The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

epilogue

spondence with imagery relating to the overmas-

Arrān, and Nakhchavān 23 In their quest for legit-

tering of the dragon, this iconography can be

imacy, the Mongols may well have given serious

assumed to have been implicitly imbued with

consideration to their choice of the motif of the

favourable properties, possibly of an empowering

mounted archer and dragon as a symbol of “inher-

quality, which would in turn be passed on to the

ited” sovereignty, using it as a means of propa-

owner of the buckle At the same time it is a sign

gating their ideological formula The image here

of supremacy and of victory over untamed forces

represents a victorious mounted archer in Mongol

The frequent application of the dragon motif on

dress, combined with the traditional imagery of

accoutrements pertaining to a traditional nomadic

the dragon-fighting horseman that was easily

lifestyle, moreover, suggests that it was not only

recognisable throughout Western Asia

well-known but firmly enshrined in Mongol

Another important form of dragon symbolism,

mythological concepts and formed an integral

that of the tree with dragons, had made an appear-

part of their artistic repertoire even before the

ance in thirteenth-century Mongolia in the form

onset of the period of Mongol imperial rule The

of an automaton During Ögödei’s time the des-

fact that belief in a dragon played a significant

ignated capital of the empire at Qaraqorum in

part in the indigenous beliefs of the Mongols (see

the Orkhon valley in central Mongolia, chosen

below), lends added weight to this possibility 20

by his father as early as 1220, was walled and,

Two years after Genghis Khān’s death in 1227,

according to the Yüan-shih (“History of the yuan

his third son and designated successor, Ögödei,

dynasty”), the official history of the yuan dynasty

was confirmed as the second Great Khān (r 1229–

composed in the early Ming dynasty, Ögödei con-

1241) From 641/1243–4 until 653/1255–6 his

structed a palace there in 1235 24 In the imperial

territories in greater Khurasan were overseen by

precinct his son Möngke erected a serpent-tree,

governor Arghūn Āqā, who was part of the Oirat

which became a monument of central signifi-

Mongol clan 21 It was under him that in 642/1244–5

cance At his orders it was built in the form of a

the Mongols minted their first silver coins in

large, gilded silver tree-fountain by the French

Arrān (the district in Transcaucasia between the

silversmith Guillaume Bouchier, a prisoner-

Kur and Aras rivers) Not least because of the

of-war, together with fifty local workmen 25 The

turbulent political situation in Khurasan, Arghūn

serpent-tree-fountain was of considerable size and

chose to retain the area of Azerbaijan as one of

was situated in the southern section of the main

the centres of Mongol monetary production 22 It

reception hall of the Khān’s palace called Tumen

is significant that for the iconography of these

Amgalant (“Myriad Tranquillities”) opposite the

first coins, the Mongols chose that of the dragon-

Khān’s throne 26

fighting horseman The latter is portrayed as a

During Möngke’s reign the Franciscan friar,

galloping archer in Mongol attire turning to aim

William of Rubruck (Willem van Ruysbroeck, c

over his shoulder at a “Saljuq-style” ophidian

1210–1270) from French Flanders visited the

dragon The arched inscription above, written in

Mongol capital of Qaraqorum in 1254 and in his

the Turkic language but in Arabic script, states:

Itinerarium addressed to king Louis IX of France

“Ūlūgh Mūnqūl ulūsh nyk/One great Mongol

gives a detailed account of this silver tree-foun-

nation ” Coins of this type were chosen for dif-

tain:

ferent principalities such as Ganja, the capital of

20 Spuler, 1939, repr 1955, p 140, with reference to

24 Dschingis Khan und seine Erben, 2005, p 152

Banzarov, D , Čërnaja věra ili šamanstvo u Mongolov i drugi-

25 For a monograph on William Bouchier, see Olschki,

ja stat’i (“Der schwarze Glaube oder der Schamanismus bei

1946

den Mongolen und andere Aufsätze”), ed Potanin, G N , St

26 Cf a contemporary oil on paperboard painting rep-

Peterburg, 1891, pp 15–6 Cf Liu, 1958, p 10; Roux, 1978,

resenting the silver serpent-tree-fountain by B Pürevsüch,

p 128, also p 143

Mongolia, 1980 (Mongolian Cultural Foundation, Ulan Batar,

21 Cf Kolbas, 2006, pp 100, 114

inv no 21); Dschingis Khan und seine Erben, 2005, p 153,

22 Eadem, pp 114–5

cat no 109 See also an eighteenth-century engraving of the

23 Eadem, pp 125–7 and n 20; Ganja: pl 5 1 (reverse)

fountain in Bergeron, 1735, p 96, preserved in the Staats-

and cover; Nakhchavān, preserved in the Bibliothèque Natio-

bibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Orientab-

nale, Paris: the dragon’s head rears up behind the horse, an

teilung, Ms 4’Uk 2408; reproduced in Olschki, 1946, pl 3,

arrow piercing its mouth

and Dschingis Khan und seine Erben, 2005, p 154, cat no 110