The Story of Geographical Discovery: How the World Became Known by Joseph Jacobs - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

CHAPTER XI

EXPLORATION AND PARTITION OF AFRICA: PARK—LIVINGSTONE— STANLEY

We have seen how the Portuguese had slowly coasted along the shore of Africa during the fifteeenth century in search of a way to the Indies. By the end of the century mariners portulanos gave a rude yet effective account of the littoral of Africa, both on the west and the eastern side. Not alone did they explore the coast, but they settled upon it. At Amina on the Guinea coast, at Loando near the Congo, and  at  Benguela on  the western coast,  they established  stations whence to  despatch the  gold  and ivory,  and,  above  all,  the  slaves,  which  turned  out  to  be  the  chief  African  products  of  use  to Europeans.  On  the east coast they  settled  at Sofala,  a  port of Mozambique; and  in Zanzibar they possessed no less than three ports, those first visited by Vasco da Gama and afterwards celebrated by Milton in the sonorous line contained in the gorgeous geographical excursus in the Eleventh Book—

"Mombaza and Quiloa and Melind."

-Paradise Lost, xi. 339.

It is probable that, besides settling on the coast, the Portuguese from time to time made explorations into the interior. At any rate, in some maps of the sixteenth and seventeenth century there is shown a remarkable knowledge of the course of the Nile. We get it terminated in three large lakes, which can be scarcely other than the Victoria and Albert Nyanza, and Tanganyika. The Mountains of the Moon also figure prominently, and it was only almost the other day that Mr. Stanley re-discovered them. It is difficult,  however,  to  determine  how far  these entries  on the  Portuguese maps  were due  to  actual knowledge or report, or to the traditions of a still earlier knowledge of these lakes and mountains; for in  the maps  accompanying the  early editions  of Ptolemy  we likewise  obtain the  same information, which  is  repeated  by  the  Arabic   geographers,  obviously  from  Ptolemy,   and  not  from  actual observation. When the two great French cartographers Delisle and D'Anville determined not to insert anything on their maps for which they had not some evidence, these lakes and mountains disappeared, and  thus  it  has  come  about  that  maps  of the  seventeenth  century  often  appear  to  display  more knowledge of the interior of Africa than those of the beginning of the nineteenth, at least with regard to the sources of the Nile.

African exploration of the interior begins with the search for the sources of the Nile,  and has been mainly concluded  by the  determination of the course of the three other  great rivers,  the Niger,  the Zambesi,  and  the Congo.  It is remarkable that all four rivers have had  their  course determined  by persons of British nationality. The names of Bruce and Grant will always be associated with the Nile, that  of Mungo  Park  with  the  Niger,  Dr.  Livingstone with  the  Zambesi,  and  Mr.  Stanley  with  the Congo. It is not inappropriate that, except in the case of the Congo, England should control the course of the rivers which her sons first made accessible to civilisation.

img20.png

DAPPER'S MAP OF AFRICA, 1676.

We have seen that there was an ancient tradition reported by Herodotus, that the Nile trended off to the west and became there the river Niger; while still earlier there was an impression that part of it at any rate wandered eastward, and some way joined on to the same source as the Tigris and Euphrates at least that seems to be the suggestion in the biblical account of Paradise. Whatever the reason, the greatest uncertainty existed as to the actual course of the river, and to discover the source of the Nile was for many centuries the standing expression for performing the impossible. In 1768, James Bruce, a   Scottish  gentleman   of  position,   set  out   with  the   determination  of  solving  this  mystery—a determination which he had made in early youth, and carried out with characteristic pertinacity. He had acquired a certain amount of knowledge of Arabic and acquaintance with African customs as Consul at Algiers. He went up the Nile as far as Farsunt,  and then crossed the desert to the Red Sea, went over to  Jedda, from which he took ship for Massowah,  and began his search for the sources of the Nile in Abyssinia.  He visited the ruins of Axum,  the former capital, and in the neighbourhood of that place saw the incident with which his travels have always been associated, in which a couple of rump- steaks were extracted from a cow while alive, the wound sewn up, and the animal driven on farther.

