Choice by david m. giosa - HTML preview

Choice

By david m. giosa

Introduction

This book is about two fictional characters that must face modern day

Issues and what direction there choices will take them. And doing so

without giving up there free will and ability to make their own choice

To solving issues without having someone else make the decision for

them.

February 2024

CHOICE

THIS STORY BEGINS WITH THE BIRTH OF TWO BOYS FROM DIFFERENT FAMILYS INTO A WORLD

DIVIDED, EVEN THE COUNTY THEY LIVED IN WAS DIVIDED. THE DIVISION IN THERE COUNTY WAS

DIVIDED IN BY TWO PARTIES. THEY SAW THINGS THAT MADE NO SENCE FOR THE DIVISION. IT DID

NOT MATCH WHAT THEY LEARNED IN SCHOOL. AS TIME WENT ON THE TWO FRIENDS LIVES WOULD GO

IN SEPARATE DIRECTIONS. WHAT WE WILL SEE IS WHEN A SITUATION ARRIVED, THERE WILL BE TWO

DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES OF THE SITUATION. AS THEY WERE TOUGHT, ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, BUT IS THAT THE CASE IN REAL LIFE. IF YOU LOOK AT THINGS FROM GODS VIEW, A CAT IS A CAT, A DOG

IS A DOG, AND A HUMAN IS A HUMAN. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF HE IS RICH OR POOR, SUCCESFULL OR

LIVING ON THE STREET. THE BOTTOM LINE IS A HUMAN IS A HUMAN. IF THIS IS TRUE ALL MEN ARE

CREATED EQUAL NO MATTER THERE RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR SEXUAL ORIANTATION. THEN

WHY DOES DISCRIMANATION EXIST. AS THE TWO FRIENDS LIVES MOVE ON IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS, THERE PERSPECTIVES ON THIS MATTER AND OTHER MATTERS WILL ALSO BE DIFFERENT. THE BOTTOM

LINE IS GOD GRANTS FREE WILL TO ALL HUMANS. HE DOUS NOT GRANT THE RIGHT TO FORCE THERE

FREE WILL ONTO OTHERS.

PAGE 1

BUT OF COURSE, THIS IS NOT WHAT WE SEE IN THE REAL WORLD. EVEN THOUGH WE SEE

POLITITIONS AND A SMALL MAJORITY OF PEOPLE DOING THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE OF FREE WILL.

WHAT THE TWO FRIENDS REALIZED IS THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOD. THEY MAY TRY TO HIDE BEHIND

GOD AND RELIGIUS WRITINGS TO PUSH THERE EXSTREAM AGENDA ONTO OTHERS. BUT THE BOTTOM

LINE STILL EXISTS THAT THEY ARE NOT GOD AND FREE WILL DOES EXIST, AND YOU HAVE A CHOICE. LETS

LOOK WERE THERE FREE WILL IS CHALLANGED. ABORTION- ONE FRIEND MAY BELIEVE A WOMAN

SHOULD HAVETHE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AND THAT DICISION SHOULD BE BETWEEN HER AND HER

DOCTOR. THE OTHER FRIEND MAY BELIEVE LIFE IS PRECIUS AND A WOMAN SHOULD GO THROUGH THE

FULL PROCESS OF PREGNANCY. JUST FROM LOOKING AT THIS ARE THEY TAKING AWAY A WOMANS

FREE WILL, JUSTBECAUSE THERE A WOMAN. DOUS THIS NOT MAKE THEM A SECOND CLASS CITIZEN

AND DEPRIVETHEM OF THERE FREE WILL.THERE IS NO MENTION OF MEN BEING PART OF THIS DEBATE, WHAT ARETHEYGIVING UP. THEY DON’T HAVE TO PUT THERE BODY AT RISK, AND THEY ARE NOT ASKED

TO GIVE UPTHERE FREE WILL. NOW THE TWO FRIENDS HAVE A NEW DEBATE TO CONSIDER. NOW THEY

MOVE ONTO GUNS, ONE IS AGAINST GUNS AND THE OTHER OWNES A GUN. ONE SAYS HE IS A RESPONSIBLE GUNOWNER, HE LOCKS UP HIS GUN WHEN HE IS NOT USING IT. AND HE IS THE ONLY ONE

ALLOWED TO USE HIS GUN.

PAGE 2

NOW LETS LOOK AT THE OTHER FRIEND WHO IS AGAINST GUNS. HE HAS SEEN CHILDREN

SHOOTING CHILDREN, MASS SHOOTINGS AT SCHOOLS, PLACES OF WORSHIP, SUPER MARKETS AND

EVERY WHERE ELSE.ARE THEY BOOTH RIGHT, ONLY TIME WILL TELL, NEW LAWS COULD BE PASSED.

RED FLAG LAWS, MENTAL HEALTH, AGE OF OWNERSHIP, ANY LAW THAT KEEPS THE GUNS OUT OF THE

HANDS OF PEOPLE WHO SHOULD NOT POCESS A GUN. GUN OWNERS SECURING THERE WEAPONS

WHEN NOT IN USE, HOLDING STRAW PURCHASERS LIABLE FOR GUNS USED IN A CRIME AND FACING

THE SAME PENALTY AS THE PERSON USING THE GUN TO COMMIT THE CRIME. NOW LETS LOOK AT THE

OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN. WHY SHOULDN’T A RESPONSIBLE PERSON OWN A GUN. HIS RIGHT TO

PROTECT HIMSELF, HUNT OR JUST AS A COLLECTER TO RESELL AT A PROFIT.THIS IS THE DELEMA THE

TWO FACE, BOTH SIDES ARE RIGHT, BUT THERE HAS TO BE SOME GIVE ROOM FROM BOTH SIDES OF

THE ISSUE. AND REMEMBER THAT THE TEN COMMANDMENTS SAYS THOU SHALL NOT KILL ALONG

WITH THE LAW. NOW LETS LOOK AT CERTAIN GROUPS OF POPULATION AROUND THE WORLD. BOTH

FRIENDS HAVE A STAKE IN WHATS GOING ON IN CERTAIN CONFLICS AROUND THE WORLD. ISRIAL IS

OCCUPYING AND INCURING ON PALASTIEN LAND, RUSSIA IS OCCUPYING AND INCURRING ON UCRAINE

LAND. ONE IS AN ALLIE AND ONE IS AN AVERSARY, YET THERE DOING THE SAME THING.

