YELLOW RACE
This race is, to a certain extent, feminine and is represented by the color blue, because from a symbolic point of view it belongs and has been formed in the coldest part of the earth. It must be taken into account that the blue color represents the cold and also the spiritual values, therefore, it is part of this race. It is not true that this breed has yellow skin, because it usually varies between white and brown, but it is correct to represent it with that color, because the harshness and aggressiveness of the Asian climate, especially during the previous ice age, deteriorated its external appearance, making that the predominant blue color at the beginning becomes yellow from the symbolic or metaphysical point of view. This is due to the fact that the yellow color represents the drought that occurs when the intense cold freezes the water that the blue color represents, therefore, it is a race that from this spiritual point of view can be seen as acidic, arid or masculine. . That means that this race on the one hand is unbalanced towards the blue color and the feminine side of the human species, which endows it with a great spiritual sensitivity, we can see this in the emotionality of Chinese or Japanese traditions. But on the other hand, the yellow color that also represents it has a masculine symbolism and can favor wisdom, but misdirected it can also favor materialism. It could be said then, that the original blue color in this breed became yellow because the extreme cold in which it has developed causes the drought from which the yellow color is derived. The yellow race is the characteristic of Asia, although it is also found in America, it surely reached that continent by two routes, one was through the Bering Strait during the last ice age, and also crossing the Pacific Ocean by small boats when the level of the sea was lower and consequently the size of the islands larger. Due to the different climates that exist in America, this breed is in a process of change towards the brown race. The extreme cold of Asia has also favored this breed to have a somewhat nervous character.
THE BLACK RACE
The black race is on the opposite side of the yellow and has developed mainly in places that are too hot for human life to be ideal. The fact of living in an environment that is mainly warm and therefore material, makes her be excessively masculine and physical, which makes her more agile than the others on this plane, but also makes it very difficult for her to progress in metaphysical and spiritual aspects of life, therefore, in that aspect it is on the opposite side to the white or yellow races. Matter can be considered masculine, when it is posed in contrast to water, which is feminine. Although this breed is characterized by being very expressive and effusive, its emotional stability is almost as great as that of the white race because the warm climate to which it is accustomed is the most common in the lands in which it originated. The large amount of pigmentation that it has makes this breed the most suitable to live in countries with intense solar radiation. Unfortunately, many people of this race who live in white countries try to integrate by modifying their physical appearance to make it easier to go unnoticed, women dye their hair blonde or iron it straight and men cut their hair hair very short to hide the curls, with that attitude what they are doing is bleaching their race instead of claiming their rightful place in the world, therefore, the ideal would be for each race to live with its own peers and on its own territory so as not to feel the need to appear to be what they are not.
Another example that shows how it is trying to appear the opposite of what is thought we have it in the films of North American cinema, because in their films, we continually see how the Indians who get too close to the whites beyond what morality can bear are murdered by some evildoers, actually, that is true in the film, but what the viewers do not understand is that the real reason that it is yes, is that the screenwriter has decided to eliminate the Indian so that the most conservative social sectors do not be offended. In this way, it is tried that those who support the miscegenation believe that the film is favoring that situation, but at the same time it tries to provoke the end for those who reject it. We also see it when the white protagonists continually say everything they appreciate about the Indians and their rights, but not five minutes go by without someone having been killed. Or when a white man marries an Indian woman and in the end she dies, also in this case it is the scriptwriter who causes her death so as not to upset the social groups that oppose that marriage, we see this in the film (The last Gun Hill train). In this way, the screenwriter tries to satisfy both those who support that marriage and those who reject it. People should ask themselves, why do blacks, except in exceptional cases, always play supporting roles and are the servants or jokers of the whites as if they were still their slaves? Well, because that is the only way that many whites accept them even if they do not fully realize this situation. Psychology and cinema are deeply related as we see in the film (Planet of the Apes), because in this film, what is tried to communicate subliminally, is that if one day the developed countries, that is, the North American whites and Russians are destroyed in a nuclear war, the world would remain in the hands of underdeveloped countries, that is, those populated by blacks, but so that the suggestion is not consciously noticed, the blacks are replaced by the apes, so the message can be understood without provoking rejection reactions.
