Summary of Preceding Section:
The Distinct Nature of Preliterate Art Is the Second Key to Unscrambling the
Truth About When the Sphinx Was Built and Why.
A Quick Summary of My Theory
So as I go along, I'll be repeating many of my contentions, but showing you more and more evidence. Bear with me. This is by far the easiest way to bring you along. Right now, I'm going to expand my base of contentions by quickly outlining the essentials my theory.
Author's Note
Of course we have no way of knowing if such an individual existed as the preliterate hunter/gatherer period was one that left few clues. We are basic ally left to our own resources. At one end of a dark tunnel we have the face of the Sphinx, which is almost surely preliterate. What we don't know is whose face it is. on t he Sphinx
We can, however, work backwards from the characteristics of the carved face and what we know of preliterate cultures and other large, carved preliterate faces to approximate the nature of the person represented by the carving. Others might come up with a much different deduction than I have, so we would then have to see which deduction holds the most water. I stand ready to have such a comparison set up and judged, as I believe my own deduction, which will be expanded as the site proceeds, to be very close to the truth as to the nature of the person represented.
End Author's Note
There you have it: a simple, straightforward theory that makes enormous sense if we look at the Sphinx with the right eyes, preliterate eyes.