Doing Science: The Process of Scientific Inquiry by National Institute of Health. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Note to teachers: Make sure that students have available their

failures of the system.

Investigative Report Forms from the previous two activities. This helps

Others are the result

them recall the progress of their investigation.

of damage by infection

by other organisms.

1. Explain to the class that they will continue their investigation

into the school absences among band members at Truman and

Jackson middle schools. Specifically, they will explore the

activities students were engaged in during the Battle of the

Bands event to see whether they can pinpoint how the students

became ill.

2. Give each student one copy of Master 3.1, Investigative Report

Form. Instruct them to write the testable questions developed at the end of the previous activity in the “Testable Question” space

on their form.

3. Continue with students in the same teams as in the previous

activities. Display a transparency of Master 3.9, Third Memo from

Director. Read the memo aloud to the class.

The memo informs the teams that a nearby community has reported

that its water supply may be contaminated by bacteria that cause a

stomach-related illness.

Tip from the field test: The students’ knowledge

about disease transmission is limited. Make sure that

they understand that food poisoning and illness from

contaminated water are not contagious. However, a

stomach virus can be passed from one person to another.

4. Give each team one copy of Masters 3.10a and b, Activity Tables.

Ask students to review the information and record their findings

on their Investigative Report Form.

The Activity Tables provide information about the activities that

band members from both schools participated in on the day of the

Battle of the Bands event. The tables include information about

activity participation by band members who became ill and those

who did not become ill.

76

5. Give each team one copy of Masters 3.11a and b, Activity Maps.

Ask students to review the information and record their findings

on their Investigative Report Form.

The Activity Maps show the street locations for the various student

Content Standard A:

activities. The maps depict

Recognize and

• students from Truman Middle School who became ill and the

analyze alternative

activities in which they participated,

explanations and

• students from Jackson Middle School who became ill and the

predictions.

activities in which they participated, and

• students from both Truman and Jackson middle schools who

became ill and the activities in which they participated.

Content Standard E:

Science and

6. Instruct the teams to record their conclusions about which

technology are

activities may have exposed the students to disease. They should

reciprocal. Science

be prepared to share their conclusions with the other teams.

helps drive technology.

Technology is essential

Analysis of the activity data suggests that either eating at the Cheep

to science.

Chicken Hut restaurant or swimming in the lake made the band

members ill.

Content Standard A:

7. Acting as team supervisor, facilitate a class discussion to

Communicate

summarize the findings from all the teams. Guide the discussion

scientific procedures

to focus on how the teams think the band members became ill.

and explanations.

Ask the teams to explain their evidence and reasoning.

Students should conclude from their analyses of the activity tables

that two possibilities exist: 1) students got food poisoning at the

Cheep Chicken Hut and 2) students were infected while swimming

in the lake. Without additional information, it is not possible to

eliminate either possibility from suspicion. A third possibility

also exists. Students could have contracted a stomach virus while

attending the planning meeting on May 15. Explain to students

that the process they followed is similar to that used by scientists

conducting an investigation. Investigations do not always reach a

single conclusion. They often raise more questions that need to be

investigated.

8. Ask students to consider what next steps they would take to

reach a firm conclusion about the cause of the student illnesses.

What evidence would they like to collect?

Students’ suggestions may include

• visit the various restaurants and take food samples for testing,

• visit the lake and take water samples for testing,

• have the illnesses of the sick students diagnosed by a doctor,

• investigate activities (such as eating) that took place during the

planning meeting, and

77

Student Lesson 3

Doing Science: The Process of Scientific Inquiry

• survey other people (not students) who ate at the Cheep Chicken

Hut or swam in the lake to see whether they also became sick.

9. Collect from students their three Investigative Report Forms.

Assessment:

These can be used as an assessment tool.

Use the completed

Investigative Report

Activity 4: Reflecting on the Process of

Forms as a summative

Scientific Inquiry

assessment.

Note to teachers: Make sure that students have available their

Investigative Report Forms from the previous three activities. This helps

them recall the progress of their investigation.

1. Explain to the class that they will review the process used

during the community health department investigation from

the previous activity. Ask, “How did your investigation begin?”

Content Standard G:

Student responses will vary. Bring out the idea that the

Science requires

investigation began with a problem that prompted the asking

of a testable question.

different abilities,

depending on such

2. Ask students, “What testable question began your investigation?”

factors as the field

of study and type of

Students will report different questions. Appropriate questions deal

inquiry.

with whether or not the school absences noticed by the principal are

unusually high. Students may have asked a question such as, Is the

number of school absences in the last week more than in previous

weeks?

