The Wedding Dance by Matthew Butcher - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

child universe of the mind.

      This prevents the false knowledge from growing and festering into a weed. The weed is a product of a event, action or experience where guilt or false knowledge has been left to grow in the pathological path of the child’s mind to fester and grow into a weed. When you ignore the seed of the false knowledge of your heart it will present a truth language called emotion that will inform you of guilt, anger, sadness, remorse, shame or fear that you are in custody of a problem that needs to be addressed. It is read by the innocents of the inner child heart of conscious and the conscious will return a message of guilt to the mind for judgments to correct.

      The Judgment then is weighed by the judgment center and conscious of the mind and a signal is sent to the heart of the child as a negative feeling. If the child ignores the signal of guilt of the original parent memory to examine the trauma for correction it will fester into a festering guilt that will continue to disturb the child. As time goes by the child will revisit the memory on another day and as he examines the guilt he will replicate the event into a new memory cell. This replication will in turn add weight to the original parent memory of the event as well as create a new memory made by examining the trauma and increase the festering guilt. As the child procrastinates to cleans the event in the mind he will feel an increase of animosity, hostility or friction toward the event.

This is now a urgent message from God to visit the memory and correct it in order to bring comfort or salvation.

      The child will then examine or visit the parent memory again and also review the child secondary memory and if left unchecked the mind will form another memory on the landscape of the mind. This is the propagation of the parent weed into a garden of offspring weeds in the garden of Eden of the child mind universe and reality. Each reinforcing, strengthening and increasing the trauma of the parent memory and negative emotions.

      Creating a replicated fractal Armageddon of the event and the soul wars with the mind in emotional heat. It is a battle between heaven and hell in the universe of the mind. This is fractal and can replicate the same scenario in a society of minds and landscape of a communities of market patrons and Gods Children. How it relates is that an introduction of the immoral disturbance will be introduced into the society and enter the minds and create a memory of the disturbing introduction in the society. This can present great challenges for the witness because it not only does it create the same scenario as above it also has no access to removing the introduction out of the society.

Page. 76       Page. 77

Example 1: The introduction of legal pornography into a society will create animosity into the minds of morality. It can also replicate, create or result in one or two other scenario like a numbing acceptance or a serious perversion with the above.

      Immoral perversions introduced into a society like pornography, fornication, sex, drugs, murder, man slaughter violence and numerous crimes in news for entertainment in media and music for profit are greed and gluttons.

      Resulting in the propagations of weeds like the scenarios above, but also will result in acting out or replicating such events into the reality or landscape of a society in the form of copycat crimes like drug abuse, sex crimes Sex Abuse and violent crimes resulting in deaths and traumas.

Example 1. On a hot summer evening in Colorado, families and friends gather at the local movie theater to enjoy an evening of light entertainment. That evening is turned into a night of blood lust and bedlam when a lone gunman enters the hitherto safe confines of the theater, and, with rifle, shotgun, and pistol, kills a dozen and wounds more than four dozen more.

      Sadly, it is a scene with which Americans are all too familiar. Disgruntled employees, broken by the strain of the workplace or terrified at the abyss that lays before them in unemployment after a recent dismissal, return to their offices or factory floors with guns.

      Alienated students bring homemade bombs to their schools, and confused loners, seeking significance in a society that has cast them aside create their own headlines through mass murder. Self-appointed vigilantes gun down children for merely appearing to be in the wrong neighborhood. Police put 41 bullets into an innocent, unarmed, immigrant peddler, succumbing to a ‘shoot-first, ask questions later’ mentality.

      After each and every incident Americans are left pondering why and wondering what if anything can be done to stop it and also, ‘how did this occur, and what caused it?’

      Are violent games, movies, and music desensitizing and molesting our Gods children? Is the problem that inadequate precautions have been taken to screen and then care for those with emotional problems? Problems that, left untreated, can overtake the better angels of one’s own personality?

