Studies in the psychology of sex, volume 2 by Havelock Ellis. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

[239] Magnan has in recent years reaffirmed this view ("Inversion Sexuelle

et Pathologic Mentale," _Revue de Psychothérapie_, March, 1914): "The

invert is a diseased person, a degenerate."

[240] It is this fact which has caused the Italians to be shy of using the

word "degeneration;" thus, Marro, in his great work, _I Caratteri del

Delinquenti_, made a notable attempt to analyze the phenomena lumped

together as degenerate into three groups: atypical, atavistic, and morbid.

[241] Hirschfeld and Burchard among 200 inverts found pronounced stigmata

of degeneration in only 16 per cent. (Hirschfeld, _Die Homosexualität_,

ch. xx.)

[242] Alcohol has sometimes been considered an important exciting cause of

homosexuality, and alcoholism is certainly not uncommon in the heredity of

inverts; according to Hirschfeld (_Die Homosexualität_, p. 386) it is well

marked in one of the parents in over 21 per cent, of cases. But it

probably has no more influence as an exciting cause in the individual

homosexual person than in the individual heterosexual person. From the

Freudian standpoint, indeed, Abraham believes (_Zeitschrift für

Sexualwissenschaft_, Heft 8, 1908) that even in normal persons alcohol

removes the inhibition from a latent homosexuality, and Juliusburger from

the same standpoint (_Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse_, Heft 10 and 11,

1912) thinks that the alcoholic tendency is unconsciously aroused by the

homosexual impulse in order to reach its own gratification. But we may

accept Näcke's conclusions (_Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie_, vol.

lxviii, 1911, p. 852), that (1) alcohol cannot produce homosexuality in

persons not predisposed, that (2) it may arouse it in those who are

predisposed, that (3) the action of alcohol is the same on the homosexual

as the heterosexual, and that (4) alcoholism is not common among inverts.

CHAPTER VII.

CONCLUSIONS.

The Prevention of Homosexuality--The Influence of the School--Coeducation--The Treatment of Sexual Inversion--Castration--Hypnotism--Associational Therapy--Psycho-analysis--Mental and Physical Hygiene--

Marriage--The

Children of Inverts--The Attitude of Society--The Horror Aroused by

Homosexuality--Justinian--The _Code Napoléon_--The State of the Law in

Europe Today--Germany--England--What Should be our Attitude toward

Homosexuality?

Having now completed the psychological analysis of the sexual invert, so

far as I have been able to study him, it only remains to speak briefly of

the attitude of society and the law. First, however, a few words as to the

medical and hygienic aspects of inversion. The preliminary question of the

prevention of homosexuality is in too vague a position at present to be

profitably discussed. So far as the really congenital invert is concerned,

prevention can have but small influence; but sound social hygiene should

render difficult the acquisition of homosexual perversity, or what has

been termed pseudo-homosexuality. It is the school which is naturally the

chief theater of immature and temporary homosexual manifestations, partly

because school life largely coincides with the period during which the

sexual impulse frequently tends to be undifferentiated, and partly because

in the traditions of large and old schools an artificial homosexuality is

often deeply rooted.

Homosexuality in English schools has already been briefly

referred to in chapter iii. As a precise and interesting picture

of the phenomena in French schools, I may mention a story by

Albert Nortal, _Les Adolescents Passionnés_ (1913), written

immediately after the author left college, though not published

until more than twenty-five years later, and clearly based on

personal observation and experience. As regards German schools,

see, e.g., Moll, _Untersuchungen über die Libido Sexualis_, p.

449 et seq., and for sexual manifestations in early life

generally, the same author's _Sexual Life of the Child_; also

Hirschfeld, _Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen_, vol. v,

1903, p. 47 et seq., and, for references, Hirschfeld, _Die

Homosexualität_, p. 46 et seq.

While much may be done by physical hygiene and other means to prevent the

extension of homosexuality in schools,[243] it is impossible, and even

undesirable, to repress absolutely the emotional manifestations of sex in

either boys or girls who have reached the age of puberty.[244] It must

always be remembered that profoundly rooted organic impulses cannot be

effectually combated by direct methods. Writing of a period two centuries

ago, Casanova, in relating his early life as a seminarist trained to the

priesthood, describes the precautions taken to prevent the youths entering

each other's beds, and points out the folly of such precautions.[245] As

that master of the human heart remarks, such prohibitions intensify the

very evil they are intended to prevent by invoking in its aid the impulse

to disobedience natural to every child of Adam and Eve, and the

observation has often been repeated by teachers since.

We probably have to

recognize that a way to render such manifestations wholesome, as well as

to prepare for the relationships of later life, is the adoption, so far as

possible, of the method of coeducation of the sexes,[246]--not, of course,

necessarily involving identity of education for both sexes,--since a

certain amount of association between the sexes helps to preserve the

healthiness of the sexual emotional attitude.

