The Man‐Made World
X. LAW AND GOVERNMENT.
It is easy to assume that men are naturally the lawmakers and law‐
enforcers, under the plain historic fact that they have been such since the beginning of the patriarchate.
Back of law lies custom and tradition. Back of government lies the correlative activity of any organized group. What group‐insects and group‐animals evolve unconsciously and fulfill by their social instincts, we evolve consciously and fulfill by arbitrary systems called laws and governments. In this, as in all other fields of our action, we must discriminate between the humanness of the function
in process of development, and the influence of the male or female upon it. Quite apart from what they may like or dislike as sexes, from their differing tastes and faculties, lies the much larger field of human progress, in which they equally participate.
On this plane the evolution of law and government proceeds somewhat as follows:—The early woman‐centered group organized
on maternal lines of common love and service. The early
combinations of men were first a grouped predacity—organized hunting; then a grouped belligerency,—organized warfare.
By special development some minds are able to perceive the need of
certain lines of conduct over others, and to make this clear to their fellows; whereby, gradually, our higher social nature establishes rules and precedents to which we personally agree to submit. The process of social development is one of progressive co‐ordination.
From independent individual action for individual ends, up to interdependent social action for social ends we slowly move; the
“devil” in the play being the old Ego, which has to be harmonized with the new social spirit. This social process, like all others, having been in masculine hands, we may find in it the same marks of one-sided Specialization so visible in our previous studies.
The coersive attitude is essentially male. In the ceaseless age‐old struggle of sex combat he developed the desire to overcome, which
is always stimulated by resistance; and in this later historic period of his supremacy, he further developed the habit of dominance and mastery. We may instance the contrast between the conduct of a man
when “in love” and while courting; in which period he falls into the natural position of his sex towards the other—namely, that of a 75
The Man‐Made World
wooer; and his behavior when, with marriage, they enter the, artificial relation of the master male and servile female. His “instinct of dominance” does not assert itself during the earlier period, which was a million times longer than the latter; it only appears in the more modern and arbitrary relation.
Among other animals monogamous union is not accompanied by
any such discordant and unnatural features. However recent as this
habit is when considered biologically, it is as old as civilization when we consider it historically: quite old enough to be a serious force.
Under its pressure we see the legal systems and forms of
government slowly evolving, the general human growth always
heavily perverted by the special masculine influence. First we find the mere force of custom governing us, the mores of the ancient people. Then comes the gradual appearance of authority, from the purely natural leadership of the best hunter or fighter up through the unnatural mastery of the patriarch, owning and governing his wives, children, slaves and cattle, and making such rules and regulations as pleased him.
Our laws as we support them now are slow, wasteful, cumbrous systems, which require a special caste to interpret and another to enforce; wherein the average citizen knows nothing of the law, and
cares only to evade it when he can, obey it when he must. In the household, that stunted, crippled rudiment of the matriarchate, where alone we can find what is left of the natural influence of woman, the laws and government, so far as she is responsible for them, are fairly simple, and bear visible relation to the common good, which relation is clearly and persistently taught.
In the larger household of city and state the educational part of the law is grievously neglected. It makes no allowance for ignorance. If a man breaks a law of which he never heard he is not excused therefore; the penalty rolls on just the same. Fancy a mother making solemn rules and regulations for her family, telling the children nothing about them, and then punishing them when they disobeyed
the unknown laws!
The use of force is natural to the male; while as a human being he must needs legislate somewhat in the interests of the community, as a male being he sees no necessity for other enforcement than by penalty. To violently oppose, to fight, to trample to the earth, to triumph in loud bellowings of savage joy,—these are the primitive 76
The Man‐Made World
male instincts; and the perfectly natural social instinct which leads to peaceful persuasion, to education, to an easy harmony of action, are contemptuously ranked as “feminine,” or as “philanthropic,”—
which is almost as bad. “Men need stronger measures” they say proudly. Yes, but four‐fifths of the world are women and children!
As a matter of fact the woman, the mother, is the first co‐ordinator, legislator, administrator and executive. From the guarding and guidance of her cubs and kittens up to the longer, larger management of human youth, she is the first to consider group interests and co‐relate them.
As a father the male grows to share in these original feminine functions, and with us, fatherhood having become socialized while motherhood has not, he does the best he can, alone, to do the world‘s mother‐work in his father way.
