The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

chapter three

(fig 24) The so-called “Saljuq-style” heads of the

alive and of enormous size; that they were born

fabulous beasts are turned towards the back thus

in Persia a little way beyond Iberia; that they are

confronting each other with their wide-open jaws

bound to long poles, and raised on high, create

terror while the Parthians are coming from a dis-

terminating in upward curled tips and revealing

tance; that in the encounter itself at close quarters

the tongues, the long cusped ears projecting at the

they are freed and sent against the enemy; that

top The quadruped protomes with snugly-fitted

in fact they had swallowed many of our men in

feet are oriented towards the edge of the chape,

this way and coiled themselves around others

their serpentine bodies with slender, curved wings

and suffocated and crushed them 46

forming five loops attenuating towards its tip It

is interesting to note a closely related depiction

Later on the emblem was introduced into the

found on a twelfth- or thirteenth-century silk

Roman army where the standard-bearer bore the

fragment from Samangan province in present-

title draconarius Such a banner with a dragon

day Afghanistan, also housed in the al-Sabāh

ensign belonging to the Dacians and their Sar-

Collection in Kuwait, which is woven with an

matian allies is portrayed on the narrative reliefs

upright pair of dragons with gaping jaws, here in

of Trajan’s column which commemorates the

confronted position and wearing beaded collars,

Dacian wars of the early second century ad The

their winding serpent-like bodies having clusters

fluttering dragon ensigns were described by the

of three dots in the bends and set against a back-

contemporary Greek historian Flavius Arrian in

ground of foliate scrolls (fig 25)

his Tactica (XXXV 2–5) as being of “Scythian”

origin:

The dragon motif on banners

Scythian ensigns are serpents of good length, tied

In the Middle Iranian period, a dragon (azhdahā)

to staffs They are made out of pieces of dyed

material The heads and the bodies through to

was often depicted on standards carried in battle

the tail are made in order to appear as terrify-

as a symbol of martial valour, intended to frighten

ing as possible … They swell in the wind of a

the enemy by its ferocious aspect and to show the

ride so that they look like those serpents and

ruler’s power 44 These banners are referred to sev-

even begin to whistle when the breath of air is

eral times in the Shāh-nāma, in which the ancient

strong enough 47

history of Iran, from its legendary origins down

to the dissolution of the Sasanian dynasty was

The dragon banner in the Roman army appears

recorded, as azhdahā-paykar (“having a drag-

to have been instituted in the wake of the deploy-

on’s body”) 45 In his De historia conscribenda

ment of new tactical divisions as part of the Roman

sit (XXIX) the second-century Greek writer

emperor Diocletian’s (r 284–305) reorganisation

Lucian describes the war against the Parthian

of the military machinery 48 Such dragon ban-

king Vologesus III who defeated the Romans

ners are again described by the fourth-century

at Elegia in 162, destroying the Roman legion

Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus, who

and killing the commander Severianus Lucian

served in the army of Constantine II (337–361)

notes that the Parthians used banners with dif-

in Persia, in his Rerum gestarum libri (XVI 10 7

ferent emblems to differentiate the divisions of

and 12 39) In his record of Constantine’s entry

their army, a dragon ensign (dracōn) preceding

into Rome in 357 (XVI 10 7) Marcellinus writes

a thousand-man division He refers to another

that the emporer:

historian’s vivid report of these dragon ensigns,

was surrounded by dragons, woven out of purple

which were made of light material, attached to

thread and bound to the golden and jewelled tips

open-jawed heads and mounted on poles, so that

of spears, with wide mouths open to the breeze

they would move in the breeze like enormous

and hence hissing as if roused by anger, and leav-

serpent-dragons, so much so that they appeared

ing their tails winding in the wind 49

to the Romans to be:

44

46

It is of note that the Indian makara, discussed above

Lucian, Quomodo historia conscribenda sit, tr Kilburn,

(p 36, n 12), also formed the head of the battle standard

K , London, 1959, vol VI, pp 42–3 Cf Widengren, 1969,

(makaradhvaja) of Rudra or Shiva, and was later also carried

pp 17–8 and n 38; Shahbazi, “Derafš,” EIr

47

by Siddhārtha’s son, Rāhula It served as battle standard for

Arrian, Tactica (XXXV), cited after Lebedynsky, 1995,

the hosts of Mara, who attacked the Buddha The makara also

pp 93–4

48

served as designation for specific battle formation of troops

Haussig, 1992, p 29

49

that take the form of a makara during battle manoeuvres

Cf Widengren, 1969, p 18, n 39 (with further refer-

Cited after Beer, 2004, p 68

ences)

