Women in early Christianity by Alfred Brittain and Mitchell Carroll - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

was a polygamist, and also from the fact that he watched his soldiers

amuse themselves with the awful death agonies of two hundred maidens,

whom they tore limb from limb with wild horses and crushed under the

wheels of heavy wagons.

Placidia died in the year 450. She was buried at Ravenna; and, with some

ambiguity of meaning, it is said that there her corpse, seated in a

chair of cypress wood, was preserved for ages. Her son perished by the

avenging hand of a senator whose wife he had perfidiously violated. He

was the last emperor of the house of Theodosius; and his mother was the

last woman, with a name in history, who was worthy of mention in the

records of the perishing Western Empire.

With the death of Placidia, we arrive at the end of a cycle in the

evolution of the human race. It was contemporaneous with the terminus of

ancient Aryan civilization--it was during a climacteric in human

history. Again the world was to revert to the rudeness necessarily

accompanying the vigorous strength which characterizes the setting forth

of a new race. The world began again--polished manners and social order

gave place to strenuosity and individualism. The strong hand again

became the one thing needful. Literature was silent, and art was

forgotten. Of the glory of classic civilization there remained only a

memory; and even this grew faint, for the struggle for existence became

exacting. Nevertheless, from all that Rome had done and had been there

remained an imperishable deposit. From the ruins of one civilization

there is gathered the foundations for the succeeding.

Rome left, among

other contributions to absolute progress, the idea of nationality and a

belief in the necessity of popular law. In these two respects, woman

shared in the determined progress of the world. The Roman woman

manifested the capacity of her sex to place a steady hand on the helm of

the state; she wrested for herself some of those legal rights to which,

by virtue of her humanity at least, she is indubitably entitled.

VIII

WOMEN OF THE FRANKISH CHURCH

We may now consider ourselves to have nearly passed the transition

period between the Classic and the Middle Ages, and to have begun to

enter that indefinite range of history known as Mediævalism--indefinite

as to character rather than extent of period. A new world opens to our

view; a world which we examine under the influence of the romanticist

more than under that of the philosopher. In the age to which our

researches have now brought us we find that the life of woman has wholly

changed. Evolution has taken a new beginning. In place of the state as

the symbol and the object of power and progress individualism has come

to the front and asserted itself. There is now more play for personal

initiation on the part of the multitude. The activity of the individual

is more directly attributable to his personal motives and culminates

more fully in his own desires. Consequently, though woman is still held

down to an inferior level, and is hampered by unequal laws, she has more

room in which to assert herself, and she plays a stronger part in

historical events. Practically, though not theoretically, she is still

given in marriage without her consent; but she is no longer regarded as

a mere possession. Her surroundings also have wonderfully changed. In

place of the porticoed villa with its marble floor and beautiful

statuary, its highly decorated atrium and sparkling fountains, she is

now seen in what was the rudiment of the turreted castle with its rough

hall and rush-strewn floor. She has lost the learning by which she was

wont to delight her idle hours with classic poetry and Greek philosophy;

if she can read at all, her accomplishment is a rare one, and the most

powerful stimulus to her imagination is the song of illiterate bards who

recite the heroic achievements of her race. In this she has reverted to

literature in its embryonic condition. Her religion has gained morality,

though emphatically more in theory than in practice, but it has

distinctly lost in poetry. Elegance has disappeared from every phase of

her life. When she rides abroad it is no longer in a splendidly equipped

litter, but, in hardier fashion, upon horseback. While for her to lead

men-at-arms is an extreme rarity, she is far likelier to attain ruling

authority than she was under the refined civilization of older times.

With the Franks, however, supreme rule by a woman, in any direct manner,

was rendered impossible by the ancient Salic law which prescribed that

"no portion of really Salic land (that is to say, in the full

territorial ownership of the head of the family) should pass into the

possession of women, but it should belong altogether to the virile sex."