Today cinema is defined as an art, although many of its productions are far from that qualifier. In reality, everything that is well done can be defined as art or divine, because it is in connection with universal truths. Unfortunately, nowadays, the word "art" is used to refer to everything that gallery owners want to define in this way, even if it is just the opposite of its true meaning, because in reality, a work of art can be anything that is perfect in its design or construction, because that perfection expresses its connection with divinity and that is why that word should never be applied to the unclean or deformed as it is done today. Fortunately, there have always been perfect things along with others that are not, that is what progress is based on, because the more the world advances, the greater the proportion of what is perfect and the less imperfect until the day comes when it only exists The perfection. Between the fifties and nineties of the twentieth century, films and television series were made with great artistic value and connected with divinity, because everything that is or is close to perfection is in direct connection with the divine, such as the films of the American West, it is true that they showed a world full of conflicts, but they also encouraged us to fight against tyranny and promoted the illusion of living with its beautiful landscapes.
Television series such as Meteor, Mazinguer Z, Space 1999, Galactica, MacGyver, or superheroes such as Spider-Man or Iron Man, taught children and adults how technology can advance man and turn him into a superior being. At the same time, they taught to defend the good and reject the evil and move from the darkness that contains ignorance towards the light of knowledge, in this way a deep moral teaching was transmitted. In the Mazinguer Z series, the pilot who controls the robot is installed in his head with a glider in much the same way as the spirit is installed in the human body, which is quite suggestive. In the same way, in Space 1999 the pilot is installed in the head of the spacecraft, which gives it capabilities that without that spacecraft it could not have. These examples show us how technology can make humanity progress and they do so with great beauty and spiritual sense, but that a materialistic society is not capable of seeing.
Also superheroes actually represent a contemporary version of divinity, because they imitate the qualities attributed to angels or Jesus with special powers that they use to fight evil and defend decent people. Now there are those who say that these productions are not suitable for children because they include some scenes of violence, but it is logical, to a certain extent, that they include some of these scenes, because they only reflect the reality of the world they represent and when people You see, in reality what they are trying to do is to become mentally aware and prevent that risk, and if that violence is also used to teach how to defend good over evil, in the end, the child is being taught to choose the correct path. It is surprising that nowadays there are those who recommend avoiding scenes of violence in children's films, but at the same time they recommend other films that are supposedly suitable for them but that carry the seed of evil deeply rooted, because they are full of scenes in which it is stimulated vanity and arrogance or are loaded with vulgar or sexual expressions with which they promote promiscuity, and all with the aim of attracting them to those productions and enriching those who make them. By doing this, the opposite effect is created to that which is said to be sought, because children are taught to be scoundrels or adulterers when they reach adulthood, perhaps those films contain fewer scenes of violence than those made for adults. Which seems fine to me, but if that violence is replaced by fostering the child's vanity and ego then the remedy is worse than the disease.
Another example of the degeneration both in cinema and in society is the case of the film (Star Wars), because in the first trilogy of the series some fantastic films were made that tried to promote good and illusion by technological progress, however, in the second trilogy, they came up with the absurd idea of turning the villain of the first trilogy into the protagonist of the second showing his life from childhood to adulthood. The absurdity in this case is not the fact that things can be told about his life, but that he is proposed as a model for children by becoming the protagonist of the series. It is as if a series were made and in its first episode it is suggested that Hitler is the father of an American soldier, and in the second episode Hitler's life is narrated from his youth to his adulthood. In this case the question is, what moral benefit can children have if the evil one is cast as the protagonist of the film? Is it that there were no other characters in the first trilogy to put as the protagonist of the second before choosing the one who represents tyranny and evil? The defenders of this second trilogy will say that this was done because in the first film the screenwriter decided to choose the evil man as the father of the protagonist. But is it that there was no one in the entire galaxy to choose as a supposed father who only thought of putting the leader of the criminals in that position? Where in this case are the critics who claim to defend the good for children who do not denounce the message for evil that these films carry hidden? In addition, what sense can it have that films made after refer to events that occurred before? This is just yet another aberration meant solely to narrate all the details of the assassin Darth Vader's life. What follows from all this is that deep down, the person in charge of that script feels admiration for the criminal who leads the evil ones like many of the followers of that second trilogy, and for that reason, it also represents the degeneration of the Today's society that is increasingly inclined to worship evil and the antichrist. We also see this in the interest that many show in filling their skin with tattoos or dressing in black clothes. People, in public, always say that they support democracy, but it is evident that inside many people a dictator with a desire to go abroad is hidden, that is why they admire the leader of tyrants. On this we must be clear that whoever seeks the good favors the good and opposes without exception any subterfuge so that people identify with the evil as it happens in this case. Whoever seeks the good changes what has to be changed so that the message in favor of good prevails over that which favors evil, both in the script of a movie and in real life.
