don’t think Christians would like Jesus if he showed up today as he did 2,000 years ago.
In fact, I think we’d call him a heretic and plot to kill him, too.
It is said with just a little sadness, for all truth and wisdom intimates the sadness
that reality (that is evolutionary imperative) is beyond our own individuality, that one must say that Satanism is obsolete as is most forms of magick, paganism and the occult. Whilst the latter three have much to offer the unfolding of science of the Folk and its
manifestations in aeons and civilisations as evolving organisms because of the traditions they entail with regard to the experience and striving of countless ancestral generations who continued to express the innate spirit of their founding, the former (for all its self-vaunted and vacuous elitism and self-hypnotic promotion) was nothing more than a brief
experiment in a causal moment – for those who know. Those who fail to see this are
completely unaware of the real meaning of so-called satanism.
We are not talking here even of the devout satanic churches and groups which
emerged in and after the Crowley days (mainly in the United States of America, which
due to it’s cultural and racial bastardisation and homogenisation is constantly throbbing with the need to ‘save the world’ via some, usually, superficial eclectic concoction, which quickly declines into religious and thereby ephemeral fashion) and those writers who
created various satanic bibles, covens, etc and fulfilled the role of a brief distraction whilst deeper work was enacted elsewhere in society (although the fact that they mistakenly
chose and thence got so carried away with dead forms and largely Judaic forms, weakened
the value of their role). With only one or two exceptions, they missed the point of
exploiting a heresy manipulated and imposed for millennia by the Establishment).
Rather, of the serious ‘satanic’ eruption from England that actually brought a
breath of fresh air and was a real accuser. It served its purpose, as chosen by its progenitors; played its role and now it has returned to become reborn in another form.
Sadly this breath of fresh air itself has become contaminated, by the mixing of the
two forms which has now been swallowed by the disease of individualism, ego and
fashion: a teenage culture has been born replete with hackneyed weaponry and ceremonial,
face paint, church burning, pseudo rituals, and legions of grand masters: my Jehovah must really trembling! Meanwhile those who are supposedly serious cry foul because they have
been refused the right to do as they wish with the material created by others: ‘me a satanic priest, how dare you tell me what to do on the Internet’ rather than attempt to understand why the material was made public initially and why, now, it is to be disseminated in a
different manner for a variant purpose.
History itself should teach us something. In this context it has not. For the outer
form has been seized upon as the thing itself, as opposed to it being merely a role or
process for something far more. In that respect, all true manifestation of heresy (in
whatever form: politics, art, music, science, etc) should fulfil the destiny of the Folk – not by the outer noises it makes and the adherents it attracts, but by the real change it causes in the being of those few who are capable of dedicating their lives to something beyond
themselves and thus taking the heresy further and, via their roles, causing a shift in the fabric of the aeon – as a comrade recently put it like a sapling growing in the shadow if a rotting tree.
But the plain fact is that it is the perpetual mistake of promulgators of the Old
Aeon in whatever form (occultic, political and religious), to sense symbols in terms of
‘answers’ rather than as ‘keys’ to the progression of the Aeon and the unleashing of the
New Order after Ragnorak. This is just as true of the plethora of pseudo-masters currently proliferating: satanic, pagan, national socialist and their assorted precious coteries. They fester, unaware that the keys are a challenge, for further and painful change. Hence the
tradition in Fraternitas Loki and in the Order of Nine Angles to use and then dispose of
roles, to live with total conviction a mission or task and then move on (in the event that something useful or unique or of use to the overall aeonic initiative is created then a
disciple, or comrade or sub-group will be found or created to further presence that
initiative as part of a subsequent role). Change once apprehended in the purging of the
self, is then applied to a practical achievement in society: without noisy fanfares usually.
After all a real magickian does not look like a magickian. A good wine speaks for itself.
This is not to presuppose that, in judeo-christian-satanic sense, the role is a game for the delight of the ego which has ‘joined the elite’.
