Greek Women by Mitchell Carroll - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

One day in March of the year 415, Peter secretly gathered in an alley

not far from the lecture hall of Hypatia a band of savage monks from the

Nitrian desert. When the customary lecture hour approached, Hypatia,

unconscious of danger, left her house and entered her chariot to drive

to the lecture hall. Soon the mob of zealots, headed by Peter, rush out

from the alley, seize the horses, tear the helpless woman from her seat,

and drag her into a neighboring church. Here, more like savage beasts

than men, Peter's frenzied followers remove from her every shred of

clothing, and at the foot of the bleeding image of the Saviour of

mankind do to death the virgin martyr in the most horrible manner with

fragments of tiles and mussel shells. The limbs are torn from the still

quivering body, and, when life is extinct, the howling mob gather up and

burn the fragments of the mutilated corpse.

It was a horrible deed. The life of a beautiful and talented maiden was

sacrificed for the cause which she professed, and, like many a Christian

maiden, she attained by her death the sanctity of martyrdom. The purity

and nobility of her character invested her with an enduring fame, and,

though her end marks the doom of the old gods, Hypatia herself will

never be forgotten. Judged by the abiding results of her activity,

Hypatia was, like Shelley, "a beautiful and ineffectual angel beating in

the void her luminous wings in vain," but as the embodiment of the

highest and best elements of Greek culture she deserves to rank as one

of the most typical of Greek women.

* * * * *

A peculiar and deep-rooted trait in woman's nature is tender compassion

and sympathetic devotion to suffering humanity. Hence from heroic times

onward through the various epochs of Greek history we find women at the

bedside of the sick and the wounded, acting as attendant, nurse, or

physician. Thus it is not surprising that we should find Greek women

preeminent in the art of medicine.

In the Heroic Age, Homeric heroines were gifted with a knowledge of

plants and their virtues. Hecate, wife of King AEetes of Colchis, her

daughter Medea, and Circe were so celebrated in this respect that they

passed for enchantresses. One has but to recall the transformation of

Odysseus's companions into swine as an evidence of Circe's peculiar

power. All the daughters of Asclepius the physician--

Hygiea, Panacea,

Iaso, and AEgle--were specialists in medicine. Helen of Troy knew how to

compound her celebrated potion, Nepenthe, which made men forget all care

and enjoy sound slumbers; and OEnone, the forsaken wife of Paris, and

Agamede, daughter of a king of Elis, were skilled in the use of simples.

In historical times, the Thessalian women were noted for their knowledge

of the virtues of plants, and were acquainted with all forms of

witchcraft. They were frequently consulted for the preparation of "love

potions," and, as midwives, were in demand throughout Hellas. Women

naturally preferred women's services in those ailments which are

peculiar to the sex; but in ancient Athens, so unfriendly to the female

sex in its laws, there was a statute forbidding the practice of

gynaecology by women as a profession. Women rebelled, but their

complaints were without avail.

Agnodice, whose date is not known, was the name of the courageous maiden

who broke the prevailing traditions and won a natural right for her sex.

She conceived the idea of studying medicine in secret until she became

an expert, and then of offering her services to women, also in secret,

for medical treatment, especially in cases of maternity.

To this end,

she cut off her hair, adopted masculine apparel, and, as a promising

youth, took instruction in medicine from Hierophilus, a celebrated

physician. Her progress was rapid, and when she was pronounced

sufficiently equipped for independent practice she revealed her identity

to prospective mothers, who gladly availed themselves of her services,

so that she soon obtained the monopoly of this kind of practice. The

other physicians were naturally overcome with jealousy and chagrin that

the young doctor should supplant them, and finally they brought charges

of malpractice against the supposed youth. Agnodice was brought to

trial, and in self-defence was compelled to reveal her sex. The older

physicians then endeavored to have the laws enforced against her; but

all the prominent ladies of the city took her part, and the obnoxious

laws were repealed.

From that time forward, large numbers of women studied medicine, the

majority devoting their attention to the diseases of women and children.

These female physicians frequently appear as medical writers, especially

on gynaecology and pediatrics. They also produced many treatises on

cosmetics, which ranked as a branch of hygiene and was cultivated most

diligently by many eminent physicians. These women rivalled one another

in the discovery of an endless variety of toilet preparations, beauty

wafers, skin and hair ointments, pastes and powders, and wine essences

for the removal of pimples and freckles.

In later and more immoral times, female physicians lent their talents

gladly to demoralization and license, and wrote treatises on love

potions and abortives--a disreputable form of literature very popular

with the hetserae, and which, according to Pliny, found diligent readers

among the great ladies of Rome. Of all the numerous works of the

feminine doctors, only fragments and excerpts have come down to us, and

their loss is not greatly to be regretted. Yet credit is due to these

women as pioneers in female emancipation, and the most eminent of them

deserve to be rescued from oblivion.