      Is it that America has made a cult of gun ownership and made firearms ‘sexy,’ using the beast advertising techniques to glorify their ownership?

Page. 78       Page. 79

      Is it a foreign policy that equates patriotism to bombing campaigns that left cities from Pyongyang to Hanoi in piles of smoking ruin? Is it that war itself is reduced to a video game as remote control drones kill American citizens whose names appear on a ‘death list’ that is kept in the Oval Office itself? A reasonable case can be made that each of these in varying degrees contribute to a poor socialization of the American psyche, leaving it vulnerable to improper and ultimately violent impulses.

      The larger question however is what sort of society do we wish to live in, and once that question is answered, how do we go about organizing it?

      There is only one problem: There is a road block to the progress of citizens organizing the society. That problem is a dictatorship of immoral finance-capitalism. Our society is not organized along the lines that the people desire but rather along the lines that the private owners have determined will reap them the greatest profits.

      There is no immediate profit in the public care and treatment of those with psychological and emotional disturbances; that costs money and the one percent do not wish to pay. Films, literature, and television that seek to portray working people accurately and that are uplifting are potentially financially risky; much easier to splatter the screen with gratuitous violence to a public taste already deadened by decades of exposure.

The creation of a consumerist society, obsessed with obtaining the appropriate brand name shoes, hats, jackets, cars, and liquor labels lead youth desperate to acquire any outward sign of success and acceptance they will even kill to get it. It is a long term sales plan.

      While peace and cooperation between nations would produce profit in trade, there is an immediate profit in war. The munitions, the equipment, must be rapidly replaced and the quantity increased. The lawmakers of the land who vote for the expenditures must abide dare they be accused of leaving our boys into the field without the tools they need to get the job done.

      The job of multiple simultaneous wars however is too big even for the Pentagon, and so private armies must be hired for additional security, and private companies make profits from taxpayers by being the lowest bidder to do the wash and cook the meals of those on what soon become permanent forward bases as imperialist ambitious grow grander and the thirst for profits is immoral capitalism. All these decisions are made on behalf of the ruling class; the working class would have none of it if their voices were truly represented in deliberative bodies.

Page. 80       Page. 81

      An intelligent debate about the responsibilities that should correspond to the rights of gun ownership is made impossible. The gun lobby, financed by the arms manufacturers who wish only to sell more weapons, regardless of the purpose, be it hunting, competitive shooting, forming your own militia, or robbing the local liquor store shut down the debate before it even begins. Instead some propose that still more guns is the solution so that each and every armed citizen can squelch an unexpected gunfight with his own superior firepower. Proposals such as this are actually taken seriously, as if the Wild West remained untamed and the 21st century were not the present time.

      Rather than a society that first seeks war as a solution to geopolitical problems, why not a ‘Department of Peace’ as some lawmakers had frequently proposed? In 1995, the government of South Africa instituted a ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ to deal with the human rights abuses that occurred in their society during the Apartheid period. No such commission exists in the U.S. to seek resolve for all the monstrous crimes committed by a capitalist government against it’s own people, from the enslavement of an entire race, to the genocidal slaughter of another. No official government body seeks to find the root causes of why a government would suppress the desire for workers rights by using automatic weapons against families in Ludlow, Colorado. We do not as a society confront the crimes of the wholesale murder of the incarcerated in places like Attica State prison. We wish only to bury and not confront the institutional racism that prompted and excused the most ghastly medical experiments and forced sterilization of human beings.

      There is a great deal to do if we are to take positive steps in taming the savageness of man and make gentle this world. It is not the ruling class that will provide the solutions, it is the 99 percent, but first they need the power to do so. Perhaps no society will ever be immune to a certain pathological personality, determined to do evil, but those who have been fortunate enough to visit socialist societies, both of the past such as the USSR and of the present, such as Cuba, will have observed something different from the experience a capitalist society produces. They will have noticed a kindness, a joy, a spirit of cooperation, of mutual support and caring. They will have also seen a great interest in the development of youth, as well as a purposefulness to culture, art, literature, and film.