The truth is that many of those who tattoo their bodies or wear black clothes do so because they feel insecure in themselves. They act this way because, as tattoos and black clothes are evil symbols, they believe that looking evil will compensate for their own insecurity in front of others, because people associate evil with greater aggressiveness. But with this behavior they show a great intellectual void, because in reality, there is no greater support and foundation for the soul than goodness and justice. Then there are those who really identify with evil, those deserve pity, because they choose a mediocre path that can only lead to suffering. It is true that with this behavior they can harm others, but it must be borne in mind that the main victims of antisocial behavior are precisely those who promote it, because they have chosen a dead-end path.
The same thing happens with music, because at the beginning it evolved until it reached a great quality, its best example being POP music. In my opinion, this music is the closest to the perfection of everything that man has created due to its great spirituality. But today and surprisingly, music is undergoing a degeneration in this regard, because people prefer low frequency music which is much more mundane and materialistic. In reality, there are quality songs in all frequencies, but when style and good taste are lacking the result is disastrous, this is a clear example of the confusion and directionlessness that dominates society.
It is also striking to see how film scriptwriters portray the supposed extraterrestrial beings, because to avoid public rejection they are forced to pose them as if they were morally degenerate beings, because if they were shown as truly superior beings then the audience would be ashamed when they are compared to them and consequently they would reject the film, that is why people only accept them when they are shown with the same human vices. In some exceptional cases they have also been shown as supposedly benign, but so that they do not appear superior to men they are put on as if they were idiots, in this way the spectators are not offended. This is done this way, because the only way to show man as if he were more civilized or in some way superior to aliens, is when they are shown uglier, more violent or more foolish than terrestrial people, in this way not their vanity is offended. It is the same as the Greeks did when they imagined the world of the gods filled with the same low passions that are normal among human beings. But the truth is that among superior beings there is no evil, genetic diseases or immoral behaviors, because that would be in contradiction with what it means to be superior.
In the series (Star trek) a ship full of earthlings travels through the universe solving the problems of the "stupid and uncivilized aliens" and with their wisdom and education they show them how to do things. This is reminiscent of the documentaries of animals that go through the forest urinating to mark the area with their scent and in this way remind the other animals what their territory is and who is in charge.
This attitude of supposed help conceals the interest in the occupation or interference in the affairs of other civilizations. It is as if it were an English schooner that travels the world occupying territories because according to them its inhabitants are so stupid and uncivilized that they need to be governed by the "kind" English society. This series gives meaning to the word arrogance. In the case of the film (Superman) something similar happens, because it shows an extraterrestrial being who dreams of living with the "beautiful and civilized terrestrial society" and that is why he falls in love with the leading girl who, in reality, is like saying that falls in love with the same Earth. In all these examples it is a question of suggesting that the superior or civilized beings are the earthlings, this is done to flatter the vanity of the spectators and that they do not reject the film but with the consequence that a totally false universe is shown.
The ability of Superman to fly with his body is an indirect way of representing the ability of higher beings to fly with their mind, that is, the ability to explore the higher worlds through meditation. This quality does not have people who are too extroverted, because in that situation they are only able to move with their body but not with their mind. The mind has two dimensions or wheels, the horizontal for physical movement, and the vertical for mental movement. Primitive beings are only capable of moving on the horizontal wheel, but higher beings know how to properly combine the two wheels or ways of traveling.
There is also currently a cinema in favor of miscegenation, because they show us a future full of violence and conflicts but it is made clear that all the opposing sides are equally full of mestizos and feminists, they try to suggest in this way that the two are on the same page according to that fact. It is evident that they act this way, in part to avoid the contrary reaction of the social groups that support them, but this also shows how cinema is used to manipulate the human mind, by offering a version of reality and the future adapted to the interests of the present.
The same happens with historical films, because they do not hesitate to give a totally false version of the past, in this way reality is completely altered to adapt to the politically correct truths of the present. It is also surprising how the cinema has tried to adapt to feminism, because the body of women is not designed for physical confrontation, however, in the films they show us women with a masculine aspect fighting against men, but, of course, without getting a scratch or disheveled, so as not to damage its aesthetic image.
