The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

epilogue

217

tures, Kondui Palace in the Transbaikal region,

As for the myriad creatures be they feathered,

which seems to have developed upon the archi-

hairy, scaly or armored, they all find their ances-

tectural and spatial arrangement of Ögödei’s

try in the dragon 66

palace complex Tumen Amgalant at Qaraqorum

According to ancient ritual beliefs, particularly

The palace was built on a platform, surrounded

favoured in Buddhist and Daoist traditions, drag-

by double-tiered terraces, the dragon sculpture

ons are a symbolic expression of fertility and

being set on the upper terrace at intervals of two

fecundity, able to control rain and, if invoked, to

metres facing outwards Of the 150 dragon sculp-

procure rain in agricultural life 67 Far from being

tures that decorated the terrace, 102 were found

a mere symbol of the natural elements, the long

during Sergei Kiselev’s archaeological excavations

also carried imperial affiliations from ancient

in the 1940s (figs 188 and 189) 62 The excavations

times 68 This is symbolised not least by the mythol-

revealed traces of conflagration, and it is thought

ogising of the miraculous conception of Gaozu,

that Kondui Palace was burned to the ground

founder and first emperor of the Han dynasty,

during raids by the Chinese army approximately

who was born as the result of his mother’s union

at the same time as Qaraqorum was destroyed in

with a scaly dragon, a sure sign of a heavenly

1380 It is worthy of note that in contrast to many

mandate 69 Already in the Shang shu, one of the

of the previously discussed examples from Islamic

major historical works of early Chinese history,

architecture, these dragon sculptures were over-

the dragon is thought to have been depicted

all not only highly visible but were in fact inte-

together with “the sun and the moon, the stars

grated into the structural aspects of the palatial

and the constellations, the mountains, and the

architecture often with a supportive function 63

flowery animals on the upper sacrificial robes

Dragon imagery was therefore well established

of the emperor ”70 In spite of this association,

and had wide currency in Mongol culture In

dragons were used outside the court context in

ad di tion, glazed roof tiles, tile terminals (the cir-

China before and after the advent of the Mongols

cular goutou and the triangular-shaped dishui)

Early thirteenth-century Mongols of any rank

in particular, with moulded decoration of dragons

appear to have worn garments decorated with

have been found in many Mongol cities 64 The

dragons and phoenixes as witnessed by the Song

overall depiction of the dragons on the roof tiles

envoy Peng Daya who recorded his visit to

Ögödei’s court in the Heida Shilue (“Summary

is closely related stylistically to that on the tiles

of the Records of the Tatars”) written in 1237 71

from Takht-i Sulaimān

However, beginning with the Chinese Song

In Chinese culture the dragon (long) 65 is one

dy nasty (960–1279) the symbol of the dragon

of the oldest, most significant and most pervasive

became an imperial prerogative and paramount

symbols, recognised, according to a twelfth-cen-

imperial symbol, customarily referring to the

tury reading of the early Han-period account

“emperor’s person: his body was the dragon body,

Huainanzi, as an all-encompassing creature, the

his hands the claws, his capital the dragon’s

antecedent of all species:

pool ”72 The Song and Jurchen Jin dynasties, fol-

62 Kiselev, 1965, pp 325–69; for further examples of

66 Erya yi (“Ramifications of the Literary Expositor”),

dragon sculptures from Kondui, see idem, p 340, fig 180,

compiled by Luo yuan (1136–1184), 28 297, cited after

and p 343, fig 181 At least one of the dragon sculptures

Sterckx, 2002, pp 84–6 See also the study of Suetoshi Ikeda

remained in situ, cf Artemiev, 2003, p 306, fig 3 For

(1981, pp 290–5) who proposes an etymological relation-

comparable architectural marble sculptures of dragon

ship between the Chinese characters long (dragon) and the

protomes from Shangdu, see Legacy, 2002, fig 21, cat no

much debated, obscure gui (perhaps “ancestral spirits”) and

204 Similar sculptures were found in western Siberia in

considers the dragon to be an ancestral deity transformed

the territory of the Golden Horde, see Golden Horde, 2000,

into a mythical animal

pp 208–9, nos 2, 3

67 For detailed discussions of these rituals, see Loewe,

63 I must thank Professor Robert Hillenbrand for point-

1987, pp 195–214; and Jing, 2002, pp 70–3

ing this out to me

68 Masuya, 2002, p 96

64 See Kiselev, 1965, p 319, fig 166, p 321, fig 168,

69 Cf Sterckx, 2002, pp 194, 202

pl XXXI, fig 1 and 2; Masuya, 1997, pp 723–4, chart XVIII;

70 Shangshu zhengyi, 5 4b, annotated by Kong yingda et

Legacy, 2002, figs 22, 83, 105, cat nos 188–90

al , in Shisanjing zhushu, vol 1, cited after Sterckx, 2002,

65 As a “species” the mythological long encompasses dif-

p 53

ferent subspecies For a discussion of the dragon in ancient

71 Ed and comm , Wang Guowei, Menggu shiliao sizhong

Chinese myth, see Allan, 1991, pp 64–7 For the dragon in

(“Four Historical Sources on the Mongols”), Taipei, 1962,

Chinese art in general, see eadem, pp 157–64, 174; Rawson,

p 479, cited after Masuya, 1997, p 570

1984, pp 93–9

72 Rawski, 1998, p 42

218