The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

chapter three

In Asadī Ṭūsī’s Garshāsp-nāma the eponymous

of the celebrated feat carried out by Farāmarz,

hero’s victory over the dragon was commemo-

son of Shahrbānū Irem and Rustam, in slaying a

rated by a flag (dirafsh) embellished with the rep-

dragon cal ed hissing serpent (mār-i juwshā) 73 An

resentation of a black dragon (azhdahāy-i siyāh)

extended list of heroes thus seems to have claimed

and a pole surmounted by a golden lion, in turn

the right to own a dragon banner as emblem The

topped by a moon 64 The banner was passed on

visual appropriation of the dragon’s likeness on

to Garshāsp’s descendants and became his fam-

individual and dynastic banners not only com-

ily’s coat of arms 65 Likewise, the standard of the

municated mastery over the mythical creature but

paladin Rustam, whose ancestors are thought to

also implied that through victory the vanquisher

have been Saka people who came to Sakastān/

had been able to appropriate the formidable quali-

Sīstān and Zābulistān in the late second century

ties of the dragon

bc,66 was “blazoned with the dragon’s form and

from its tip a golden lion roars ”67 His grandfather,

The dragon motif on belt/strap fittings and

Sām, also had a dragon banner,68 as did Rustam’s

equestrian accoutrements

son, Farāmarz 69 The Shāh-nāma account records

that when Bahrām Chōbīn received the supreme

Girding with a belt was a rite of passage in all

command, the Sasanian king Hurmuz IV (578–

Central Asian, in particular Iranian, societies from

590) handed him the purple dragon banner with

ancient times 74 Adorned parade belts played an

the words: “you are indeed a second Rustam ”70

important role in the investiture of warriors in

Not only did Bahrām Chōbīn receive the distin-

the Indo-Iranian world and were insignia of cultic

guishing emblem which likened him to the great

or ritual significance as well as symbols of social

hero, but, in addition, he claimed Arsacid Par-

distinction 75 In the Armeno-Parthian dynasty

thian descent and was thus heir to the traditional

the belt was presented to the dihqān s (“members

Arsacid dragon banner 71 Dragon banners bearing

of the lesser feudal nobility”) along with a ring and

the effigy of a gold-coloured dragon without legs

a banner as tokens of royal service 76 The origin

or wings, the open mouth revealing the tongue,

of the custom has been attributed to the sacred

set against red and black grounds alternately,

rope-girdle ( kustī) of the Zoroastrians, for whom,

are featured on a page from a dispersed Shāh-

however, such girding was an act of consecration,

nāma. Painted in Shiraz in 742/1341, the min-

as in the rite of initiation In Turkish and Islamic

iature, which was formerly in the collection of

the prince and the princess Sadruddin Aga Khan,

society the belt was of great importance; it was

now in the Aga Khan Foundation, portrays the

an integral part of male costume, often presented

victory of the dragon-slayer Bīzhan, grandson of

by the ruler, and hence regarded as an insignia

the Iranian commander, Gūdarz, over Hūmān,

of rank 77

brother of the Tūrānian commander, Pīrān;72

The nomadic warrior seems to have been girt

the banners being displayed in commemoration

with a pair of belts78 adorned in accordance with

64

72

Widengren, 1969, p 17, n 35; Asadī Ṭūsī, Garshāsp-

“Victory of Bīzhan over Human ” Page of a dispersed

nāma, pp 49–63 (63 35–6), as cited in Khāleqī-Moṭlaq,

Shāh-nāma Iran, Shiraz 1341 Height 36 9 cm, width 30 7

“Aždahā II,” EIr A dragon-shaped long narrow flag floating

cm Collection of the Prince and the Princess Sadruddin

from the mast of a boat is featured on a ninth-century luster-

Aga Khan, Ms 006/E Chevaux et cavaliers arabes, 2002,

ware plate from Nīshāpūr Papadopoulo, 1979, fig 420

p 161, cat no 119 A further example of a dragon banner

65 Op. cit.

is illustrated in an Ilkhanid-period Shāh-nāma manuscript;

66 De Bruijn, “Rustam,” EI 2 VIII, 636b Cf the discussion

Pope and Ackerman, eds , 1938–9, repr 1964–81, vol 10, pl

in Shahbazi, 1993, pp 157–8

834

67

73

Shāh-nāma, tr and ed Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 3,

Farāmarz-nāma, London, British Museum, Ms Or

p 107, ll 1224–1255, p 113, ll 1292–1293; vol 5, pp 85,

2946, fols 24, 25, as cited in Khāleqī-Moṭlaq, “Aždahā II,”

89; The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám, tr and ed Clinton,