      This is not to suggest that we should strive to replicate, imitate, or mirror these societies, but rather to indicate that given the opportunity, the people will create a society much different than immoral capitalism will. Americans, given the chance, would organize themselves into a society brimming with opportunity and reflecting the unique values, customs, and traditions that this nation can be proud of.

Page. 82       Page. 83

      Given the chance, the people will once and for all remove the corrupting profit motive that has poisoned a culture, left a workforce at loose ends, and praised and accepted anything, even violence, in the pursuit of private gain. Given the chance, working people would build an America that was truly ‘kinder and gentler’ and would seek real solutions to put an end to the violence that has cut short so many American dreams.

Example 2.Watching Violent films does make people more aggressive, study shows

      In the first study of its kind, researchers found that each person’s reaction depended on how aggressive they were to begin with Violence on screen can translate into real life, according to a new study Violence on screen can translate into real life, according to a new study

      Watching violent movies really does make people more aggressive - but only if they have an abrasive personality to start with, a study shows. Bloody scenes do not have the same effect on passive characters who react to what they see on a screen in an entirely different way.

      The link between X-rated films and video games and the rise in violent crime has been debated for years so scientists scanned the brains of two very different groups of people to see what happened as they were shown violent images.

In the first study of its kind they found each person’s reaction depended on how aggressive they were to begin with.

      After answering a questionnaire 54 men were split into two groups, those who were aggressive including a history of physical assault and those were calmer.

Related Articles

Attenborough blames films for knife crime 24 Jul 2008

      Tarantino in furious rant over Django Unchained 11 Jan

2013 Brutal truth about violence in movies 25 Jun 2013 Their brains were scanned as they watched a succession of shootings and street fights on day one, emotional but non-violent scenes such as people interacting during a natural disaster on day two and nothing on day three.

      While watching violence the aggressive group had less activity in the orbito-frontal cortex, which controls emotion-related decision making and self-control.

Page. 84       Page. 85

      These subjects said they felt more inspired, determined and less upset or nervous than their non-aggressive counterparts when watching violent instead of only emotional scenes.

      Their blood pressure also went down progressively while the calm groups’ rose.

      During the final ‘mind wandering’ stage - when no films were shown - the aggressive participants had unusually high brain activity in a network of regions known to be active when not doing anything in particular.

      This suggests they have a different brain function map than their non-aggressive peers, said the researchers.

      Dr Nelly Alia-Klein, of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, said: “How an individual responds to their environment depends on the brain of the beholder.

      Aggression is a trait that develops together with the nervous system over time starting from childhood. Patterns of behavior become solidified and the nervous system prepares to continue the behavior patterns into adulthood when they become increasingly coached in personality.

      This could be at the root of the differences in people who are aggressive and non aggressive - and how media motivates them to do certain things.”

      The findings published in the science journal PLOS ONE could have implications for intervention programs seeking to reduce aggressive behavior starting in childhood.

      Dr Alia-Klein said: “Our aim was to investigate what is going on in the brains of people when they watch violent movies. We hypothesized if people have aggressive traits to begin with, they will process violent media in a very different way as compared to non-aggressive people - a theory supported by these findings.”

      In the study the scans measured the subjects’ brain metabolic activity - a marker of brain function. Participants also had their blood pressure taken every 5 minutes and were asked how they were feeling at 15 minute intervals.

      Dr Alia-Klein said: “Hopefully these results will give educators an opportunity to identify children with aggressive traits and teach them to be more aware of how aggressive material activates them specifically.”

Example 3. In writing this article, it is not our intention to prove scientifically, or otherwise, that behind every violent sex crime there is a pornography problem.