Even so, I believe that North American cinema has always had a great quality in general, although today that is changing. Naive people believe that only films made in the present can have quality, but there are black and white films much better than current ones in color and with a higher budget, because the quality does not depend on the money invested in them but, above all, of the depth and meaning of the argument. Before the Second World War, movies were made with interesting scripts and full of moral values. After the war, films and series were made full of the illusion of living, this greatly favored social progress and constructive meditation. But nowadays, the excessive effort to satisfy the current social clichés of the moment is causing many films to end up being cold and insubstantial.
All this shows that Western society is mired in a racial conflict and the cinema, with its double standard discourse, tries to satisfy two opposing ways of seeing the world, therefore, the ideal would be that each race could live between yours so that it is not necessary to pretend something different from what you feel. A black person does not have to seek or expect the complacency of the whites by being his slave or his servant, he must demand that they be given land to build their own state where they can be independent, they have the right to have a country where it is not necessary pretend that everything is going well when it is not. It is a fallacy to say that the races must necessarily be mixed, because it will always be better for each one to have its own territory so that it is possible to better guarantee their rights, because equality is only possible when surrounded by equals. In reality, those who defend miscegenation in the United States is because they do not want to recognize each race the right to dispose of the part of the country's land that may correspond to it, because if the country were divided by race it would be weakened and consequently they would have to put end their imperialist campaign. In other words, it is a matter of pretending that all races are equal even if it is false, to avoid recognizing each one the right to create its own independent state. This happens, because when they took the slaves to America, they were not considered people and consequently it was never thought that one day their rights would have to be recognized, therefore, by favoring miscegenation, it is a matter of hiding that they are being denied their rights the right to have a land with which to create their own country independent of the whites. Meanwhile, European countries are now creating the same problem by bringing in immigrants unnecessarily, because they could always get labor by favoring the birth rate, but they act like this by simple imitation of the country they have as an idol and with that they create their very problems.
At present, an attitude in favor of disorder, immorality, anarchism or miscegenation prevails in the world, an example of this is the misnamed "abstract art" because it tries to promote chaos and disorder over symmetry and harmony in an attempt to divert humanity from its progress toward the light that is achieved by fostering both racial and social order. Another form of nonsense "abstract art" is one that seeks to impress the viewer with extravagances as if the absurd could be put in place of art, this shows the lack of criteria in today's society.
In the past, the Jewish people were always a staunch defender of racial or cultural integrity, this is very important in the foundations of their religion, but the persecution they suffered during the Second World War has caused them to now support miscegenation, but not They support it within their families or in their community, but for the rest of society as a method of self-defense, because it is evident that in a mixed-race society, their racial or religious differences can go unnoticed.
In my opinion, it was stupid that the Nazis persecuted the Jews for racial reasons, because the Jews of Germany had been crossing their race with Europeans for many centuries, which meant that there were hardly any differences, perhaps not all of them were blond or with blue eyes, but in that, they were equal to half the Germans. In addition, if they raise it from a religious point of view, in that case the persecution did not make sense either, because in reality most of the Christian Bible was written by the Jews, therefore, the only explanation that can be found is interest for using them as a scapegoat to distract the Germans while the Nazis created a dictatorship.
It must also be said that the spiritual and progressive sense of Jews in general is admirable, because they hate living from charity and have a great creative capacity, in this they are opposed to the gypsy race, which unlike them has a great attachment to the matter which greatly hinders his progress towards the spiritual world. It cannot be denied that during the war, the Jews suffered greatly because of the tyranny of the Nazis, but it is just as true, that by promoting miscegenation they are favoring the extermination of the European race, thereby harming the rest of society.
One of the reasons that triggered the civil war in the United States was that the slave model did not allow workers to move freely to factories in the north where more and more labor was needed, this was also the reason that slavery ended in Russia, although they called it serfdom there. This was because the world was moving from an agricultural to an industrial model of economy and keeping workers by force in an agricultural zone prevented their movement to the industrial zones. The end of slavery supposed freedom of movement for them, but they went from serving some masters to serving others without this implying a significant change in their living conditions, because the white and black communities followed each on their own side as if they were different countries but living in the same.
