The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

chapter nine

Antichrist and Satan, the Leviathan of the Old

fifth-century Sasanian seal (fig 150),67 suggests

Testament 59 The Pistis Sophia, which claims to

that the Sasanian representations of the serpent

record the teachings of Jesus during the eleven

biting its own tail may perhaps be based on con-

years following his resurrection, states:

ventional renderings of the dragon in contempo-

raneous star-maps inspired by astrological works

The outer darkness is a great dragon whose tail

of the Hellenistic east 68 In Hellenic astrology, the

is in its mouth, and it is outside the world, and

it surrounds the whole world

great celestial serpent (draco coelestis) dominated

60

the heavens, encompassing all the spheres of the

Significantly, in the apocalypse of the heavens

cosmos, coiling around the heavens and biting

the Sun appears as a great dragon accompanied

its tail 69 yet it is important also to consider the

by the seven planets and with the four horses61

reverse of the seal, which depicts a palm tree above

that in Greek mythology drew the chariot of the

a pair of outspread wings with small streamers

sun god Helios (sol invictus), while the Moon is

surrounded either by a decorative border or a

depicted as steered by a male and a female dragon

more stylised ouroboros 70 Since this represents

and drawn by two white bulls 62

a rare iconographic variant, Rika Gyselen ten-

Nevertheless, the ancient conceptions of the

tatively suggests a magical interpretation of the

serpent resurface in the Gospel of John in the New

seal 71

Testament (3:14) As noted earlier, the serpent

The motif of the paired encircling dragons also

lifted up by Moses is presented in the Epistle of

makes an appearance in the well-known legend

Barnabas as a symbol of Jesus and of Christian-

of the Ascent of Iskandar Certain editions of

ity 63 The formula, “I am the alpha and the omega,”

the romance of Pseudo-Callisthenes ( c fourth

meaning “in my beginning is my end and in my

century) describe how, as Iskandar is carried to

end is my beginning,” also leads to the imagery

heaven by eagles, he sees a field encircled by a ser-

pent which is explained as the world surrounded

of the ouroboros serpent, symbol of the unity and

by the ocean 72 The depiction of this scene also

eternal renewal of life 64

reflects the force and ongoing cultural resonance

The ouroboros motif reached its apogee during

which the Alexander Romance possessed at the

the Gnostic period, which lasted from the second

time; in particular, the meaning associated with

century bc to the third century ad, when the

this imagery It is portrayed on a small Byzantine

Greek and West Asian cultures were subsumed

enamel ed medal ion of the eleventh century from

by a form of pan-Hellenism 65 It is of significance,

the Pala d’Oro on the high altar of St Mark’s,

however, that the symbol had not been known in

now preserved in the Treasury of San Marco,

Classical Greek, Etruscan or early Roman cul-

Venice, representing the schematised composi-

ture 66 Thus the ouroboros symbol came to serve

tion of Iskandar’s view of the world as seen from

as an image for a complex of ideas that was known

on high (fig 151) 73 The plaque is decorated with

by a Greek name

a large central tree inhabited by birds and flanked

An ouroboros serpent that encircles a lion, sur-

by a pair of addorsed peacocks with their heads

mounted by a crescent and star, engraved on a

turned backwards The composition is encircled

59 Leisegang, 1955, repr 1979, p 218

65 Needham and Wang, 1965, p 376

60 Pistis Sophia, text ed Schmidt and tr Macdermot, 1978,

66 Eidem, p 376, n g

bk III, ch 126, p 635; cf Pistis Sophia, tr Mead, 1896, p 320,

67 Cf Gyselen, 1995, pp 52–3, fig 60 (photograph of seal

sec 319 See also Leisegang, 1955, repr 1979, p 218; Reitzen-

recto, verso)

stein, 1916, esp p 41; Merkelbach, “Drache,” RAC IV, 1959,

68 Bivar (1969, p 26) connects the ouroboros serpent

p 228; Sheppard, 1962, p 88; Beck, 2004, p 225

with the Egyptian serpent deity Āpep that is regarded

61 Pistis Sophia, text ed Schmidt and tr Macdermot,

as the cosmic antagonist of the Sun and the Moon Ac -

1978, bk IV, ch 136, pp 709–10; cf Pistis Sophia, tr Mead,

cording to Azarpay (1978, p 369 and fig 6) “representa-

1896, p 296, sec 359; Leisegang, 1955, repr 1979, p 218 and

tions of the ouroboros serpent on Sasanian seals of the

n 11; Sheppard, 1962, p 89; Beck, 2004, pp 225–6, n 72 The

fifth century suggest the currency of astrological notions

motif of the flying chariot driven by dragons apppears also in

about the ecliptic Dragon at an earlier period in Sasanian

the myth of Medea (Pseudo-Apollodorus, Bibliotheca I 146;

Persia ”

Diodorus Siculus, Library of History IV 50 6; Ovid, Metamor-

69 Leisegang, 1955, repr 1979, p 217

phoses VII 217, 350 and 391–3)