In study of any long established human custom it is very difficult to see it clearly and dispassionately. Our minds are heavily loaded with precedent, with race‐custom, with the iron weight called authority.
These heavy forces reach their most perfect expression in the absolutely masculine field of warfare. The absolute authority; the brainless, voiceless obedience; the relentless penalty. Here we have male coercion at its height; law and government wholly arbitrary.
The result is as might be expected, a fine machine of destruction. But destruction is not a human process—merely a male process of eliminating the unfit.
The female process is to select the fit; her elimination is negative and painless.
Greater than either is the human process, to develop fitness.
Men are at present far more human than women. Alone upon their
self‐seized thrones they have carried as best they might the burdens of the state; and the history of law and government shows them as changing slowly but irresistably in the direction of social improvement.
The ancient kings were the joyous apotheosis of masculinity. Power
and Pride were theirs; Limitless Display; Boundless Self‐indulgence; Irresistable Authority. Slaves and courtiers bowed before them, subjects obeyed them, captive women filled their harems. But the 77
The Man‐Made World
day of the masculine monarchy is passing, and the day of the human
democracy is coming in. In a Democracy Law and Government both
change. Laws are no longer imposed on the people by one above them, but are evolved from the people themselves. How absurd that
the people should not be educated in the laws they make; that the trailing remnants of blind submission should still becloud their minds and make them bow down patiently under the absurd
pressure of outgrown tradition!
Democratic government is no longer an exercise of arbitrary authority from one above, but is an organization for public service of the people themselves—or will be when it is really attained.
In this change government ceases to be compulsion, and becomes agreement; law ceases to be authority and becomes co‐ordination.
When we learn the rules of whist or chess we do not obey them because we fear to be punished if we don‘t, but because we want to
play the game. The rules of human conduct are for our own happiness and service—any child can see that. Every child will see it when laws are simplified, based on sociology, and taught in schools.
A child of ten should be considered grossly uneducated who could not rewrite the main features of the laws of his country, state, and city; and those laws should be so simple in their principles that a child of ten could understand them.
Teacher: “What is a tax?”
Child: “A tax is the money we agree to pay to keep up our common
advantages.”
Teacher: “Why do we all pay taxes?”
Child: “Because the country belongs to all of us, and we must all pay our share to keep it up.”
Teacher: “In what proportion do we pay taxes?”
Child: “In proportion to how much money we have.” ( Sotto voce: “Of course!”)
Teacher: “What is it to evade taxes?”
Child: “It is treason.” ( Sotto voce: “And a dirty mean trick.”) 78
The Man‐Made World
In masculine administration of the laws we may follow the
instinctive love of battle down through the custom of “trial by combat”—only recently outgrown, to our present method, where each contending party hires a champion to represent him, and these
fight it out in a wordy war, with tricks and devices of complex ingenuity, enjoying this kind of struggle as they enjoy all other kinds.
It is the old masculine spirit of government as authority which is so slow in adapting itself to the democratic idea of government as service. That it should be a representative government they grasp, but representative of what? of the common will, they say; the will of the majority;—never thinking that it is the common good, the common welfare, that government should represent.
It is the inextricable masculinity in our idea of government which so revolts at the idea of women as voters. “To govern:” that means to boss, to control, to have authority; and that only, to most minds.
They cannot bear to think of the woman as having control over even
their own affairs; to control is masculine, they assume. Seeing only self‐interest as a natural impulse, and the ruling powers of the state as a sort of umpire, an authority to preserve the rules of the game while men fight it out forever; they see in a democracy merely a wider range of self interest, and a wider, freer field to fight in.
The law dictates the rules, the government enforces them, but the main business of life, hitherto, has been esteemed as one long fierce struggle; each man seeking for himself. To deliberately legislate for the service of all the people, to use the government as the main engine of that service, is a new process, wholly human, and difficult of development under an androcentric culture.
Furthermore they put forth those naively androcentric protests,—
women cannot fight, and in case their laws were resisted by men they could not enforce them,— therefore they should not vote!
What they do not so plainly say, but very strongly think, is that women should not share the loot which to their minds is so large a
part of politics.
Here we may trace clearly the social heredity of male government.