PAGE 3

THE TWO FRIENDS ARE TOLD TO TAKE SIDES. WHEN THE REAL QUESTION IS WHICH SIDE IS RIGHT AND

WHICH SIDE IS WRONG IN THIS MATTER. OBVIOUSLY BOTH ISRIAL AND RUSSIA ARE THE AGGRESSURES

AND SIDES SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE TAKEN, THERE CHOICE WAS ALREADY MADE. NOW THE TWO

FRIENDS ARE LOOKING AT POLITICS. ONE IS REPUBLICAN AND ONE IS DEMECRAT, EVEN THOUGH IF

BOTH WERE INDEPENDENT THEY WOULD CHOOSE WHO IS BEST FOR THE JOB INSTEAD OF VOTING ON

PARTY LINES AND HAVING THERE CHOICE CHOOSEN FOR THEM.THERE DECISIONS SHOULD BE BASED

ON WHO IS BEST FOR THE COUNTRY AND SHOULD NOT HAVE TO CHOOSE SIDES. WITH ONLY ONE

THIRD OF ELAGBLE VOTERS VOTING AND YET ALL ELAGBLE VOTERS PAY TAX TO SUPPORT THE

GOVERNMENT. AND REMEMBERING THE TAXS COLLECTED PAY THESE POLITICIANS SALERY TO FIX

PROBLEMS THAT ARRISE AND MAKE THE RIGHT DISSISION THAT BENEFIT ITS CITIZENS. WHY TAKE SIDES

WHEN ITS POLITICIANS WHO ARE GETTING PAID TO DO THERE JOB. SOMETIMES IT IS JUST EASYER TO

SAY TO YOURSELF, WHAT WOULD GOD DO, AND USESUALLY YOU COME TO THE RIGHT PROGNOSIS TO

AN ISSUE. VIEWING BOTH SIDES OF A ISSUE WILL ALWAYS LEAD TO THE RIGHT DECISSION, REMEMBER

THERE IS ALWAYS TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY. JUDGES FACE THIS EVERY DAY IN COURT, THEY MUST

LISTEN TO BOTH SIDES BEFORE MAKING A RULING. THE TWO FRIENDS ARE NOW FACED WITH A NEW

ISSUE ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING. THIS WILL EFFECT BOTH OF THEM NOW AND INTO THE FUTURE. ONE

BECAME A CLIMATE DENIER AND BELIEVES THINGS ARE NOT SO BAD. THE OTHER FRIEND CAN SEE THE

WEATHER PATTERNS CHANGING AND REALIZE PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO THE SCIENTISTS

WHEN THEY WARNED OF THE CHANGE HAPPENING.

PAGE 4

EXTREME HOT DAYS WERE NOW TURNING INTO WEEKS, EXTREME COLD DAYS WERE

TURNING INTO WEEKS. TORNADOES AND HURRICANES WERE HAPPENING MORE OFTEN IN AREAS

WERE THIS HAPPENED EVERY COUPE OF YEARS WAS NOW A YEARLY EVENT, ALSO THEY ARE BECOMING

MORE EXTREAM AND DEADLY. FLOADING WAS NOW A FREQUENT OCCURANCE IN AREAS THAT ONLY

EXPERIENCE FLOODING EVERY COUPLE OF YEARS. DROUGHTS ARE LASTING LONGER AND EFFECTING

THE FARMING INDUSTRY ALONG WITH CREATING WATER SHORTAGES ACROSS THE COUNTRY. A SUBJET

THAT AT ONE TIME BOTH FRIENDS DEBATED HAS NOW BECOME REALALITY.THERE WAS NO TURNING

BACK THE CLOCK, WHAT THE FOCEL FUEL INDUSTRY AND POLITITIONS TOLD THEM THAT WOULD NOT

HAPPEN, HAPPENED. THEY COULD WAIT FOR POLITICIANS TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, BUT REALIZED THEY

WERE WARNED LONG AGO AND NO ACTION WAS TAKEN. THE ONLY OPTION NOW IS TO TRY AND

SLOW IT DOWN. BOTH FRIENDS REALIZED THIS WOULD REQUIRE A GROUP EFFORT AND BE INVOLVED

IN THIS EFFORT. THEY NOW KNEW IT WOULD CHANGE THE WAY OF LIFE AND WOULD NEED TO

CHANGE THERE LIFE STYLES. THE EXSPENCE OF EVERY DAY LIVING WOULD RISE, SHORTAGES NOW

WOULD BE SEEN MORE OFTEN, AND NOW THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE CUTS TO THERE LIFE STYLES

JUST TO SURVIVE.

PAGE 5

EVEN THOUGH WITH ALL THEY DID, THEY KNEW IT WOULD TAKE A GROUP EFFORT TO

SLOW DOWN THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, THIS WAS NOW A WORLD ISSUE. THE PUBLIC SECTOR

WOULD HAVE TO GET BEHIND A MOVE TO CHANGE THE DIRECTION THINGS WERE GOING. WAITING ON

POLITITION TO DO SOMETHING WAS AN EFFORTLESS OPTION, THEY HAD THERE CHANCE AND FAILED

MISERABLY. THEY NEVER ACTED ON THE WARNINGS, SO WHAT WERE THE FRIENDS TO THINK WOULD

HAPPEN, MORE ARGUING ABOUT THE ISSUE WAS THE ONLY THING COMING FROM THAT GROUP. THE

LONG TERM EFFECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE HAS NOT COME TO ITS FULL TUITION ON THE WORLD YET.

ONLY TIME WILL TELL, THIS SUBJECT STILL NEEDS TO PLAY OUT. THE ONLY OPTION FOR THE TWO

FRIENDS WERE TO DO THERE PART IN SLOWING IT DOWN AND HOPE OTHERS DID THERE PART. BOTH

FRIENDS KNEW MAN TOGETHER MADE THIS MESS AND IT WOULD TAKE MAN WORKING TOGETHER TO

FIX IT. THE NEXT ISSUE THAT CONFRONTED THE TWO WERE SOCIAL MEDEA, THIS COULD BE A GOOD

TOOL FOR CHANGE AND ALSO COULD CREATE MORE ISSUES FOR THEM.THEY BOTH KNEW THAT THERE

WERE BAD ACTORS OUT THERE THAT WOULD USE THIS TOOL TO ADVANCE THERE OWN SELFISH

BELIEFS.ONE FRIEND USED SOCIOL MEDEA FOR NEWS, TO KEEP INTOUCH WITH OLD FRIENDS AND SO

ON. THE OTHER FRIEND USED BIPARTICAN NEWS TO KEEP UP WITH EVENTS AND USED THE PHONE

AND TEXT TO KEEP UP WITH FRIENDS. HE DID NOT LIKE HAVING HIS PERSONEL INFORMATION ALL

OVER THE NET FOR HACKERS AND ADVERTISERS TO USE AGAINST HIM OR TRACK HIS SPENDING

HABBITS. ALSO SOCIAL MEDIA IS JUST SOMEONES OPINION AND USUALLY NOT FACTUAL.