To us the early Mediæval life seems more remote and less intelligible

than that of the classic age. We are more at home in the villas of Rome

than in the castles of Charlemagne. This is partly because the

literature of the latter age has not presented such a satisfying picture

as have the immortal productions of the former; but more largely because

the genius of modern civilization has its counterpart in the social

ideas of classic times, rather than in the individualistic motive of

mediævalism.

The period covered by this chapter extends over four hundred years, from

the end of the fifth century to the tenth. In our selection of

characters from the successive generations during that term, we shall

have an eye to their utility as representing types of the feminine, even

more than to their aptitude for illustrating any special development in

civilized habits. Evolution proceeded slowly in those days, and,

consequently, a century or two did not greatly change social habits.

Somewhere about the middle of the fifth century, a Frankish chief named

Childeric was driven from his own people by the varying fortunes of war.

He took refuge among the Thuringians, and rewarded their kindness by

seducing Basina, the wife of their king. After his return, she left her

husband and joined her lover, becoming his recognized wife. Childeric's

guilt in this affair is somewhat mitigated by the spirit of Basina, who

declared that she chose the Frank solely because she knew no man who was

wiser, stronger or handsomer, surely a frank admission of natural

sentiment. The offspring of this free union was Clovis, the founder of

the kingdom of the Franks, and the means whereby it became Christian.

While still a youth, though established in the chieftainship by his

valor in marauding expeditions, Clovis heard of the beauty and the

desirable character of Clotilde, the niece of Gondebaud, King of the

Burgundians. She had been brought up amidst the most barbarous scenes

which those times could produce. Her father and her two brothers had

been put to death by her uncle, who had also caused her mother Agrippina

to be thrown into the Rhone, with a stone fastened to her neck, and

drowned. Clotilde and her sister Chrona, he permitted to live. The

latter had become a nun, while Clotilde, no less religious, was living

at Geneva where, as it is said, she employed her whole time in works of

piety and charity. Clovis sent to Gondebaud asking the hand of his

niece; but it appears that at first his suit was not favorably looked

upon, for the Frank resorted to unusual measures whereby he gained his

end and provided the material for an interesting story.

It is told as

follows by Fredegaire in his commentary on the history by Gregory of

Tours: "As he was not allowed to see Clotilde, Clovis charged a certain

Roman, named Aurelian, to use all his wit to come nigh her. Aurelian

repaired alone to the spot, clothed in rags and with his wallet upon his

back, like a mendicant. To ensure confidence in himself, he took with

him the ring of Clovis. On his arrival at Geneva, Clotilde received him

as a pilgrim charitably, and whilst she was washing his feet, Aurelian,

bending toward her, said under his breath, 'Lady, I have great matters

to announce to thee if thou deign to permit me secret revelation.' She

consenting, replied, 'Say on.' 'Clovis, King of the Franks,' said he,

'hath sent me to thee: if it be the will of God, he would fain raise

thee to his high rank by marriage; and that thou mayest be certified

thereof, he sendeth thee this ring.' She accepted this ring with great

joy, and said to Aurelian, 'Take for recompense of thy pains these

hundred sous in gold and this ring of mine. Return promptly to thy lord;

if he would fain unite me to him in marriage, let him send without delay

messengers to demand me of my uncle Gondebaud, and let the messengers

who shall come take me away in haste, so soon as they shall have

obtained permission; if they haste not, I fear lest a certain sage, one

Aridius, may return from Constantinople; and if he arrive beforehand,

all this matter will by his counsel come to naught.'"

Aurelian returned and told Clovis all that had passed and the

instructions he had received from Clotilde. "Clovis, pleased with his

success and with Clotilde's notion, at once sent a deputation to

Gondebaud to demand his niece in marriage. Gondebaud, not daring to

refuse, and flattered at the idea of making a friend of Clovis, promised

to give her to him. Then the deputation, having offered the denier and

the sou, according to the custom of the Franks, espoused Clotilde in the

name of Clovis, and demanded that she be given up to be married. Without

any delay, the council was assembled at Chalons, and preparations were

made for the nuptials. The Franks, having arrived with all speed,

received her from the hands of Gondebaud, put her into a covered

carriage and escorted her to Clovis, together with much treasure. She,

however, having already learned that Aridius was on his way back, said

to the Frankish lords, 'If ye would take me into the presence of your

lord, let me descend from this carriage, mount me on horseback, and get

you hence as fast as you may; for never in this carriage shall I reach

the presence of your lord.'

