Building Soils for Better Crops Sustainable Soil Management by Fred Magdoff and Harold Van Es - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub for a complete version.

chAPter 16 reduCing tillage

Table 16.1

Tillage System Benefits and Limitations

Tillage System

Benefits

Limitations

Full-Field Tillage

Leaves soil bare.

Allows easy incorporation of

Destroys natural aggregation and

fertilizers and amendments.

enhances organic matter loss.

Moldboard plow

Buries surface weed seeds.

Commonly leads to surface

Allows soil to dry out fast.

crusting and accelerated erosion.

Temporarily reduces compaction.

Causes plow pans.

Requires high energy use.

Same as above, but less aggressively

Chisel plow

Same as above, but leaves some surface

destroys soil structure; leads to

residues.

less erosion, less crusting, no

plow pans; requires less energy use.

Disk harrow

Same as above.

Same as above.

Restricted Tillage

Leaves little soil disturbance.

Makes it more difficult to incorporate

Requires few trips over field.

fertilizers and amendments.

No-till

Requires low energy use.

Makes wet soils dry and

Provides the most surface residue

warm up slowly in spring.

cover and erosion protection.

Can’t al eviate compaction.

Zone-till

Same as above.

Same as above, but compaction is al eviated.

Allows easy incorporation of

fertilizers and amendments.

Is hard to use with sod-type or

narrow-row crop in rotation.

Ridge-till

Provides some weed control

as ridges are built.

Requires wheel spacing to be

Allows seed zone on ridge to

adjusted to travel between ridges.

dry and warm more quickly.

TIllAgE SYSTEMS

erosion potential, it also is affected by factors such as

Tillage systems are often classified by the amount of sur-

surface roughness and soil loosening.

face residue left on the soil surface. Conservation tillage

Another distinction of tillage systems is whether they

systems leave more than 30% of the soil surface covered

are full-field systems or restricted systems. The benefits

with crop residue. This amount of surface residue cover

and limitations of various tillage systems are compared

is considered to be at a level where erosion is significantly

in table 16.1.

reduced (see figure 16.2). Of course, this residue cover

partially depends on the amount and quality of residue

Conventional Tillage

left after harvest, which may vary greatly among crops

A full-field system manages the soil uniformly across the

and harvest method (corn harvested for grain or silage is

entire field surface. Such conventional tillage systems

one example). Although residue cover greatly influences

typically involve a primary pass with a heavy tillage tool

176

Building SoilS for Better CropS: SuStainaBle Soil ManageMent

index-192_1.jpg

index-192_2.jpg