Studies in the psychology of sex, volume VI. Sex in Relation to Society by Havelock Ellis. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Part of the Marriage

System--The Complex Causation of Prostitution--The

Motives Assigned by

Prostitutes--(1) Economic Factor of Prostitution--

Poverty Seldom the Chief

Motive for Prostitution--But Economic Pressure Exerts a Real

Influence--The Large Proportion of Prostitutes Recruited from Domestic

Service--Significance of This Fact--(2) The Biological Factor of

Prostitution--The So-called Born-Prostitute--Alleged

Identity with the

Born-Criminal--The Sexual Instinct in Prostitutes--The Physical and

Psychic Characters of Prostitutes--(3) Moral Necessity as a Factor in the

Existence of Prostitution--The Moral Advocates of

Prostitution--The Moral

Attitude of Christianity Towards Prostitution--The

Attitude of

Protestantism--Recent Advocates of the Moral Necessity of

Prostitution--(4) Civilizational Value as a Factor of

Prostitution--The

Influence of Urban Life--The Craving for Excitement--Why Servant-girls

so Often Turn to Prostitution--The Small Part Played by Seduction--Prostitutes Come Largely from the Country--

The Appeal of

Civilization Attracts Women to Prostitution--The

Corresponding Attraction

Felt by Men--The Prostitute as Artist and Leader of

Fashion--The Charm of

Vulgarity.

IV. _The Present Social Attitude Towards Prostitution:_-

-The Decay of the

Brothel--The Tendency to the Humanization of

Prostitution--The Monetary

Aspects of Prostitution--The Geisha--The Hetaira--The

Moral Revolt

Against Prostitution--Squalid Vice Based on Luxurious

Virtue--The Ordinary

Attitude Towards Prostitutes--Its Cruelty Absurd--The

Need of Reforming

Prostitution--The Need of Reforming Marriage--These

These Two Needs

Closely Correlated--The Dynamic Relationships Involved.

_I. The Orgy_.

Traditional morality, religion, and established

convention combine to

promote not only the extreme of rigid abstinence but

also that of reckless

license. They preach and idealize the one extreme; they drive those who

cannot accept it to adopt the opposite extreme. In the great ages of

religion it even happens that the severity of the rule of abstinence is

more or less deliberately tempered by the permission for occasional

outbursts of license. We thus have the orgy, which

flourished in mediæval

days and is, indeed, in its largest sense, a universal manifestation,

having a function to fulfil in every orderly and

laborious civilization,

built up on natural energies that are bound by more or less inevitable

restraints.

The consideration of the orgy, it may be said, lifts us beyond the merely

sexual sphere, into a higher and wider region which

belongs to religion.

The Greek _orgeia_ referred originally to ritual things done with a

religious purpose, though later, when dances of

Bacchanals and the like

lost their sacred and inspiring character, the idea was fostered by

Christianity that such things were immoral.[107] Yet

Christianity was

itself in its origin an orgy of the higher spiritual

activities released

from the uncongenial servitude of classic civilization, a great festival

of the poor and the humble, of the slave and the sinner.

And when, with

the necessity for orderly social organization,

Christianity had ceased to

be this it still recognized, as Paganism had done, the need for an

occasional orgy. It appears that in 743 at a Synod held in Hainault

reference was made to the February debauch (_de

Spurcalibus in februario_)

as a pagan practice; yet it was precisely this pagan

festival which was

embodied in the accepted customs of the Christian Church as the chief orgy

of the ecclesiastical year, the great Carnival prefixed to the long fast

of Lent. The celebration on Shrove Tuesday and the

previous Sunday

constituted a Christian Bacchanalian festival in which all classes joined.

The greatest freedom and activity of physical movement was encouraged;

"some go about naked without shame, some crawl on all fours, some on

stilts, some imitate animals."[108] As time went on the Carnival lost its

most strongly marked Bacchanalian features, but it still retains its

essential character as a permitted and temporary

relaxation of the tension

of customary restraints and conventions. The Mediæval

Feast of Fools--a

New Year's Revel well established by the twelfth

century, mainly in

France--presented an expressive picture of a Christian orgy in its extreme

form, for here the most sacred ceremonies of the Church became the subject

of fantastic parody. The Church, according to

Nietzsche's saying, like all

wise legislators, recognized that where great impulses and habits have to

be cultivated, intercalary days must be appointed in

which these impulses

and habits may be denied, and so learn to hunger

anew.[109] The clergy

took the leading part in these folk-festivals, for to

the men of that age,

as Méray remarks, "the temple offered the complete notes of the human

gamut; they found there the teaching of all duties, the consolation of all

sorrows, the satisfaction of all joys. The sacred

festivals of mediæval

Christianity were not a survival from Roman times; they leapt from the

very heart of Christian society."[110] But, as Méray admits, all great and

vigorous peoples, of the East and the West, have found it necessary

sometimes to play with their sacred things.

