Questions of the poem,
poem in question
Seriality forced the poem opens with two semiotic sense the scope of the work itself. Will we " towards " or " this "In the statement of the only poetic tradition-typology (by itself the renewed tradition) and the lyrical optical machadienne as Unamuno double littérair e and / or the language does it fit in concealment (the trace) and she is a body sui - generis defend to discern that no other considerations ? In order synonymous ideas, can we classify the genre in a one to-axial-lexical approach as ownership which combines the imagination in what to name the manner of Heidegger ar r aisonnement text to the detriment of the intercession of the writing subject ? We can not cross the boundaries of these two modes of questioning (not operating) to continue to question the economics of contemporary philosophical or literary text and poetic text to meet with these two movements we say art ( within the meaning of p o ï in Greek), useful to our research congruence. We began our statement cited by A. Machado and M. de Unamuno. We bet that their peninsular aspects, do ent Chent nor cross their fame or their posthumous fame. One more poet than philosopher but also playwright loved yet further excel in philosophy that what made him known, the other polygraph exercised his gifts as a writer in several registers.