The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

introduction

13

involving the dragon in which Islamic, Turko-

of the medieval Central Asian world often remains

Mongol, Jewish and Christian beliefs overlapped

incomprehensible for modern people Because

and amalgamated

of the refractory nature of the evidence, some

iconographic elements of the period are based

Since there are no previous comprehensive studies

upon a number of deductions while some others

of the dragon in the Islamic world,98 the present

necessarily remain elusive, even impenetrable It

exercise is prone to all the risks that are char-

is therefore the intention of the present study

acteristic of such an endeavour Depictions of

to locate certain iconographic details that so

dragons in the material culture of the medieval

far have not been understood or, perhaps, even

Islamic period have never been fully catalogued

recognised At the same time it has to be borne

as a corpus, hence in what follows only a repre-

in mind that what may be considered a symbol

sentative sampling wil be considered in which the

in the twentieth century may well represent an

selected objects are individually discussed Inevi-

authentic transfer of a reality for man in medieval

tably, numerous potentially relevant objects may

Central Asia and beyond Even so it is hoped that

have been overlooked or considered too briefly,

the following chapters will shed some light on the

and the aim of tracking down the exact symbolic

perception of the great dragon beast within the

significance of the serpent and its greater rela-

overall intellectual and visual universe of the

tive, the dragon, may not have been fully realised

medieval Irano-Turkish world

Nevertheless, the approach adopted here will

Finally, the path that has led to the realisa-

at least bring into focus the complexity of the

tion of this study has been long and tortuous:

semantic horizon associated with these images

the serpent is not called a dragon for nothing

This endeavour is particularly precarious since

Nonetheless, this study represents but a small

modern perception of the elements that determine

contribution to a better comprehension of the

different modes of interpretation will not neces-

complex multivalent symbolism of the dragon

sarily reflect the meaning and mental associations

in the medieval Islamic sphere Some proposi-

attributed to them by the medieval populations

tions consequently have a provisional character

studied Imagery that elicited clearly identifiable

that, with the help of new material, specialists

connotations and allusions in the cultural milieu

will confirm or invalidate

98 Giovanni Curatola’s thorough work on the dragon

scripts of the post-Timurid period Curatola, 1979; idem,

focuses on the overall relation of its iconography to Chinese

1982; and idem, 1989 Other previous studies cited above

and Central Asian sources as well as its appearance in manu-

have mainly focused on particular topics

the medieval islamic world from central asia to anatolia

15