PAGE 6

BESIDES SOCIAL MEDEA CAN LEAD TOALL KINDS OF PROBLEMS,

MISINFORMATION, DISINFORMATION, BULLYING, IDENITY THEFT AND THREATS FROM

SOME ONE WHO MAY DISAGREE WITH YOUR VIEW ON CERTAIN SUBJECTS. HE LIKES THE IDEA WITH

DEALING WITH FACTUAL INFORMATION AND MAKING HIS OWN DECISSION ON SUBJETS WITHOUT

SOME ONE HE NEVER MET GIVING THERE OPINION. BOTH FRIENDS LOOK AT THE PRO AND CONS OF

SOCIAL MEDEA AND AGREE IT HAS ITS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON PEOPLE AND SHOULD BE

TAKEN WITH CONCERN AND CAUTION. ALL INFORMATION SHOULD BE FACT CHECKED BEFORE ACTING

ON IT. AND LIMIT PERSONAL INFORMATION THEY ALLOW ON IT.ONE FRIEND STAYS ON SOCIAL MEDEA, BUT NOW APROUCHES IT WITH MORE CAUTION, THE OTHER JUST STAYS OFF IT TO AVOID POTENTIAL

ISSUES. THIS WOULD HAVE NEVER CAME ABOUT IF BOTH FRIENDS DID NOT DISCUSS THE ISSUES SOCIAL

MEDIA PRESENTS. THE WHOLE REASON GOD IS SO BIG ON FREE WILL IS BECAUSE HE WANTS YOU TO

GATHER ALL THE FACTS AND BASE YOUR DECISION OFF YOUR FINDING, WHEATHER THERE WRONG OR

RIGHT. YOU WILL BE THE ONE WHO HAS TO LIVE WITH THE DECISION YOU MADE AND NOT BLAME GOD

FOR MISTAKES THAT YOU MADE. THIS IS HOW FREE WILL IS MEANT TO WORK, IN THE END YOU MAY BE

JUDGED ON HOW YOU USED FREE WILL, BUT THAT’S JUST LIFE.

PAGE 7

YOU MAY BE WRONG, YOU MAY BE RIGHT, THE BOTTOM LINE IS YOU USED YOUR FREE

WILL AND GAVE YOURSELF A CHOICE. NOW YOU HAVE A BASIS FOR THE DECISION YOU CHOOSE AND

IT’S BACKED UP BY FACTUAL INFORMATION BECAUSE YOU LISTENED TO BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY.

MAYBE IF EVERYBODY USED THIS TYPE OF INFORMATION GATHERING AND THERE FREE WILL

CORRECTLY, THEY WOULD STOP USING GODS NAME IN VAIN AND STAND BEHIND THE DECISIONS THEY

MAKE AND STOP BLAIMING EVERYBODY ELSE FOR THERE PROBLEMS.

THE NEXT SUBJECT TO FACE THE TWO IS THE ECONOMY AND HOW THE BUSINESS

CYCLE DICTATES WHAT THE ECONOMY WILL DO IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE CYCLE. INFLATION, HIGH

OR LOW INTREST RATES, GDP, RECESSION AND HIGH OR LOW EMPLOYMENT, SUPPLY AND DEMAND

ISSUES. THIS IS ALL PART OF A GLOBAL ECONOMY AND WERE WE ARE IN THE BUSINESS CYCLE. THE

PUBLIC SECTOR CREATES THESE ISSUES AND NOT JUST ONE MAN AS POLITICIANS WANT YOU TO

BELIEVE. THEY BOTH SEE THE MEDIA AND SOME POLITITIONS TRY TO TAKE CREDIT FOR GOOD

ECONOMIC TIMES AND BLAME OTHERS WHEN THE ECONOMY GOES BAD. REMBERING BOTH THE

MEDIA AND POLITICIANS OPPERATE ON FEAR TO GET VIEWERS AND VOTES. WERE WE ARE IN THE

BUSINESS CYCLE WILL TELL THEM WHAT THE ECONOMY WILL BE DOING. REMEMBERING HISTORY ,THE

GREAT DEPRESION WAS CAUSED BY A POLITICIAN AND THAT’S WHY THE FEDERAL RESURVE WAS

CREATED AND THEY ARE NOT PART OF CONGRESS OR THE WHITEHOUSE AND MAKE THERE OWN

DECISIONS. THE PRIVATE SECTOR CONTROLS THE ECONOMY THROUGH SUPPLY AND DEMAND AND THE

PAGE 8

FEDERAL RESURVE TRYS TO KEEP INFLATION AND GDP BALANCED THROUGH INTREST RATE HIKES AND

DROPS, ALSO CONTROL MONEY SUPPLY. THEY ALSO REMEMBER IT WAS A POLITITION WHO CAUSED

THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND WHY ECONOMISTS ARE ALWAYS SAYING, EVERYTHING A POLITITION

TOUCHES THEY SCREW UP. THE TWO HAVE SEEN HERD MANTALITY FOLLOW THE WORD OF

ONE POLITITION AND GIVE UP THERE FREE WILL AND THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE. THE FRIENDS WERE NOT

GOING TO GIVE UP THAT RIGHT AND FACT CHECKED EVERYTHING THAT CAME OUT OF A POLITITIONS

MOUTH. THEY BOTH KNEW WHEN THEY CAME INTO THIS WORLD WAS TO MAKE IT A BETTER PLACE

BEFORE THEY LEFT. THINGS STARTED TO MAKE SENCE AND FALL INTO PLACE WHEN THEY LISTENED TO

THE ADVICE GIVEN TO THEM BY INVESTORS THEY BOTH KNEW. THEY HEARD TERMS LIKE WHO EVER

RAN THE FEDERAL RESEARVE WAS THERE PRESIDENT AND TEN PERCENT OF YOUR INCOME IS NOT

YOURS, IT SHOULD GO TO CHARITY. SO THIS IS HOW INVESTORS TRY TO IMPROVE THE WORLD

OUTLOOK. THE TWO FRIENDS KNEW THE ECONOMY FLUCTUATES AND COULD TURN AGAINST THEM AT

ANY TIME. THEY KNEW THEY SHOULD TAKE ACTION SO THEY COULD GET THROUGH BAD FINANCIAL

TIMES. THEY BOTH CREATED THERE OWN PERSONAL BUDJET AND STUCK TO FILLING THERE NEEDS AND

NOT THERE WANTS. THEY ALSO KNEW THEY HAD TO BUILD THERE ECONIMY TO WORK IN THE FUTURE

AND SECURE THEM SELVES FOR WHEN THEY REACHED RETIREMENT. THEY JOINED THE 401K PLAN AT

WORK,OPENED AN INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNT, OPENED A HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT. THEY