The greatest was Aspasia--not the favorite of Pericles nor the devoted

companion of Cyrus the Younger, but the "medical"

Aspasia, who was a

prominent figure in the Athens of the fourth century before the

Christian era. She attained great fame, not only in women's diseases,

but also in surgery and other branches of medicine, as may be judged

from the titles of her works, preserved by Aetius, a physician and

writer of the fifth century of our era. It seems clear from what is

known of her that the Athenian women saw nothing criminal in giving and

using abortives. Even Aristotle desired to have a law regulating the

number of children that might be borne by woman.

Antiochis, to whom Heraclides of Tarentum, one of the best physicians of

antiquity, dedicated his works, was a practising female physician in

Magna Graecia, in the third century before Christ, who devoted especial

attention to salves and plaster cures. To the great Cleopatra has been

ascribed the authorship of a work "on the medical means of preserving

beauty"; but there were probably one or more physicians of this name, as

there are various treatises ascribed to "Cleopatra."

Other female

physicians, of whom we know little more than the name and the titles of

their works, are Olympias of Boeotia, Salpe, Elephantis, Sotira,

Pamphile, Myro, Spendusa, Maia, and Berenice.

Space will not suffer us to do more than call attention to many wise and

able women of Hellas who were eminent in other branches of learning. In

historical writings, Thucydides's daughter is worthy of mention, as she

is said to have composed the eighth book of her father's history of the

Peloponnesian War; Nicobule, the author of a history of Alexander the

Great, was another excellent woman writer. Plutarch gathered about him a

learned circle of women, of whom the chief was Clea, the clever matron

of Delphi, to whom he dedicated several of his works, and Eurydice, who

enjoyed his instruction. Aganice, daughter of Hegetor of Thessaly,

possessed an astonishing knowledge of astronomy, and was regarded as an

enchantress. To Melanippe, the sculptor Lysistratus erected a monument

as a tribute to her learning.

Alexandria, with its vast number of scholars, its libraries and museums,

and its intellectual freedom for women, naturally produced a large

number of women eminent in history and philology.

Frequently

philologists' daughters were trained from childhood by their fathers,

and afterward became their companions and secretaries in literary

labors. The most prominent of these literary feminine grammarians was

doubtless Hestiaea of Alexandria, a Homeric scholar of note, who was the

first to devote scientific attention to the topography of the Iliad and

to throw doubt on the generally accepted view that New Ilium was the

site of Ancient Troy. Pamphile, daughter of the grammarian Soteridas and

wife of the scholar Socratidas, was a woman of wide erudition,

celebrated especially as essayist and historian. Others whose names are

associated with similar labors are Agallis, Theodora, and Theosebia.

When one reflects on the varied activity of Greek women, the conclusion

forces itself upon him that they were intellectually as acquisitive and

as brilliant as the Greek men, who have set the standard for the world

in the realm of literature and science. Cleverness is the most salient

characteristic of the Greek intelligence, and this trait belonged as

truly to the female sex as to the male. The Renaissance furnishes

examples of women renowned for their erudition and culture; but perhaps

only the present age furnishes an adequate parallel to the varied

intellectual activities of Greek women in the centuries that followed

the decline of Greek independence and that saw the spread of Greek

culture among all civilized peoples. Modern women can therefore learn

much from their Greek sisters in all that pertains to the so-called

emancipation of the sex.

XIV

THE MACEDONIAN WOMAN

Separated from the lands of the Hellenes by the range of the Cambunian

Mountains which extended north of Thessaly from Mount Olympus on the

east to Mount Lacmon on the west, there lay a rugged country, whose

inhabitants were destined to play a prominent role and become a powerful

factor in the later history of Greece. This country, divided into many

basins by spurs which branch off from the higher mountain chains, by its

mountain system not only shut the people off from the outside world, but

also forbade any extended intercourse between the dwellers in the

various cantons. The wide and fertile valleys, however, and the mountain

slopes abounding in extensive forests, the haunts of wild game, mark the

land as the country of a great people, who by generations of seclusion

were storing up strength and vitality to be of vast influence whenever

they should break through their narrow confines.

Such a people dwelt there, but it required strong leaders to bring them

in touch with the rich Hellenic life to the south of them and to make

them a powerful factor in the history of the world.

Philip, lord of

Macedon, and his mightier son, Alexander, were the great men who were to

accomplish the work of grafting the new blood and energy of Macedon

upon the decaying stock of Greek culture, and to diffuse the spirit of

Hellenism throughout the civilized world. With them the old order of

things, as represented in Athens and Sparta, passed away, and a new

order, with new ideals, new motives, new views of life, was born. Hence,

the people of Macedon, themselves Greek by race, have a large place in

the consideration of any phase of Greek life. When the Hellenes

originally migrated into Greece, a branch of the race found its way into

the southwestern part of Macedon behind the barriers of Olympus, and

later, by intermixture with the Illyrians and other barbarous races,

these invaders lost some of their national characteristics and, shut off

as they were, failed to share in the history and development of their

kinsmen to the south. In language, in institutions, and in aspirations,

however, they gave indisputable evidence of their right to be considered

as members of the great Hellenic family.

