p. 71: The basic historical text for this whole period, the Dynastic History of the Han Dynasty, is now in part available in English translation (H.H. Dubs, The History of the Former Han Dynasty, Baltimore 1938, 3
volumes).
p. 72: The description of the gentry is based upon my own research. Other scholars define the word "gentry", if applied to China, differently (some of the relevant studies are discussed in my note in the Bull. School of Orient.
& African Studies, 1955, p. 373 f.).
p. 73: The theory of the cycle of mobility has been brought forth by Fr. L.K. Hsu and others. I have based my
criticism upon a forthcoming study of Social Mobility in Traditional Chinese Society. The basic point is not the momentary economic or political power of such a family, but the social status of the family ( Li-shih yen-chiu, Peking 1955, No. 4, p. 122). The social status was, increasingly, defined and fixed by law (Ch'ü T'ung-tsu).—
The difference in the size of gentry and other families has been pointed out by a number of scholars such as Fr.
L.K. Hsu, H.T. Fei, O. Lang. My own research seems to indicate that gentry families, on the average, married
earlier than other families.
p. 74: The Han system of examinations or rather of selection has been studied by Yang Lien-sheng; and analysis of the social origin of candidates has been made in the Bull. Chinese Studies, vol. 2, 1941, and 3, 1942.—The meaning of the term "Hundred Families" has been discussed by W. Eichhorn, Kuo Mo-jo, Ch'en Meng-chia and especialy by Hsü T'ung-hsin. It was later also a fiscal term.
p. 75: The analysis of Hsiung-nu society is based mainly upon my own research. There is no satisfactory history of these northern federations available in English. The compilation of W.M. MacGovern, The Early Empires of Central Asia, Chapel Hil 1939, is now quite antiquated.—An attempt to construct a model of Central Asian nomadic social structure has been made by E.E. Bacon, Obok, a Study of Social Structure in Eurasia, New York 1958, but the model constructed by B. Vladimirtsov and modified by O. Lattimore remains valuable.—For
origin and early-development of Hsiung-nu society see O. Maenchen, K. Jettmar, B. Bernstam, Uchida Gimpu
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11367/pg11367.html
210/257
8/15/12
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11367/pg11367.html
and many others.
p. 79: Material on the "classes" ( sz[)u] min) wil be found in a forthcoming book. Studies by Ch'ü T'ung-tsu and Tamai Korehiro are important here. An up-to-date history of Chinese education is stil a desideratum.
p. 80: For Tung Chung-shu, I rely mainly upon O. Franke.—Some scholars do not accept this "double
standard", although we have clear texts which show that cases were evaluated on the basis of Confucian texts and not on the basis of laws. In fact, local judges probably only in exceptional cases knew the text of the law or had the code. They judged on the basis of "customary law".
p. 81: Based mainly upon my own research. K.A. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, New Haven 1957, has a
different interpretation.
p. 82: Cases in which the Han emperors disregarded the law code were studied by Y. Hisamura.—I have used
here studies published in the Bull, of Chinese Studies, vol. 2 and 3 and in Tôyô gakuho, vol. 8 and 9, in addition to my own research.
p. 85: On local administration see Kat[=o] Shigeru and Yen Keng-wang's studies.
p. 86: The problem of the Chinese gold, which wil be touched upon later again, has gained theoretical interest, because it could be used as a test of M. Lombard's theories concerning the importance of gold in the West
( Annales, Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, vol. 12, Paris 1957, No. 1, p. 7-28). It was used in China from c. 600 B.C. on in form of coins or bars, but disappeared almost completely from A.D. 200 on, i.e. the period of economic decline (see L.S. Yang, Kat[=o] Shigeru).—The payment to border tribes occurs many times again in
Chinese history down to recent times; it has its paralel in British payments to tribes in the North-West Frontier Province in India which continued even after the Independence.