"Aridius, in fact, returned very speedily from Marseilles; and

Gondebaud, on seeing him, said, 'Thou knowest that we have made friends

with the Franks, and that I have given my niece to Clovis to wife.'

'This,' answered Aridius, 'is no bond of friendship, but the beginning

of perpetual strife; thou shouldst have remembered, my lord, that thou

didst slay Clotilde's father, that thou didst drown her mother, and that

thou didst cut off her brothers' heads and cast their bodies into a

well. If Clotilde become powerful, she will avenge the wrongs of her

relatives. Send thou forthwith a troop in chase, and have her brought

back to thee. It will be easier for thee to bear the wrath of one person

than to be perpetually at strife, thyself and thine, with all the

Franks.' And Gondebaud did send forthwith a troop in chase to fetch back

Clotilde with the carriage and all the treasure; but she, on approaching

Villers (where Clovis was waiting for her), in the territory of Troyes,

and before passing the Burgundian frontier, urged them who escorted her

to disperse right and left over a space of twelve leagues in the country

whence she was departing, to plunder and burn; and that having been done

with the permission of Clovis, she cried aloud, 'I thank thee, God

omnipotent, for that I see the commencement of vengeance for my parents

and my brethren!'"

The kingdom to which Clovis welcomed his queen was not large. It

comprised no more than the island of the Batavians, and the dioceses of

Tournay and Arras. Nevertheless, this marriage was of exceeding

importance in the history of Europe, for by virtue of his qualities

Clovis was destined to go far in conquest, and to establish the

beginning of a great nation; and the question of his conversion, whether

to Arianism or to Catholicism, was fairly certain to be answered by his

matrimonial alliance. The time had come when political wisdom provided

the most effective argument against paganism.

It was not at once, however, that Clotilde was able to bring about the

conversion of her husband. The most she could accomplish was to gain his

consent, after the birth of their first son, to the baptism of the

latter. The child dying a few days afterward, serious misgivings arose

in the king's mind as to whether he had not been ill advised in

permitting the Christian rite. But Clotilde's second son also was

baptized, and fell sick. Said Clovis: "It cannot be otherwise with him

than with his brother; baptized in the name of your Christ, he is going

to die." The child lived, and thereby Clotilde was placed to better

advantage in attacking her husband's mind with her Christian arguments.

He was brought to the point of decision when, in his battle at Tolbiac

against the Alemannians, the day seeming about to be lost, Aurelian

cried: "My lord king, believe only on the Lord of heaven, whom the

queen, my mistress, preacheth!" Clovis exclaimed:

"Christ Jesus, Thou

whom my queen Clotilde calleth the Son of the Living God, I have invoked

my own gods, and they have withdrawn from me; I believe that they have

no power, since they aid not those who call upon them.

Thee, very God

and Lord, I invoke; if Thou give me victory over these foes; if I find

in Thee the power the people proclaim of Thee, I will believe on Thee,

and will be baptized in Thy name." The fortune of battle immediately

turned in favor of the Franks.