Among the Greeks and Romans this need is everywhere

visible, not only in

their comedy and their literature generally, but in

everyday life. As

Nietzsche truly remarks (in his _Geburt der Tragödie_) the Greeks

recognized all natural impulses, even those that are

seemingly unworthy,

and safeguarded them from working mischief by providing channels into

which, on special days and in special rites, the surplus of wild energy

might harmlessly flow. Plutarch, the last and most

influential of the

Greek moralists, well says, when advocating festivals

(in his essay "On

the Training of Children"), that "even in bows and harps we loosen their

strings that we may bend and wind them up again."

Seneca, perhaps the most

influential of Roman if not of European moralists, even recommended

occasional drunkenness. "Sometimes," he wrote in his _De Tranquillilate_,

"we ought to come even to the point of intoxication, not for the purpose

of drowning ourselves but of sinking ourselves deep in wine. For it washes

away cares and raises our spirits from the lowest

depths. The inventor of

wine is called _Liber_ because he frees the soul from

the servitude of

care, releases it from slavery, quickens it, and makes it bolder for all

undertakings." The Romans were a sterner and more serious people than the

Greeks, but on that very account they recognized the

necessity of

occasionally relaxing their moral fibres in order to

preserve their tone,

and encouraged the prevalence of festivals which were

marked by much more

abandonment than those of Greece. When these festivals began to lose

their moral sanction and to fall into decay the

decadence of Rome had

begun.

All over the world, and not excepting the most primitive savages--for even

savage life is built up on systematic constraints which sometimes need

relaxation--the principle of the orgy is recognized and accepted. Thus

Spencer and Gillen describe[111] the Nathagura or fire-ceremony of the

Warramunga tribe of Central Australia, a festival taken part in by both

sexes, in which all the ordinary rules of social life

are broken, a kind

of Saturnalia in which, however, there is no sexual

license, for sexual

license is, it need scarcely be said, no essential part of the orgy, even

when the orgy lightens the burden of sexual constraints.

In a widely

different part of the world, in British Columbia, the

Salish Indians,

according to Hill Tout,[112] believed that, long before the whites came,

their ancestors observed a Sabbath or seventh day

ceremony for dancing and

praying, assembling at sunrise and dancing till noon.

The Sabbath, or

periodically recurring orgy,--not a day of tension and constraint but a

festival of joy, a rest from all the duties of everyday life,--has, as we

know, formed an essential part of many of the orderly

ancient

civilizations on which our own has been built;[113] it is highly probable

that the stability of these ancient civilizations was

intimately

associated with their recognition of the need of a

Sabbath orgy. Such

festivals are, indeed, as Crawley observes, processes of purification and

reinvigoration, the effort to put off "the old man" and put on "the new

man," to enter with fresh energy on the path of everyday life.[114]

The orgy is an institution which by no means has its

significance only for

the past. On the contrary, the high tension, the rigid routine, the gray

monotony of modern life insistently call for moments of organic relief,

though the precise form that that orgiastic relief takes must necessarily

change with other social changes. As Wilhelm von

Humboldt said, "just as

men need suffering in order to become strong so they

need joy in order to

become good." Charles Wagner, insisting more recently (in his _Jeunesse_)

on the same need of joy in our modern life, regrets that dancing in the

old, free, and natural manner has gone out of fashion or become

unwholesome. Dancing is indeed the most fundamental and primitive form of

the orgy, and that which most completely and healthfully fulfils its

object. For while it is undoubtedly, as we see even

among animals, a

process by which sexual tumescence is accomplished,[115]