We see this delusion all around us those so called ‘aristocrats’, ‘grand-masters’
‘warriors’, ‘priests’, ‘adepts’ et al ad nauseam: roll-up, roll-up, book your tickets now for The Abyss is very overpopulated with every phoney. Anyone worth his salt would not
accept the title of Grand Master or even Master or Priest or whatever, at least not in any public context (and only in the private working of a lodge where the title merely denotes a function of duty and service for the work to be done), as is now the case in the myriad of
‘zines and ‘Aryan aristocratic satanic heathenish’ orders: AIDS of the mind, for like
acquired immune deficiency syndrome it too caused by an over-indulgence, infantile
arrogance and egotism concerning so called individualism.
There was a time when children acted out in their learning games the role models
of their ancestors, great heroes and achievers of their race and civilisation. Now overfed, overpaid, over nurtured with egotism by the materialist system they so despise
(apparently), like puppets they are manipulated into turning their dole money or
educational grant from the State, or their pocket money from moma and papa, or their
advance from any minor producer wily enough to suck them dry; even their acts of
rebellion are nothing more than premature ejaculations: anything from occasionally
burning the unprotected ancient stave church, to cemetery graffiti and parading jackboots.
Well, it makes someone some money somewhere. Sadly so much energy is wasted acting
out for The System the ‘evil’ image it created. The Nazarene Barbarian Church stole the
traditions of The Folk; what it could not absorb was turned into their own perverse
fantasies: Cernunnos<>Satan.
So what of the great spirit of the new aeon supposedly guiding these wanna-be’s?
Empty. Worse than that a neurotic inverts. The fact is that no amount of ‘sinister’
intellectual argument about the origins of the name Satan as Greek for accuser borrowed
by the Jews will hide the fact that the entirety of satanism rife in the world today is a mere reverberation of that initial expropriation by the enemies of the Folk. Take a look at the average Satanist: any honour, vitality, health, élan? Doing anything at all beyond the role (which should cause inner change) other than as an ego-crutch which centuries of cultural indoctrination has seeded? Begun the long, slow and painful task towards individuation?
Good manners, bearing, integrity, industry and a calm self-effacing mien with self-honesty and striving triumph over self-importance, dogma, petty-territorialism? No. Yet more
dualism dressed up in variant forms of decadent pandering to the ego.
Nothing new is actually offered by these masters and groups. A few manuscripts, a
couple of rituals, the first game of playing with someone else’s mind and they have been
hooked: like that first cigarette, or that first snort of coke; they haven’t broken away from the System; rather it has massaged their ego. Satanic of national socialist masturbation
then follows in whatever the current ‘in thing’ happens to be. The music scene for example is redolent of the decadence of society itself: on label after another, each as doctrinaire and cliquish as its predecessor. Given a choice any self-respecting aeonic traveller of The Path would rather have Zulu warrior or a fundamentalist preacher for company than these banal
parrots, running around comatose in priapic obsession, for them puberty is a lifetime
disease.
Those falling into the trap are self evident. Those that are truly committed to self
evolution rarely disagree, for there is already an inner calm and a willingness to meet like gentlemen, rather to score a point: instinctively the evolving individual knows his fellow traveller, the real heretic. F.L. has found this to be the case with its comrades in its own ranks and other groups over the years.
As with the outpourings of the universalist culture and its politically correct
perversions, the whole issue of the satanic dialectic, (or to use more European forms
Thorian, Lokian or Faustian imperative) is now distorted by kiddy wannabe’s: a little
knowledge is dangerous and combined with the technological toys The System has so
conveniently supplied them with, these teeny and miasmic Black Popes, Masters and
Priests hold forth on the Internet, or in countless zines, and in the most dire and un-Aryan cacophonic obscenities masquerading as music – by comparison one would be grateful for
the primal close-harmonies of the most primitive African tribes. Take their toys away and they are nothing. They have not lived. Neither will they. They haven’t even the time or
courage to get a real job, live in the real world, see a task through, or attempt to
apprentice themselves to a master craftsman: no, because they are instant aristocratic
adepts – but of course! Get your candy wand out and read the holy qaballah and
googachoo grimoire baby.
It rather calls to mind all those revolutionaries of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s:
it is interesting to note that the most radical of them who were at the barricades,
fomenting the demos, who were screaming for the blood of the bourgeois police, judges
and industrialists, are now usually to be found as executives in the big corporations, with the usual palatial split-level detached’s, BMW, pool, 2nd home, and a little business on the side.
