The UN Population Control Agenda
Ever heard the term, “eugenics”? It was a very popular term in the early part of the 20th century, yet many today have never once heard the term. Some might even think that it is simply because eugenics was disregarded long ago, after World War II. Just what is eugenics and how does it affect our lives, today, in the 21st century?
Eugenics is defined as, “The self-direction of human evolution,” or “The study of methods of improving genetic qualities by selective breeding (especially as applied to human mating).” Is this beginning to sound like a bunch of men playing God? But wait, there’s more. According to the website www.eugenics.net: “Humanitarian eugenics strives to leave a genuine legacy of love to future generation: good health, high intelligence and noble character.” Excuse me? Since when does noble character come from good breeding? I though noble character came from following the teachings of Adonai. And, regardless of their claims, good health is dependant on the foods we eat, not genetics.
But the idea of genetic perfection has taken a hold of the world’s elite ruling class and has caused them to believe, for one reason or another, that “they” are somehow superior to “us”. They dispute the fact that, “All men are created equal,” and truly believe that this world would be a much better place without most of “us”. How can I say this? Consider the following statements:
My position is simply stated. Within the next half-century, it will be essential for the human species to have fully operational a flexibly designed, broadly equitable and internationally coordinated set of initiatives focussed on reducing the then-current world population by at least 80%. - J. Kenneth Smail, Professor of Anthropology Department of Anthropology/Sociology at Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio
Right now there are just way too many people on the planet. We need to cut the world’s population from the current 5 billion to no more than 250 – 350 million.” – Ted Turner, 1996
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. – Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, 1991 [Emphasis mine]
“Eliminate 350,000 per day…” that’s a lot of dead people! What are they going to do, simply go around shooting a whole bunch of people every day? I don’t think so; too many armed Americans. And just who do you think these folks are who are to be eliminated? Do you think they mean their own families? Who could they possibly mean if not us? Why do we trust these people?
Other ways of “eliminating” us had to be found. They actually have a multi-pronged attack in progress to which most of our citizenry are oblivious, although this is changing. More and more people are taking notice of chemtrails and the planes that are spraying us. These planes look eerily like UN planes.
There are many strange occurrences around UN activities. For example, the WHO (World Health Organization, which is the public health arm of the UN) was involved in distributing the hepatitis vaccine in Africa, only these very same people (the ones who received the vaccination) were among the very first known cases of AIDS in Africa. Coincidence? Personally, I don’t believe in coincidences.
Ever wonder why UN peacekeeping troupes are brought into a country but then are not allowed to use their weapons even when the evidence of genocide is obvious? I’ve been wondering this for years. Apparently they are not allowed to because they have a history of contributing to the genocide! The tales out of Africa are very disturbing; tales of UN troups raping and pillaging abound but are rarely reported, especially in the western media. That is because we (in the western world) do not care about Africa, and it appears to be racially motivated.
Population control not only involves ridding the world of “useless eaters” through disease and poison (chemtrails) but also through birth control. The WHO distributes more contraceptives than penicillin; why is that? Could it be that they are more interested in preventing births than maintaining the health of the world’s population?
"The doctor finds that while he cannot save the life of a woman dying of a simple pneumonia because he does not have a vial of penicillin which costs only a few cents, he could if he so desired, fit her with as many IUDs as he liked in her death throes. An IUD costs many times the price of penicillin." Dr. Margaret A. Ogola, Testimony on International Population Control Activities, 1994
“In villages where there is no portable water, no electricity, and no health care services, the major concern of these world population control agencies is not development but family planning clinics." African Caucus, Report on negative effects of population control on Africa Testimony on International Population Control Activities, 12 April 1994, sponsored by Population Research Institute
The WHO is expecting AIDS (with its 39% infection rate) to kill 66 million Africans by the year 2020, yet they refuse to teach abstinence, which studies have indicated is the only foolproof way to reduce the rate of infection. The testimonies above indicate that the UN is much more interested in birth control than healthcare.