DID ALL THAT THEY COULD TO ENSURE A SMOOTH RETIREMENT FUTURE. AS THEY WORKED TOWARDS

THERE FUTURE THEY EDUCATED THEMSELVES ON HOW TO INVEST. THIS WOULD HELP THEM IN THE

SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM, TO PURCHASE A CAR OR A HOUSE AND EVEN RAISE A FAMILY. THEY

WERE NOW SECURING THERE FINANCIAL FUTURE. THIS WOULD REQUIRE DOUBLE CHECKING ALL

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTING. NOW THEY WERE PUTTING THERE MONEY WERE THERE

MOUTH WAS, MISINFORMATION OR INFLATED INFORMATION WOULD BE VERY COSTLY.THIS WOULD

PAGE 9

REQUIRE EDUCATING THEM SELVES BEFOR COMMITING ANY MONEY TO ANY TYPE OF INVESTMENT.

GROWING UP LEARNING TO FACT CHECK ALL THAT THEY HEARD WOULD COME INTO PLAY NOW AT

THIS TIME OF THERE LIVES, THEY WERE READY AND TRAINED THEM SELFVES JUST FOR THIS TYPE OF

OPPORTUNITY. BY PUTTING EVERY THING THEY LEARNED OVER THERE LIFE TIME, THERE ODDS OF

SUCCESS HAD GREATLY INCREASED. THEY CONTROLED THE CHOICES THAT HAD TO BE MADE AND DID

NOT HAVE TO GIVE UP THERE FREE WILL IN THE PROCESS. AS LONG AS THEY COMPENSATED FOR ALL

OR MOST OFTHE THINGS THAT COULD GO WRONG, THEY GAVE THEM SELVES A FIGHTING CHANCE.

AS THE TWO GOT OLDER, A SUBJECT WOULD COME UP THAT COULD DIVIDE THEM. THERE POLITICAL

VIEWS WOULD INFLUENCE ALL THE DICISIONS THEY MADE.IF THEY DID NOT GET A HANDLE ON THIS, IT

COULD DESTROY A GOOD FRIENDSHIP AND RELATIONSHIP THAT THEY BUILT OVER THE YEARS. WHEN IT

CAME TO POLITICS THEY KNEW IT WAS LIKE TWO PEOPLE READING THE SAME BOOK AND COMING OUT

OF IT WITH TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES ON WHAT THEY READ. THERE WERE TWO

MAJOR PARTIES IN THE COUNTRY , BUT A THIRD PARTY WAS STARTING TO EMERGE AND GAIN

TRACKTION. THE INDEPENDENT PARTY LOOKED LIKE SOMETHING THEY COULD BOTH GET BEHIND. IT

DID NOT TAKE AWAY THERE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, OR PUT THEM INTO A HERD MANTALITY. THEY

STARTED GETTING THERE NEWS SOURCE FROM BIPARTISON SOURCES THAT GAVE BOTH POINTS

OF VIEW. NOW THEY COULD MAKE A DECISIVE DECISION ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER THAT WAS

PRESENTED TO THEM WITHOUT GIVING UP CHOICE.

PAGE 10

BY USING THIS PROCESS THEY KNEW FROM RESEARCH THAT MOST POLITICIANS HAVE A LOW

APPROVAL RATING AMOUNG THE GENERAL PUBLIC. JUST BECAUSE HE WAS GOOD FOR THE PARTY HE

REPRESENTED DID NOT MEAN HE WAS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY. NOT ALL POLITITIONS MET THIS

CRITERIA, BUT MOST DID. THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE SOME POLITITIONS WOULD SAY ONE THING AND

THEN DO ANOTHER. JUST AS THE MEDIA PRAYED UPON THE PUBLIC BY USING FEAR TO GET

RATINGS,POLITITIONS USED FEAR TO GET VOTES. THE TWO REMEMBERED HOW INSURANCE AGENTS

KEEP BRINGING UP WORSE CASE SCENAREOS TO GET YOU TO BUY MORE INSURANCE THAN YOU NEED.

THIS TACTIC IS USED BY THE MEDIA AND POLITITIONS FOR YOUR VOTE AND VIEWERSHIP. THE ONLY

WAY TO FIGHT THIS TYPE OF TACTIC WAS ON HOW THEY RECEIVED THERE INFORMATION. THIS WOULD

HELP PREVENT FALLING INTO THE HERD MANTALLITY MOST PEOPLE FALL FOR. THEY SAW THIS TYPE OF

MANTALITY WHEN THEY BECAME INVESTORS AND SAW THE DAMAGE IT COST TO THERE FINANCES.

THE RULE THEY FOLLOWED THERE ALSO APPLIED HERE. THE MARKET HAS THREE TYPES OF ANIMALS IN

IT, BULLS, BEARS AND SHEEP, BULLS LONG THE MARKET, BEARS SHORT THE MARKET AND SHEEP JUST

GET SLAUGHTERED. SO BEING A SHEEP WAS NOT THE DIRECTION IN LIFE THAT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL

TO THEM.THE FRIENDS VIEWS WERE NOT EXACTLY THE SAME ON ALL SUBJECTS, BUT NEITHER WOULD

THEY GIVE UP THERE FREE WILL AND BECOME PART OF A HERD MANTALLITY.

PAGE 11

AT TIMES THINGS DID COME UP WERE THERE VISIONS OF A SUBJET WAS DIFFERENT. BUT

NOW THEY COULD LOOK AT BOTHH POINTS OF VIEW TO COME UP WITH A FAIR SOLUTION TO AN

ISSUE. ONE THING THEY BOTH NOTICED WAS THAT THEY VOTED THESE POLITITIONS IN, PAYED THERE

SALERIES THROUGH TAXATION. AND THE ONLY JOB THESE POLITITIONS WERE SUPPOSED TO DO IS

SOLVE THE BIG PROBLEMS THAT ARROSE SO IT WAS FAIR TO ALL OR MOST OF THE CITIZENS THEY

REPRESENTED. INSTEAD WHAT THEY GOT WAS POLITICAL GRID LOCK, BOTH PARTIES VOTED ON PARTY

LINES, AND DID EVERYTHING TO PREVENT THE OTHER SIDE FROM GETTING CREDIT FOR AN IDEA THAT

WOULD BENEFIT MOST, IF NOT ALL CITIZENS. THE SAME ISSUES WOULD COME UP EVERY ELECTION, ABORTION, BUDJET, IMMAGRATION AND SO ON. THE SAME PROMISES WERE MADE AND BROKEN

JUST BECAUSE OF PARTY LINES. IT WOULD NEVER CHANGE UNTILL THE PEOPE ALL STOOD UP AND

DEMANDED THINGS CHANGE. THE ONLY WAY THEY COULD SEE THIS CHANGE COME ABOUT IS MORE

CITIZENS BECOME INDEPENDENT THEN THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM WOULD BECOME WEEKER AND THEN

POLITIONS WOULD HAVE NO CHOICE TO WORK TOGETHER TO PRODUCE RESULTS FOR TS CITIZENS. ITS

FUNNY HOW YOUR PAYING SOMEBODY TO DO THERE JOB AND THEY DO EVERYTHING BUT THERE JOB.