Few have the currency of their conviction. Even fewer step outside The System or
can stomach the years of privation to engage in the long process of knowledge in practical that can lead, perhaps even in this lifetime, to individuation and self-mastery and even a contribution to the creative minority. For it is through this kindless winterland of struggle and growth, creating and changing self and others as one goes, that each crisis and
watershed helps trigger a ripple in the causal fabric, and a fertile ground is sown of our successors, who may (or may not) recollect us.
How far the West fallen; how easily each new generation falls prey to that mind-set
of the infection is seen in one of its creations: linear time, which has so effectively enslaved not only the Europeans but every race upon which its bestial conversions were fulminated.
It is even seen in the most serious of Odinists: for years they have laboured under the
judeo-christian delusion that the triumph of the Thurses and the forces of chaos and the
Twilight of the Gods was some sort of failure or a lesson of ‘avoidance’, rather than the procession of the aeons.
It is hard for anyone, who having first tasted the waxing of greater insight in this
life, to realise that we are part of something more important than our individual selves.
That we must experience and master this process of collapse and destruction, within us.
“What saith the wise man? Vanity of vanities: all is vanity”.
Loki’s presence told Odin he was doomed: This did not weaken his vitality nor his
involvement in the cycle. And Balder’s death was nothing to do with some overtly
benevolence. His ‘goodness’ was a steely determination not to become involved and
muddied in what for him will be a passing phase of that Aeon to precede the one he will
rule: it is as if his participation in the Asgardian Age was just a portent.
This lesson must be learnt well by all who journey into Satanism. It is not for those
who will play at life or take destiny lightly or allow ego to condition the work in hand. The Vikings had this sadness embedded in their ethos: we live we die; there is no safe haven or happy pill of eternity – except for the sure knowledge that we have sent a clear and eternal message throughout all time of our contribution to totality and evolution; we have played the game and yielded our potential before gods and men.
RELIGION & SCIENCE
Modern science had its origins in the late Middle Ages, especially
during the period called the Renaissance. Many of its discoveries
brought it into conflict with the traditional beliefs held by the
medieval church. There is no neutral ground in the universe; every square
inch, every split second, is claimed by God and counter-claimed by Satan.
The assertion by Galileo and others that the Earth was not the center
of the universe outraged many church leaders, and Galileo was
brought to trial for teaching unacceptable doctrines.
Conflicts between religion and science did not cease with the
Renaissance. Today there are many religious people who condemn all
teaching about the theory of evolution. They assert that the Biblical
account of creation is literally true; therefore, evolution is
unacceptable to them.
Opposition between religion and science arose from the mistaken notion
that religion could present its doctrines as undisputed knowledge that
would hold true for all time. The medieval church had incorporated
into its system of belief certain ancient scientific assertions about
the Earth and the heavens. As these assertions were slowly proved
false, the church reacted because it had used ancient science to
support its doctrine. In other words, it had attempted to use assumed
facts of science to support belief. It feared, consequently, that if
the facts were swept away, the belief would crumble. As it happened,
religious resistance to science alienated many educated people.
The church did not realize that real belief cannot be supported by
evidence from science. Nor can belief be undone by scientific
evidence. The sciences deal with what they can see, inspect, and
experiment with. They can make no valid statements about the existence
or nonexistence of a god, for instance, because such statements must
be made without any available evidence. On the other hand, religion
cannot pretend to invalidate the findings of scientists for fear that
belief will be challenged. If the objects of faith are true and the
objects of scientific discovery true as well, then the objects are
equally true and cannot contradict each other.
The uneasiness between science and religion has not been limited to
Christianity. Marxist communism of the 20th century has become a kind
of religion. It has an all-embracing worldview, and it has a faith in
the historical process for which no evidence exists. During Joseph
Stalin's rule in the Soviet Union, scientific theories that seemed to
contradict his version of Marxism were suppressed. Stalin's favorite
scientist was Trofim Lysenko, a biologist and agronomist who supported
theories on heredity completely at variance with the genetic
principles developed by Gregor Mendel. Through Lysenko's influence
and under Stalin's insistence, all other approaches to biology
were outlawed. Some scientists who had previously taught Mendelian
genetics were forced to change their opinion and teach Lysenko's
version of biology.