Here, guided by some Gallas, he worked his way up the Blue Nile to the three fountains, which he declared to  be the true sources of the Nile,  and identified  with the three mysterious lakes in the old maps. From there he worked his way down the Nile, reaching Cairo in 1773. Of course what he had discovered  was merely the source of the Blue Nile,  and  even this had  been previously visited  by a Portuguese  traveller  named  Payz.  But  the  interesting  adventures  which  he  experienced,  and  the interesting style in which he told them, aroused universal attention, which was perhaps increased by the fact that his journey was undertaken purely from love of adventure and discovery. The year 1768 is distinguished  by  the  two  journeys  of James  Cook  and  James  Bruce,  both  of them expressly  for purposes of geographical discovery,  and  thus  inaugurating the era  of what may be  called  scientific exploration.  Ten  years  later  an  association was  formed  named  the  African  Association,  expressly intended  to  explore  the  unknown  parts  of  Africa,  and  the  first  geographical  society  called  into existence. In 1795 MUNGO PARK was despatched by the Association to the west coast. He started from the Gambia, and after many adventures, in which he was captured by the Moors, arrived at the banks of the Niger, which he traced along its middle course, but failed to reach as far as Timbuctoo. He made a second attempt in 1805,  hoping by sailing down the Niger to prove its identity with the river known at  its mouth as the Congo; but he  was forced  to  return,  and  died  at Boussa,  without having determined the remaining course of the Niger.

Attention was thus drawn to  the existence of the mysterious city  of Timbuctoo,  of which Mungo Park had brought back curious rumours on his return from his first journey. This was visited in 1811 by a British seaman named  Adams, who  had  been wrecked  on the Moorish coast,  and  taken as a slave  by  the  Moors  across  to  Timbuctoo.  He  was  ultimately  ransomed  by  the  British  consul  at Mogador,  and  his  account  revived  interest  in  West  African  exploration.  Attempts  were  made  to penetrate the secret of the Niger, both from Senegambia and from the Congo, but both were failures, and  a fresh method was adopted, possibly owing to Adams'  experience in the attempt to reach the Niger by the caravan routes across the Sahara. In 1822 Major Denham and  Lieutenant Clapperton left  Murzouk,  the  capital  of Fezzan,  and  made  their  way  to  Lake  Chad  and  thence  to  Bornu. Clapperton, later on, again visited the Niger from Benin. Altogether these two travellers added some two  thousand miles of route to  our knowledge of, West Africa.  In 1826-27  Timbuctoo  was at last visited by two Europeans—Major Laing in the former year, who  was murdered  there; and  a young Frenchman,  Réné Caillié,  in the latter.  His  account aroused  great interest,  and  Tennyson began his poetic career by a prize-poem on the subject of the mysterious African capital.

It was not till 1850 that the work of Denham and Clapperton was again taken up by Barth, who for five years explored the whole country to the west of Lake Chad, visiting Timbuctoo, and connecting the lines of route of Clapperton and Caillié. What he did for the west of Lake Chad was accomplished by Nachtigall east of that lake in Darfur and Wadai, in a journey which likewise took five years (1869– 74). Of recent years political interests have caused numerous expeditions, especially by the French to connect their possessions in Algeria and Tunis with those on the Gold Coast and on the Senegal.

The next stage in African exploration is connected with the name of the man to whom can be traced practically  the  whole  of  recent  discoveries.  By  his  tact  in  dealing  with  the  natives,  by  his  calm pertinacity  and  dauntless  courage,  DAVID LIVINGSTONE  succeeded  in  opening  up  the  entirely unknown districts of Central Africa. Starting from the Cape in 1849, he worked his way northward to the Zambesi,  and then to Lake Dilolo, and  after five years'  wandering reached  the western coast of Africa at Loanda. Then retracing his steps to the Zambesi again, he followed its course to its mouth on the east coast, thus for the first time crossing Africa from west to east. In a second journey, on which he started in 1858, he commenced tracing the course of the river Shiré, the most important affluent of the Zambesi, and in so doing arrived on the shores of Lake Nyassa in September 1859.