EIr 74

1987, pp 95, 549–50 Cf Shahbazi, 1993, p 159; Melikian-

It is of note that the belt did not play an important role

Chirvani, 1998, p 179

in Greek tradition Cf Brentjes, 1989, p 42

68

75

Widengren, 1969, p 17, n 35, with reference to the

Cf Widengren, 1969, pp 21–32

76

Garshāsp-nāma, as also cited by Shahbazi, 1993, p 159

Brentjes, 1989, p 43 The Parthian king Uthal is

69 Khāleqī-Moṭlaq, “Aždahā II,” EIr

depicted with a belt whose central belt plaques are rendered

70 Shāh-nāma, tr and ed Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 6,

with winged and apparently bearded dragons with coiled

pp 587–9, ll 525–31 It is of note that like the dragon ban-

serpentine tails resting on their forelegs See Winkelmann,

ners surrounding Constantine when he entered Rome, as

2004, pp 10–3, fig 5b

77

described by Ammianus Marcellinus (see above), the Shāh-

Cf the discussion of Katharina Otto-Dorn, 1961–2,

nāma account specifies that the colour of Bahrām Chōbīn’s

pp 9–13

78

dragon banner was – just like that of Rustam – purple; tr and

As evidenced for instance by the first-century ad finds

ed Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 6, pp 587–9, ll 525–31

in the Sarmatian kurgan near Porogi, nomadic warriors cus-

71 Shahbazi, “Derafš,” EIr

tomarily wore two belts Simonenko, 1991, p 215, fig 1

the dragon motif on portable objects

43

rank and ancestry 79 Hence on one belt a diago-

Hungary, attributed to the second half of the

nally suspended bow in a long narrow bow-case

seventh century (fig 26) 86 The beast is rendered

and a quiver filled with arrows could be carried,

in profile with elongated open snout, the upper

while a sword or sabre and a dagger might be

lip curving upwards revealing a pointed tongue,

suspended from the second 80 Paired belts, a cer-

crowned by horns or ears, with a beard projecting

emonial main belt and another with straps from

from the chin; the elongated, undulant, serpentine

which the sword and other weapons were sus-

body covered with a spotted pattern is demar-

pended, were, according to the Tarikh-i Bukhārā,

cated by crest-like, spiky protrusions, and rests

worn by the young attendants (bandagān) at the

on three curved legs with pointed protrusions

court of the queen of Bukhara 81 Reports on the

at the feet, probably representing unsheathed

Turks in their homeland emphasise the impor-

claws Depicted at mid-section of the body is what

tance of belts, which in addition to their utili-

appears to be a small version of the dragon An

tarian function served as status symbols The

association of this representation with the Chinese

Turks are described as rich in cattle, horses and

dragon through Byzantine mediation has been

sheep and possessing “many vessels of gold and

proposed by Falko Daim on the grounds that the

silver They have many weapons They have silver

depiction of the dragon is comparatively rare in

belts…”82

Avar iconography 87 Samuel Szádeczky-Kardoss

The Avars, an Ibero-Caucasian people who

however relates this iconography to Hellenistic

were subjects of the Turks, followed in the wake

(that is Seleucid and Parthian) and Sasanian influ-

of the great migrations of nomadic peoples from

ence, while underlining that “the subject matter

the Eurasian steppes, fleeing to the north Cau-

[of the Avars] is taken from the body of beliefs

casus region in 558 and from thence migrating

proper to the peoples of the steppe ”88

westwards 83 Late Avar period iconography is pre-

Belts also had an important ceremonial sig-

served almost exclusively on items of personal

nificance and were a symbol of authority for the

adornment, in particular compartmentalised belt

Samanids, Ghaznawids and Saljuqs 89 Tenth- or

sets with multiple plaques figuring more natu-

eleventh-century Western Central Asian belt

ralistic tamga s in the form of fabulous creatures

hooks were commonly S-shaped with a central

reflecting “ancestral, totemic ideas ”84 Often these

cuboctahedral or spherical knob, terminated at

are shown in combat with ungulates or human

either end by a horned dragon head, one end bent

beings perhaps symbolising “the cycle of death

to a closed position and with a heavy rectangular

and rebirth ” Among the animals another hybrid

strap-slot 90 The dragon heads are shown with the

creature with a long history in the Near East, the

wide-open snouts characteristic of the “Saljuq”

griffin, appears to have been particularly preva-

type, the upper lip curving upwards and reveal-

lent, however the dragon also made an appear-

ing a deep cavity with stumpy fangs A roughly

ance as did natural animals such as horses, eagles

contemporary horned dragon with open snout

and wild boars 85 An elongated silver tongue-strap

and sinuous body also occurs on narrow essen-

fitting (“Hauptriemenzunge”) with one arched

tially rectangular copper alloy belt strap fittings

end featuring a quadruped dragon was unearthed

from present-day Afghanistan, some of which

from grave 292 of an Avar necropolis in Abony,

are gilded 91

79 Szádeczky-Kardoss, 1990, p 126

cat no 271 (catalogue entry by Falko Daim)

80

88

Cf the belts of the sandstone statue of the Śaka

Szádeczky-Kardoss, 1990, p 128 It is interesting to

satrap Caṣṭana (first half of the first century) Czuma, 1985,

observe that a plaque in the form of a reptilian mythical crea-

pp 112–3, cat no 43; Azarpay, 1981, pp 122–5

ture with large gaping snout bearing the images of fish on

81 Schefer, 1892, pp 7–12

its belly, datable between the sixth and the eighth century,

82 Gardīzī, Zayn al-akhbār, in V V Bartol’d (W Barthold),

can be detected among the animal copper alloys from the

Otč o poezdke v Srednyuyu Aziyu s naučnoy tsel’yu 1893–1894

governorate of Perm, north of the Caspian; see Oborin and

gg. , in Zapiski Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk, ser VII, t i,

Tshagin, 1988, p 93, cat no 69

89

74–175 Pers text and Russ tr repr in Sočineniya, Moscow

Bosworth, 1963, p 38

90

1963–73, vol 8, p 35, cited after Golden, “Pečenengs,” EI²

Several of these examples are preserved in Kuwait,

VIII, 289a

al-Sabāh Collection, Kuwait National Museum, such as inv

83 Pohl, 1988, pp 28–9; Barthold and Golden, “Khazar,”

nos LNS 617 J, LNS 1122 J, LNS 1123 J, LNS 1125 J b, LNS

EI 2 IV, 1172a

2762 J

84

91

Szádeczky-Kardoss, 1990, pp 126–8

See an example in Kuwait, al-Sabāh Collection, Kuwait

85 Pohl, 1988, p 289

National Museum, inv no LNS 3103 J; putative origin:

86 Cf Xi’an, 2006, p 356, cat no 271

Herat, Afghanistan

87 Daim, 2000, pp 134–6, fig 60; Xi’an, 2006, p 356,

44