The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

chapter ten

minaret of Jām 47 The name and elaborate titles

first–third centuries) who ruled over the region

of sulṭān Ghiyāth al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Sām

which comprises what is now Tajikistan, Afghani-

are given on the three lower epigraphic bands of

stan, Pakistan and northern India,55 as well as by

the minaret of Jām 48 Another important Ghurid

the Armenians of a province near Lake Sevan 56

document for assessing the evolving titulature of

According to the genealogy of the Sām dynasty

the sulṭān is a four-volume leather-bound lavishly

of Ghūr, the fourth caliph ʿAlī brought about the

illuminated Qurʾān dated 584/1188–9, now pre-

conversion of the family to Islam in the first cen-

served in the Iran Bastan Museum in Tehran The

tury of the Islamic era, granting them the ruler-

sulṭān’s extensive range of official and celebra-

ship of Ghūr 57

tory titles is recorded in the colophon,49 combin-

The knot that joins the two dragons is the so-

ing epithets used earlier by both the Saljuqs and

cal ed “knot of Solomon,” which was known in the

the Ghaznawids 50 Even by the inflated standards

Central Asian region from at least the first centu-

of the time they are ostentatious, providing an

ries ad through to the Islamic period This knot

insight into this sulṭān’s self-representation and

succeeded the ancient so-called Herakles/Hercu-

imperial aspirations a decade before the Ghurid

les knot, the most famous knot used in ancient

conquest of India 51

times, considered to have apotropaic and magical

The choice of the dragon and the lion, both

qualities, which was often depicted in the form of

emblems of might and royalty, as symbols to rep-

both ophidian and quadruped dragons,58 and is

resent Ghiyāth al-Dīn’s rulership, under which the

a compelling example of continuity of meaning

Ghurid empire reached its apogee, is significant

in spite of formal change The symbolism of the

Even though he was greatly concerned with ortho-

Herakles knot stil had currency in late seventh- or

doxy52 a metrical version of the genealogy of the

early eighth-century Sogdia Moulded in the form

family, composed by Fakhr al-Dīn Mubarākshāh

of a pair of upright dragons that are linked by

Marwarrūdhi, which was completed during the

means of a large Herakles knot, the motif appears

reign of Ghiyāth al-Dīn, traces the family back

in a non-Buddhist context in the monumental

to the hominoid serpent of the ancient Iranian

sculptural decoration on the plastered mud-brick

epic past, Azhi Dahāka As is well-known, a pair

architecture of the portico of Temple II in the

of serpents are said to have sprouted from the

ancient city of Panjikent in Sogdiana (Zarafashān,

latter’s shoulders After Farīdūn (arabicised from

north of the Hiṣār range) (fig 170)