Meanwhile two explorers, Captain (afterwards Sir Richard) Burton and Captain Speke, had started from Zanzibar to discover a lake of which rumours had for a long time been heard, and in the following year succeeded in reaching Lake Tanganyika. On their return Speke parted from Burton and took a route more to the north, from which he saw another great lake, which afterwards turned out to be the Victoria Nyanza.  In 1860,  with another companion (Captain Grant), Speke returned to  the Victoria Nyanza,  and traced  out its course. On the north of it they found  a great river trending to the north, which they followed as far as Gondokoro. Here they found Mr. (afterwards Sir Samuel) Baker, who had  travelled up  the White Nile to  investigate its source, which they thus proved  to  be in the Lake Victoria Nyanza. Baker continued  his search, and  succeeded  in showing that another source of the Nile was to be found in a smaller lake to the west, which he named Albert Nyanza. Thus these three Englishmen had combined to solve the long-sought problem of the sources of the Nile.

The  discoveries  of the  Englishmen  were  soon  followed  up  by  important  political action  by  the Khedive of Egypt, Ismail Pasha, who claimed the whole course of the Nile as part of his dominions, and established stations all along it. This, of course, led to full information about the basin of the Nile being  acquired  for  geographical  purposes,  and,  under  Sir  Samuel  Baker  and  Colonel  Gordon, civilisation was for a time in possession of the Nile from its source to its mouth.

Meanwhile  Livingstone had  set himself to  solve  the  problem of the great  Lake Tanganyika,  and started on his last journey in 1865 for that purpose. He discovered Lakes Moero and Bangweolo, and the river  Nyangoue,  also  known as  Lualaba.  So  much  interest had  been aroused  by Livingstone's previous exploits of discovery, that when nothing had been heard of him for some time, in 1869 Mr. H.  M.  Stanley was sent by the proprietors of the New  York  Herald,  for whom he had  previously acted  as war-correspondent,  to find  Livingstone. He started  in 1871  from Zanzibar,  and before the end of the year had come across a white man in the heart of the Dark Continent, and greeted him with the  historic  query,  "Dr.  Livingstone,  I  presume?"  Two  years  later  Livingstone  died,  a  martyr  to geographical and  missionary enthusiasm.  His work  was taken up by Mr. Stanley,  who in 1876 was again despatched to continue Livingstone's work, and succeeded in crossing the Dark Continent from Zanzibar to the mouth of the Congo, the whole course of which he traced, proving that the Lualaba or Nyangoue were merely different names or affluents of this mighty stream. Stanley's remarkable journey completed the rough outline of African geography by defining the course of the fourth great river of the continent.

But Stanley's journey across the Dark Continent was destined to be the starting-point of an entirely new development of the African problem.  Even while Stanley was on his journey a conference had been  assembled  at  Brussels  by  King  Leopold,  in  which  an  international  committee  was  formed representing all the nations of Europe,  nominally for the exploration of Africa,  but,  as it turned  out, really  for  its  partition  among  the  European  powers.  Within  fifteen  years  of  the  assembly  of  the conference  the interior  of Africa  had  been  parcelled  out,  mainly  among the  five powers,  England, France,  Germany,  Portugal,  and  Belgium.  As  in the  case of America,  geographical discovery was soon followed by political division.

 img21.png

EXPLORATION AND PARTITION OF AFRICA.

The process began by the carving out of a state covering the whole of the newly-discovered Congo, nominally independent, but really forming a colony of Belgium, King Leopold supplying the funds for that purpose. Mr. Stanley was despatched in 1879 to establish stations along the lower course of the river, but, to his surprise, he found that he had been anticipated by M. de Brazza, a Portuguese in the service of France, who had been despatched on a secret mission to anticipate the King of the Belgians in seizing the  important river mouth.  At the same  time Portugal put in claims for  possession of the Congo mouth, and it became clear that international rivalries would interfere with the foundation of any state on the Congo  unless some definite international arrangement was arrived  at.  Almost about the same time, in 1880, Germany began to enter the field as a colonising power in Africa. In South-West Africa  and  in  the  Cameroons,  and  somewhat  later  in  Zanzibar,  claims  were  set  up  on  behalf of Germany by Prince Bismarck  which conflicted  with English interests in those districts, and  under his presidency a Congress was held at Berlin in the winter of 1884-85 to determine the rules of the claims by which Africa could  be partitioned.  The old historic claims of Portugal to  the coast of Africa,  on which  she  had  established  stations  both  on  the  west  and  eastern  side,  were  swept  away  by  the principle that only effective occupation could furnish a claim of sovereignty.  This great principle will rule henceforth the whole course of African history; in other words, the good old Border rule

"That they should take who have the power.