PEOPLE WOULD NOT PUT UP WITH THIS IN THE BUSINESS WORLD, THEY WOULD HAND THEM THERE

WALKING PAPERS. BUT YET PEOPLE PUT UP WITH THIS YEAR IN AND YEAR OUT WITH THERE ELECTED

OFFICIALS. AND WHEN THERE APPROUCHED ON THERE FAILURE TO PERFORM THERE JOB, THEY JUST

POINT FINGERS AND BLAME SOMEONE ELSE OR JUST TRY TO REDIRECT THE PEOPLE AWAY FROM THE

ISSUES THERE SUPPOSED TO BE ADDRESSING TO SOMETHING ELSE.

PAGE 12

POLITITION ALWAYS SEEM TO FIND A CERTAIN GROUP OF PEOPLE AND SAY THERE DOING WRONG TO

DEVERT FROM THE REAL ISSUES. EVEN THOUGH BOTH FRIENDS PERSONNALLYKNOW PEOPLE IN THESE

GROUPS AND FIND THEM TO BE UPSTANDING AND PAY THE SAME TAXES AS THEY DO AND ARE

ENTITLLED TO THE SAME RIGHTS. CERTAIN POLITITIONS ATTACK THESE GROUPS BASED ON THERE

RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR SEXUAL ORIANTATION, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS

AS EVERYONE ELSE, JUST TO STIR UP THE HERD MANTALLITY. BOTH FRIENDS KNOW PEOPLE WHO FIT

INTO THESE GROUPS AND KNOW THERE NOT BAD PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY SOCIALIZE WITH THEM,WORK

WITH THEM, CONDUCT BUSINESS WITH THEM AND EVEN LIVE WITH THEM.WHY SHOULD THESE

PEOPLE BE TREATED ANY DIFFERENT THEN THEMSELVES. DOES THIS NOT MAKE THEM A SECOND CLASS

CITIZEN. IT ALL GOES BACK TO CREATING FEAR TO TAKE YOUR ATTENTION OFF THE REAL ISSUES THAT

ARE NOT GETTING ADDRESSED.ARE THESE POLITITION NOT TAKING AWAY THERE FREE WILL THAT IS

GRANTED TO ALL. IF POLITITION ARE SUCCESSFUL IN DEVERTING PEOPLE AWAY FROM THE REAL ISSUES

AND GAIN IN CHANGING HERD MANTALLITY, AND THEN DOES FREE WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST. JUST

LIKE IMMIGRATION REFORM, THERE IS A DEBATE ON THIS SUBJECT EVERY ELECTION AND THE ISSUE IS

JUST KICKED DOWN THE ROAD. IN A COUNTRY WERE MOST OF THE COUNRTY IS DERIVED FROM

IMMIGRANTS, NEW ARRIVALS ARE TREATED LIKE TRASH. THESE IMMIGRANTS MAY BE SLEEPING ON

THE STREET, RECEIVING LOW WAGES AND SO ON , BUT IT IS STILL BETTER THAN WERE THEY CAME

FROM. WHETHER THEY CAME IN LEGALLY OR ILLEGALLY, THIS IS UP FOR DEBATE. BUT THE PEOPLE

WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FIX THIS ISSUE SEEM TO BE OUT TO LUNCH. THESE IMMAGRANTS ARE

LOOKING FOR A BETTER LIFE FOR THEMSELVES AND THERE FAMILY, SO WERE IS IT WRITTEN THAT WE

SHOULD TREAT OUR FELLOW HUMANS LIKE TRASH BECAUSE THERE TRYING TO REACH THE SAME

GOALS AS THE REST OF US.

PAGE 13

AS TIME CONTINUES TO MOVE ON THE TWO FRIENDS ARE REMINDED OF A MOVIE

THEY BOTH WATCHED WHEN THEY WERE KIDS. THE MOVIE MOSES AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

COMES TO MIND, AND INSTEAD OF FALSE PROPHITS, THERE REPLACED BY POLITITIONS. WHEN MOSES

LEADED THE PEOPLE TO THE MOUNTAINS TO HEAR AND SEE THE RULE OF GOD, HE GOES INTO THE

MOUNTAIN ONLY TO RETURN TO SEE THE PEOPLE HE LEAD IDOLIZING GOLD STATUES AND FOLLOWING

FALSE PROPHETS. THIS BROUGHT THE TO FRIENDS BACK TO AN EARLIER PLEDGE THEY MADE WHEN

THEY WERE YOUNG, WHEN SET INTO A QUESTIONABLE SITUATION, ASK YOURSELF WHAT WOULD GOD

DO. NEITHER FRIEND WAS REALLY RELIGIUS, THEY DID NOT GO TO CHURCH ON A REGULAR BASIS, PREACH THE WORD OF GOD, BUT WHAT THEY DID KNOW WAS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND

WRONG.AND WHEN THEY SAW A WRONG BEING COMMITED THEY GOT INVOLVED TO TRY TO CORRECT

IT. RELIGION WAS NOT AN ISSUE WITH THE TWO FRIENDS BECAUSE THEY VIEWED IT IN A DIFFERENT

LIGHT THAN MOST, EITHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR YOU DON’T. IT DID NOT MATTER HOW YOU

PRACTICED YOU’RE RELIGION, JUST AS LONG AS YOU BELIVED OR NOT. THEY DID NOTICE THAT PEOPLE

WHO DID BELIEVE IN GOD ALSO BELIEVED IN THEM SELVES, AND LEAD FULLER LIVES. AND THEY ALSO

KNEW THERE WERE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT WOULD TRY TO DIVIDE THEM. PREACHERS, POLITITIONS

AND EVEN SOME RELIGIUS GROUPS WOULD TRY TO TAKE PEOPLES RIGHTS AWAY AND TRY TO HIDE

BEHIND THE WORD OF GOD AS THEY SAW IT FIT INTO THERE OBJECTIVES TO DEPRIVE SOMEONE OF

THERE FREE WILL. THEY WOULD MISINTERPIT RELIGIOS WRITING TO ACHIVE THERE PURPOSE.