ONTOLOGY OF DIVINITY
It is my contention that the theological and mythic elements of religion are
best understood as prescientific (or a-scientific) systems analogous to the reality-
models used by both philosophers and scientists. That is, historically, the various
systems of divine ontology are best understood as nonscientific methods of
explanation for the nature of the visible world. Religion, as such, is wider in scope
than mere ontology, however ontology (along with the attendant myth-cycles) is
certainly one of the two* fundamental elements thereof.
The various ancient polytheisms develop around an axiomatic core of
interconnected interplay between the elements of creation. In other words, there is
a basic assumption that a coherent story can be told encompassing the totality of
observed phenomena. Such a coherent story is known as a myth-cycle. The
regularities observed in the world are due to the collective activity of the divinities,
whose mythic and cosmic dance is the underlying cause of the rationality (and
irrationality) of creation.
The fundamental unit of the polytheistic system is the pantheon (Greek =
“all the gods”), or the governing set of divinities. The divine pantheon, as a
collective entity, is responsible for maintaining the rational (and irrational) structure of perceived reality. Individual divinities are delimited through coherent groupings
of characteristics/spheres of provenance. These divinities and their activities are
interpreted anthropomorphically, in order to achieve a mythic vision relevant to the
human condition.
Monotheism, as a theological development, received its primary impetus
from philosophers** who were concerned with determining the “first principle”, a
single element/idea from which all things originate. The determination that there is
(or should be) such a principle is fundamental and axiomatic to the monotheistic
philosophies, but its justification may be held as a consequence of a prior axiom of
simplicity.
Common to both the various polytheisms and monotheisms is the idea that
the visible world owes its characteristic be-ness to the activity of the divine.
Common to both is the idea that divine activity is cosmic in scope, in that the
entirety of visible reality is thereby sustained. Common to both is the idea that
divinity is conscious (or meta-conscious), and that the activities of human beings
are relevant to the divine order.
The various polytheisms and monotheisms all hold that the activities of
humankind are participatory (or at least can be participatory) in the cosmic order.
This attitude colors both the practice of solemn ritual as well as the proscription of
taboos. The former seeks to amplify/reside in the sacred order, whereas the latter
are interpreted as violations thereof.
In philosophical Hinduism, both polytheism and monotheism can be
simultaneously posited, by allowing for differences in the scale/magnification of
resolution. In fact, the two viewpoints are not opposed to one another, as is often
thought.
Regardless of whether one is considering a polytheistic system, or a
monotheistic system, or a hybrid system, the common theme is that the divine
ontology acts as the fundamental explanation for the observed regularities of the
visible world. In this fundamental sense, then, the development of an ontology of
divinity proceeds from the same concern that drives both philosophy and the
empirical sciences (at one time called “natural philosophy”). Obviously, however,
the methods of determination involved in these three sibling areas are quite
different - with the pure empirical method (hypothesis testing) of science being
considered the best (most informative; most useful) currently.
Proponents of theology often state that divine ontology can provide
justifications for the meaningfulness (mythic relevance) of experience which
science, due to its detachment of subject from object, and its categorization-
analysis, cannot. On this point, I am inclined to be in agreement, preferring not to
grant exclusive truth status to any model.
*The other fundamental element of religion, namely the transformation of the self
toward the divine prototype, is not examined in the present analysis.
**Here, I am indicating the ancient Greek, Arab, and Indian philosophers who
proposed the various monisms in ancient and medieval systems. Though both the
Hebrews and (briefly) Egyptians had developed non-philosophical monotheisms,
these systems were limited in their influence in the ancient world.
EVIDENCE OF A NEW SATANIC AGE
We are entering into a new aeon, the Age of Aquarius. Aquarius is the 11th
sign of the Zodiac.
This is the “Aeon of Satan.” Here are some of the signs:
* 1999, inverted, is 1666 (one-666). 666x3=1998.
* 2000, in numerology is number 2; 11, (1+1=2) Two and eleven are the chief
numbers of Lucifer.