The people were a hardy, peasant folk, devoted to hunting, to grazing,

and to agriculture, and they preserved the patriarchal institutions

which obtained among the earliest Greeks. They were divided into many

tribes, each with its own chief and leader. Among some of the hardier

tribes, the man who had not slain a wild boar was not allowed to recline

at table with the warriors, and not to have slain an enemy was regarded

as a mark of disgrace. In the tribal organization and in the institution

of the kingship, we are carried back to the society of Homeric times,

and in manifold ways the public and private life of the Macedonians

reflects the life portrayed in the Iliad and the Odyssey.

Aristotle remarks that the ancient kingship survived only among the

Spartans, the Molossians, and the Macedonians, of all the Greek peoples;

and only among the last mentioned did the office retain all its

prerogatives. As in the Heroic Age, so in Macedon, the king was supreme

judge, military commander-in-chief, and at the head of the religion of

the State. But he was no Oriental despot. The people were conscious of

their liberty and sensitive as to their rights. By the side of the king

stood the nobles, who were closely associated with him at all times,

constituting his council, accompanying him to war, and sharing with him

his dangers and his honors. As the population was largely rural, there

were present none of the conditions which tend to nullify clan

distinctions and create a democracy. The lines between noble and peasant

were very broad. Hence, Macedon was essentially a dynastic State, and

its history is largely the history of its royal family.

As we have

frequently noted, in monarchies woman is ever a most influential factor,

A king must have a court, and there can be no court without a queen. The

queen's life has necessarily its public, political, and military

aspects; and the part she plays largely determines the weal or woe of

both king and people. Hence it is with the royal family of Macedon, and

with those queens and princesses who make up a large part of its

history, that we are now chiefly concerned.

The royal family of Macedon claimed descent from members of the ancient

Heracleid family of Argos, which had taken refuge in the north; and this

descent was so capable of proof, that, on the basis of it, one of the

earlier kings was admitted to the Olympic games.

Herodotus, the great

story teller, relates the incident of the founding of the dynasty.

According to his narration, three brothers of the royal race of

Temenus,--the fourth in descent from Heracles,--Gauanes, Eropus, and

Perdiccas, exiles from Argos, went into Illyria, and thence into upper

Macedon, where they placed themselves, as herdsmen, at the service of

Lebea, one of the local kings. Now, when the queen baked the bread for

their food, she always noticed that the loaf destined for Perdiccas

doubled its weight; she made this marvel known to her husband, who saw

danger in it, and ordered the three brothers to depart from the country.

They replied that they would go as soon as they had received their

wages. Thereupon the king, who was sitting by the hearth, on which fell

sunlight through the opening of the roof, as if by divine inspiration

said to the brothers, pointing to the light on the floor: "I will give

you that; that is your wages." Upon this, the two elder brothers stood

speechless; but the younger, who held a knife in his hand, said: "Very

well; we accept it." And having traced with his knife a circle on the

floor surrounding the rays, he stooped down thrice, feigning each time

to take up the sunshine and place it in the folds of his garment and to

distribute it to his brothers; after which, they all went away. One of

those who sat by called the attention of the king to this conduct on the

part of the young man, and the manner in which he accepted what was

offered him; and the king, becoming anxious and angry, sent horsemen to

follow the brothers and slay them. Now in that country is a river, to

which the descendants of these Argives offer sacrifice as to a god. This

river, after the fugitives had crossed it, became suddenly so swollen

that the horsemen dared not follow. The brothers arrived in another part

of Macedon and established themselves near the lake called the Gardens

of Midas, and, when they had subjugated the country in those parts, they

went thence to conquer the rest of Macedon.

Herodotus states that Perdiccas I. founded the reigning dynasty in

Macedon, and he mentions as his successors Argaeus, Philip, Eropus,

Alcetas, and Amyntas I., whose son, Alexander "the Philheliene," the

Greeks permitted to take part in the Olympic games. This Alexander on

one occasion visited dire punishment upon a party of Persian envoys who

at a banquet forgot the respect due to the ladies at the court of

Macedon; he caused them to be assassinated by a company of young men

whom he had disguised in women's attire. When the Persians sent to

require the punishment of the guilty, Alexander won over the envoy by

giving him his sister in marriage.

