The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this research is to contextualise and

into a centre of Islamic civilisation It also resulted

chart, as far as possible, the complex iconogra-

in the assimilation and subsequent Islamicisation

phy of the dragon in the medieval Islamic world,1

of the steppe peoples of Turko-Mongol heritage

by interrogating the many factors, contexts and

Islamic-period Central Asia natural y inherited

contingencies that helped to shape and transform

artistic traditions from preceding dynasties such

it 2 The study focuses on the identification of the

as the Sasanians ( c 224–651) and the Sogdians

dragon imagery in a medieval Central Asian3

(fifth–eighth centuries) A true melting pot of

cultural context, in what may be described as

peoples and cultures, the region had from earli-

Irano-Turkish territories, from where it was dis-

est times served as a mediator and transmitter of

seminated by people of predominantly Turkic

artistic trends as they passed from east to west

and Iranian stock 4 It necessarily draws on a

Asia and vice versa This phenomenon was taken

vast corpus of imagery of long artistic and icono-

even further in the vast spatial entity of Islam,

graphic tradition which originates from an equal y

where economic links facilitated the transmis-

vast geographic area of enormous cultural and

sion of knowledge as well as cultural and artistic

ethnic complexity, with a primary emphasis on

exchange among peoples of different backgrounds

the transmission of the dragon iconography from

and thus, in spite of the multicultural setting, con-

Central Asia to Anatolia Importantly, the latter

veyed a feeling of unity and a sense of belong-

comprises to a large extent parts of the region

ing to a common civilisation 6 Medieval Islamic

that formed part of the empire of Alexander the

society was a mixture of several regional cultures

Great at his death in 323 bc, constituting ancient

which included Muslims and non-Muslims speak-

Sogdia, Bactria, the Indus Valley, Parthia, Media,

ing many languages, including Arabic, Persian,

the Transcaucasus and Anatolia A common fea-

Syriac, Hebrew, Armenian, Turkish, Kurdish and

ture of these regions is therefore to have been

various local dialects The approach in the fol ow-

subject for three to four centuries to intermittent

ing essays is thus necessarily broadly compara-

waves of Hellenistic influence

tive since evidently, as Julie Scott Meisami has

Arab conquests of Central Asia began to gain

aptly put it, “the medieval world does not stop

momentum from 86/705 when Qutayba ibn

at, say, the border between Christian By zantium

Muslim was appointed governor of Khurasan,

and Islamic territories, it is also clear that valu-

from where he led incursions into neighbouring

able insights may be gained from comparing

regions 5 This led to a process of Islamicisation in

the various manifestations of what is, to a great

the city states of sedentary Central Asia and the

extent, a unified tradition, which shares certain

subsequent transformation of the entire region

basic attitudes and assumptions despite the par-

1 Throughout this investigation the traditional historical

part of China, northern India, northeastern Iran, Mongolia,

era, commonly referred to as the medieval period, is defined

Pakistan and the [former] Central Asian Republics of the

as spanning the eighth to the thirteenth century

USSR ” See Miroshnikov, 1992, repr 1999, pp 259–80 (the

2 On the history of the study of iconography in Islamic

discussion also includes a brief outline of the historical

art, see the recent resumé of Ernst Grube (2005, pp 13–33)

usage of the term) The problems of defining the concep-

with an extensive list of references

tual geographies of Central Asia are revisited by Akiner,

3 Today “Central Asia” has acquired a narrower meaning

1998, pp 3–62

associating it with its use in the former Soviet Union and

4 The words “Turkic” as well as “Iranian” are used as gen-

can be said to include the territories of Uzbekistan, Turk-

eral designations to denote people whose ruler or majority

menistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan as well as

spoke a Turkic or an Iranian language Tribal confederacies

Mongolia, the Tibet Autonomous Region and the Xinjiang

in Central Asia were very heterogeneous and under various

Uighur Autonomous Province in northwest China However

cultural influences Cf Frye, 2005, p 149, n 1

throughout the present study the term is used in its broader

5 On the Muslim Arab campaign in Central Asia and

sense following the cultural definition of Central Asia given by

subsequent consolidation of power, see the classical study of

UNESCO in two meetings of experts, held in 1978 and 1979,

Gibb, 1923

which is anchored in the multi-volume History of Civilization

6 The accounts of medieval travellers show that there

of Central Asia The Final Report of 12 February 1979, Paris,

were, in fact, apart from sea frontiers, no clearly defined

reads that the spatial dimensions include “territories lying at

boundary lines within the Islamic empire See Bauer, 1995,

present within the boundaries of Afghanistan, the western

pp 34–6

4