it by no means

necessarily becomes focused in sexual detumescence but it may itself

become a detumescent discharge of accumulated energy. It was on this

account that, at all events in former days, the clergy in Spain, on moral

grounds, openly encouraged the national passion for

dancing. Among

cultured people in modern times, the orgy tends to take on a purely

cerebral form, which is less wholesome because it fails to lead to

harmonious discharge along motor channels. In these

comparatively passive

forms, however, the orgy tends to become more and more pronounced under

the conditions of civilization. Aristotle's famous

statement concerning

the function of tragedy as "purgation" seems to be a recognition of the

beneficial effects of the orgy.[116] Wagner's music-

dramas appeal

powerfully to this need; the theatre, now as ever,

fulfils a great

function of the same kind, inherited from the ancient

days when it was the

ordered expression of a sexual festival.[117] The

theatre, indeed, tends

at the present time to assume a larger importance and to approximate to

the more serious dramatic performances of classic days by being

transferred to the day-time and the open-air. France has especially taken

the initiative in these performances, analogous to the Dionysiac festivals

of antiquity and the Mysteries and Moralities of the

Middle Ages. The

movement began some years ago at Orange. In 1907 there were, in France, as

many as thirty open-air theatres ("Théâtres de la Nature," "Théâtres du

Soleil," etc.,) while it is in Marseilles that the first formal open-air

theatre has been erected since classic days.[118] In

England, likewise,

there has been a great extension of popular interest in dramatic

performances, and the newly instituted Pageants, carried out and taken

part in by the population of the region commemorated in the Pageant, are

festivals of the same character. In England, however, at the present time,

the real popular orgiastic festivals are the Bank

holidays, with which may

be associated the more occasional celebrations,

"Maffekings," etc., often

called out by comparatively insignificant national

events but still

adequate to arouse orgiastic emotions as genuine as

those of antiquity,

though they are lacking in beauty and religious

consecration. It is easy

indeed for the narrowly austere person to view such

manifestations with a

supercilious smile, but in the eyes of the moralist and the philosopher

these orgiastic festivals exert a salutary and

preservative function. In

every age of dull and monotonous routine--and all

civilization involves

such routine--many natural impulses and functions tend to become

suppressed, atrophied, or perverted. They need these

moments of joyous

exercise and expression, moments in which they may not necessarily attain

their full activity but in which they will at all events be able, as

Cyples expresses it, to rehearse their great

possibilities.[119]

_II. The Origin and Development of Prostitution_.

The more refined forms of the orgy flourish in

civilization, although on

account of their mainly cerebral character they are not the most

beneficent or the most effective. The more primitive and muscular forms of

the orgy tend, on the other hand, under the influence of civilization, to

fall into discredit and to be so far as possible

suppressed altogether. It

is partly in this way that civilization encourages

prostitution. For the

orgy in its primitive forms, forbidden to show itself

openly and

reputably, seeks the darkness, and allying itself with a fundamental

instinct to which civilized society offers no complete legitimate

satisfaction, it firmly entrenches itself in the very

centre of civilized

life, and thereby constitutes a problem of immense

difficulty and

importance.[120]

It is commonly said that prostitution has existed always and everywhere.

That statement is far from correct. A kind of amateur

prostitution is

occasionally found among savages, but usually it is only when barbarism is

fully developed and is already approaching the stage of civilization that

well developed prostitution is found. It exists in a

systematic form in

every civilization.

What is prostitution? There has been considerable

discussion as to the

correct definition of prostitution.[121] The Roman

Ulpian said that a

prostitute was one who openly abandons her body to a

number of men without

choice, for money.[122] Not all modern definitions have been so

satisfactory. It is sometimes said a prostitute is a

woman who gives

herself to numerous men. To be sound, however, a

definition must be

applicable to both sexes alike and we should certainly hesitate to

describe a man who had sexual intercourse with many

women as a prostitute.

The idea of venality, the intention to sell the favors of the body, is

essential to the conception of prostitution. Thus Guyot defines a

prostitute as "any person for whom sexual relationships are subordinated

to gain."[123] It is not, however, adequate to define a prostitute simply

as a woman who sells her body. That is done every day by women who become

wives in order to gain a home and a livelihood, yet,

immoral as this

conduct may be from any high ethical standpoint, it

would be inconvenient

and even misleading to call it prostitution.[124] It is better, therefore,

to define a prostitute as a woman who temporarily sells her sexual favors

to various persons. Thus, according to Wharton's _Law-

lexicon_ a

prostitute is "a woman who indiscriminately consorts with men for hire";

Bonger states that "those women are prostitutes who sell their bodies for

the exercise of sexual acts and make of this a

profession";[125] Richard

again states that "a prostitute is a woman who publicly gives herself to

the first comer in return for a pecuniary

remuneration."[126] As, finally,

the prevalence of homosexuality has led to the existence of male

prostitutes, the definition must be put in a form

irrespective of sex, and

we may, therefore, say that a prostitute is a person who makes it a

profession to gratify the lust of various persons of the opposite sex or

the same sex.

