It had been known for a number of years that there was a manuscript treatise in Arabic on the soul, which was attributed
on the title page to Bahya. In 1896 Isaac Broydé published a Hebrew translation of this work under the title "Torot ha-
Nefesh," ("Reflections on the Soul").[131] The original Arabic was edited by Goldziher in 1907.[132] The Arabic title is
"Maʿani al-Nafs," and should be translated "Concepts of the soul," or "Attributes of the soul."
There seems little doubt now that despite the ascription on the title page of the manuscript, the treatise is not a work of
Bahya. It is very unlikely that anything written by so distinguished an author as Bahya, whose "Duties of the Hearts" was
the most popular book in the middle ages, should have been so thoroughly forgotten as to have left no trace in Jewish
literature. Bahya as well as the anonymous author refer, in the introductions to their respective works, to their sources or
to their own previous writings. But there is no reference either in the "Duties of the Hearts" to the "Attributes of the Soul,"
or in the latter to the former. A still stronger argument against Bahya as the author of our treatise is that derived from the
content of the work, which moves in a different circle of ideas from the "Duties of the Hearts." Our anonymous author is
an outspoken Neo-Platonist. He believes in the doctrine of emanation, and arranges the created universe, spiritual and
material, in a descending series of such emanations, ten in number. The Mutakallimun he opposes as being followers of
the "Naturalists," who disagree with the philosophers as well as the Bible. Bahya, on the other hand, is a strict follower of
the Kalam in his chapter on the "Unity," as we have seen (p. 86), and the Neo-Platonic influence is very slight. There is
no trace of a graded series of emanations in the "Duties of the Hearts."[133]
The sources of the "Attributes of the Soul" are no doubt the various Neo-Platonic writings current among the Arabs in the
tenth and eleventh centuries, of which we spoke in the Introduction (p. xx) and in the chapter on Gabirol (p. 63 f.). Gabirol
himself can scarcely have had much influence on our author, as the distinctive doctrine of the "Fons Vitæ" is absent in
our treatise. The reader will remember that matter and form, according to Gabirol, are at the basis not merely of the
corporeal world, but that they constitute the essence of the spiritual world as well, the very first emanation, the Universal
Intelligence, being composed of universal matter and universal form. As we shall see this is not the view of the "Attributes
of the Soul." Matter here occupies the position which it has in Plotinus and in the encyclopædia of the Brethren of Purity.
It is the fourth in order of emanations, and the composition of matter and form begins with the celestial sphere, which is
the fifth in order. Everything that precedes matter is absolutely simple. At the same time it seems clear that he was
familiar with Gabirol's doctrine of the will. For in at least two passages in the "Attributes of the Soul" (chs. 11 and 13)[134]
we have the series, vegetative soul, spheral impression, [psychic power—omitted in ch. 13], universal soul, intellect, will.
The "Categories" of Aristotle is also clearly evident in the "Attributes of the Soul." It is the ultimate source of the definition
of accident as that which resides in substance without being a part of it, but yet in such a way that without substance it
cannot exist.[135] The number of the species of motion as six[136] points in the same direction. This, however, does not
prove that the author read the "Categories." He might have derived these notions, as well as the list of the ten
categories, from the writings of the Brethren of Purity. The same thing applies to the statement that a spiritual substance
is distinguished from a corporeal in its capacity of receiving its qualities or accidents without limits.[137] This probably
goes back to the De Anima of Aristotle where a similar contrast between the senses and the reason is used as an
argument for the "separate" character of the latter. The doctrine of the mean in conduct[138] comes from the ethics of
Aristotle. The doctrine of the four virtues and the manner of their derivation is Platonic,[139] and so is the doctrine of
reminiscence, viz., that the soul recalls the knowledge it had in its previous life.[140]
Ibn Sina is one of the latest authors mentioned in our work; hence it could not have been written much before 1037, the
date of Ibn Sina's death. The terminus ad quem cannot be determined.
As the title indicates, the anonymous treatise is concerned primarily with the nature of the soul. Whatever other topics
are found therein are introduced for the bearing they have on the central problem. A study of the soul means psychology
as well as ethics, for a complete determination of the nature of the soul necessarily must throw light not only upon the
origin and activity of the soul, but also upon its purpose and destiny.
The first error, we are told, that we must remove concerning the soul, is the doctrine of the "naturalists," with whom the
Muʿtazilites among the Arabs and the Karaites among the Jews are in agreement, that the soul is not an independent
and self-subsistent entity, but only an "accident" of the body. Their view is that as the soul is a corporeal quality it is
dependent for its existence upon the body and disappears with the latter. Those of the Muʿtazilites who believe in
"Mahad" (return of the soul to its origin), hold that at the time of the resurrection God will bring the parts of the body
together with its accident, the soul, and will reward and punish them. But the resurrection is a distinct problem, and has
nothing to do with the nature of the soul and its qualities.
