The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

epilogue

211

established on the accoutrements of the steppe

(now Kaifeng), the former capital of the Tungu-

culture that extended far beyond Mongolia After

sic Jurchen of the Jin dynasty 14 Early Mongol

the demise of the Qitan state of Liao in China,

battle and parade belts and belt buckles with

part of the Qitan nobility, who were most prob-

depictions of dragons are known from archaeo-

ably distant descendants of the eastern branch of

logical finds brought by the first generation of

the Xianbei tribal confederacies, moved west-

Jurchids as early as the 1220s to 1240s to the Euro-

wards to Chinese Turkestan With the help of the

pean steppe zone, pertaining to finds in the

Uighurs, to whom they were related, they created

Dnieper region, the Middle Don region, the

between 1128 and 1133 the Qara-Qitai (“Black

steppes of the Caucasus foreland and the Mid -

Qitan”) state in the Ili Valley, which after their

dle and Lower Volga regions 15 According to

victory over the Saljuq Turks in 1141 near Samar-

Kramarovsky, the first stratum of gilded and niel-

qand stretched over a vast area of Central Asia

loed silver belts with heraldic dragons may be

as far as the northern bank of the Āmū Daryā

assigned to the second half of the twelfth century

(known to the Arabs as the Jayḥūn, “flood”) With

and the first half of the thirteenth century Of a

the expansion of the Qitan, some of their icono-

complete belt found at Krasnoyarskoye archaeo-

graphic expressions also moved westwards into

logical site in the vicinity of Astrakhān, which

Central Asia

would have consisted of 65 to 70 elements, 29

In 1206 Genghis Khān marched westwards

parts survive, many carrying the emblem of a

with the main body of his army, progressively

dragon (fig 183) 16 The type and style of this belt,

taking over the Tangut kingdom, and the empire

which is Central Asian in origin, dates from the

of the Qara-Qitai, who submitted to the author-

time of the formation and the flourishing of the

ity of the Great Khān and were with time assim-

single Mongol state 17 The elite night guard be -

ilated by the local population Qara-Qitai, Jurchen,

longed to the elder generation of the officer corps

Uighurs, Qarluqs, Qıpchaqs and Chinese were

of the Jurchids who arrived in the European part

of the steppes around the middle of the thirteenth

already fighting on the side of the Great Khān in

century and had disappeared by the late four-

the victorious war against the Khwārazm-shāh

ʿ

teenth century 18

Alāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Takash (596/1200–

Among these finds is a so far unrecognised

617/1220)

composition It appears on a belt head and

According to Mark Kramarovsky, it follows

expresses the ancient Central Asian conceptu-

from the description of the military gear of Jalair

alisation of the “Master of the Dragons” as the

Mukhali (d 1223) that the saddle and horse trap-

dragon-tamer The almost universal currency of

pings of Genghis Khān and his elite night guard

the motif throughout the Central Asian world is

(kebteul s ), the most privileged military unit of

underscored by its use on this accoutrement of

the Mongol army, were decorated with dragons 11

rectangular outline with arched ends It shows a

The workmanship and, perhaps, the choice of the

frontally rendered figure with mask-like face,

motif are thought to have been influenced by the

punctuated by small, almond-shaped eyes, angu-

Qitan and Jurchen to the northeast of China 12

lar nose, large open mouth and with large pro-

Kramarovsky suggests that the conscious choice

truding ears, grasps with extended arms the necks

of the dragon as unifying heraldic symbol,

of two imposing rampant dragons, holding them

reserved for the “emperor” and his elite guards,

at bay (fig 184) 19 Although the remarkably fluid

was formed in the period between 1204 to 1206

rendering of the dragons with their long pointed

and 1217 to satisfy the needs of a rapidly growing

horns owes much to the Chinese canon of these

new elite 13 In 1221 the widespread occurrence

fabulous beasts, it is used here in a typically Cen-

of the dragon symbol was observed by the Chinese

tral Asian configuration that was not prevalent

traveller Chang Chun during his visit to Bianjing

in the Chinese empire Given its evident corre-

11 Kramarovsky, 2000, p 203, and, idem, 2005, p 225

17 Kramarovsky, 2005, p 226

12 Idem, 2000, p 205, and, idem, 2005, p 225

18 Idem

13 Idem, 2000, pp 203–4, and, idem, 2005, p 226

19 Cf Golden Horde, 2000, p 69, p 151, fig 7 1 (line

14 Men-da bei-pu [ sic; Mengda beilu (“Thorough Account of

drawing), pp 216–7, cat no 19; Legacy, 2002, fig 198, cat

the Mongol Tatars”)], 1975, p 76, as cited by idem, 2000, p 203

no 142; Dschingis Khan und seine Erben, 2005, p 230, cat no

15 Idem, 2005, p 226

253 (bottom left, depicted in inverted position)

16 Cf Golden Horde, 2000, p 69, p 151, fig 7 2 (line

drawing), pp 216–7, cat no 19

212