Afrīdūn) overthrew the thousand-year reign of

Like the Hercules knot, the knot of Solomon

Ẓaḥḥāk/Dahāk, his descendants were presumed

is a well-known apotropaic sign 59 It is com-

to have settled in Ghūr 53 The Ghurid descent

monly associated with the magical seal of Solo-

from Dahāk seems to have enjoyed a favourable

mon (khātam Sulaymān) 60 and attributed to the

reputation This descent was shared by Rustam,

magician-king Solomon of post-biblical Jewish

one of the greatest warriors of Iranian legends,54

tradition61 who controls the winds, animals, and

by the Kushāṇas of the yuezhi confederacy ( c

spirits The biblical King Sulaymān is named

47 A pair of nielloed gold pendants, now in the al-Sabāh

Ghurids; Bosworth, “Ghūrids,” EI² II, 1099a Cf Shahbazi,

Collection, also inscribed with the name of the Ghurid

1993, p 159

sulṭān, “Muḥammad ibn Sām” was found in the same village

54 See p 8, n 46

Kuwait, al-Sabāh Collection, Dar al-Athar al-Islamiyyah,

55 See p 8, n 47

Kuwait National Museum, inv no LNS 1890 J

56 See p 8, n 51

48 The name and titles of the sulṭān Ghiyāth al-Dunya wa

57 See p 8, n 48

’l-Dīn Abu ’l-Fatḥ Muḥammad ibn Sām are given by Maricq

58 See Belenizkii, 1980, fig 92

and Wiet, 1959, p 27, no 3; Pinder-Wilson, 2001, p 168 and

59 The importance accorded to such plaited knots

n 47

is underlined by their ubiquitous use in monumental

49 Iran Bastan Museum, Tehran, Ms 3507, fol 198a Cf

epigraphic friezes on architecture, an early example being

Flood, 2005, pp 267–9, fig 1

the tomb tower Rādkān West in the Alburz Mountains in

50 Idem, p 268

Māzandarān finished in 411/1021 See Blair, 1992, pp 85–7,

51 Cf idem, pp 267–9

figs 48–52

52 Ghiyāth al-Dīn was closely affiliated with the

60 Melikian-Chirvani, 1977, pp 367–406 The “Seal of

Karrā miyya sect that was dominant among the population of

Solomon” was portrayed as a five-pointed star or pentagram,

Ghūr and instrumental in persecuting the Ismāʿīlis, but later

interchangeably used with a six-pointed star or hexagram Cf

he shifted allegiance to the Shāfiʿī school of law, while his

Doutté, 1909, p 154; Dawkins, 1944, pp 145–50; Ittig, 1982,

brother, Muʿizz al-Dīn, became a Ḥanafī; idem, pp 270, 281

p 86; Moulierac, 1987, p 88; Shani, 1999, p 254 and n 11

and n 66, p 287

61 Cf Henninger, 2004, pp 20, 25 Evidence of Solomon’s

53 Quoted by Abū ʿAmr al-Jūzjānī, the historian of the

influence on the magical traditions of the Graeco-Roman

the knotted dragon motif

165

seventeen times in the Qurʾān (especially sūra

(a motif also associated with the magical khātam

38, 30–9) 62 The khātam Sulaymān is thought to

Sulaymān) as well as another unprovenanced

have been the symbol inscribed on the seal ring of

example from a private collection 72

Sulaymān, “which endowed his owner with power

A moulded band with eight almond-shaped

over both terrestrial and supernatural beings ”63

medal ions enclosing pairs of knotted dragons cir-

Melikian-Chirvani, moreover, has drawn atten-

cumscribes a pyriform flask of unglazed earthen-

tion to the possibility that the presence of the

ware, thought to come from Iran or Mesopotamia,

motif, which is “typical of the Eastern Iranian

which is datable to the same period, now in the

repertoire [on metalwork] seldom used in the

Musée national de la céramique, Sèvres 73 Here the

West,”64 indicates an esoteric intention 65

winged dragons are pictured addorsed The heads,

The motif of the knotted dragons, rendered

jaws agape, are twisted back so that their out-

in virtually the same manner as on the Ghurid

stretched tongues meet at the centre while their

matrix, is pictured on a “sphero-conical” unglazed

forelegs are turned outwards and the bodies are

earthenware vessel found in the region of the

linked by means of a quadripartite knot

Golden Horde (Juchi Ulus), datable to the late

Like most of the “sphero-conical” vessels, the

twelfth or early thirteenth century, now pre-

body of the flask is made of dense almost stone-

served in the State Historical Museum in Moscow

ware-like high-temperature fired earthenware,

(fig 171) The dragons are more stylised, how-

which makes the vessel watertight The specific-

ever, and have lost their horns and forelegs, so

ity of the paste and the esoteric connotation of the

that only their necks are shown to cross over A

motifs evoke alchemical procedures which were

great quantity of these “sphero-conical” vessels

practised by great physicians such as Abū Bakr

have been found throughout the Islamic world,

Muḥammad ibn Zakariyyāʾ al-Rāzī (the Rhazes

and while the vessels probably served numerous

of the Latin Middle Ages) from Rayy in Iran ( c.