Page. 86       Page. 87

      Clearly, violent sexual crimes existed long before dirty magazines and porn sites came into the picture. The purpose of this article is to address the concerning misinformation that many pro-porn defenders promote by saying that pornography is harmless or by saying that we lack the necessary “conclusive scientific data” that pornography causes sex crimes. (We have heard countless people even argue that pornography is helpful because it allows people to view their deviant sexual fantasies, rather than practicing them on another person.) These pro-porn people contend that pornography actually decreases instances of rape because it is an acceptable sexual outlet. However, there is already enough evidence of a causal link between porn and sex crimes to make the claim that pornography is extremely harmful.

      Everyone’s brain is wired to repeat what it sees and hears; it’s a major part of how we learn. And the more senses you get involved in the learning process, the more consistent the message, and the more often you see it, the more likely you are to be influenced by it. That’s just one more reason why viewing pornography is dangerous. It’s only a short jump from watching something in porn to actually imitating it in real life. And sometimes the things you see can really hurt yourself and other people.

      Did you know that there’s been a correlation found between people who view pornography and people who commit sexual crimes? Now we’re not saying that watching porn will make you become a serial rapist, while the way pornography affects you, it can definitely influence your judgment. This is why porn is connected with sexual violence. Proving this point is kind of tough, because an accurate study, as one researcher put it, “would require a sampling of much more than a thousand males, exposed to pornography through puberty and adolescence, while the other group is totally isolated from its influence in all its forms and varying degrees. Each group would then have to be monitored—through the commission of violent crimes or not”

(Related: How Porn Likely Influenced Stanford Rape Case)

      Obviously, a study that invasive and complex would be next to impossible to set up. But that doesn’t mean the facts aren’t already there.

      “In spite of the lack of formal research, though, the FBI’s own statistics show that pornography is found at 80 percent of the scenes of violent sex crimes, or in the homes of the perpetrators”

      Now we think that’s kind of tough to ignore. The people who promote pornography think that is actually easy to overlook. They say that porn is harmless, or that science doesn’t support the claims. Sounds about right coming from someone who stands to make a profit in the porn industry.

Page. 88       Page. 89

      The fact is that there is more than enough evidence, like findings from the FBI, that prove there is a link between pornography and sex crimes.

In fact, here’s a bunch of evidence about that link:

      The University of New Hampshire did a study that showed that the states with the highest readership of pornographic magazines like Playboy and Penthouse, also have the highest rape rates

      The Michigan State Police Department found that pornography is used or imitated in 41 percent of the sex crimes they have investigated

      Dr. Victor Cline did research that showed how men who become addicted to pornographic materials begin to want more explicit or deviant material and end up acting out what they have seen.

      Now this one will make your skin crawl—Dr. James Dobson interviewed Ted Bundy, one of the nation’s most notorious serial killers, on the day before his execution. Bundy said that the “most damaging kinds of pornography are those that involve sexual violence . . . The wedding of those two forces, as I know only too well, brings about behavior that is just too terrible to describe”

      Two doctors noted in their research- based book, Pornography and Sexual Aggression, that “Certain [aggressive] forms of pornography can affect aggressive attitudes toward women and can desensitize an individual’s perception of rape. These attitudes and perceptions are, furthermore, directly related to actual aggressive behavior against women.” They also found that adult pornography was connected with each of the 1,400 child sexual molestation cases in Louisville, Kentucky, and child pornography was connected with the majority of them.

      Another review of controlled studies found that extensive viewing of the type of pornographic material commonly sold at adult bookstores was positively correlated with an increased self- reported willingness to commit rape or other forced sexual acts.

      The Kingston Sexual Offenders Clinic in Canada found “an unexpected finding” when they conducted a study of their patients over a period of six years. “One of the rapists reported that he used consenting sex depictions to incite rape images in the process of preparing himself to attack a woman. Subsequent questioning revealed a further five rapists who made similar claims, and 10 of the 10 rapists who currently used (pornography) for enjoyment (not necessarily preparatory to offending) also said they used it to incite rape fantasies