It is essential that the act of prostitution should

be habitually

performed with "various persons." A woman who gains her living by

being mistress to a man, to whom she is faithful, is

not a

prostitute, although she often becomes one

afterwards, and may

have been one before. The exact point at which a

woman begins to

be a prostitute is a question of considerable

importance in

countries in which prostitutes are subject to

registration. Thus

in Berlin, not long ago, a girl who was mistress to

a rich

cavalry officer and supported by him, during the

illness of the

officer accidentally met a man whom she had formerly

known, and

once or twice invited him to see her, receiving from

him presents

in money. This somehow came to the knowledge of the

police, and

she was arrested and sentenced to one day's

imprisonment as an

unregistered prostitute. On appeal, however, the

sentence was

annulled. Liszt, in his _Strafrecht_, lays it down

that a girl

who obtains whole or part of her income from "fixed relationships" is not practicing unchastity for gain in the sense

of the German law (_Geschlecht und Gesellschaft_,

Jahrgang 1,

Heft 9, p. 345).

It is not altogether easy to explain the origin of the systematized

professional prostitution with the existence of which we are familiar in

civilization. The amateur kind of prostitution which has sometimes been

noted among primitive peoples--the fact, that is, that a man may give a

woman a present in seeking to persuade her to allow him to have

intercourse with her--is really not prostitution as we understand it. The

present in such a case is merely part of a kind of

courtship leading to a

temporary relationship. The woman more or less retains her social position

and is not forced to make an avocation of selling

herself because

henceforth no other career is possible to her. When Cook came to New

Zealand his men found that the women were not

impregnable, "but the terms

and manner of compliance were as decent as those in

marriage among us,"

and according "to their notions the agreement was as innocent." The

consent of the woman's friends was necessary, and when the preliminaries

were settled it was also necessary to treat this "Juliet of a night" with

"the same delicacy as is here required with the wife for life, and the

lover who presumed to take any liberties by which this was violated was

sure to be disappointed."[127] In some of the Melanesian Islands, it is

said that women would sometimes become prostitutes, or on account of their

bad conduct be forced to become prostitutes for a time; they were not,

however, particularly despised, and when they had in

this way accumulated

a certain amount of property they could marry well,

after which it would

not be proper to refer to their former career.[128]

When prostitution first arises among a primitive people it sometimes

happens that little or no stigma is attached to it for the reason that the

community has not yet become accustomed to attach any

special value to the

presence of virginity. Schurtz quotes from the old

Arabic geographer

Al-Bekri some interesting remarks about the Slavs: "The women of the

Slavs, after they have married, are faithful to their

husbands. If,

however, a young girl falls in love with a man she goes to him and

satisfies her passion. And if a man marries and finds

his wife a virgin he

says to her: 'If you were worth anything men would have loved you, and you

would have chosen one who would have taken away your

virginity.' Then he

drives her away and renounces her." It is a feeling of this kind which,

among some peoples, leads a girl to be proud of the

presents she has

received from her lovers and to preserve them as a dowry for her marriage,

knowing that her value will thus be still further

heightened. Even among

the Southern Slavs of modern Europe, who have preserved much of the

primitive sexual freedom, this freedom, as Krauss, who has minutely

studied the manners and customs of these peoples,

declares, is

fundamentally different from vice, licentiousness, or

immodesty.[129]

Prostitution tends to arise, as Schurtz has pointed out, in every society

in which early marriage is difficult and intercourse

outside marriage is

socially disapproved. "Venal women everywhere appear as soon as the free

sexual intercourse of young people is repressed, without the necessary

consequences being impeded by unusually early

marriages."[130] The

repression of sexual intimacies outside marriage is a

phenomenon of

civilization, but it is not itself by any means a

measure of a people's

general level, and may, therefore, begin to appear at an early period. But

it is important to remember that the primitive and

rudimentary forms of

prostitution, when they occur, are merely temporary, and frequently--though not invariably--involve no degrading influence on the

woman in public estimation, sometimes indeed increasing her value as a

wife. The woman who sells herself for money purely as a professional

matter, without any thought of love or passion, and who, by virtue of her

profession, belongs to a pariah class definitely and

rigidly excluded from

the main body of her sex, is a phenomenon which can

seldom be found except

in developed civilization. It is altogether incorrect to speak of

prostitutes as a mere survival from primitive times.

On the whole, while among savages sexual relationships are sometimes free

before marriage, as well as on the occasion of special festivals, they are

rarely truly promiscuous and still more rarely venal.

When savage women

nowadays sell themselves, or are sold by their husbands, it has usually

been found that we are concerned with the contamination of European

civilization.