45 Skjærvø, “Aždahā I,” EIr

the dragon motif on portable objects

41

According to Moses of Chorene, in commemora-

akin to the dragon banners represented on wall

tion of the Armenian king Tigran’s resettlement

paintings in Chinese Turkestan (present-day Xin-

of the defeated Medes to the area of Goghtʿn

jiang), discussed below Marcus Mode tentatively

and around the foot of Mount Ararat, the wind-

ascribes the plaque to the reign of the Xiongnu

sock-like silk dragon (vishap) banner, adopted

king of Sogdiana (Su-te) in the 30s of the fifth

from the Parthians, became the Armenian king’s

century attested by The History of the Wei (Wei-

heraldic sign 50 In his account of the battle of

shu) 57 The Xiongnu were known to have fought

Jiraw the sight of the banners (III 37) is similarly

under the dragon banner, a traditional ensign of

vividly conveyed:

the military forces of the steppes 58

Similar banners, some rendered in serpent or

the sinuous rippling of the dragon [banners],

dragon-like form, are depicted on wall paintings

puffed up by the blast of air, their jaws yawning

in Chinese Turkestan, a region whose pivotal posi-

frightfully 51

tion at the crossroads between China and Central

An account of the anonymous fifth-century Arme-

Asia resulted in a broad cultural synthesis which

nian Epic History or Buzandaran Patmutʿiwnkʿ

embraced the western Turks or Kök Türks ( T’u-

(IV 2) also describes the battle standard of the

chueh or Tujue) In the Cave of the Painter at Kizil

Arsacid Armenians (54–428) as a silk dragon

(Kezier), a sixth- to seventh-century wall paint-

banner 52 A description of the advance of the

ing illustrates an army with a dragon banner 59

Iranian army is given in the grand heroic epic,

During the German Turfan expeditions at the

Firdawsī’s Shāh-nāma, which states that:

beginning of the twentieth century, Albert von

le Coq recorded several such banners At Kizil,

behind each banner, there followed another

in the “Cave of the Dove,” a seventh- or eighth-

banner – some with dragons, others with the

century wall painting features a senāpatiratna, a

image of eagles

deity who symbolises the wrathful power to over-

showing that different royal emblems could be

come enemies, carrying a banner in the form of a

used concurrently 53

serpentine body terminating in a swallow-tailed

A dragon banner may be depicted on a bone

pennant with projecting dragon head with gaping

plaque which is incised with a battle scene and

jaws,60 and in the “Caves with Fireplace,” a warrior

probably served as a belt element 54 It was found in

riding a war elephant also holds such a dragon

a necropolis near the vil age of Orlat in the district

banner 61 A wal painting discovered in the eighth-

of Koshrabad, west of Samarqand, and, according

century “Cave of the Doves” at Kirish, the ruins of

to Boris Marshak, does not reflect a local but a

Simsim, portrays a dragon-king (nāgarāja) above

Central Asian nomadic tradition 55 The mail-clad

whom floats a large banner with lupine head and

combatants are wielding lances, bows, swords and

what appears to be a serpentine body 62 The wolf

battle axes 56 Strapped to the lancer on the lower

was one of the prevalent emblems on the military

left is a military emblem, which may have served

standards of Turkish tribes; other such emblems

as badge of rank, a long, flowing banner on a pole

seem to have been the moon or the dragon 63

50 Russell, 2004, pp 621–40, esp 624 and 622–23 (for

and Rusanov, 1997–8, pl IV:1; Mode, 2006, p 444, fig 1 Cf

a discussion of the historical Tigrans that could have in -

Brentjes, 1989, p 40, fig 3

57

spired the orally transmitted legend); also pp 1047–8 (with a

Mode, 2006, p 433 For a comprehensive list of sug-

translation of the late twelfth-century Armenian Catholicos

gested dates of the plaques, cf esp pp 421–2, 433

58

Nersēs Šnorhali’s text Interpretive Explanation, Mingled with

Idem, p 433

59

Supplication, of the Standards of the Kings of Armenia which

G 356; von Le Coq, 1925, p 54, fig 50

60

recalls the king and his banner)

G 274; idem, p 72, fig 117

51

61

Idem, p 627

G 50; idem, p 55, fig 53

52

62

Idem, pp 624–5 and n 9 It is interesting to observe

G 432; idem, p 68, fig 101 The lupine figures recall

that such dragon standards are still represented in thirteenth-

the fact that the T‘u-chüeh tribe, which was part of the

century Armenian miniatures (Washington, DC, Freer Gal-

Xiongnu confederacy, is said to have depicted a wolf on their

lery of Art, Ms 32 18, p 513; “Judas leading the Multitude,”

banners; Eberhard, 1979, pp 52–3

63

see Der Nersessian and Agemian, 1993, vol 2, fig 251)

Roux, 1979, p 170 The seventh-century Chinese

53 Tr and ed Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 3, p 589, ll 2107–2108

dynastic annals, the Pei shih, as well as the Chou shu (50,

54 Mode, 2006, p 420 and n 4

4a), explicitly state that the Turks put wolf heads on their

55 Marshak, B I , “Iskusstvo Sogda,” Tsentral’naya Aziya.

standards; Sinor, 1982, p 233 and 1996, repr 1999, p 329;

Novye pamyatniki pis’mennosti I iskusstva. Sbornik statey, eds ,

Liu, 1958, p 9 It is interesting to observe that wolf-stan-

Piotrovskiy, B B and Bongard-Levin, G M , Moscow, 1987,

dards were sometimes referred to as dragon-standards; see

p 235, as cited in Mode, 2006, pp 421–2 Cf Brentjes, 1989,

Schmidt, 1980, p 63 The dragon, the wolf and the moon

p 41

were also emblems on the respective flags of Rustam, Gurgīn

56 Bone plaque with battle scene Orlat, Koshrabad dis-

and Farīburz ( Shāh-nāma; tr and ed Mohl, 1838–1878,

trict, west of Samarqand, present-day Uzbekistan Ilyasov

vol 3, p 66)

42