The true opinion, which is that of the Bible and the true philosophers, is that the soul is a spiritual substance independent
of the body; that it existed before the body and will continue to exist after the dissolution of the latter. The existence of a
spiritual substance is proved from the presence of such qualities as knowledge and ignorance. These are opposed to
each other, and cannot be the qualities of body as such, for body cannot contain two opposite forms at the same time.
Moreover, the substance, whatever it be, which bears the attributes of knowledge and ignorance, can receive them
without limit. The more knowledge a person has, the more capable he is of acquiring more. No corporeal substance
behaves in this way. There is always a limit to a body's power of receiving a given accident. We legitimately conclude,
therefore, that the substance which bears the attributes of knowledge and ignorance is not corporeal but spiritual.[141]
To understand the position of the soul and its relation to the body, we must have an idea of the structure and origin of
the universe. The entire world, upper as well as lower, is divided into two parts, simple and composite. The simple
essences, which are pure and bright, are nearer to their Creator than the less simple substances which come after.
There are ten such creations with varying simplicity, following each other in order according to the arrangement dictated
by God's wisdom. As numbers are simple up to ten, and then they begin to be compound, so in the universe the ten
simple substances are followed by composite.
The first of these simple creations, which is nearest to God, is called in Hebrew "Shekinah." The Torah and the Prophets
call it "Name" (Exod. 23, 21), also "Kabod," Glory (Is. 59, 19). God gave his name to the nearest and first of his creations,
which is the first light, and interpreter and servant nearest to him. Solomon calls it "Wisdom" (Prov. 8, 22); the Greeks,
Active Intellect. The second creation is called by the Prophets, "the Glory of the God of Israel" (Ezek. 8, 9); by the
Greeks, Universal Soul, for it moves the spheres through a natural power as the individual soul moves the body. The
soul partakes of the Intelligence or Intellect on the side which is near to it; it partakes of Nature on the side adjoining the
latter. Nature is the third creation. It also is an angel, being the first of the powers of the universal soul, and constituting
the life of this world and its motion.
These three are simple essences in the highest sense of the word. They are obedient to their Creator, and transmit in
order his emanation and the will, and the laws of his wisdom to all the worlds. The fourth creation is an essence which
has no activity or life or motion originally, but only a power of receiving whatever is formed and created out of it. This is
the Matter of the world. From it come the bodies which possess accidents. In being formed some of its non-existence is
diminished, and its matter moves. It is called "hyle," and is the same as the darkness of the first chapter in Genesis. For it
is a mistake to suppose that by darkness in the second verse of the first chapter is meant the absence of the light of the
sun. This is accidental darkness, whereas in the creation story the word darkness signifies something elemental at the
basis of corporeal things. This is what is known as matter, which on account of its darkness, i. e., its imperfection and
motionlessness, is the cause of all the blemishes and evils in the world. In receiving forms, however, it acquires motion;
its darkness is somewhat diminished, and it appears to the eye through the forms which it receives.
The fifth creation is the celestial Sphere, where for the first time we have motion in its revolutions. Here too we have the
first composition of matter and form; and the beginning of time as the measure of the Sphere's motion; and place. The
sixth creation is represented by the bodies of the stars, which are moved by the spheres in which they are set. They are
bright and luminous because they are near the first simple bodies, which were produced before time and place. The last
four of the ten creations are the four elements, fire, air, water, earth. The element earth is the end of "creation." What
follows thereafter is "formation" and "composition." By creation is meant that which results through the will of God from
his emanation alone, and not out of anything, or in time or place. It applies in the strictest sense to the first three only.
The fifth, namely the Sphere, already comes from matter and form, and is in time and place. The fourth, too, enters into
the fifth and all subsequent creations and formations. Still, the term creation is applicable to the first ten, though in
varying degrees, until when we reach the element earth, creation proper is at an end. This is why in the first verse in
Genesis, which speaks of heaven and earth, the term used is "bara" (created), and not any of the other terms, such as
"yazar," "ʿasah," "kanah," "paʿal," and so on, which denote formation.
From earth and the other elements were formed all kinds of minerals, like rocks, mountains, stones, and so on. Then
plants and animals, and finally man.
Man who was formed last bears traces of all that preceded him. He is formed of the four elements, of the motions of the
spheres, of the mixtures of the stars and their rays, of Nature, of the Universal Soul, the mother of all, of the Intellect, the
father of all, and finally of the will of God. But the order in man is reversed. The first two creations, Intellect and Soul,
appear in man last.
The soul of man, embracing reason and intellect, is thus seen to be a divine emanation, being related to the universal
soul and Intellect. On its way from God to man it passes through all spheres, and every one leaves an impression upon
her, and covers her with a wrapper, so to speak. The brightness of the star determines the ornament or "wrapper" which
the soul gets from it. This is known to the Creator, who determines the measure of influence and the accidents attaching
to the soul until she reaches the body destined for her by his will. The longer the stay in a given sphere the stronger the
influence of the sphere in question; and hence the various temperaments we observe in persons, which determine their
character and conduct. For at bottom the soul is the same in essence and unchangeable in all men, because she is an
emanation from the Unchangeable. All individual differences are due to the spheral impressions. These impressions,
however, do not take away from the soul its freedom of will.[142]
In the rest of his psychology and ethics the anonymous author follows Platonic theories, modified now and then in the
manner of Aristotle. Thus we are told that the soul consists of three powers, or three souls, the vegetative, the animal
and the rational. We learn of the existence of the vegetative soul from the nourishment, growth and reproduction
evidenced by the individual. The animal soul shows its presence in the motions of the body. The existence of the rational
soul we have already shown from the attributes of knowledge and ignorance.
