A History of Art in Ancient Egypt by Perrot and Chipiez - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Fig. 174.—Rameses II. in battle; Luxor. (Champollion, pl. 331.)

It will be seen that the difference between the two kinds of temple,

between that of the necropolis and that of the city, is not so striking

and conspicuous as to be readily perceived by the first comer who

crosses from the one bank of the river to the other; but the variations

are quite sufficiently marked to justify the distinction propounded by

Mariette. According to him the temples in the necropolis are funerary

chapels which owe their

273

increased size and the richness of their decoration to the general

magnificence and highly developed taste of the century in which they

were built. But it is enough for our present purpose to have indicated

the places which they occupied in the vast architectural compositions

which formed the tombs of a Seti or a Rameses. They had each a

double function to fulfil. They were foundations made to the perpetual

honour of a deceased king, chapels in which his fête-day could be

kept and the memory of his achievements renewed; but they were at

the same time temples in which the national gods were worshipped

by himself and his descendants, in which those gods were

perpetually adored for the services which

274

they had done him while alive and for those which they might still do

him when dead. In their latter capacity these buildings have a right to

be considered temples, and we shall defer the consideration of their

architectural arrangements, which differ only in details from those of

the purely religious buildings, until we come to speak of the religious

architecture of Egypt.

Fig. 175.—Painting in a royal tomb at Gournah. Amenophis

II. upon the lap of a goddess. (Champollion, pl. 160.)

We shall here content ourselves with remarking that the separation of

the tomb and the funerary chapel by some mile or mile and a half was

a novelty in Egypt. The different parts of the royal tomb were closely

connected under the Memphite Empire, and the change in

arrangement must have been a consequence of some modification in

the Egyptian notions as to a second life.

Fig. 176.—Amenophis III. presenting an offering to

Amen. Decoration of a pier at Thebes; from Prisse.

In the mastaba the double had everything within reach of his hand.

Without trouble to himself he could make use of all of the matters

which had been provided for the support of his precarious existence:

the corpse in the mummy pit, the statues in the serdab, the portraits

in bas-relief upon the walls of the public chamber. Through the chinks

between the pieces of stone by which the well was filled up, and

through the conduits contrived in the thickness of the walls, the magic

formulæ of the funerary prayers, the grateful scent of the incense,

and of the burnt fat of the victims (Fig. 177), reached his attentive senses. Brought thus into juxtaposition one with another, the

elements

275

of the tomb were mutually helpful. They lent themselves to that

intermittent act of condensation, so to speak, which from time to time

gave renewed substance and consistency to the phantom upon which

the future life of the deceased depended. This concentration of all the

acts and objects, which had for their aim the preservation of the

deceased for a second term of life, was obviously destroyed as soon

as the division of the tomb into two parts took place. The mummy,

hidden away in the depths of those horizontal wells in the flank of the

Western Range of which we have spoken, would seem to be in

danger of losing the benefit of the services held in its honour upon the

Theban plain. At such a distance it would neither hear the prayers nor

catch the scent of the offerings. And the double? Is it to be supposed

that he oscillated between the colossi in the temple where the

funerary sites were celebrated, and the chamber in which the corpse

reposed?

Fig. 177.—Flaying the funerary victim. From a tomb of the 5th

dynasty at Sakkarah. (Boulak.)

Before they could have accepted this division of the tomb into two

parts the Egyptians must have arrived at some less childish

conception of the future life than that of their early civilization.

276

That primitive conception was not entirely banished from their minds;

evidence of its persistency is, indeed plentiful, but a more intelligent

and less material notion gradually superimposed itself upon the

ancient belief. The indescribable being which was the representative

of the deceased after death became gradually less material and more

spiritual; in time it escaped from its enforced sojourn in the tomb and

approached more nearly to that which we call the soul. This soul, like

the nocturnal sun, passed a period of probation and purgation in the

under world, and, thanks to the protection of Osiris and the other

deities of the shades, was at last enabled to return to earth and rejoin

the body which it had formerly inhabited. The problem of death and a

future life was resolved in much the same way by the Greeks and by

all other races who drew much of their inspiration from the Egyptians.