* 2000 was Year of the Dragon (the Dragon is one of the symbols of Satan)
which marked the commencement of the 21st century.
* 666- 6 x 6 x 6 = 216. 2,160 years is the approximate time it takes for the
synetic vernal point to travel backwards from one constellation to another.
Aquarius, the sign of a man (the water bearer) represents the coming new age.
Ea/Enki also known as Satan is symbolized by the Water Bearer of Aquarius.
The Gods placed much emphasis on the movement of the planets, stars, and
constellations. They left images in stone, as seen in the Egyptian Sphinx, which was
constructed during the age of Leo (10,500 years ago). The scarab, representing the
ancient Egyptian sign of and the Age of Cancer, the rows of ram's heads (Age of
Aries) and the monolithic sculptures of the twins (Gemini), are seen in numerous
places throughout Egypt and Middle East.
In 1962, the planets lined up- Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
and Saturn all in the sign of Aquarius and ushered in the computer age, which
emerged worldwide 28 years later following the Saturn cycle. Technology has
advanced at an unprecedented pace in the past century.
Atheist, Dr. Madalyn Murray O'Hair succeeded in removing the xian bible and
compulsory prayer from the public schools in 1963. Anton LaVey established the
first above ground Church of Satan on the Eve of Beltane, April 30th, 1966. During
the late 1960's the Catholic Church, which is the original xian church and the
backbone of xianity, began to crumble. Catholic nuns and priests gradually shed
their vestments. Today, the wearing of formal vestments by the Catholic clergy in
many parts of the world, especially in the United States is rare. The Catholic clergy
has dwindled to where the lay people are taking over the former duties of Catholic
priests and nuns. The remaining priests, most of whom are aging, are being
exposed and brought to justice for the sexual abuse and exploitation of children and
other revolting crimes that have occurred for centuries. The resulting lawsuits and
scandals are breaking the Catholic Church. The Protestants have their share of
crimes against humanity as well. We are now in the age of information and
communication, which will result in many of these xian sects being exposed along
with the Catholic Church.
The 1970's band "Black Sabbath," paved the way for heavy metal,
death/black metal. The metal scene openly blasphemes the xian "god" and Satanic lyrics are very popular, especially among the youth. Look around you- Satanic
music, movies, books, role playing games, video games, the internet with
thousands of Satanic websites, Satanic t-shirts, Baphomet jewelry, and more. Satan
is becoming very popular. Satan has the youth.
During the 1990's, thousands of xian churches were burned worldwide. The
xian churches are rapidly losing their credibility and reputations; as a result, many
are lost and looking for answers. The xian religion was built upon murder, lies,
injustice and appalling crimes against humanity and it is now facing the
consequences. Knowledge is readily available and the lies and promises of the right
hand path religions are no longer as effective as they once were.
In the Al-Jilwah, Satan states that those who are without "do not know the
state of things that is to come. For this reason, they fall into many errors." We are reaching the end of the age of Pisces. It has been written that in the end, the truth
will come out and many will want to join at the last minute, but it will be too late to
do so. Yaweh/Jehova, the REAL "Prince of Lies" is not going after the small stakes, because he has had the judeo/xian/muslim religions for centuries. The bible
bangers are in for a rude awakening.
SATANIC SEX
With all the New Age hype, there is this emphasis on love, love, love. Love is an
emotion. Yes, it is essential to human happiness and one's well-being, but all of this
emphasis on "love" has cheapened it and made it to be something it is not. ALL
emotions are equally valid and essential.
The truth is- love is something everyone must earn. Of course, there is misplaced
love, as in situations where one becomes infatuated or even obsessed with another
person and the love is not returned. These are emotions out of control and can be
something very ugly and painful.
Satanism is about being free and living with nature. Love for love's sake, or love
that is wasted on ingrates is abuse of this emotion. Foolish xians are taught to love
their enemies. This teaching is suicidal. How long would our bodies last if our
immune systems turned the other cheek so to speak and loved invaded viruses?
These sick twisted teachings regarding love can land one in the psychiatrist's office.
This is where so many of these people end up going at certain points in their lives.
Abuse of love, like the other teachings of the nazarene, leads to confusion and
chaos. True love is something that is e