The vegetative soul comes from certain spheral influences, themselves due to the universal soul, and ultimately to the
will of God. It is the first of the three to make its appearance in the body. It is already found in the embryo, to which it
gives the power of motion in its own place like the motion of a plant or tree. Its seat is in the liver, where the growth of the
embryo begins. Its function ceases about the twentieth year, when the growth of the body reaches its limit.
The animal soul springs from the heart. Its functioning appears after birth when the child begins to crawl, and continues
until the person loses the power of locomotion in old age. The rational soul resides in the middle of the brain. She knows
all things before joining the body, but her knowledge is obscured on account of the material coverings which she
receives on her way down from her divine source.[143]
The virtue of the vegetative soul is temperance; of the animal soul, courage; of the rational soul, wisdom. When these
are harmoniously combined in the individual, and the two lower souls are controlled by the higher, there results the fourth
virtue, which is justice, and which gives its possessor the privilege of being a teacher and a leader of his people. In
Moses all these qualities were exemplified, and Isaiah (11, 1-4) in describing the qualities of the Messianic King also
enumerates these four cardinal virtues. "The spirit of wisdom and understanding" represents wisdom, "the spirit of
counsel and strength" stands for courage; "the spirit of knowledge and fear of the Lord" denotes temperance; and justice
is represented in the phrase, "and he will judge the poor with righteousness."[144]
Virtue is a mean between the two extremes of excess and defect, each of which is a vice. Thus an excess of wisdom
becomes shrewdness and cunning and deceit; while a defect means ignorance. The true wisdom consists in the middle
way between the two extremes. Similarly courage is a mean between foolhardiness and rashness on the side of excess,
and cowardice on the side of defect. Temperance is a mean between excessive indulgence of the appetites on one side
and utter insensibility on the other. The mean of justice is the result of the harmonious combination of the means of the
last three. If the rational soul has wisdom and the two other souls are obedient to it through modesty and courage, their
substance changes into the substance of the rational soul, i. e., their bad qualities are transformed into the four virtues
just mentioned. Then the two lower souls unite with the rational soul and enjoy eternal happiness with it. On the other
hand, if the rational soul follows the senses, its wisdom changes into their folly, its virtues into their vices, and it perishes
with them.[145]
The immortality of the soul is proved as follows. Things composed of elements return back to their elements, hence the
soul also returns to its own origin. The soul is independent of the body, for its qualities, thought and knowledge, are not
bodily qualities, hence they become clearer and more certain after the soul is separated from the body than before, when
the body obscured its vision like a curtain. The fact that a person's mind is affected when his body is ill does not show
that the soul is dependent in its nature upon the body; but that acting as it does in the body by means of corporeal
organs, it cannot perform its functions properly when these organs are injured.
Since death is a decree of God, it is clear that he has a purpose in changing the relations of body and soul. But if the
soul comes to an end, this change would be a vain piece of work of which he cannot be guilty. Hence it follows that the
destruction of the body is in order that we may exist in another similar form, similar to the angels.[146]
The purpose of the soul's coming into this world is in order that she may purify the two lower souls; also that she may
know the value of her own world in comparison with this one, and in grieving for having left it may observe God's
commandments, and thus achieve her return to her own world.
In the matter of returning to their own world after separation from the body, souls are graded according to the measure of
their knowledge and the value of their conduct. These two conditions, ethical and spiritual or intellectual, are requisite of
fulfilment before the soul can regain its original home. The soul on leaving this world is like a clean, white garment
soaked in water. If the water is clean, it is easy to dry the garment, and it becomes even cleaner than it was before. But if
the water is dirty, no amount of drying will make the garment clean.
Those souls which instead of elevating the two lower souls, vegetative and animal, were misled by them, will perish with
the latter. Between the two extremes of perfection and wickedness there are intermediate stages, and the souls are
treated accordingly. Those of the proud will rise in the air and flying hither and thither will not find a resting place. Those
which have knowledge, but no good deeds, will rise to the sphere of the ether, but will be prevented from rising higher by
the weight of their evil deeds, and the pure angels will rain down upon them arrows of fire, thus causing them to return
below in shame and disgrace. The souls of the dishonest will be driven from place to place without finding any rest.
Other bad souls will be punished in various ways. Those souls which have good deeds but no knowledge will be placed
in the terrestrial paradise until their souls recall the knowledge they had in their original state, and they will then return to
the Garden of Eden among the angels.[147]