They all looked upon the corpse as still alive when they expressed

their hopes that the earth upon which they poured out wine and milk

would like lie lightly upon it. After a time they added Tartarus and the

Elysian Fields to their beliefs, they introduced the heroic fathers of

their race into the councils of the gods, and they described and

figured the joys which awaited the just upon the Happy Islands.

These various hypotheses are contradictory enough from a logical

point of view; they exclude and destroy one another. But when it is a

question of notions which are essentially incapable of being strictly

defined, the human intelligence is singularly content to rest in vague

generalities. Contradictions do not embarrass it; its adaptability is

practically infinite.

The beliefs which we have just described tended for many centuries

to become more and more general. They were taught in that Ritual of

the Dead which, although certain of its parts date from the most

ancient times, did not take its complete and definite form until the

Theban epoch. Being more spiritual and less material, they were less

opposed to the subdivision of the sepulchre than the more primitive

idea; and this subdivision was necessary if the public and

commemorative part of the tomb were to receive a splendour and

amplitude befitting the exploits of a Thothmes, a Seti, or a Rameses.

Dayr-el-Bahari proves that the change had already been made under

the eighteenth dynasty, but it was not until the nineteenth that it

became definitely adopted. The progress of ideas and of art had then

advanced so far, that more

277

ambitious desires could be satisfied, and the country filled with

magnificent edifices, which, like the temples of the two Rameses,

were original in so far as they belonged at one and the same time to

religious and funerary architecture. We should call them cenotaphs,

were it not that the Egyptians, like all the other races of antiquity,

believed in the real presence of their dead in the buildings erected in

their honour.

Fig. 178.—Entrance to a royal tomb. ( Description de l'Égypte, ii.,

pl. 79.)

The other division of the tomb is that which contains the well and the

mummy-chamber, the eternal dwelling-place of the illustrious dead.

The second half of the royal sepulchre had to be as sumptuous and

luxurious in its way as the first, but the problem placed before the

architect was diametrically opposed to that which he had to solve in

the other part of his task. In constructing and decorating the funerary

temple upon the plain, he was working before the eyes of the public,

for their benefit and for that of the remotest posterity.

278

But the task of hewing out the tomb was a very different one. For long

years together he pursued his enterprise in the mystery and shadow

of a subterranean workshop, to which all access was no doubt

forbidden to the curious. He and his assistants cut and carved the

living rock by the light of torches, and his best ingenuity was taxed to

devise means for preserving from the sight of all future generations

those works of the best artists of Egypt with which the walls were to

be covered. Those prodigies of patience and skill were executed for

the benefit of the deceased alone. Important though it was that the

sepulchre of a great man should be ornamented to the greatest

extent possible, it was of still greater moment that his last resting-

place should not be troubled by the visits of the living; and the more

completely the mummy was concealed, the greater were the deserts

of the faithful servant upon whom the task had been placed.

In order that this blessing of undisturbed peace in his eternal dwelling

should be secured, the royal tomb seems to have been constructed

without any such external show as would call attention to its situation.

The tombs of private individuals usually had a walled courtyard in

front of them to which access was obtained by a kind of porch, or

tower, with inclined sides and crowned by a small pyramid. But the

explorers, Belzoni, Bruce and others, who disengaged the entrances

to the royal tombs, found them without propylæa of any kind.[246] The doorway, cut vertically in the rock, is of the utmost simplicity, and we

have every reason to suppose that, after the introduction of the

mummy, it was carefully masked with sand and rocky débris.[247]

The existence of the temples in the plain made it unnecessary that

the tombs themselves should be entered after that final

279

operation had been performed. Some words of Diodorus are

significant in this direction. "The priests say that their registers attest

the existence of forty-seven royal tombs, but that at the time of

Ptolemy the son of Lagus, only seventeen remained."[248] This assertion cannot be accepted literally, because twenty-one tombs

have already been discovered in the Bab-el-Molouk, some of them in

a state of semi-completion, besides four in the ravine which is called

the Valley of the West, which makes twenty-five in all. What the

priests meant when they spoke to Diodorus was no doubt, that at the

time of the Ptolemies, no more than seventeen of their entrances had

been discovered. If through the plans made for their construction and

preserved in the national archives there were some who knew their

situation, they preserved the secret. We know, by the inscriptions

upon their walls, that fifteen of the tombs which are now accessible,

were open in the time of the Ptolemies; several of them seem to have

been shown, to the Roman and other travellers who visited Egypt, as

national objects of interest.[249]

