Criticisms of Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy
Some Possible Side-Effects
Surgeons have to be a little careful in using hy drogen peroxide to irrigate deep wounds. If the H2O2 becomes trapped, it may go into the circulation, causing gas embolism—an oxygen bubble that can block the circulation in the lungs.
A case was reported in the British Medical Journal of a man with deep abscess of the thigh.1 Three percent H2O2 was pumped into the wound. Then the surgeon pressed the thigh to expel the H2O2 . Trouble is, the H2O2 went both ways-out of the wound opening and also into the bloodstream. The patient became blue and went into shock. He was given cortisone and blood for treatment (both ill-advised, in my opinion). But in spite of this catastrophic event and the ensuing bad treatment, the patient made a complete recovery.
This case emphasizes the safety of H2O2. An air embolus, which is mostly nitrogen, can be fatal or cause permanent paralysis. But a pure oxygen embolus quickly dissolves into the tissues and so rarely causes any permanent damage.
Hydrogen peroxide colitis is another potential hazard in the misuse of H2O2 . Chemical ulcerative colitis, a serious ulceration of the large bowel causing cramping and bloody diarrhea, can be caused by H2O2 .
Yale Medical School investigators reported three cases of ulcerative colitis, in patients with no history of this disease, following the use of H2O2 in an enema.2 All three recovered, but they were seriously ill. As the authors observed, "sepsis invariably occurs in association with hydrogen peroxide colitis." Sepsis means bacteria in the blood, a potentially fatal complication.
But, as often happens in medical reporting, the investigators opined beyond their state of knowledge, and thereby added to the store of false reporting on H2O2 They said in their discussion of the cases that "solutions of hydrogen peroxide are relatively weak germicides." They also remarked on the "exotic use" of H2O2 in the vein for treatment of blocked arteries. They claimed that the procedure was discontinued: "Potentially lethal gas embolism led to the discontinuation of such therapy." Finney and the other Baylor investigators never reported any such problems. This kind of disinformation can set a good therapy back 50 years.
The Yale doctors did conclude that peroxide enemas are safe if the concentration is carefully controlled. But that got lost in the adverse report. Govoni reported 30 cases using 10 cc of three percent H2O2 in one liter of water with no complications.3
As with any treatment, there are possible side effects with peroxide, but, fortunately, they are usually minor.
The most frequent side effect reported is inflammation of the vein through which the infusion was given. This phenomenon is very inconsistent, occurring repeatedly in some patients, but rarely in others. This reaction is less likely to occur if a large vein, such as the one in the forearm, is used for infusion and the rate of administration is slow. At least one and a half hours should be used for every treatment. For some reason not understood, inflammation of the vein may not appear until the day after the treatment. If it does occur, heat may make the reaction even more severe, since heat speeds up the rate of most biochemical reactions, and, therefore, heat is not recommended. An ice pack would be more appropriate for discomfort, but it will clear without any treatment at all.
Occasionally, a non-tender red streak will appear where the infusion is given, and a white, blanched appearance may occur in the center of the red streak. Treatments are not discontinued because of this, and there have been no adverse effects from it. This streaking, whether red or white, is not related to the inflammation of the vein mentioned previously, and there seems to be no correlation.
The treatment can be too effective and cause a socalled Herxheimer reaction. This consists of migratory aches, nausea, sometimes headaches, chills without any fever and mild diarrhea. This is due to an "overkill." The breakdown of products of the infective agent causes the reaction. It will usually occur within the first three treatments if it is going to occur at all, and, after it clears, the patient continues to improve. The Herxheimer reaction is not consistent and is not predictable.
There have been attempts by some entrepreneurs interested in competitive modes of therapy to frighten people away from intravenous peroxide by pointing out certain toxic reactions which, in reality, occur only in the laboratory and not in humans. These promoters will report on the dark consequences of lipid peroxidation, platelet aggregation, chromosomal aberrations, etc. Clinically, however, no significant acute toxicity has been observed in several hundred patients, some receiving up to 40 and 50 infusions of hydrogen peroxide. The treatment is quite safe when given by a qualified physician. The worst side-effect is: "Patient has deteriorated considerably since last treatment"—because he felt so well that he abruptly quit the therapy. We relate such a case on page 124.
Can You Take Hydrogen Peroxide Orally?
Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, an eminent scientist, was the first to suggest taking H2O2 by mouth. The formula he devised is still the standard for peroxide taken orally.
Many people are now recommending hydrogen peroxide by mouth. It appears efficacious by mouth, but extreme caution has been advised. Ascorbate, iron, and fats in the stomach change H2O2 into superoxide free radicals.4 These free radicals can do severe damage to the lining of your stomach. Studies on mice given H2O2 , even in low concentrations, were indicative of the risk from taking H2O2 by mouth. The mice developed erosion of the stomach lining, tumors, and in some, cancer.
But these studies have been challenged by none other than the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
I don't like the FDA any more than you do. Anyone who has studied the history of the FDA knows they have a very cozy relationship with the drug industry. They are now brazenly (and illegally) joined with the drug industry, the Post Office police, the AMA (sub rosa) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in an all-out attempt to destroy the natural health movement in the U.S.