different purposes,66 the prevalent view is that they

250/854–313/925 or 323/935), whose interest lay

contained liquids such as beverages,67 mercury

particularly in practical chemistry,74 and suggest

or perfume,68 while some may have been used

the use of the flask in a laboratory context 75

for chemical or alchemical operations 69 Several

In the symbolism of medieval Islamic alchemy,

“sphero-conical” vessels with the same motif have

it seems the paired dragons connected with the

been found, such as a bottle fragment from Dwīn

use of a quadripartite knot represented a funda-

in Ararat province, the former Armenian capital

mental polarity on which the cosmic rhythm is

until the Arab conquest when it became the seat

based, the solve et coagula of the alchemical pro-

of the governor,70 an example from Iran, now in

cess: the sulphur and mercury of alchemy 76 This

the collection of Michael Rogers, London,71 with

complex theory was developed in the writings

stamped decoration and a large six-pointed star

of the Jābirian Corpus, Muḥammad ibn Umayl

period, revealing the extensive influence of Jewish magic,

67 On the use of the vessels as beer gourds, containing

is found in the use of his name in several incantations

fuqāʿ or fuqqāʿ, see Ghouchani and Adle, 1992, pp 72–92

in magical papyri and the specific reference to the use of

68 Ettinghausen, 1965, pp 218–29

his seal in the following appeal: “I adjure you by the seal

69 Rogers, 1969, pp 147–58; Moulierac, 1987, pp 86, 88

which Solomon placed on the tongue of Jeremiah, and he

70 The History Museum of Armenia, inv no 1682–8,

spoke ” Preisendanz, 1973, p 102 (Pap IV, 3039–041) Cf

height 12 cm, diameter 9 cm Dzhanpoladyan, 1958, p 206,

Perdrizet, 1903, p 58; Aune, “Exorcism,” ISBE, vol 2, 1939,

fig 5 Cf Ettinghausen, 1965, p 228, fig 15 (drawing);

repr 1994, p 243

Rogers, 1969, p 153, n 12 (drawing p 154, fig 3); Moulierac,

62 Sulaymān is acquainted with the speech of birds and

1987, p 87 and n 28

animals ( sūra 27, 16–9), he can control the wind as well as

71 Rogers, 1969, p 152, pls 1 and 2; Moulierac, 1987,

the demons and jinn s who taught magic to humans ( sūra s 21,

p 87; Savage-Smith, 1997, pp 324–5, type 6, drawing below

81–2; 34, 12; 34, 12–3; and 38, 36–40)

(“private collection, London”)

63 Ittig, 1992, p 86; Shani, 1999, p 254 and n 10

72 Ettinghausen, 1965, p 224, pl L A (photograph)

64 Melikian-Chirvani, 1982, p 178

73 Sèvres, Musée national de la céramique, inv no MNC

65 Idem, 1977, pp 367–406

19589; see À l’ombre d’Avicenne, 1996, p 143, cat no 56

66 On the possible usage of these vessels, see Etting -

(detail)

hausen, 1965, pp 218–29; Rogers, 1969, pp 147–58 A com-

74 Anawati, “Arabic Alchemy,” EHAS, 1996, vol 3, p 868

prehensive list of functions based on the vessels’ forms is given

75 Moulierac, 1987, p 86 Flasks of comparable shape are

by Savage-Smith, 1997, pp 324–33 The contents of “sphero-

featured on fol 15 and fol 17 of the Pseudo-Galen treatise

conical” vessels excavated at Nīshāpūr were tested and were

Kitāb al-diryāq (“Book of Antidotes”), dated 595/1198–9,

thought to “hold volatile liquids, water and oil without seep-

now in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Ms Arabe 2964 Cf

age ” See Hauser and Wilkinson, 1942, p 89; Wilkinson,

eadem, p 84

1973, pp XXXII–XXXIII

76 Eadem, p 88

166