This Alexander, who became king in the year 500 before the Christian

era, begins the series of those Macedonian kings who felt the need of

Hellenizing their people, and his reign accordingly marks a turning

point in the history of Macedon. Perdiccas II., Archelaus I., and

Amyntas II. were his successors, who continued this policy; but this

forced civilization by no means reached the mass of the people, and,

while it refined the nobility and the court and paved the way for the

Macedonian inroads into Greece, it also introduced luxury and

corruption. Amyntas II. left three sons, Alexander II., Perdiccas III.,

and Philip, the last of whom was the one so well known to fame; and

Eurydice, the mother of these three valiant sons, was the first of that

series of remarkable women, noted for their power, their beauty, or

their crimes, who from this time on fill the annals of Macedonian

history.

In her barbarous instincts, Eurydice gives evidence of the non-Hellenic

blood in her veins. Her career in crime was such as to place her among

the Messalinas and Lucrezia Borgias of history. To begin with, she was

implicated in a conspiracy with a paramour, Ptolemaeus of Alorus, against

her husband's life; but when the plot was detected, she was, out of

regard for their three sons, mercifully spared by her husband.

Alexander, the eldest, succeeded his father, but, after reigning two

years, was assassinated by Ptolemaeus, with his own mother as an

accomplice of the murderer. When Perdiccas grew to manhood, he avenged

his brother's death and his mother's disgrace by slaying Ptolemaeus; but

he himself, a few years later, fell in battle against the Illyrians, or,

as was asserted, at the hand of an assassin hired by his mother

Eurydice. Philip, the next in succession, then ascended the throne, and

succeeded in securing himself against the attempts of his mother and in

conciliating all factions. Eurydice then disappears from the scene, and

the manner of her death is unknown. Heredity, without doubt, had much to

do with the cruelty in Philip's nature, and in spite of her crimes he

seems to have had much respect for his sanguinary mother, for he placed

a figure of her among the gold-and-ivory statues embellishing the

monument he erected to commemorate his victory over the Athenians and

Thebans at Chaeronea.

We are not concerned here with the rise of Philip's power over Hellas,

nor with the history of his son Alexander and the empire he established,

except in so far as the spread of Hellenism and the union of the world

under one dominion brought about changes in social conditions which

affected the status of woman. We shall, for the present, confine our

attention to the consideration of those women, chiefly royal princesses,

whose names group themselves about the careers of Philip and Alexander

and their immediate successors, and who by their strong personalities

greatly influenced the course of events.

A few general reflections will prepare us for the sombre history which

we are about to read. The Macedonian kings were, as a rule, not content

with one wife; they either kept concubines, or married a second wife, as

did Philip and Alexander, while the first was living.

This practice led

to jealousy, envy, and hatred, and the attendant ills of constant and

bloody tragedies in the royal families. We find henceforth a

combination of Greek manners and Macedonian nature. In the life of the

courts, women as well as men, in spite of their Greek culture, show the

Thracian traits of passion and cruelty. Owing to the intense respect in

which women were held, the royal princesses occupied an exalted station

and hence found willing instruments for the carrying-out of their cruel

practices. Every king was either murdered or conspired against by his

family. Women entered into matrimonial alliances with a view to

increasing their power and extending their influence.

Hence, the women

who played so prominent a part in the great struggles that attended

Philip's extension of his power over all Hellas, Alexander's conquest of

the world, and the founding of independent dynasties by the Diadochi and

their descendants, were not women who attained the Thucydidean ideal of

excellence; namely, that those are the best women who are never

mentioned among men for good or for evil. They were, on the contrary,

powerful and haughty princesses, who possessed royal rights and

privileges, who had resources of their own in money and soldiery, who

could address their troops with fiery speeches and go forth to battle at

the head of their armies, who made offers of marriage to men, and who

finally got rid of their rivals with sinister coolness and cruelty.

Philip the Great followed the Oriental fashion of marrying many wives;

according to Athenaeus, he was continually marrying new wives in war

times, and seven more or less regular marriages are attributed to him.

Of his numerous wives or mistresses, the strong-minded Olympias was the

chief; and, as she survived both her husband Philip and her son

Alexander, she played a dominant part in Macedonian history and was the

most prominent woman of those stormy times. Olympias was the daughter

of Neoptolemus, King of Epirus, who traced his lineage back to

Neoptolemus, son of Achilles. Philip is said to have fallen in love with

Olympias while both were being initiated into some religious mysteries

in Samothrace, at a time when he was still a stripling and she an

orphan. He was ardent in his suit, and, gaining the consent of her

brother Arymbas, he shortly after married her. We know nothing of the

first few years of their married life, but the union seems never to have

been a happy one. Both were of too decided individuality to blend well

together. Says President Wheeler: "Both were preeminently ambitious,

energetic, and aggressive; but while Philip's ambition was guided by a

cool, crafty sagacity, that of his queen manifested itself in impetuous

outbreaks of almost barbaric emotion. In her, joined a marvellous

compound of the mother, the queen, the shrew, and the witch. Th