The precautions taken to hide and obstruct the openings of the royal

tombs were thus successful in many cases. Some of these have only

been discovered in our own times, through the ardour and patience

which characterize modern research, and we have still good reason

to suppose that there are others which yet remain to be found. In

1872 Professor Ebers discovered a beautiful private tomb, that of

Anemenheb, which, although situated close to one of the most

frequented paths in the necropolis, had been previously unknown. It

was open, but the opening had been carefully concealed with rough

pieces of rock and general rubbish by the fellahs, who used the tomb

as a hiding-place from the recruiting officers of the viceroy. They

would remain concealed in it for weeks at a time until the officers had

left their village. The royal cemetery of the Ramessides has possibly

much more to tell us before its secrets are exhausted.

The entrance to the tomb always ran a certain chance of being

discovered and freed from its obstacles. It was difficult, of course, to

prevent the survival of some tradition as to the

280

whereabouts of the burial-places of those great sovereigns whose

memory was a consolation to Egyptian pride in the days of national

abasement and decay. Provision had to be made, as in the case of

the pyramids, against a forced entry into the gallery either by an

enemy or by some robber in search of treasure, and we find that the

precautions adopted were similar to those which we have described

in noticing the royal tombs at Memphis. Let us take as an example

the finest and most complete of all the tombs of the Ramessides, that

of Seti I. After descending two flights of steps, and traversing two long

and richly decorated corridors, Belzoni arrived, without discovering

either sarcophagus or anything that looked like the site of a

sarcophagus, at an oblong chamber 13 feet 6 inches by 12 feet. A

wide and deep well, which here barred the passage, seemed to

indicate that the extremity of the excavation had been reached.

Belzoni caused himself to be lowered into the well. The walls were

everywhere hard and firm, and without resonance, and there was no

sign of a passage, either open or concealed, by which access to a

lateral chamber, or to a second series of galleries might be obtained.

But Belzoni was too old an explorer to be deceived by such

appearances. On his first arrival at the edge of the well he had

perceived in the wall on the farther side of it a small opening, about

two feet wide, and two feet and a half high. This had been made, at

some unknown period, in a wall covered with stucco and painted

decorations. Across the well a beam was still lying, which had served

the purpose of some previous visitor to the tomb. A cord hung from

this beam, and it was after discovering that the well ended in nothing

that the screen of masonry on the other side had been pierced.

Belzoni had therefore only to follow the road opened for him by earlier

explorers. A plank bridge was thrown across the well, the opening

was enlarged, and a new series of galleries and chambers was

reached, which led at last to the sarcophagus-chamber itself.[250]

Belzoni remarked that throughout the whole course of the excavation

the doors of the chambers showed evidence of having been walled

up, and that upon the first steps of one of the staircases a heap of

stone rubbish had been collected, as if to discourage any one who

might penetrate beyond the well and pierce the barrier beyond its

gaping mouth. It seems likely that the

281

first violator of the tomb knew the secret of all these arrangements,

and consequently that its first opening took place in very ancient

times, and was the work of some native Egyptian robber.

In the sarcophagus-chamber Belzoni discovered a contrivance of the

same kind as that which had failed to stop him almost upon the

threshold of the tomb. The sarcophagus of oriental alabaster was in

place, but empty; the lid had been raised and broken.[251] From the sound given out by the floor when struck the explorer perceived that

there must be a hollow space under the base of the sarcophagus. He

cut a hole and brought to light the first steps of a staircase, which led

to an inclined plane by which the interior of the mountain was deeply

penetrated. A wall had been raised at the foot of these steps, beyond

which a settlement of the superincumbent rock put an end to all

advance after a distance of fifty-one yards had been traversed. Is it

not possible that Belzoni only discovered a false sarcophagus, placed

to deceive unbidden visitors like himself, and that the mummy was

deposited, and still lies, in a chamber at the end of this corridor? The

point at which the fallen rock arrested his progress is four hundred

and eighty-three feet from the external opening, and about one

hundred and eighty below the level of the valley. At such a depth, in

these narrow and heated galleries, where there is no ventilation and

where the smoke of the torches rapidly becomes stifling, it is not

astonishing that, in spite of his admirable perseverance, Belzoni held

his hand before completing the exploration.[252]