70 Bivar, 1969, p 26, pl 11, DL2; Gyselen, 1995, p 53,

62 Pistis Sophia, text ed Schmidt and tr Macdermot,

fig 60

1978, bk IV, ch 136, pp 709–10; cf Pistis Sophia, tr Mead,

71 Eadem, 1995, pp 52, 76–7

1896, p 296, sec 359; Beck, 2004, pp 225–6, n 72

72 Pseudo-Callisthenes II, ch 41, tr and ed Stoneman,

63 Tr Lake, 1914, vol 1, p 385

1991, p 123 Cf Millet, 1923, p 94, ch 102 See also p 55

64 Leisegang, 1955, repr 1979, p 229

73 Grabar, 1951, p 48, fig 10c (photograph)

vestiges of ancient dragon iconographies

151

by a pair of giant serpents with looped bodies

it rules over all denizens of the waters ”80 Islamic

and interlaced tails

cosmological notions speak of the “Lote Tree on

The significance of this imagery is underlined

the Boundary” (sidrat al-muntahā), also known

by Grabar who identifies it as highly character-

as ṭubā (“blessed”) 81 The Qurʾān describes how

istic of the Iranian repertoire of motifs, stating

when the Prophet was carried on his night jour-

that “this image of the Universe, a distinctly Ira-

ney (miʿrāj) up to the seventh heaven, he went

nian iconography, deserved to be introduced into

on as far as the sidrat al-muntahā beyond which

the family of medieval representations of the

no angel or any other being can pass This tree is

Cosmos ”74 Similarly the tree and the birds rep-

located to the right of the divine throne (ʿarsh)

resented on the plaque, as Grabar has observed,

and near the garden of the eternal abode ( sūra

represent “Iranian symbols of the garden of the

53, 14–5) 82

Earth; in the text of the legend they are docu-

An emblematic illustration of the city of Baby-

mented with the words: “fruits of the Earth ” ”75

lon in the manuscripts of Beatus’ Commentary

The Latin version of the text states: “orbis ter-

on the Apocalypse shows the theme of two giant

rarum sicut area, in qua conduntur fruges ”76 This

serpents enclosing a city Discussing this coinci-

form of imagery thus provides a bird’s eye view

dence of imagery John Williams comments that

of the terrestrial universe current in the medieval

“Christian culture shared iconographic traditions

Iranised Central Asian sphere The motif was here

associated with the Muslim world…”83 Babylon,

adapted to a Christian context and, as Grabar

which must have been notorious for its dragons,

notes, it is possible that the stylised cruciform

was also known in Iranian tradition as the loca-

motif on the apex of the tree represents a Chris-

tion of the giant dragon Dahāka 84

tian cross which served to “convert” this oriental

The illustration of the city of Babylon serves

representation of the universe into a Christian

as frontispiece for the Daniel Commentary (1 1

one 77 Evidently the motif had wide currency in

and 14 23) in two tenth-century manuscripts, the

the medieval world, both Muslim and Byzantine

Morgan Beatus, dated between c 940 and 945

The origin of this iconography may plausibly

(fig 152), and the Girona Beatus, dated 6 July

be seen to lie in the Zoroastrian cosmological

975,85 as wel as in one mid-eleventh-century man-

motif of the Saēna Tree, the perch of the great

uscript, the Saint-Sever Beatus from the monas-

mythical Saēna bird (Av saēna-mərəγa-, Mid

tery of Saint-Sever-sur-l’Adour (on which the city

Pers sēn murw, Pers sīmorḡ) 78 The tree on

is shown to be enclosed by two dragons whose

which the Saēna nests grows in the middle of

heads and tails entwine at top and bottom) 86

Lake Vārukasha (yasht 12 17) and is cal ed Vīspō

In the Morgan Beatus Babylon is shown as a

bish (the Gaokərəna-Tree, Mid Pers Gōkirn),

towering city with a large horseshoe arch-shaped

Tree of All Remedies, because it bears the seed of

main city gate framed by an inverted pair of

all healing herbs 79 According to the Bundahishn

small dragons, who touch at the tail tips, in such

the revered Vāsī Panchā sadvarā lives in the lake

a manner that their undulant bodies seem to form

(yasht 42 4) It appears to be a kind of sea dragon

an ogee arch-shaped enclosure around the gate

and is “so huge that if it were to rush swiftly along

The entire composition is encircled by a sequence

from sunrise to sunset it still would not have cov-

of two giant dragons demarcated by a fine spotted

ered as much ground as the length of its own body;

pattern in anti-clockwise arrangement, the gaping

74 Idem, p 48 Similar cosmological concepts referring to

Islamic eschatology as growing in Hell ( sūra s 37, 60–2; 44,

the gigantic tree and the mythical bird sent by God to aid the

43; and 56, 52)

hero are described in the Kitāb-i Samak ʿAyyār; see Gaillard,

83 Williams, 1994, vol 1, p 139

1987, p 113

84 Skjærvø, “Aždahā I,” EIr Cf yarshater, 1983a, p 426;

75 Grabar, 1951, p 48

Hintze, 1999, p 86, n 62

76 Cited after idem, p 48 Cf Millet, 1923, p 102

85 City of Babylon enclosed by two dragons, frontis-

77 Grabar, 1951, p 48, n 17

piece, Daniel Commentary The Girona Beatus Kingdom

78 See Boyce, 1975, repr 1996, pp 88–91, 137–8, 143

of Léon, probably Tábara Dated 6 July 975 Museu de la

79 Cf Janda, 2010, pp 320–1

Catedral de Girona, Num Inv 7 (11) Williams, 1994, vol 2,

80 Eadem, p 89

ill 376

81 On the Tree of Life in Islamic tradition, see Lechler,

86 City of Babylon enclosed by two dragons, frontispiece,

1939, pp 369–419; Wensinck, 1921, repr 1978, p 33; Wid-

Daniel Commentary The Saint-Sever Beatus Monastery of

engren, 1955, pp 103–4, 208–9, 212–3

Saint-Sever-sur-l’Adour Mid-eleventh century Paris, Bi -

82 The Qurʾān mentions also the Tree of Eternity (shajarat

blio thèque Nationale, Ms Lat 8878, fol 217 Williams, 1994,

al-khuld) ( sūra 20, 120–1) and another tree which appears in

vol 2, ill 466

152