PAGE 14

AND IN THE PROCESS TRY TO CREATE A HERD MANTALITY TO JUSTIFY WHAT THEY WERE

PREACHING. THIS HAPPENED WHEN MOSES CAME DOWN FROM THE MOUNTAIN AND IT STILL EXISTS

TODAY. A FALSE PROPHET IS STILL A FALSE PROPHET, THEY ONLY NEED A FEW TO HELP SPREAD THERE

LIES. THEY BOTH KNEW GOOD AND EVIL DOES EXIST, AND THAT THEY SHOULD ALWAYS KEEP THERE

GUARD UP WHEN APPROUCHED IN THESE SITUATIONS AND QUESTION IT.KNOWING THESE SITUATIONS

ONLY LEAD TO GREED AND POWER, GREED KILLS AND POWER ONLY LEADS TO REMOVING FREE WILL

AND CHOICE. ALSO THEY REALIZED THAT NOT JUST ONE MAN OR GROUP CAN HEAL ALL PROBLEMS

FACING THE WORLD. THIS TYPE OF THINKING COULD BE DAMAGING TO THERE FUTURE AND EVEN

THERE EXISTANCE. THEY BOTH DECIDED IT WAS NOT WORTH GIVING UP THERE FREE WILL OR RIGHT

TO CHOOSE JUST TO BE PART OF A HERD. AND THAT EVERY HUMAN HAS THAT CHOICE, THEY JUST

HAVE TO EXERCISE IT. BOTH FRIENDS DID WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THESE PEOPLE WITH

HERD MANTALLITY THAT FOLLOWED THESE FALSE PROPHETS, KNOWINGLY BELIEVING THE FALSE

HOOD THEY WERE BEING HANDED. WHAT HAPPENS IF SCRIPTURE IS TRUE THAT AN ANTI-CHRIST WILL

COME, WILL THIS PART OF THE POPULATION BE WIPED OUT. WHAT BOTH FRIENDS REALIZED IS THAT

THEY DON’T STAND A CHACE BECAUSE THEY GAVE UP THERE FREE WIIL AND RIGHT TO CHOOSE. WHAT

WAS MORE IMPORTANT , LOOSING THERE LIFE OR LOOSING THERE SOUL. BOTH FRIENDS KNEW

THAT WAS NOT A CHOICE THEY WANTED MAKE.

PAGE 15

ONLY TIME WILL TELL, SO WHY TAKE THE RISK THEY BOTH THOUGHT. IF THESE FALSE

PROPHETS OR POLITITION SUCEED IN DIVIDING MAN AND CREATING A HERD MANTALLITY. AND IF THE

WRITINGS ARE TRUE ABOUT THE RISE OF AN ANTI-CHRIST AND COME TO TUITION, THE FINAL DIVISION

OF THE HUMAN RACE WILL ARRIVE. ONE GROUP WILL GO ONE WAY AND THE OTHER GROUP WILL GO

THE OTHER WAY. BOTH WONDERED HOW THEY COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE, IT WOULD BE A HARD

TASK TO CHANGE PEOPLES BELIEFS IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE. BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES PUSHED FOR

CHANGE , BUT NEITHER SUCEEDED WHEN THEY HAD FULL CONTROL. THE SAME PROBLEMS STILL

EXISTED, CRIME, POVERTY, ABORTION, IMMAGRATION, CLIMATE CHANGE AND SO ON. IT WAS THE

SAME OLD STORY, BIG COMPANIES WOULD THROUGH THERE MONEY AROUND TO TYE THINGS UP IN

COURT, OR LINE THE POCKETS OF SOME POLITITIONS RE-ELECTION CAMPAIN. IT SEEMED MONEY

TALKED,EVERYTHING ELSE WALKED. THE ONLY WAY TO TAKE DOWN THESE LOBBYISTS WAS TO HIT

THEM IN THE WALLET. THEY SAW A GROUP OF YOUNG KIDS TAKE DOWN BILLION DOLLAR HEDGE

FUNDS, SO THEY KNEW IT WAS POSSIBLE. THEY BOTH KNEW THAT YOU COULD VOTE FOR COMPANY

CEO AND BOARD MEMBERS IF YOU OWNED STOCK IN THE COMPANY, THIS COULD CREATE CHANGE

AND HIT THEM IN THE WALLET. ALSO START A SOCIAL MEDIA BOYCOTT OF THESE COMPANIES TO GET

ATTENTION. NOW THEY HAD A WAY TO TAKE ON BIG MONEY AND CREATE CHANGE.

PAGE 16

NOW AS INDIVIDUALS THEY COULD MAKE CHANGE THAT THEY THOUGHT WAS

UNATTAINABLE. IT WAS THERE CHOICE TO MAKE IT A BETTER WORLD AND NOW THEY HAD THE TOOLS

TO MAKE IT POSSIBLE.CHOICE CAN BE A HARD THING TO RECODNIZE, BUT ONCE YOU DO , THE SKY IS

THE LIMIT. THIS IS WHY BOTH FRIENDS WOULD NEVER GIVE UP THERE RIGHT TO CHOOSE OR THERE

FREE WILL. NOW THE TWO LOOK AT WHATS GOING ON OVERSEAS AND OUTSIDE OF THERE COUNTY

WERE THEY LIVE. THE COUNTIES THEY LOOK AT ARE ONES WERE THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY. THESE

PEOPLE HAVE LOST THERE FREE WILL AND RIGHT TO CHOOSE . PLACES LIKE RUSSIA,IRAN,SYRIA AND

NORTH KOREA, JUST TO NAME A FEW. THESE COUNTRIES ARE RAN BY DICTATORS WHO SURPRESS THE

POPULATIONS RIGHT TO CHOOSE OR HAVE ANY FREE WILL, JUST TO FUEL THERE GREED AND POWER

OBJECTIVES. SOME OF THESE POPULATIONS HAVE BEEN SURPRESSED FOR SO LONG THEY DON’T HAVE

THE WILL TO FIGHT BACK. THE DICTATORS CONTROL THE MEDIA AND THE MILITARY, AND CAN TELL

THESE POPULATIONS WHATEVER THEY WANT TO. THEY CONTINUE TO TELL THEM LIES TO SURPRESS

THERE FREE WILL AND BLAIM ALL THAT IS WRONG IS DO TO OUTSIDE INFLUENCE. THEY ARE JAILED OR

EVEN KILLED IF THEY TRY TO UPRISE, THIS IS NO WAY TO LIVE. SOME DO ESCAPE FROM THESE

COUNTRIES, AND THIS IS WERE IMMIGRATION COMES INTO PLAY, IT IS A WORLD WIDE PROBLEM.

