The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

epilogue

unsheathed claws Another newly acquired fea-

received through a Central Asian filter, resulting

ture is the band of flames that flickers along the

in a new creation which came to be de rigueur

dragon’s right leg and above its back, a charac-

after the Ilkhanid period This assimilation

teristic already known from Central Asian textiles

through osmosis of the dragon imagery also pro-

such as the above-mentioned fragment of a silk

vides eloquent testimony of the crucial role played

tapestry (kesi), dated between 1200 and 1300, fea-

by the pastoral nomads in the process of east-west

turing dragons chasing pearls 167 In spite of the

exchange 172 Their creative energy and determined

fact that the dragon is shown with two rather

agency underlay the forging of a distinct aesthetic

than four legs, its depiction deserves particular

combining Western Asian and East Asian motifs

attention because it is one of the earliest adop-

in the post-Mongol period

tions of a complete figure of a Chinese-derived

dragon in Iranian painting 168

This debt to China is also evident in a miniature

b Syncretism and the dragon

from the Great Ilkhanid Shāh-nāma of 1330–

1335, portraying Bahrām Gūr, one of the most

The personal interest taken by the Muslim Ilkhans

celebrated rulers of the Sasanian dynasty in the

Shāh-nāma, killing a giant dragon, now in the

in Islamic mysticism extended to the teachings

Cleveland Museum of Art,169 or in a folio from

of wandering dervishes known for their antino-

the so-called “Small Shāh-nāma group of man-

mian and heterodox outlook These dervishes

uscripts, dated 735/1335, featuring Isfandiyār’s

arose from a frontier milieu in Transoxania,

third course, the dragon-slaying, preserved in the

Khurasan and Anatolia that was characterised by

Metropolitan Museum of Art 170

heroic figures, warrior adventurers and warrior

The new Chinese-derived elements were thus

saints that ensued from the age-old pastoral cul-

gradually assimilated into a well-established

ture of predation but who in later Ottoman chron-

Western Asian dragon iconography As has been

icles were portrayed as ghāzī s fighting for the

shown, the iconography of the Chinese-style

defence and victory of Islam 173 It will be shown

dragon was meaningful for the Ilkhanids and their

that in these liminal societies epic-chivalrous

entourage but when transmitted to a Western

frontier narratives were characterised by the

Asian context it gradually disintegrated, to be

heroic valour associated with the dragon as well

appropriated only in fragmentary form by the

as the jihād against the dragon The dragon was

receiving cultural milieu In the process of diffu-

used as a link to narrative intersections of other-

sion certain stylistic aspects of the Chinese-

wise unconnected heroic and saintly figures whose

inspired dragon motif were combined in hybrid

identities became connected and often amalgam-

fashion with prevailing Islamic artistic features

ated This was complemented by the cross-cultural

and gradually integrated into existing tradi-

convergence of saintly cults prominently involv-

tions 171 The iconographic expression was thus

ing the dragon in which Islamic, Turko-Mongol,

167 On the flame as chinoiserie element, see Kadoi,

170 Ms 1974 290 26; Swietochowski and Carboni, 1994,

2008, pp 204–5, who also associates the motif of the “flam-

cat no 32 For a description of the feat, see Shāh-nāma, tr

ing dragon” with Chinese dragon paintings; eadem, p 147,

and ed Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 4, pp 499–503 The dragon

fig 4 22

slaying theme is also represented in the illustrations of the

168 Another early depiction of a Chinese-derived dragon

Shāh-nāma cycles of Hūshang, Farīdūn and Gushtāsp Cf

appears in a copy of al-Qazwīnī’s ʿAjāʾib al-makhlūqāt, writ-

Arberry et al , 1959, pl 4d; Simpson, 1979, figs 42, 58, 91 and

ten and illustrated during the author’s lifetime in Wāsiṭ in

92; Fitzherbert, 2001, fig 81 Shāh-nāma, tr and ed Mohl,

678/1279–80 (Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Cod

1838–1878, vol 4, pp 499–503, ll 427–71

Arab 464, fol 73v; see Badiee, 1978, pl 72) The quadruped

171 As Bertold Spuler (1939, repr 1955, p 363) succinctly

dragon is somewhat awkwardly rendered with its hindlegs

observes:

marchant whereas the foreshortened forelegs are slightly

raised While the head overall echoes Chinese-derived

The rising tide of East Asian forms that swept in [with

models, in spite of the fact that it is not crowned by ant-

the Mongol onslaught] did not represent a danger

lers, the protome thus still follows conventional prototypes

to Iranian artists but rather served as inspiration for

Added features are however the flaming bands rising from

new work in almost a creative sense With sovereign

the neck and an exaggerated spiky crest projecting from the

mastery they knew how to assimilate foreign elements

dragon’s back and belly

without being untrue to themselves

169 Ms 1943 658; Grabar and Blair, 1980, cat no 49;

172 Allsen, 2001, p 211

Legacy, 2002, fig 187, cat no 56 Shāh-nāma, tr and ed

173 Lindner, 1983, pp 21–5

Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 6, pp 41–5, ll 427–71