But that's what makes their defense of H2O2 so interesting. H2O2 is dirt cheap. The drug companies can't patent it, so it's a threat to the antibiotic industry (it has remarkable antibiotic effects). It's a threat to the heart bypass industry (it will clean arteries of atherosclerotic buildup), and it's a threat to the surgical and chemotherapy cancer treatment industry (combined with radiation, it will rapidly reduce cancer growths with less toxic doses of X-ray) . If the FDA runs true to form, it will eventually join its brothers in the drug industry—medicine, the Post Office, and the FTC—and condemn peroxide therapy.
I have good friends who use oral H2O2 in their practice. I have good friends who claim that it's dangerous to use it orally. All I can do is present both sides and let you make up your own mind as to whether it's safe.
Just because it causes cancer of the stomach in mice doesn't mean it does in humans. The dose used may have been unrealistically high, as in the studies that resulted in the banning of cyclamate. Or the frequency of dos age may have been excessive. After all, it's dose times frequency that tells you how much your mouse is actually getting.
Incidentally, garlic extract, called Kyolic, will detoxify even large doses of cyclamate. It may do the same for H2O2 ; I don't know. Don't get me wrong. I'm not recommending cyclamate for your coffee. I just want to make the point that animal experimentation can be misleading.
The practitioners using H2O2 by mouth say they "haven't had any trouble." That may be like the man who jumped from the 40th floor. As he passed the 10th floor he yelled to a man looking out the window: "So far, so good!"
I'm not saying that everything is going to go splat with people taking H2O2 by mouth. But the evidence I have seen can't be ignored. Those mice I mentioned were given very small doses and they developed serious gastric problems, including cancer, in as little as three weeks. But mice aren't people.
Hydrogen peroxide reacts with fatty acids in the stomach to form hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl free radicals are probably one of the major factors in many degenerative diseases, including cancer. Much of the body contains enzymes that quickly break up H2O2 into oxygen and water. But the stomach and intestinal tract contain very little of these protective enzymes, so ulceration of the lining could theoretically develop. Ulceration can lead to hyperplasia, and hyperplasia to cancer.
From the Federal Register, January 9, 1981: "In response to the study from Japan, the FDA initiated a review of all available safety data on hydrogen peroxide including the Japanese study and subsequent clarification obtained from the Japanese authors. FDA concludes after this review that there is insufficient evidence from the Japanese study and elsewhere to conclude that hydrogen peroxide is a duodenal carcinogen.
My conclusion: I don't think H2O2 is dangerous taken orally as long as the recommended dose is not exceeded (ten drops of three percent H2O2 , three times a day).
But a caveat: Dr. Charles Farr, who probably knows the research literature better than anyone, does not agree. Recent research confirms Dr Farr's doubts.5 Dr. Farr says that further evidence exists that H2O2 should not be taken by mouth, especially when there is food in the stomach. If you do take H2O2 orally (and this is not a recommendation that you do so), take it on an empty stomach.
The reagent grade H2O2 is probably the safest. One reason is because of the lead found in the other grades. USP peroxide, for instance, contains five times more lead than reagent grade. But after proper dilution, the contamination problem is revealed to be far worse. There is 200 times more lead or other heavy metals in the other mixtures than in the reagent grade.6 Food grade has not been tested for lead at this time, but it may very well have an even higher level; or it may not.
Occasionally, a patient will have a reaction to peroxide. This may be due to toxins being expelled by the breakup of bacteria as the H2O2 zaps them, causing a Herxheimer type of reaction, as mentioned on page 35. It will pass after a few treatments.
Skin emptions are a particularly good sign, although distressing to the patient. This means that toxins are being released. There may even be boils or other inflammatory conditions that develop temporarily. Severe fatigue is not unusual, and there may be sleepiness, nausea, or diarrhea. The reaction will vary with the condition being treated.
None of these reactions are common, but almost any kind of minor reaction is possible. The dosage or frequency of treatment can be reduced, but don't stop. Eventually, you will probably be rewarded with better health. Before starting, consult a doctor familiar with the procedure. (That won't be easy. Even doctors who use it I.V. often are chary of recommending it by mouth.)
Negative Reports on H2O2
Not all reports have been favorable. Researchers at Duke University School of Medicine tried intravenous H2O2 infusions in pigs. All of the animals developed a serious blood condition called methemoglobinemia. But none of the human experiments have caused this complication. (Just another example of how unreliable animal data can be. People aren't pigs, even though some may act like it).
Mary Beth Dodson—
A Negative Report
"I had the greatest faith in it when I started," Mary Beth told me.
Mary Beth has multiple sclerosis. She had worked up to 50 drops of H2O2 by mouth daily, with no good effect after three months. It was causing nausea, so she gave it up.
She is the only case of multiple sclerosis I have interviewed who has not responded, at least partially, to H2O2 . However, I would not classify her as a failure until she has tried intravenous H2O2 . I assured her that the intravenous method would not cause nausea, and I urged her to find a doctor who uses this therapy. For a remarkable case of multiple sclerosis, see page 98.