PAGE 17

THE TWO FRIENDS KNOW PEOPLE WHO ESCAPED FROM THESE COUNTRIES AND HEARD

ALL THE HORROR STORIES THEY HAD TO TELL. THE PEOPLE FROM THESE COUNTRIES ARE CONSTANTLY

BEING FED MISINFORMATION ABOUT THE WEST BUY THERE LEADERS SO THEY CAN STAY IN POWER.

THE TWO REALIZE THAT THEY DON’T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE PEOPLE OF THESE COUNTRIES, IT’S

JUST THERE LEADERS. THE TWO WERE ALWAYS TOUGHT THAT CERTAIN COUNTRIES WERE THERE

ADVERSAIRY AND THAT’S WHY WE GO TO WAR AGAINST THEM, WHEN ALL ALONG IT IS THERE

POLITICAL LEADERS WHO ARE THE PROBLEM. THEY SEE HOW THERE FREE WILL IS BEING SURPRESSED

AND HAVE NO CHOICE. WHAT ALSO COMES TO REALIZATION IS IN MOST CASES IT IS NOT A GROUP OF

PEOPLE FROM A CERTAIN POPULATION THAT ARE BAD, IT’S THE LEADERS THAT THEY CHOOSE OR HAVE

FORCED UPON THEM. THE ONLY REASON THESE LEADERS EXIST IS FOR POWER AND GREED, IF THEY

COULD CHANGE THERE LEADERS, THEY COULD CHANGE THERE OUTLOOK. EASIER SAID THAN DONE, ONCE THEY CONTROL THE MEDIA AND THE MILITARY, THERE IS NOT MUCH ONE CAN DO WITHOUT

OUTSIDE HELP. BOTH FRIENDS THANK GOD THEY LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY AND THERE FREE WILL AND

RIGHT TO CHOOSE IS NOT TAKEN FOR GRANTED, IT’S A SHAME SOME PARTS OF THE WORLD THIS IS

NOT SO. SOME DAY THINGS WILL CHANGE; IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME.

PAGE 18

BOTH FRIENDS NOTICED A RISE IN EXSTREAM RIGHT RELIGIUS GROUPS IN THERE

COUNRTY. THIS WAS SEAPING INTO THERE POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THREATING THERE FREE WILL

AND RIGHT TO CHOOSE. THESE GROUPS WOULD TRY TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT BOOKS TO READ, WHAT

WORDS TO SAY AND EVEN TRY TO ENFORCE THAT AN EMBRYO IS A LIFE AND CHILD THAT SHOULD BE

PROTECTED. THEY FOUND A LEADER TO REPRESENT THEM WITH A VERY QUESTIONABLE BACK

GROUND. HE SERVED OFFICE ONCE BEFORE AND WAS IMPEACHED TWICE, BLACK MAILED ALLIES FOR

SUPPORT, AND A HOST OF OTHER OFFENCES. THE PEOPLE OF THERE COUNRTY GAVE HIM HIS WALKING

PAPERS ONLY TO HAVE HIM START A CAMPAINE THAT THE ELECTION WAS FIXED AND HE WON. ONLY

PROBLEM WAS HE DID NOT KNOW THE DIFFERNCE BETWEEN POLITICS AND THE LAW. HIM AND HIS

ASSOCIATES WERE NOW BEING PROSICUTED FOR THE CRIMES THEY COMMITED. NEW LAWS HE HAD

BROKEN ALSO CAME TO LIGHT, RAPE,FRAUD AND THE PAYMENTS OF HUSH MONEY TO KEEP

INFORMATION FROM THE VOTERS ABOUT ACTS OF ADULTRY, THIS WAS NOT THE END OF THIS EITHER, HE ALSO WAS FACING CHARGES OF TREASON. WHEN THESE RELIGIUS GROUPS WERE CONFRONTED

WITH THIS, THERE ONLY RESPONSE WAS HE IS NOT MY PREACHER HE IS THE PRESIDENT, I WOULD NOT

LET HIM BE MY PREACHER. THE ODD THING IS THIS INFORMATION MADE PUBLIC WAS NOT WHAT WAS

IN TEN COMMANDMENTS OR ACCEPTABLE TO ANY RELIGIUS WRITTINGS, YET THIS RELIGIUS GROUP

FOUND IT ACCEPTABLE. WHAT RELIGIUS WRITING WERE THESE PEOPLE FOLLOWING, WAS THIS THE

BEGINNING OF AN ANTI-CHRIST MOVEMENT, DID SATAN JUST COME OUT WITH HIS OWN VERSION OF

RELIGIUS WRITTINGS. NO, THIS WAS A BLUEPRINT TO CREATE A DICTATERSHIP, TAKE THE RIGHTS AWAY

FROM THE PUBLIC. THEY SAW THIS BEFORE IN THE MIDDLE EAST,EXSTREAMIST VERSION OF SHARERE

LAW, EXTREAMISTS HAVE THERE OWN VERSION OF THE KORRAN, WHICH IN PART TAKES AWAY THE

PEOPLES RIGHTS. IN RELIGIUS WRITINGS GOD IS THE GRANTER OF FREE WILL, SO WHY IN THESE SAME

PAGE 19

WRITING WOULD IT SAY TO TAKE THEM AWAY, MAKES NO SCENCE. ALL HE IS ASKING IS FOR YOU TO

ACCEPT HIM AND HIS WORD, THIS IS NOT FORCED UPON YOU.THIS TYPE OF IDIOLIGY RAISED A RED FLAG TO THE TWO FRIENDS AND THEY KNEW THEY HAD TO KEEP THERE GUARD UP TO PREVENT IT

FROM SPREADING. WHAT THEY WERE SEEING IS THIS GROUP TRYING TO JUSTIFY THERE ACTIONS BY

HIDING BEHIND THE WORD OF GOD. BOTH FRIENDS KNOW WHATEVER RELIGIUS WRITING PEOPLE

CHOOSE TO LIVE BY; IT DOES NOT SAY TO TAKE AWAY PEOPLES RIGHT TO CHOOSE OR FREE WILL.

THE AUTHORS OF THESE WRITING HAD NO INTENTION TO GET THAT TYPE OF IDIOLIGY ACROSS TO

THERE READERS OR HAVE IT MISINTERPETED FOR SOMEONE ELSES CONVINANCE. EXTREAMISTS TRY TO

MAKE THE WRITTINGS OF A RELIGIUS MANUSCRIPT BE INTERPETED DIFFERENTLY FROM ITS ORIGINAL

TEXT, THIS IN TURN WILL FUEL THERE ABILITY TO GAIN POWER AND PROFIT FROM THERE GREED.

