Understanding Shakespeare: The Tempest by Robert A. Albano - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

 

FINAL REMARKS

 

 

Plot

 

In terms of plot, The Tempest is perhaps the least interesting of Shakespeare’s plays. In Act IV Ariel and some of the other spirits perform a masque, a short form of entertainment that relies more on spectacle and music than it does on plot. However, the entire play of The Tempest is like one grand masque. Audiences enjoy the music and the magic, the splendor and the sense of wonder, more so than any complications or conflicts that appear in the plot of the play. The play is indeed a popular one even today, but that popularity rests upon the sheer pleasure and amusement that resides in the characters and their musical and poetic performance. There is very little intrigue or suspense in the play.

Nevertheless, several plot and subplot elements appear to keep the reader engaged in the action and to provide continuity and unity in the events:

First and foremost, the main action rests upon Prospero getting revenge against his brother and the King of Naples for forcibly removing him from his position as the Duke of Milan: the conflict of Prospero vs. Antonio and Alonso. However, The Tempest is not at all a revenge tragedy. The benevolent magician attempts to teach Antonio and Alonso the error of their ways rather than to bring them to justice. Moreover, from the very beginning of the play, the audience has little doubt that Prospero will be successful in his undertaking. Prospero is a protagonist who has abilities and powers far beyond any ordinary man. He is more like a god; and in any conflict between man and god, man cannot win. Prospero has no real obstacles to overcome: his conflict is over before it really even begins.

Second, a conflict of man vs. fate permeates the whole of the play. At times Prospero symbolizes fate itself, and at other times he is an instrument or tool of fate. Yet Prospero is also a victim of fate – a force that contributed to his downfall in Milan and yet also contributed to the survival of the magician and his daughter. More importantly, fate – not Prospero himself – brought Antonio and Alonso to the island so that Prospero could take action against them. And because fate intervened, Prospero then receives the good fortune of regaining his dukedom and having his daughter become a queen of Naples.

Third (and the first of the subplots), Sebastian (along with Antonio) plots or schemes against his brother Alonso in order to become king himself. The subplot provides a parallel structure for the play and links the characters of Sebastian and Antonio together. Both men are driven by ambition, and both men allow their ambition to lead them to pursue acts of treachery and murder. And the subplot also serves as a keen reminder that those who commit acts of treachery themselves (namely, Alonso) may find themselves as the victim of treachery later. As with the main plot of the play, the audience has little doubt regarding the outcome of this subplot. Prospero will surely not allow such an act of treachery occur on the island where he rules.

Fourth, the lovers Ferdinand and Miranda also are involved in a conflict. Ferdinand must prove his worthiness as a suitor, and Miranda frets over the severity with which Prospero treats the man she adores. However, although some critics refer to The Tempest as a Romance, the play actually falls into the broader category of Comedy. And in the grand tradition of Renaissance comedies, the young lovers are always united by the conclusion of the play. Thus, Renaissance audiences would expect the two young lovers to find happiness before the play’s finish. And, so, their conflict also would also cause no concern or suspense to the audience.

Fifth, Caliban’s plot or scheme to remove Prospero as ruler of the island and have the drunken butler Stefano take his place also provides conflict in the play. However, this subplot is primarily for comic relief. Audiences laugh at their attempt rather than worry about it. Yet the subplot is more than just comic relief. It contributes to a theme on usurpation:

(1) Antonio usurped Prospero’s position, (2) Sebastian hopes to usurp Alonso’s position, and (3) Stefano, with Caliban’s help, believes that he can usurp Prospero’s position as ruler of the island. Thus, Shakespeare’s comic subplot draws parallels not only between Antonio and Sebastian but also between Antonio and Stefano with Caliban. Ambition is an act of the base or the low, of the irrational or the drunkenly.

Other subplots in the play include Alonso’s search for his son (man vs. fate) and Alonso’s regret about allowing his daughter to marry an African (man vs. himself). However, both of these subplots merely contribute to the lesson that Prospero is teaching Alonso and are not developed in and of themselves.

 

In the fifth act Prospero casts a charm that causes Alonso, Antonio, and the others to become spellbound and motionless. This point, though, marks the climax and resolution of the play. Prospero forgives them for their faults: his conflict with them is at an end. Prospero then hugs Alonso and shortly afterwards allows the king to be reunited with his son. The scene lacks action and intensity, yet it provides a peaceful satisfaction and fitting conclusion for the audience.

Shakespeare finalizes the play with some more comic dialogue involving Caliban, Stefano, and Trinculo. This is the denouement, the final explanation of the plot elements, for the play. The humor balances the touching, but less exciting, climax of the play. The laughter balances the tears.

 

Characters: Prospero

 

Prospero is one of the most unusual characters created by Shakespeare. Over the centuries critics have described Shakespeare’s sorcerer in numerous ways.

(1) In many ways Prospero is like the typical magician or sorcerer from Middle Ages. The Faustus character first appeared in a medieval German chapbook, and Shakespeare was certainly familiar with Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus. Like Marlowe’s character, Prospero becomes too enamored of his books on magic.
(2) A few critics define Prospero as a neo- Platonic mage. He is a holy student of sacred learning, a practitioner of white magic who achieves supremacy over natural world by holy magic but who renounces his magic as a stage in his enlightenment.
(3) Complicating any definition of Prospero is his use of a magic robe and a magic staff. Without his robe, he is powerless. Shakespeare does not provide any clues about the origins of this robe. Tales of Arabian magic, though, had been known in England since the Middle Ages. In these Arabian tales, all sorts of magical objects appear: flying carpets, rings of invisibility, and so on. Stories involving Arabian sorcerers appeared centuries before Shakespeare’s birth
(4) Prospero also bears some relationship to the King of Fairyland. During the Middle Ages such a land was synonymous with the Celtic Underworld. And the inhabitants of this land could at times be helpful to mankind, yet at other times they