p. 88: According to later sources, one third of the tributary gifts was used in the Imperial ancestor temples, one third in the Imperial mausolea, but one third was used as gifts to guests of the Emperor.—The trade aspect of the tributes was first pointed but by E. Parker, later by O. Lattimore, recently by J.K. Fairbank.—The importance
of Chang Ch'ien for East-West contacts was systematicaly studied by B. Laufer; his Sino-Iranica, Chicago 1919 is stil a classic.
p. 89: The most important trait which points to foreign trade, is the occurrence of glass in Chinese tombs in Indo-China and of glass in China proper from the fifth century B.C. on; it is assumed that this glass was imported from the Near East, possibly from Egypt (O. Janse, N. Egami, Seligman).
p. 91: Large parts of the "Discussions" have been translated by Esson M. Gale, Discourses on Salt and Iron, Leiden 1931; the continuation of this translation is in Jour. Royal As. Society, North-China Branch 1934.—
The history of eunuchs in China remains to be written. They were known since at least the seventh century B.C.
The hypothesis has been made that this custom had its origin in Asia Minor and spread from there (R.F. Spencer in Ciba Symposia, vol. 8, No. 7, 1946 with references).
p. 92: The main source on Wang Mang is translated by C.B. Sargent, Wang Mang, a translation, Shanghai
1950 and H.H. Dubs, History of the Former Han Dynasty, vol, 3, Baltimore 1955.
p. 93: This evaluation of the "Old character school" is not generaly accepted. A quite different view is represented by Tjan Tjoe Som and R.P. Kramers and others who regard the differences between the schools as
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11367/pg11367.html
211/257
8/15/12
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11367/pg11367.html
of a philological and not a political kind. I folow here most strongly the Chinese school as represented by Ku Chieh-kang and his friends, and my own studies.
p. 93: Falsification of texts refers to changes in the Tso-chuan. My interpretation relies again upon Ku Chieh-kang, and Japanese astronomical studies (Ijima Tadao), but others, too, admit falsifications (H.H. Dubs); B.
Karlgren and others regard the book as in its main body genuine. The other text mentioned here is the Chou-li which is certainly not written by Wang Mang ( Jung-chai Hsü-pi 16), but heavily mis-used by him (in general see S. Uno).
p. 94: I am influenced here by some of H.H. Dubs's studies. For this and the folowing period, the work by H.
Bielenstein, The Restoration of the Han Dynasty, Stockholm 1953 and 1959 is the best monograph.—The
"equalization offices" and their influence upon modern United States has been studied by B. Bodde in the Far Eastern Quarterly, vol. 5, 1946.
p. 95: H. Bielenstein regards a great flood as one of the main reasons for the breakdown of Wang Mang's rule.
p. 98: For the understanding of Chinese military colonies in Central Asia as wel as for the understanding of
military organization, civil administration and business, the studies of Lao Kan on texts excavated in Central Asia and Kansu are of greatest importance.
p. 101: Mazdaistic elements in this rebelion have been mentioned mainly by H.H. Dubs. Zoroastrism (Zoroaster
born 569 B.C.) and Mazdaism were eminently "political" religions from their very beginning on. Most scholars admit the presence of Mazdaism in China only from 519 on (Ishida Mikinosuke, O. Franke). Dubs's theory can
be strengthened by astronomical material.—The basic religious text of this group, the "Book of the Great Peace"
has been studied by W. Eichhorn Maspero and Ho Ch'ang-ch'ün.
p. 102: For the "church" I rely mainly upon H. Maspero and W. Eichhorn.
p. 103: I use here concepts developed by Cheng Chen-to and especialy by Jung Chao-tsu.
p. 104: Wang Ch'ung's importance has recently been mentioned again by J. Needham.
p. 105: These "court poets" have their direct paralel in Western Asia. This trend, however, did not become typical in China.—On the general history of paper read A. Kroeber, Anthropology, New York 1948, p. 490f., and Dard Hunter, Paper Making, New York 1947 (2nd ed.).