THIS SEEMS TO HAPPEN WHERE EVER YOU LOOK, NO MATTER WERE YOU LIVE. POWER AND GREED ARE

KILLERS OF FREE WILL AND THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

NOW THE TWO WERE ABOUT TO FACE THERE BIGGEST CHALANGE, LIFE OR

DEATH. A VIRUS WAS SPREADING,IT CAME OUT OF A FORIGHN COUNRTY AND WAS SPREADING , BUT

WAS COMTAINED IN ITS ORIGAN. THIS HAPPENED BEFORE THE DIVISION OF PEOPLE REALLY GOT A FOOT HOLD IN THE TWO FRIENDS PLACE OF ORIGIN. DO TO LEADERS WORKING TOGETHER THIS VIRUS

DID NOT SPREAD AND CAUSE MAJOR LOSS OF LIFE. THEY LABLED THE VIRUS AS SARS, AND DO TO THE

JOINT EFFORT OF EVERY ONE INVOLVED WITH CONTAINING THE VIRUS IT DID NOT SPREAD. OVER TIME

PEOPLE FORGOT ABOUT THIS VIRUS AND THE DAMAGE IT COULD HAVE CAUSED IF IT WERE TO SPREAD.

PAGE 20

AS TIME WENT ON, THE DIVISION OF PEOPLE GREW STONGER, NEW WORLD LEADERS WERE

ELECTED, AND NOW POPULIZM HAD A FOOTHOLD IN GOVERNMENTS, AND ITS UGLY FACE WAS NOW

VISABLE. FINGER POINTING STARTED AND NOW DIVISION AMOUNG THE PEOPLE GREW STRONGER.

JUST AS THIS WAS HAPPENING A SECOND VIRUS APPEARED, IT WAS A VARIANT OF SARS ONLY MORE

DEADLY, IT WAS LABLED COVID. DO TO THE DIVISION AND FINGER POINTING THIS VIRUS SPREAD

RAPPIDLY, TAKING THE LIVES OF MILLIONS WORLD WIDE. INSTEAD OF WORKING TOGETHER TO

ISOLATE THE VIRUS AND CONTAIN ITS SPREAD, DIVISION IN THE WORLD HAD SET IN. FINNALLY AFTER

THE VIRUS HAD TAKEN MANY LIVES, A VACCINE WAS CREATED AND RELEASED. BY NOW, DISINFORMATION AND MIS INFORMATION WAS SPEADING ON SOCIAL MEDIA AS FAST AS THE VIRUS

ITSELF. THE VIRUS HAD NOW BECOME A POLITICAL ISSUE, AND SO DID THE VACCINE. CERTAIN LEADERS

HELPED FUEL THE DISINFORMATION, WHICH IN TURN CAUSED MORE LOSS OF LIFE. THE TWO FRIENDS

ALSO FOUND THEMSELVES CAUGHT UP IN THIS DISINFORMATION CAMPAINE. ONE BELIEVED THE

DISINFORMATION ABOUT THE VIRUS AND THE VACCINE. WHILE THE OTHER STAYED AWAY FROM

SOCIAL MEDIA AND LOOKED AT THE FACTS COMING OUT OF THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY. ONE TOOK

THE VACCINE AND THE OTHER DID NOT, HE BELIEVED THE DISINFORMATION COMING OUT OF SOCIAL

MEDIA AND BECAME AN ANTIVAXER. HE BELIEVED THE VIRUS WAS A HOAX, THE VACCINE WOULD

CAUSE MORE DAMAGE THAN GOOD, AND SO ON. AS TIME WENT ON THE FRIEND WHO BELIEVED THE

INFORMATION ON SOCIAL MEDIA COUGHT THE VIRUS. HE INFORMED HIS FRIEND HE HAD COUGHT THE

VIRUS AND IT WAS TO LATE TO TAKE THE VACCINE TO HAVE ANY EFFECT ON HIM. HIS AMUNE SYSTEM

WAS WEEK FROM OTHER AILEMENTS HE HAD AND HIS BODY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FIGHT OFF THE

VIRUS. IN JUST FOUR DAYS THE VIRUS TOOK THE FRIENDS LIFE, THERE WAS NOTHING THE OTHER

COULD DO TO STOP IT, AND JUST HAD TO WATCH. THIS FREINDSHIP AND RELATIONSHIP HAD COME TO

PAGE 21

IT’S END. BUY THIS TIME DISINFORMATION WAS AT FULL STEAM, EVERYTHING WAS BEING POLITISIZED.

FINALLY ELECTIONS CAME AND THE LEADERS WHO HELPED FUEL THIS DISINFORMATION WERE

REMOVED AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE, BUT THEY WERE NOT GONE. THE PEOPLE WHO FOLLOWED THESE

LEADERS FELT THEY SHOULD NOT BE TRIED. THEY COULD NOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LAW

AND POLITICS. POLITICS IS SOMEONES OPINION, LAW IS WHAT ALL MEN ARGEE TO FOLLOW. WITH NO

LAW THERE IS NO ORDER, WITH NO ORDER THERE IS CAOUS, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. IF THE

MAJORITY CAN NOT STOP THIS KIND OF THINKING, IT COULD LEAD TO THE END OF DEMOCRACY AS WE

KNOW IT, ONLY TIME WILL TELL. NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE IN A LAWLESS WORLD OF MISINFORMATION

BEING DICTATED AS TRUTH, MAN HAS SEEN THE DAMAGE IT CAN CAUSE ON A CIVILIZATION. THE ONLY

THING THE LAST STANDING FRIEND KNEW WAS DISINFORMATION TOOK HIS FRIENDS LIFE. NOW HE

HAD TO MAKE A CHOICE, WOULD HE ALLOW HIMSELF TO GET SWOLLOWED UP IN MIS INFORMATION

AND HERD MANTALLITY, OR WOULD HE PUT HIS FOCUS ON MAKING THIS WORLD A BETTER PLACE

THEN WHEN HE ARRIVED. WHAT THE TWO FRIENDS HAD LEARNED THROUGH THE JOURNY OF THERE

LIVES IS FREE WILL AND CHOICE CREATES LEADERS NOT FOLLOWERS. AND THE CHOICE OF LIFE AND

SOUL DOES NOT COME TO LIGHT FOR MANY UNTIL THERE CLOSE TO DEATH, AND THEN IT COULD BE TO

LATE.

PAGE 22