Association between the

sexes will not, of course, prevent the development of congenital

inversion. In this connection it is pointed out by Bethe that it was

precisely in Sparta and Lesbos, where homosexuality was most ideally

cultivated, that the sexes, so far as we know, associated more freely than

in any other Greek State.[247]

The question of the treatment of homosexuality must be approached with

discrimination, caution, and skepticism. Nowadays we can have but little

sympathy with those who, at all costs, are prepared to

"cure" the invert.

There is no sound method of cure in radical cases.

At one time the seemingly very radical method of castration was advocated

and occasionally carried out, as in a case I have recorded in a previous

chapter (History XXVI). Like all methods of treatment, it is sometimes

believed to have been successful by those who carried it out. Usually,

after a short period, it is found to be unsuccessful, and in some cases

the condition, especially the mental condition, is rendered worse. It is

not difficult to understand why this should be. Sexual inversion, is not a

localized genital condition. It is a diffused condition, and firmly

imprinted on the whole psychic state. There may be reasons for castration,

or the slighter operation of vasectomy, but, although sexual tension may

be thereby diminished, no authority now believes that any such operation

will affect the actual inversion. Castration of the body in adult age

cannot be expected to produce castration of the mind.

Moll, Féré, Näcke,

Bloch, Rohleder, Hirschfeld, are all either opposed to castration for

inversion, or very doubtful as to any beneficial results.

In a case communicated to me by Dr. Shufeldt, an invert had

himself castrated at the age of 26 to diminish sexual desire,

make himself more like a woman, and to stop growth of beard. "But

the only apparent physical effect," he wrote, "was to increase my

weight 10 per cent., and render me a semi-invalid for the rest

of my life. After two years my sexuality decreased, but that may

have been due to satiety or to advancing years. I was also

rendered more easily irritated over trifles and more revengeful.

Terrible criminal auto-suggestions came into my head, never

experienced before." Féré (_Revue de Chirurgie_, March 10, 1905)

published the case of an invert of English origin who had been

castrated. The inverted impulse remained unchanged, as well as

sexual desire and the aptitude for erection; but neurasthenic

symptoms, which had existed before, were aggravated; he felt less

capable to resist his impulses, became migratory in his habits of

life, and addicted to the use of laudanum. In a case recorded by

C.H. Hughes (_Alienist and Neurologist_, Aug., 1914) the results

were less unsatisfactory; in this case the dorsal nerve of the

penis was first excised, without any result (see also _Alienist

and Neurologist_, Feb., 1904, p. 70, as regards worse than

useless results of cutting the pudic nerve), and a year or so

later the testes were removed and the patient gained tranquillity

and satisfaction; his homosexual inclinations appeared to go, and

he began to show inclination for asexualized women, being

specially anxious to meet with a woman whose ovaries had been

removed on account of inversion. (Reference may also be made to

Näcke, "Die Ersten Kastrationen aus sozialen Grunden auf

europäischen Boden," _Neurologisches Centralblatt_, 1909, No. 5,

and E. Wilhelm in _Juristisch-psychiatrische Grenzfragen_, vol.

viii, Heft 6 and 7, 1911.)

More trust has usually been placed in the psychotherapeutical than the

surgical treatment of homosexuality. At one time hypnotic suggestion was

carried out very energetically on homosexual subjects.

Krafft-Ebing seems

to have been the first distinguished advocate of hypnotism for application

to the homosexual. Dr. von Schrenck-Notzing displayed special zeal and

persistency in this treatment. He undertook to treat even the most

pronounced cases of inversion by courses lasting more than a year, and

involving, in at least one case, nearly one hundred and fifty hypnotic

sittings; he prescribed frequent visits to the brothel, previous to which

the patient took large doses of alcohol; by prolonged manipulations a

prostitute endeavored to excite erection, a process attended with varying

results. It appears that in some cases this course of treatment was

attended by a certain sort of success, to which an unlimited good will on

the part of the patient, it is needless to say, largely contributed. The

treatment was, however, usually interrupted by continual backsliding to

homosexual practices, and sometimes, naturally, the cure involved a

venereal disorder. The patient was enabled to marry and to beget

children.[248] It is a method of treatment which seems to have found few

imitators. This we need not regret. The histories I have recorded in

previous chapters show that it is not uncommon for even a pronounced

invert to be able sometimes to effect coitus. It often becomes easy if at

the time he fixes his thoughts on images connected with his own sex. But

the perversion remains unaffected; the subject is merely (as one of Moll's

inverts expressed it) practising masturbation _per vaginam_. Such

treatment is a training in vice, and, as Raffalovich points out, the

invert is simply perverted and brought down to the vicious level which

necessarily accompanies perversity.[249]

There can be no doubt that in slight and superficial cases of

homosexuality, suggestion may really exert an influence.

We can scarcely

expect it to exert such influence when the homosexual tendency is deeply

rooted in an organic inborn temperament. In such cases indeed the subject

may resist suggestion even when in the hypnotic state.

