Rhetoric and Practice of Reward Management by Rosario Longo - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

PART SEVEN

Pension

plans

466

Section XVII

State and occupational

pensions

Types of pension schemes

The pension arrangements provided by employers to their employees represents and

have therefore to be intended as employee benefits and more in particular as deferred

benefits. Employers put in place these plans, which individuals can join at the beginning

of their working life, essentially in order to ensure that their employees will continue to

receive an income also after the conclusion of the employment relationship, enabling

them to hopefully maintain their standard of living after retirement.

Well-developed pension plans can potentially represent a significant component of total

reward packages helping organizations to both attract and retain quality employees. The

importance of pensions plans, however, may differently be perceived by the individuals

forming an organization workforce; this, despite the remarkable resources and costs

faced by employers to introduce and administer these schemes. Indeed, the more

various the workforce composition, the wider the difference in perception employees are

likely to express as regards this particular type of benefit.

Generation Y employees are typically likely to be remarkably less interested in pension

plans vis-à-vis Baby Boomers and Veterans. This different perception, however, is

supposedly mostly due to the age factor rather than to the typical, pure generational

variance. Notwithstanding, Baby Boomers receiving a good or high income, especially

whether these have also made particular plans for their future, like retiring abroad or

establishing and running their own business, represents the generation of worker

potentially most interested in early retirement pay packages (Parry and Urwin, 2009).

Many pension systems around the globe have been, and in some cases are still, exposed

to the risk of implosion by reason of being not sufficiently funded. Albeit in some cases

this might mostly be due to the mismanagement of funds, whose origins date back well

in the past, there have been two other relatively more recent factors which have

accounted for this trend to sensibly worsen during the last decade. On the one hand, in

467

State and occupational pensions

fact, the ageing population phenomenon has caused pension funds having to provide

retired people with an income for, on average, a definitely longer period of time than

originally expected; on the other hand the sustained unemployment rate characterizing

many economies across the globe has accounted for pension funds to receive reduced

sums of money, in terms of employees and, where applicable, employers contributions,

whereas having to continue to provide an income to an increasing number of retired

people. As stressed by Torrington et al (2008), the latter phenomenon is causing a

sustained rise in the dependency ratio, which is based on the relation between the

(growing) number of retired people and the (declining) number of people still working

(and paying contributions to the funds). This trend has prompted in turn many

governments to postpone employee retirement time, by rising both male and female

retirement age.

The worth of the sum paid monthly by pension funds to employees after retirement

depends on the contribution made by each individual and, where applicable, his/her

employer during the employment relationship. As often as not contribution to individual

pension plans are made by both the employer and the employee.

Pension plans can be usually grouped into two main categories: state and occupational

pension plans. Notwithstanding additional types of schemes might be available in some

countries according to the local legislation.

State pension plans

In the UK a new state pension plan has recently been introduced for individuals reaching

State pension age on or after 6 April 2016. This scheme replaces the old system centred

on a “basic” and an “additional” state pension scheme, which is still operating for

employees reaching state pension age before 6 April 2016 only.

Occupational pension plans

Typically, occupational schemes can be offered by employers to employees in the form of

defined benefit schemes (DB), defined contribution schemes (DC) or in the form of a

hybrid scheme based on a combination of both.

Additional pension plans

Besides these schemes, there are other forms of plans that individuals can join according

to the circumstances. Amongst these: stakeholders and group or personal pension plans

are the most common.

State pension plans

State pension schemes are basically plans run by national governments in order to

ensure that every employee will receive a minimum income after retirement. These

plans, which are normally mandatory, are clearly differently designed and managed by

governments, but basically all of them more often than not provide retired individuals

with more basic benefits. Employees typically contribute to state pension plans by means

of the National Insurance payments.

468

State and occupational pensions

In the UK a new system, called new State Pension scheme, has recently replaced the old

arrangements formed by the Basic State Pension and the Additional State Pension

schemes.

The Basic State Pension

Men born on or after 6 April 1951 and women born on or after 6 April 1953 are eligible

to the Basic State Pension whether these reach pensionable age before 6 April 2016. The

maximum payment an individual can receive under this scheme is of £113.10 per week,

provided that the individual concerned has worked and paid national contributions for at

least thirty years (including National Insurance Credits accrued during unemployment,

illness or as a parent or carer).

Individuals having worked and contributed to National Insurance for less than thirty

years would receive a weekly payment lower than £113.10 per week, but have the

possibility to increase their basic pension by means of voluntary National Insurance

contributions payments.

In order to be eligible to the £113.10 weekly payment an individual, during his/her

working life, should have received from his/her employer (considered as a single

employer) a weekly pay of at least £153.

In the UK, State Pension of transsexual individuals is not affected by any means whereas

the individuals concerned have legally changed their gender and started to claim State

Pension after 5 April 2005. Differently, some problems, which should be eventually

settled with the relevant Authorities, are likely to arise.

The Additional State Pension

This scheme, providing retired people with an additional income besides that ensured by

the Basic State Pension plan, basically complements this. The supplementary amount

received by the retired individual is not subject to any regulation strictly defining or

limiting it, but it rather depends on the National Insurance payments made by the

individual during his/her working life and his/her earnings.