The social model that encourages miscegenation and that we want to impose today is not better either, because it is about pretending that there are no racial differences when that is not true. The truth is that one of the factors that most hinders social integration and favors poverty in countries like the United States is the refusal of many citizens to accept the left's plan to completely mix the races. Although it must also be said that it is only an indirect responsibility. These citizens do not want to accept miscegenation and consequently do not support a homogeneous social model, but it is not fair that they are accused of this poverty, because they are not the ones who promote this situation and that is why they have the right to act like this. No one has the right to impose on them a social model based on miscegenation that they consider abominable. No one has the right to impose on them the agenda of the left, an order that is not done for the social good but to obtain the votes of those minorities and thus come to power. Ideally, therefore, each country where immigrants have been forcibly taken allocate land to each race where they can form their own nations and live freely.
In the case of countries that have received illegal immigrants, it would be different, because having entered them without permission, the logical thing would be to make agreements with their countries of origin to return them, or with others of their own race when their own countries do not want to accept the return. In these cases, the NGOs that traffic in people should pay the repatriation costs, because they collaborate with the illegal traffic and then advertise it to obtain profits from the donations. By doing this, they are favoring drownings in those cases in which immigration is done by sea because what they do is not help but traffic. They are complicit in this human trafficking when they agree with the gangs that organize it to coincide with them and act as shuttles or stopovers in this illegal trafficking process. In that case, it cannot be said that they are "rescuing the shipwrecked" when what they do is transship the immigrants from the boats in which they boarded the ships of their organization, because a true rescue is only possible when a person goes in A ship and it accidentally sinks, but this is not what happens with human trafficking, so it is outrageous that these organizations accuse those who oppose illegal trafficking of preventing a ransom. If these organizations were really concerned about avoiding drowning, what they would have to do is denounce those who traffic in people instead of helping them, because with their behavior they create expectations for immigrants and that is why they are willing to pay large sums of money to the mafias. It is true that many people have to emigrate for political or other reasons, but the right thing to do is to do it to countries of their own race or culture, in this way the breakdown of social cohesion that disorderly mixing can produce can be avoided.
The truth is that Western countries are increasingly being dominated by an anarchist approach to social life leading to disorder and crime becoming more and more widespread. An example of this we have in the fact that Europe and the United States are being invaded by millions of individuals and yet society does not want to see it, because one thing is who travels with the permission in order from the receiving country and another He is the one who tries to impose his presence by force. I do not mean to deny that these immigrants have problems in their country of origin, but before emigrating their duty is to fight in their country for their rights and fulfill their duties instead of forcibly imposing their presence on others. Because the problem of overpopulation is not caused by politicians but by the irresponsible behavior of the citizens of those countries who have more children than they can support, therefore, the solution to the problem is not to emigrate but to correct that behavior. For this reason, when collaborating with illegal immigration, society is being made to understand that crime has no punishment, because, although it is not wanted to recognize it, many of the immigrants who enter without a work contract the first thing they do is steal. We must not forget that those who allow social mixing with inferior cultures end up favoring the destruction of their own society. It is not that it is important that a racial crossing can occur accidentally or exceptionally between two people of different races, what is wrong is to create the conditions so that it can occur easily. Western countries by allowing this are showing a weak and anarchic attitude because with this behavior they are favoring social decomposition.
When slavery was abolished in the United States, the correct thing would have been to give land to slaves so that they could create their own independent state, but it was preferred to say that racial differences did not exist to avoid giving them the lands to which they were entitled, thus They went from being slaves to being second-class citizens, even trying to get them to go to Africa to avoid recognizing those rights, that is how the Republic of Liberia was created in 1847. But the best thing will always be that each race has its own territory, Now, the whites who oppose giving them land say that this is only racism, but this idea was already defended by the African-American leader Malcom X, even though he was black, he also supported this idea before being assassinated. It is evident that if a person travels to a country of another race, it does not make sense to apply discriminatory norms such as those that in the United States prevented blacks from entering white bars or cinemas, or require that a person A black woman gives up her bus seat to a white man, what is wrong is to encourage miscegenation by supporting people of different races to live mixed, because that only serves to generate both social and cultural chaos and favor the economic exploitation of these minorities. . Although it may seem surprising, it is necessary for the races to be physically separated so that they can be morally united, because in reality, each of them represents a different world that needs to be separated in order to develop fully.
It would also be ideal for the United Nations (UN) to create a program to technologically equalize the whole world, this program would not only be economic but above all technological, because it would have the purpose of technically advising less developed countries so that all countries of the world could reach the same level of development. First, it would begin by eradicating poverty within the most advanced countries by introducing birth control programs together with other vocational training programs for all the unemployed. Later, the same birth control system would be used in underdeveloped countries so that population growth is in line with their industrial and agricultural pr