3. Ask students, “As your investigation went along, did you ask

other testable questions? What were they?” Write their questions

on the board.

Students will report a number of different questions. Try to guide

the discussion so that the questions are brought up in the order that

they appear in the investigation. Examples of questions that students

may report are the following:

• Are more students absent from one class than the others?

• Are there more absences in one school than the others?

• What is the reason for the higher number of absences among

students in band class at Truman and Jackson middle schools?

• Are the absent students suffering from the same illness?

• Have band members from the two schools been in contact with

each other?

• What is the cause of the disease?

• What is the source of the disease-causing organism?

78

4. Next, turn the discussion to the collection and analysis of

evidence. Ask students, “What evidence did you collect and

analyze to answer your questions?”

Students will mention various types of evidence collected.

5. Ask, “Was all of the evidence you analyzed helpful in answering

your questions?”

Student responses will vary. Some will report that all evidence was

helpful in that it helped them answer a question or choose between

alternative explanations. Other students may feel that some evidence

was not helpful because it could not definitively answer their

question.

6. Explain to students that they will now reconsider the evidence

used in their investigation, consider what information the

evidence provided, and explain how that evidence was used to

answer a question or to choose between alternative explanations.

Content Standard A:

7. Give each student one copy of Master 3.12, Analyzing Evidence.

Recognize and

Explain that they have about 15 minutes to

analyze alternative

• consider the evidence used in their investigation,

explanations

• write down the information they learned from it, and

and predictions.

• explain how it helped, or did not help, them to answer a

question or choose between alternative explanations.

Communicate

scientific procedures

While the students are working, circulate among them and guide

and explanations.

their progress. Some students may not understand why some pieces

of evidence were included in the investigation. For example, the

interviews with the parents of the sick students are necessary to

confirm their reasons for absence from school.

8. After students have completed their work on Master 3.12, ask for

volunteers to share their answers with the class.

As students report their answers, guide the discussion to raise the

points made in the following sample answers for Master 3.12.

1. Memos from the director of the community health department

Assessment:

The first memo suggests a possible health problem at a local school.

Assess students’

The second memo provides access to information about the student

absences and student band activities. The third memo raises the

understanding by

possibility that the local water supply is contaminated.

listening to their

explanations and

2. Attendance data for seventh-grade students at four middle

reasoning.

schools

79

Student Lesson 3

Doing Science: The Process of Scientific Inquiry

The attendance data reveal that students in band classes at

Truman and Jackson middle schools were absent during the past

week at rates several times higher than normal. This is considered

to be evidence of a possible health problem. It remains possible,

however, that all or some of the absent students were missing

from school for reasons other than illness.

3. Summaries of interviews from parents of absent students

Interviews with parents of the missing students confirmed that the

students were indeed absent from school and supply reasons for their

absences. The parent information summarized in the tables indicates

that all but two of the missing students were ill with a stomach-

related illness. This information rules out the explanation that

students were absent from school because they were truant.

4. Transcripts from interviews with parents of absent students

The interviews with parents provide additional information about

the student absences. For example, one parent states that her

child has the flu while another attributes his child’s illness to food poisoning. These comments are included to suggest possible causes

for the illnesses. These comments are opinions, however, and must

not be treated as necessarily factual.

We also learn from the interviews that it usually takes about five

days to become sick after being exposed to a stomach virus. In

contrast, a person who eats contaminated food usually gets sick

within the next day or two. This information becomes important

when trying to decide which contacts between students from the

two schools might be associated with the illnesses. For example, a

stomach virus may have been contracted from sick students at the

planning meeting or stomach illness may have been spread during an

activity at the band event such as swimming in contaminated water

or eating contaminated food.

5. School

calendars

Since the available evidence suggests that the absent students may

all be suffering from the same illness, it is important to investigate whether the affected students from the two schools were in recent

contact with each other. Such contacts provide opportunities for a

disease-causing organism to pass among the students. Assuming that

eating is involved, such shared experiences are also consistent with

illness resulting from food poisoning.

A comparison of the school calendars reveals that band students

from the two schools came into contact with each other three times

in the past month. The first occasion was the May Day parade on

80

May 5. It is unlikely that the illnesses resulted from this contact

because it occurred so long ago. Further supporting this view is the

fact that the band from Roosevelt Middle School also attended the

parade but its students did not become ill.