Since this scheme in parallel to the Basic State Pension plan, the criteria to access this

plan are essentially the same as those listed above for the Basic State Pension plan. The

moment arrived, there is no need to separately claim the payment of the sum associated

with the additional pension. The payment in fact will be automatically made to the

entitled people by the state.

The addition will be granted to individuals who have been employed, earned at least

£5,668 a year and have clearly made contributions to the scheme by means of National

Insurance payments. Also in this case, employees can gain Additional State Pension

credits.

469

State and occupational pensions

The New State Pension

The new scheme will apply to individuals reaching the state pensionable age on or after

6 April 2016. At the moment in time, the minimum weekly amount which will be paid to

retired people has not yet been set (it is expected to be communicated in autumn 2015),

but it is not estimated to be lower than £148.40 per week.

The actual amount of the weekly payment may be higher or lower vis-à-vis that

identified by the regulations (£148.40 per week) depending on the findings of the

National Insurance record.

Under the new scheme, individuals might decide not to claim the pension as soon as

they gain eligibility for the payment. They can in fact decide to defer, that is, to

postpone the pension payment at a later time in order to receive a higher sum. However,

the government has already decided that in order to obtain a higher payment a

minimum deferring period should be introduced, albeit this is has not yet, at the time of

writing, been set.

Since the new scheme will practically be effective from 6 April 2016, this date represents

somewhat of a landmark for the pension calculation. The National Insurance contribution

paid before that date is called “starting amount.”

The starting amount is determined by the comparison between the amount which would

have been paid to an employee applying the current mechanism, that is, basic state plus

additional state pensions, and that calculated according to the new method also to the

period preceding 6 April 2016. It will be considered as the starting amount the highest

between the two sums.

Whether the calculated starting amount is lower than the full new state pension weekly

payment, the qualifying years worked after 6 April 2016 will enable individuals to accrue

the weekly pension payment; each year accounts for a weekly payment increase of

approximately £4.25. In those cases in which the starting amount should already be

larger than that which would be received applying the new full State Pension, the

difference will represent a “protected payment.” Protected payment will be paid in

addition to the new full State Pension payment and is subject to be revaluated from year

to year according to the inflation trend. In this case, however, the additional qualifying

years eventually accrued after 6 April 2016 will not contribute to any increase in the new

full State Pension.

To receive any new State Pension individuals will need to have at least 10, also non-

consecutive, qualifying years on the UK National Insurance record. In order to receive

the new full State Pension individuals need thirty-five qualifying years. Whether an

individual should have in his/her record a number of years in between ten and thirty-five,

a proportion will be applied.

Individuals participating in other types of pension plans (occupational, stakeholders,

personal, group, etc.), are likely to have paid lower National Insurance contributions in

470

State and occupational pensions

favour of State Pension schemes. This circumstance is considered as an individual having

been “contracted out” from Additional State Pension. This occurrence can be ascertained

by checking the payslips. Whether in correspondence of the item “National Insurance

contribution” is placed the letter “D” or “N”, this means that the individual has been

contracted out; by contrast, whether the letter “A” is placed in correspondence of the

National Insurance contribution item, this entails that the individual has not been

contracted out.

On 6 April 2016 rules will change and no employee will be contracted out; however, this

clearly implies a higher contribution to National Insurance compared to that paid

presently.

Individuals will gain qualifying years to the extent of the new full State Pension scheme

whether during each year of their working life have received from one employer a

weekly pay of at least £153 and have paid National Insurance contributions. The

mechanism of the National Insurance credits applies also in this case.

Occupational pension plans

Pensions should aim at providing retired employees with an income enabling them to

maintain after retirement a standard of living as far as possible similar to that preceding

retirement. Indeed, state pension plans hardly enable individuals to achieve this

objective so that, as suggested by Torrington et al (2008), occupational schemes are

actually offered by employers to employees, besides state pension plans, in order to

offer these more valuable and wider-ranging benefits. It can therefore be argued that

occupational pension schemes basically complement state pension plans.

Occupational pension plans are usually not directly operated by employers, but by

means of ad hoc established pension funds. This clearly represents a protective measure

in favour of employee contributions and more in general of the money contributed by

both employees and employers to these funds. Whether a company should experience

cash shortage or being in a state of insolvency, these funds could not be by any means

used by the employer to face the adverse circumstances. The objective is clearly that to

protect the money contributed to pension plans from the risk that, once used by

employers for different scopes, this could not be subsequently recovered.

The money contributed to the funds by employees and employers is invested and held in

trust on behalf of employees till their retirement. Employers can either opt to set and run

their own pension fund or entrust this activity to a third party, usually an external

financial institution. Notwithstanding, this solution is not completely immune from

problems, too. Whether an employer should become insolvent and its pension fund

should simultaneously be in deficit employees could lose part or all of their pensions

(Torrington et al, 2008). The same result could be produced also in the aftermath of the

financial institution in charge of the pension fund management being forced into

bankruptcy. Governments usually establish specific institutions to protect employees

from such occurrences; but it is hardly supposable that, the case being, these

471

State and occupational pensions

institutions could enable employees to entirely recover the sums of money contributed to

the funds.