These subterranean tombs are hardly less astonishing than the

colossal masses of the pyramids for the sustained effort which they

imply; if we take the trouble to reflect upon the peculiarly difficult

conditions under which they were constructed, they may even

impress our imaginations more profoundly than the artificial

mountains of Cheops and Chephren. We have already mentioned a

figure which gives some idea of the surprising length of their

passages; and although no one of the other tombs quite equals that

of Seti, many approach it in dimensions. The tomb of Rameses III. is

416 feet long, that of Siptah 370 feet, and

282

others varied between 200 and 270 feet. For the construction of such

places an enormous number of cubic yards of rocky débris had to be

cut from the interior of the mountain, and carried up by narrow and

steep corridors to be "shot" in the open air. Still more surprising is the

elegance and completeness of the decoration. In the tombs of Seti

and of Rameses III. there is not a single surface, whether of walls,

piers, or ceilings, which is not covered with the work of the chisel and

the brush, with ornamental designs, with the figures of gods and

genii, of men and animals. These figures are far too numerous to

count. They swarm like ants in an anthill; a single chamber often

contains many hundreds. Colour is everywhere; here it is used to give

salience to the delicate contours of the figures in relief, there it is

283

laid flat upon the carefully-prepared surfaces of white stucco. In these

sealed-up caverns, in which the air is constantly warm and dry, the

pictures have preserved their freshness of tint in the most startling

fashion. And to obtain all this harmonious effect no light but an

artificial one was available. It was by the smoky glare of torches, or

by the flickering flame of little terra-cotta lamps, suspended from the

roof by metal threads, that the patient artists of Egypt drew these

masterly contours, and elaborated the exquisite harmony of their

colour compositions. Egyptian art never reached greater perfection

than in these characteristic productions of its genius, and yet no

human eye was to enjoy them after that day upon which the final

touch was to be given to their beauties, upon which they were to be

inclosed in a night which, it was hoped, would be eternal.

Fig. 179.—Plan of the tomb of Rameses II.; from Prisse.

Fig. 180.—Horizontal section of the same tomb; from Prisse.[253]

But yet all this work was not labour lost. These pictures, in which the

details change continually from one tomb to another, were all inspired

by a single desire, and all tended to the same

284

end. Like those which we have found in the tombs of the Ancient

Empire, they had a sort of magic virtue, a sovereign power to save

and redeem. The personages and articles of food represented on the

mastabas were shadows of people and shadows of material

sustenance, destined for the service and the food of a shadow, the

double of the defunct proprietor of the tomb. The all-powerful

influence of prayer and faith, working through Osiris, turned these

shadows into realities.

Fig. 181.—The smaller sarcophagus-chamberin the tomb of

Rameses VI. (From Horeau, pl. 21.)[254]

Representations of this kind are common enough in the royal tombs

of Thebes. It will suffice if we notice those which are still to be seen in

the sepulchre of Rameses III., in the series of small chambers in the

first two passages. Like the hunting scene which we take from the

walls of a private tomb (Fig. 183), these pictures have, beyond a doubt, the same meaning and value as those in the mastaba. But in

the Theban tombs their significance is only secondary. Ideas had

progressed to some purpose since the days of the Memphite kings.

Both in its general arrangement and in the details of its

ornamentation,

285

the sepulchres in the Bab-el-Molouk gave expression to the new,

more philosophical, and more moral conception which had come to

overlie the primitive beliefs.

Fig. 182.—Entrance to the tomb of Rameses III. (From Horeau, pl.

21.)

The first conception was that of the double, inhabiting the tomb, and

kept alive in it by sacrifice and prayer. But in time the Egyptians would

appear to have realized that the double was not the only thing that

remained after the death of a human unit. Their powers of

apprehension were quickened, in all probability, by that high moral

instinct of which the oldest pages of their literature give evidence.

Good or bad, every man had a double, the continuance and

prosperity of which depended in no way upon his merits or demerits.

Unless the just and the unjust were to come to one and the same

end, something more was wanting. This something was the soul ( ba).