In China the “one child per family” rule has been in effect for a number of years now and it touted by the world’s elite as a model for the rest of the world. Before we engage in this behavior as well, let’s take a look at the Chinese population. In the pre-school age group (infant to 5 years) there are 20% more males than females. This, added to the fact that there are already more men than women in China, is already beginning to cause problems. Chinese men are crossing the border into North Korea and kidnapping women, taking them back to China and making them their wives. Some of these women are already wives and mothers, taken from the husbands and children who need them, and made into sex slaves. Already 38% of women of childbearing age in China have been sterilized, many forcibly. Is this something we want to see here?
We need to open our eyes, because it is already happening. According to Linda Gordon, author of Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Societal History of Birth Control in America, twenty-four percent of the entire population of women of childbearing age were sterilized by 1987. We’re not too far behind China already. Not all of these women were sterilized willingly. Some Native Americans have testified to being coerced and even threatened with removal of their children if they did not consent to the surgery, being told that they were bad mothers. Most often these surgeries occurred within days of giving birth.
"One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death." - Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard - member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank; President of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution, which she co-founded.
Who gives these people the right to decide who lives and who dies? Ms. Hubbard sounds like she believes that they were given a divine appointment to the task, yet this woman does not believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. She is proud of the fact that they are going out to destroy. Just whom are they planning on destroying?
Just what is the agenda here? They are obviously not trying to commit suicide, so whom are they trying to kill? Michael Schwartz has made a strong accusation in his book entitled Overpopulation and the War Against the Poor, but his is not the only one. Here he quotes Population and Development by Eamonn Keane:
"The myth of overpopulation is one of the most powerful in the world... in reality it is nothing more than a rationalisation for a worldwide war against the poor - a war which inhibits legitimate development and social justice.... The Netherlands has four times the population density of its former colony Indonesia, but it is Indonesia and not the Netherlands that is said to have a problem of overpopulation."
The global elite has not hidden the fact that they want to reduce the world’s population. They have boldly stated, and continue to state the fact that a large part of the population must be eliminated. Since they are not going to eliminate themselves, whom else could they mean but us, the not so rich of the world?
In 1974, the National Security Council released a study entitled, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The council, headed by Henry Kissinger, stated that the population increase in lesser-developed countries posed grave danger to our national security. Countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia had "special political and strategic interests" for the United States.
Just how can too many Pakistanis be a threat to the national security of the Unites States? Now I can understand the concerns regarding Mexico, as we are seeing so many of their people coming here looking for work, but what about Thailand? Are they going to start invading our factories as well? I don’t think so, because we have already sent most of our factories over seas. But this study became national policy in 1975, and our government began what amounts to a war on the innocent citizens of these countries.
Certain officials in our government have convinced us that we need the United Nations in order to bring peace to the world, including Henry Kissinger, yet after over 60 years in existence have we seen any lessening in world conflicts? No, but we have seen the UN, and those who support UN activities, invade every aspect of our lives. Many do not realize that their support of the UN goes directly against the Constitution of the United States. The following comes from http://www.jpands.org:
Ergo, treaties ("made, or which shall be made") that violate the U.S. Constitution by subjugating the United States to an outside power ARE PROHIBITED, of no effect, and thus, null and void.
Since treaties are compacts between/among "the powers of the earth" of "separate and equal station" as stipulated in the Declaration of Independence, treaties may not be consummated with other than sovereign nations.
Consequently, for at least these two reasons --- 1) because the U.S. Senate in 1945 ratified the United Nations (UN) Charter as a treaty and the UN is not a sovereign nation, and 2) because membership in the UN makes the U.S. inferior to the UN --- U.S. "membership" in the United Nations is unconstitutional, FORBIDDEN, and thus declared null and void. Ditto for the World Court and the nebulous entanglements of the New World Order.
So, technically, the only power these folks have over us is that which we give them willingly. I, for one, am not longer willing to give them power over me.
The global elite believe that they have the right to not only limit the number of people populating this blue-green marble that we call home, but they believe it is also their right to decide who lives and who dies. They essentially want the same thing that Lucifer wanted; they want to be gods.
It may sound like the most unbelievable thing heard all year, but there is no denying the words from their speeches and journals. When we hear warnings of emerging pandemics and food shortages, all they are doing is simply informing us as to what they are doing next. It is not a threat; it is a warning. This is going to happen because they are working hard to make it happen. All it takes are a few high-powered people with enough money to pay off all the rest.