On his return home, to make sure that her husband would fulfil his vow

while his gratitude was warm, Clotilde sent for Saint Remi, the holy

Bishop of Rheims, to perfect her own instructions and receive him into

the Church. Clovis was baptized, as were also the majority of his

subjects. To what extent the doctrines of Christianity had taken

possession of his mind may be gathered from the anecdote which recounts

how, after hearing from the bishop's lips the story of the sufferings of

Christ, he shouted: "Had I been present at the head of my valiant

Franks, I would have revenged his injuries!" As Gibbon says: "The savage

conqueror of Gaul was incapable of examining the proofs of a religion

which depended upon the laborious investigation of historic evidence and

speculative theology. He was still more incapable of feeling the mild

influence of the gospel, which persuades and purifies the heart of a

genuine convert. His ambitious reign was a perpetual violation of moral

and Christian duties: his hands were stained with blood in peace as well

as in war." He took part in a synod of the Gallican Church, and

immediately murdered in cold blood all the princes of the Merovingian

race. Into what, a pit the Christianity of those times had fallen may be

understood when we find Gregory of Tours, after calmly reciting the

murders of Clovis, concluding with these words: "For God thus daily

prostrated his enemies under his hands, and enlarged his kingdom,

because he walked before him with an upright heart, and did that which

was pleasing in his sight." Clovis was the only strictly orthodox

sovereign of that day--a day when orthodoxy was permitted to cover a

multitude of sins.

After making himself sole monarch of the Frankish race, Clovis died in

the year 511, and was buried in the church which had been erected by

Clotilde. The queen survived her husband many years, but did not

exercise any noticeable influence. She could not even save her two

little grandsons from the ambitious cruelty of her sons-

-Clotaire and

Childebert. These sent a message to Clotilde saying:

"Send the children

to us, that we may place them on the throne." Having sent them, there

soon came to her another messenger, bearing a sword and a pair of

shears. Unshorn locks were essential as a mark of the kingly race among

the Franks; the messenger said therefore: "Most glorious queen, thy

sons, our masters, desire to know thy will touching these children; wilt

thou that they live with shorn hair or that they be put to death?"

Clotilde, in her astonishment and despair, answered: "If they be not set

upon the throne, I would rather know that they were dead than shorn."

The messenger hastened back to the two kings and, with fatal and wilful

inaccuracy, said: "Finish ye your work, for the queen favoring your

plans, willeth that ye accomplish them." Forthwith the two children were

murdered in the most cold-blooded fashion. The tale is rendered the more

shocking by the addition of the fact that Guntheuque, the mother of the

lads, had become the wife of that uncle who killed them.

The Merovingians allowed themselves as much license in love as they did

freedom from restraint in regard to the sterner passions. Nominal

Christians though they were, they felt no compunction of conscience as

to polygamy, when the vagaries of their fancy could be satisfied only by

its practice. Gregory of Tours records how: "King Clotaire I. had to

wife Ingonde, and her only did he love, when she made to him the

following request: 'My lord,' said she, 'hath made of his handmaid what

seemeth to him good; and now, to crown his favors, let my lord deign to

hear what his handmaid demandeth. I pray you be graciously pleased to

find for my sister Aregonde, your slave, a man both capable and rich, so

that I be rather exalted than abased thereby, and be enabled to serve

you still more faithfully.' At these words, Clotaire, who was but too

voluptuously disposed by nature, conceived a fancy for Aregonde, betook

himself to the country house where she dwelt, and united her to him in

marriage. When the union had taken place, he returned to Ingonde, and

said to her, 'I have labored to procure for thee the favor thou didst so

sweetly demand, and, on looking for a man of wealth and capability

worthy to be united to thy sister, I could find none better than myself:

know, therefore, that I have taken her to wife, and I trow that it will

not displease thee.' 'What seemeth good in my master's eyes, that let

him,' replied Ingonde; 'only let thy servant abide still in the king's

grace.'"

From the above, it is noticeable that a servile manner of speech to

their husbands was customary to the Frankish women of that time. It is

possible that it was little more than an affectation.