Content Standard F:

Students from the two bands were also together for the Battle of the

The potential for

Bands planning meeting held on May 15. It is possible that a student

accidents and the

with a stomach virus spread the illness to others at this meeting.

existence of hazards

Assuming that students would become sick five days later, they

imposes the need for

would be absent from school starting on May 20, which is what was

injury prevention.

observed. Students from the two schools also were together at the

Battle of the Bands event on May 19. It is possible that students ate

Important personal

contaminated food at the event and became sick the next day.

and social decisions

are made based on

6. Student activity tables

perceptions of

benefits and risks.

At this point, the most likely explanation for why the students

became ill is that they either contracted a stomach virus at the

planning meeting or got food poisoning at the Battle of the Bands.

These tables provide information about which students participated

in which activities at the Battle of the Bands. This information may

help identify a source of exposure to a disease-causing organism.

Information from the tables reveals that the majority of students

who became ill ate at the Cheep Chicken Hut restaurant and swam

in the lake. This means that students may have eaten contaminated

food at the restaurant. It also raises the possibility that students

became ill by swimming in contaminated water. Consistent with

this new possibility is information contained in the third memo

from the health department director, which mentions that a nearby

community suspects that its water supply is contaminated with

bacteria that cause a stomach-related illness.

7. Activity

maps

These maps show where the various activities associated with the

Battle of the Bands event took place. The final map depicts the

activities attended by students from both schools who later became

ill. This information suggests that the illnesses were related to eating at the Cheep Chicken Hut restaurant or swimming in the lake.

9. Explain that in the next lesson, students will continue in

their roles as members of the investigative team. They will

take charge of another investigation dealing with a community

health problem.

81

Student Lesson 3

Doing Science: The Process of Scientific Inquiry

Lesson 3 Organizer: Web Version

What the Teacher Does

Procedure Reference

Activity 1: Unusual Absences

Explain to students that they will carry out a scientific investigation.

Page 59

They will be working as members of an investigative team from the

Step 1

local community health department.

Pages 59–60

Give each student one copy of Master 3.1, Investigative Report Form.

Step 2

Divide the class into teams of three and direct them to computers.

Page 60

Have students log onto the Web site and click on “Activity 1— Unusual

Step 3

Absences.”

Instruct teams to read the new message and come up with a testable

Pages 60–61

question about the student absences.

Steps 4 and 5

Instruct teams to click on the link to the school district Web site and

Pages 61–62

export the attendance data to the community health

Steps 6–9

department Web site,

display the data in graphic form,

analyze the graphs and record their findings on Master 3.1, and

when finished, log off the Web site.

Page 62

Facilitate a class discussion. Focus on the following questions:

Step 10

What is the reason for the higher number of absences among

students in band class at Truman and Jackson middle schools?

If these absences are due to an illness, do band members from

the two affected schools share the same symptoms?

Have band members from the two schools been in contact

with each other?

Activity 2: What’s the Cause?

Explain that teams will continue their investigations, focusing on the

Page 63

questions asked at the end of the previous activity.

Step 1

Give each student one copy of Master 3.1, Investigative Report Form.

Page 63

Instruct students to write down the testable questions asked during

Step 2

the last activity.

Direct each team to a computer and have them log onto the

Page 63

Web site and click on “Activity 2—What’s the Cause?”

Step 3

= Involves copying a master.

82

Instruct teams to

Pages 63–64

read the new message,

Steps 4–6

read the results of interviews,

read the available portions of the parent interviews, and

record their findings on Master 3.1.

Instruct teams to compare the two school calendars and record their

Page 64

findings on Master 3.1.

Steps 7 and 8

When finished, teams should log off the Web site.

Page 65

Facilitate a class discussion. Focus on the following questions:

Step 9

Is there a common reason for the absences of the band

students at Truman and Jackson middle schools?

What are possible causes for the student illnesses?

How could students from both bands be exposed to a disease-

causing organism at the same time?

Assuming that the students from the two bands are suffering

from the same illness, when were they most likely exposed to

the disease-causing organism?

Activity 3: What’s the Source?

Explain that teams will continue their investigations, focusing on the

Page 65

questions asked at the end of the previous activity.

Step 1

Give each student one copy of Master 3.1, Investigative Report Form.

Page 65

Instruct students to write down the testable ques