References
Bell Jr, Daniel M. (2009). God does not demand blood. Christian Century; 126(3), 22-26.
Bennett, C. (2002). The varieties of retributive experience. Philosophical Quarterly, 52(207), 145-163.
Blocher, H. (2004). Biblical metaphors and the doctrine of the atonement. JETS 47(4), 629-645.
Boersma, H. (2005). Being reconciled. In Smith, J. K. A. & Olthius, J. H. (Eds.), Radical orthodoxy and the reformed tradition (pp. 183-202). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Brummer, V. (1992). Atonement and reconciliation. Religious Studies. 28(4), 435-452.
Cahill, L. (2007). Quaestio disputata the atonement paradigm: does it still have explanatory value? Theological Studies, 68(2), 418-432.
Cottingham, J. (1979). Varieties of retribution. The Philosophical Quarterly, 29(116), 238-246.
Daly, R. J. (2007). Images of God and the imitation of God: problems with atonement. Theological Studies, 68(1), 36-51.
Komonchak, J. A. (2005). The violence of the cross. Commonweal, 132(2), 19-22.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphors in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy 77(8), 453-486.
Leer-Salvesen, P. (2009). Reconciliation without violence. Studia Theologica, 63(2), 162-177.
Marshall, I. H. (2008). The theology of the atonement. In D. Tidball, D. Hilborn & J. Thacker (Eds.). The Atonement Debate: Papers from the London Symposium on the Theology of Atonement. (pp. 49-68). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan.
McGrath, A. E. (2007). Christian theology. An introduction. (4th ed.) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
McIntosh, M. A. (2008). Divine teaching: an introduction to Christian theology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Molander, J. (2009). Atonement retributivism. Studia Theologica, 63(2), 178-196. doi:10.1080/00393380903351071.
Talbott, T. (1993). Punishment, forgiveness and divine justice. Religious Studies, 29(2), 151-168.
Walker, N. (1999). Even more varieties of retribution. Philosophy, 74(290), 595-605.
Weaver, J. (2001). Violence in Christian theology. Cross Currents, 51(2), 150.