Doubtless the

women of character and strength then, as ever, were not without means of

holding their own. Chilperic, the King of Soissons, who was a son of

Clotaire, added to the not brief list of his wives--we may give him the

benefit of the doubt as to whether they were contemporaneous--Galsuinthe, daughter of the King of Spain. Her

attractiveness consisted in no small measure of the wealth she brought

him. But he became enamored of Fredegonde. Galsuinthe could not brook

this, and she offered to willingly relinquish her dowry if he would send

her back to her father. Chilperic adopted a solution of the difficulty

that was more to his mind. The queen was found dead in her bed. She had

been strangled by a slave. Chilperic mourned for a season which was more

remarkable for its brevity than his sorrow was marked by its intensity,

and then took Fredegonde for his wife. This queen exerted an influence

upon the affairs of her time, both political and ecclesiastical. In her

life and character was fully illustrated that strong mixture of

viciousness and affected piety which occasions such a sad commentary on

the Christianity of her time. She was the daughter of peasants, and owed

her rise solely to her beauty and her mental gifts. Her numerous murders

included her stepson, a king, and the Archbishop of Rouen. How much

regard she entertained for her own personal chastity may be judged from

the fact that she took a public oath, with three bishops and four

hundred nobles as her vouchers, that her son was the true offspring of

her husband, Chilperic. Whether the value of this great mass of

testimony consisted in a personal denial of responsibility on the part

of all the men whose position and character might be prejudicial to

Chilperic's paternity is not made clear. And yet, despite all this, the

following pious act is recorded to her: her child was ill; "he was a

little brother, when his elder brother, Chlodebert, was attacked with

the same symptoms. His mother, Fredegonde, seeing him in danger of

death, and touched by tardy repentance, said to the king, 'Long hath

divine mercy borne with our misdeeds; it hath warned us by fevers and

other maladies, and we have not mended our ways, and now we are losing

our sons; now the tears of the poor, the lamentations of widows, and the

sighs of orphans are causing them to perish, and leaving us no hope of

laying by for anyone. We heap up riches and know not for whom. Our

treasures, all laden with plunder and curses, are like to remain without

possessors. Our cellars are they not bursting with wine, and our

granaries with corn? Our coffers were they not full to the brim with

gold and silver and precious stones and necklaces and other imperial

ornaments? And yet that which was our most beautiful possession we are

losing! Come then, if thou wilt, and let us burn all these wicked

lists!' Having thus spoken, and beating her breast, the queen had

brought to her the rolls, which Mark had consigned to her of each of the

cities that belonged to her, and cast them into the fire. Then, turning

again to the king, 'What!' she cried, 'dost thou hesitate? Do thou even

as I; if we lose our dear children, at least we escape everlasting

punishment!'" It may be taken for granted that Fredegonde's "works meet

for repentance" on this occasion have not suffered in the recital by

Gregory of Tours. She may have exhorted her husband to acts of mercy;

nevertheless she planned and saw executed the assassination of

Chilperic, being fearful lest he discover the guilty connection which

had sprung up between herself and an officer of her household. By this

act, she became the sovereign guardian of her infant, and held this

potential position during the last thirteen years of her life. Guizot

thus summarizes her character: "She was a true type of the

strong-willed, artful, and perverse woman in barbarous times; she

started low down in the scale and rose very high without a corresponding

elevation of soul; she was audacious and perfidious, as perfect in

deception as in effrontery, proceeding to atrocities either from cool

calculation or a spirit of revenge, abandoned to all kinds of passion,

and, for gratification of them, shrinking from no sort of crime.

However, she died quietly at Paris in 597 or 598, powerful and dreaded,

and leaving on the throne of Neustria her son, Clotaire II., who,

fifteen years later, was to become sole king of all the Frankish

dominions."

Contemporaneous with Fredegonde, and exerting a stronger and indeed more

salutary influence upon her age, though scarcely superior in her moral

character, was Brunehaut, Queen of the Franks of Austrasia. She was a

younger sister of Galsuinthe, by the murder of whom the way was opened

to Chilperic's bed and throne for Fredegonde. The King of Austrasia was

Sigebert, brother of Chilperic. Among those fierce Merovingians kinship

of the closest degree had no deterring influence on their passions. In a

war between these two brothers, Sigebert was assassinated in his tent by

the emissaries of Fredegonde. Brunehaut fell into the latter's power,

and only the fact that she managed to make her