And they should keep who can."

Almost immediately after the sitting of the Berlin Congress, and indeed during it, arrangements were come to by which the respective claims of England and Germany in South-West Africa were definitely determined.  Almost  immediately afterwards  a  similar  process had  to  be  gone  through in  order  to determine the limits of the respective "spheres of influence," as they began to be called,  of Germany and England in East Africa. A Chartered Company, called the British East Africa Association, was to administer the land north of Victoria Nyanza bounded on the west by the Congo Free State, while to the north it extended till it touched the revolted provinces of Egypt, of which we shall soon speak. In South  Africa  a  similar  Chartered  Company,  under  the  influence  of Mr.  Cecil Rhodes,  practically controlled the whole country from Cape Colony up to German East Africa and the Congo Free State.

The   winter   of  1890-91   was  especially   productive   of  agreements  of  demarcation.   After  a considerable  amount  of friction  owing  to  the  encroachments  of  Major  Serpa  Pinto,  the  limits  of Portuguese Angola on the west coast were then determined, being bounded on the east by the Congo Free State and British Central Africa; and at the same time Portuguese East Africa was settled in its relation both to British Central Africa on the west and  German East Africa on the north. Meanwhile Italy  had  put  in  its  claims  for  a  share  in  the  spoil,  and  the  eastern  horn  of Africa,  together  with Abyssinia, fell to its share, though it soon had to drop it, owing to the unexpected vitality shown by the Abyssinians.  In the same year (1890) agreements between Germany and England  settled the line of demarcation  between  the Cameroons  and  Togoland,  with the  adjoining  British  territories; while  in August of the same year an attempt was made to limit the abnormal pretensions of the French along the Niger, and as far as Lake Chad. Here the British interests were represented by another Chartered Company, the Royal Niger Company. Unfortunately the delimitation was not very definite, not being by river courses or meridians as in other cases, but merely by territories ruled over by native chiefs, whose boundaries were not then particularly distinct. This has led to considerable friction, lasting even up to the present day; and it is only with reference to the demarcation between England and France in Africa that any doubt still remains with regard to the western and central portions of the continent.

Towards the north-east the problem of delimitation had been complicated by political events, which ultimately led to  another great exploring expedition by Mr. Stanley.  The extension of Egypt into  the Equatorial Provinces  under  Ismail Pasha,  due  in  large  measure  to  the  geographical discoveries  of Grant,  Speke,  and  Baker,  led  to  an enormous accumulation of debt,  which caused  the  country to become bankrupt,  Ismail Pasha to be deposed, and Egypt to  be administered jointly by France and England on behalf of the European bondholders. This caused much dissatisfaction on the part of the Egyptian  officials  and  army  officers,  who  were  displaced  by  French  and  English  officials;  and  a rebellion broke out under Arabi Pasha. This led  to the armed intervention of England, France having refused  to  co-operate,  and  Egypt  was  occupied  by  British  troops.  The  Soudan  and  Equatorial Provinces  had  independently  revolted  under  Mohammedan  fanaticism,  and  it  was  determined  to relinquish those Egyptian possessions,  which had  originally led  to  bankruptcy.  General Gordon was despatched to relieve the various Egyptian garrisons in the south, but being without support, ultimately failed, and was killed in 1885. One of Gordon's lieutenants, a German named Schnitzler, who appears to have adopted Mohammedanism, and was known as Emin Pasha, was thus isolated in the midst of Africa near the Albert Nyanza, and Mr. Stanley was commissioned to attempt his rescue in 1887. He started to march through the Congo State, and succeeded in traversing a huge tract of forest country inhabited by diminutive savages, who probably represented the Pigmies of the ancients. He succeeded in reaching Emin Pasha, and after much persuasion induced him to accompany him to Zanzibar, only, however, to  return as a German agent to the Albert Nyanza. Mr. Stanley's journey on this occasion was not without its political aspects, since he made arrangements during the eastern part of his journey for securing British influence for the lands afterwards handed over to the British East Africa Company.