Occupational pension plans can be basically designed and developed according to three

approaches: defined benefit schemes (DB), defined contribution schemes (DC) and

hybrid schemes, which essentially derive from a combination of both defined benefit and

defined contribution schemes.

Defined benefit pension plans

As suggested by the same schemes’ name, these plans are intended to determine the

benefits which will be payable to employees upon retirement. The worth of these

benefits broadly depends on individual pay and length of service.

The formula used to determine the value of pensions according to these schemes, also

known as salary-related pension schemes, is based on:

- The number of pensionable years - that is, the number of years an employee has

participated and contributed to the scheme;

- The pensionable earnings - which have most recently been identified with the concept

of “career average” rather than, as more typically occurred in the past, with that of “final

salary.” According to the career average approach, pensionable earnings are identified

on the basis of the calculation of the average earnings received by an individual over

his/her career or over a number of years. Final salary, by contrast, refers to the level of

pay an individual receives just before retiring;

- The accrual rate - that is, the rate of the earnings per year which need to be taken into

consideration for calculation. The most widely used accrual rates in defined benefits

pension calculations are 1/60th and 1/80th. This means that, to the extent of the

pension calculation, for each year of service of the overall pensionable earnings it will be

considered only 1/60th or 1/80th of the total amount.

Since the determination of the pension value is associated with different variables and it

is impossible to determine in advance, according to the circumstances, the final salary or

the average career salary, it is in turn practically impossible to predict in advance the

exact value of the benefits for employees and the related cost for employers. This

circumstance does not usually represent a problem for governments and public sector

employers at large, which not being normally subject to insolvency problems make

payments to retired employees without any particular need to pre-determine the exact

costs at an earlier stage (Irish Association of Pension Funds, 2014). This approach,

known as “pay as you go”, however, is not appreciated by the vast majority of

employers and let alone by employees, who want to be sure that, the moment arrived,

the employer and its pension fund will be able to pay the benefits accrued over time.

The largest part of these schemes is contributory. Contributions to the fund are made

directly by the employees participating to the scheme during their pensionable working

life, usually on the basis of a pre-set percentage of their salary. Employers’ contributions

on the other hand are required and become necessary to ensure that the fund can be

operated properly and that it constantly remains in the black. According to Armstrong

472

State and occupational pensions

(2010), employers’ contribution varies from 3 per cent to 15 per cent, with a median of

approximately 8 per cent. The amount to be paid to the fund is identified by the pension

fund actuaries, who determine it on the basis of the employees’ life expectancy and the

likely financial performance of the fund. These hypotheses are periodically reassessed

and, whether appropriate, a new payment rate recommended by actuaries (Irish

Association of Pension Funds, 2014). Both employers and employees usually benefit of a

tax relief on their contribution payments (Torrington et al, 2008).

Defined benefit schemes may also offer individuals the opportunity to receive a lump

sum, exempt from tax, in lieu of part of the pension. Some plans also allow the payment

of part of the employee pension to his/her dependants in case of the employee death

either before or after retirement.

Defined benefit scheme pension calculation

Accrual rate 1/60th

The employee retires at 65 with a final salary of £28,000 a year and a scheme

membership of 30 years.

His/her pension is 30 x 28,000 / 60 = £14,000 a year (excluding the case that the

employee may have changed part of his pension for a lump sum)

Accrual rate 1/80th

The same employee, retiring at 65 with a final salary of £28,000 a year and a scheme

membership of 30 years will receive:

30 x 28,000 / 80 = £10,500 a year (excluding the case that the employee may have

changed part of his pension for a lump sum).

It is unlikely that employees may be still offered the chance to join such schemes in that

the existing ones are mostly operated in favour of employees having joined these in the

past. However, the advantage of this type of schemes is that benefits are linked to

employees’ salary so that these are due to increase as a consequence of pay increases.

Yet, their value does not depend on stock market performance and rises of a pre-set

amount, depending on the inflation rate, year after year (Money Advice Service, 2014).

Defined contribution pension plans

Differently from defined benefit schemes, where employees contribute with a fixed

percentage of their salary and employers contribute with the sum required to ensure the

proper functioning of the pension fund, defined contribution plans, also known as

“money purchase schemes”, transfer risks entirely to employees.

According to the mechanism of this type of schemes, employers and employees

contribute to the scheme in the same fashion, namely according to a pre-identified

percentage of employee pay. The final pension is thus entirely calculated on the basis of

the combination of these contributions. However, in this case, the financial performance

attained by the pension fund has a remarkable impact on the final benefits received by

473

State and occupational pensions

employees and is therefore of crucial importance. The fund bad performance would

negatively impact employee pension value.

An additional potential risk for employees derives from the use of the final sum received

by these at retirement. This amount of money will be used to buy an annuity, normally

from an insurance company, which essentially represents the monthly income that the

retired individual will receive during his/her life. Annuities are subject to change from a

year to another (Torrington et al, 2008); moreover, insurance companies offer different

options and individuals may find it difficult to choose the most reliable and suita