All these  political delimitations  were  naturally  accompanied  by  explorations,  partly  scientific,  but mainly  political.  Major  Serpa Pinto  twice crossed  Africa  in an  attempt to  connect the  Portuguese settlements on  the two  coasts.  Similarly,  Lieutenant Wissmann  also  crossed  Africa  twice,  between 1881  and  1887,  in the interests of the Congo  State,  though he ultimately became an official of his native  country,  Germany.  Captain  Lugard  had  investigated  the  region  between  the  three  Lakes Nyanza,  and  secured  it  for  Great  Britain.  In  South  Africa  British  claims  were  successfully  and successively  advanced   to   Bechuana-land,   Mashona-land,   and   Matabele-land,   and,   under  the leadership  of Mr. Cecil Rhodes,  a railway and telegraph were rapidly pushed forward  towards the north. Owing to the enterprise of Mr. (now Sir H. H.) Johnstone, the British possessions were in 1891 pushed up as far as Nyassa-land. By that date, as we have seen,  various treaties with Germany and Portugal had  definitely fixed  the contour lines  of the  different possessions of the three  countries in South Africa. By 1891 the interior of Africa, which had up to 1880 been practically a blank, could be mapped  out  almost  with  as  much  accuracy  as,  at  any  rate,  South  America.  Europe  had  taken possession of Africa.

One of the chief results of this, and formally one of its main motives, was the abolition of the slave trade. North Africa has been Mohammedan since the eighth century, and Islam has always recognised slavery,  consequently  the  Arabs  of the  north  have  continued  to  make  raids  upon  the  negroes  of Central Africa, to supply the Mohammedan countries of West Asia and North Africa with slaves. The Mahdist rebellion was  in part at least a reaction  against the abolition of slavery by  Egypt,  and  the interest of the next few years will consist in the last stand  of the slave merchants in the Soudan,  in Darfur,  and  in  Wadai,  east  of Lake  Chad,  where  the  only  powerful independent  Mohammedan Sultanate still exists. England is closely pressing upon the revolted provinces, along the upper course of the Nile; while France is attempting, by expeditions from the French Congo and through Abyssinia, to take possession  of the Upper  Nile before England  conquers it.  The race for  the Upper Nile  is at present one of the sources of danger of European war.

While  exploration and  conquest  have either  gone hand  in  hand,  or  succeeded  one another  very closely, there has been a third motive that has often led  to interesting discoveries, to  be followed by annexation. The mighty hunters of Africa have often brought back, not alone ivory and skins, but also interesting information of the interior. The gorgeous narratives of Gordon Cumming in the "fifties" were one of the causes which led to an interest in African exploration. Many a lad has had his imagination fired and his career determined by the exploits of Gordon Cumming, which are now, however, almost forgotten.  Mr.  F.  C.  Selous has  in our  time surpassed  even Gordon  Cumming's exploits,  and  has besides done excellent work as guide for the successive expeditions into South Africa.

Thus,  practically within our own time,  the interior of Africa,  where once geographers,  as the poet Butler  puts  it,  "placed  elephants  instead  of towns,"  has  become  known,  in  its  main  outlines,  by successive series of intrepid  explorers, who  have often had to be warriors as well as scientific men. Whatever the motives  that have led  the white  man into  the centre of the  Dark  Continent—love of adventure,  scientific  curiosity,  big  game,  or  patriotism—the  result  has  been  that  the  continent  has become known instead of merely its coast-line. On the whole, English exploration has been the main means by which our knowledge of the interior of Africa has been obtained,  and  England  has been richly rewarded  by coming into  possession of the most promising  parts of the  continent—the Nile valley and  temperate South  Africa.  But  France has  also  gained  a huge  extent of country covering almost the whole of North-West Africa. While much of this is merely desert, there are caravan routes which tap the basin of the Niger and conduct its products to Algeria, conquered by France early in the century, and to Tunis, more recently appropriated. The West African provinces of France have, at any rate, this advantage, that they are nearer to  the mother-country than any other colony of a European power; and the result may be that African soldiers may one of these days fight for France on European soil, just as the Indian soldiers were imported to Cyprus by Lord  Beaconsfield in 1876. Meanwhile, the  result  of  all this  international ambition  has  been  that  Africa  in  its  entirety  is  now  known  and accessible to European civilisation.

[Authorities: Kiepert, Beiträgge zur Entdeckungsgeschichte Afrikas, 1873; Brown, The Story  of Africa,  4 vols., 1894; Scott Keltie, The Partition of Africa, 1896.]