This is pointed out

by Moll, a great authority on hypnotism, and with much experience of its

application to homosexuality, but never inclined to encourage an

exaggerated notion of its efficacy in this field. Forel, who was also an

authority on hypnotism, was equally doubtful as to its value in relation

to inversion, especially in clearly inborn cases.

Krafft-Ebing at the end

said little about it, and Näcke (who was himself without faith in this

method of treating inversion) stated that he had been informed by the

last homosexual case treated by Krafft-Ebing by hypnotism that, in spite

of all good-will on the patient's side, the treatment had been quite

useless. Féré, also, had no belief in the efficacy of suggestive

treatment, nor has Merzbach, nor Rohleder. Numa Praetorius states that the

homosexual subjects he is acquainted with, who had been so treated, were

not cured, and Hirschfeld remarks that the inverts

"cured" by hypnotism

were either not cured or not inverted.[250]

Moll has shown his doubt as to the wide applicability of suggestive

therapeutics in homosexuality by developing in recent years what he terms

association-therapy. In nearly all perverse individuals, he points out,

there is a bridge,--more or less weak, no doubt,--which leads to the

normal sexual life. By developing such links of association with

normality, Moll believes, it may be possible to exert a healing influence

on the homosexual. Thus a man who is attracted to boys may be brought to

love a boyish woman.[251] Indications of this kind have long been observed

and utilized, though not developed into a systematic method of treatment.

In the case of bisexual individuals, or of youthful subjects whose

homosexuality is not fully developed, it is probable that this method is

beneficial. It is difficult to believe, however, that it possesses any

marked influence on pronounced and developed cases of inversion.[252]

Somewhat the same aim as Moll's association-therapy, though on the basis

of a more elaborate theory, is sought by Freud's psychoanalytic method of

treating homosexuality. For the psychoanalytic theory (to which reference

was made in the previous chapter) the congenital element of inversion is a

rare and usually unimportant factor; the chief part is played by perverse

psychic mechanisms. It is the business of psychoanalysis to straighten

these out, and from the bisexual constitution, which is regarded as common

to every one, to bring into the foreground the heterosexual elements, and

so to reconstruct a normal personality, developing new sexual ideals from

the patient's own latent and subconscious nature. Sadger has especially

occupied himself with the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexuality and

claims many successes.[253] Sadger admits that there are many limits to

the success of this treatment, and that it cannot affect the inborn

factors of homosexuality when present. Other psychoanalysts are less

sanguine as to the cure of inversion. Stekel appears to have stated that

he has never seen a complete cure by psychoanalysis, and Ferenezi is not

able to give a good account of the results; especially as regards what he

terms obsessional homosexuality, he states that he has never succeeded in

effecting a complete cure, although obsessions in general are especially

amenable to psychoanalysis.[254]

I have met with at least two homosexual persons who had undergone

psychoanalytic treatment and found it beneficial. One, however, was

bisexual, so that the difficulties in the way of the success--granting it

to be real--were not serious. In the other case, the inversion persisted

after treatment, exactly the same as before. The benefit he received was

due to the fact that he was enabled to understand himself better and to

overcome some of his mental difficulties. The treatment, therefore, in his

case, was not a method of cure, but of psychic hygiene, of what Hirschfeld

would call "adaptation-therapy." There can be no doubt that--even if we

put aside all effort at cure and regard an invert's condition as inborn

and permanent--a large and important field of treatment here still

remains.

As we have seen in the two previous chapters, sexual inversion cannot be

regarded as essentially an insane or psychopathic state.[255] But it is

frequently associated with nervous conditions which may be greatly

benefited by hygiene and treatment, without any attempt at all to overcome

a homosexual attitude which may be too deeply rooted to be changed. The

invert is specially liable to suffer from a high degree of neurasthenia,

often involving much nervous weakness and irritability, loss of

self-control, and genital hyperesthesia.[256] Hirschfeld finds that over

67 per cent. inverts suffer from nervous troubles, and among the cases

dealt with in the present _Study_ (as shown in chapter v) slight nervous

functional disturbances are very common. These are conditions which may be

ameliorated, and they may be treated in much the same way as if no

inversion existed, by physical and mental tonics; or, if necessary,

sedatives; by regulated gymnastics and out-of-door exercises; and by

occupations which employ, without overexerting, the mind. Very great and

permanent benefit may be obtained by a prolonged course of such mental and

physical hygiene; the associated neurasthenic conditions may be largely

removed, with the morbid fears, suspicions, and irritabilities that are

usually part of neurasthenia, and the invert may be brought into a fairly

wholesome and tonic condition of self-control.

The inversion is not thus removed. But if the patient is still young, and

if the perversion does not appear to be deeply rooted in the organism, it

is probable that--provided his own good-will is aiding--

general hygienic

measures, together with removal to a favorable environment, may gradually

lead to the development of the normal sexual impulse. If it fails to do

so, it becomes necessary to exercise great caution in recommending

stronger methods. Purely "Platonic association with the other sex," Moll

points out, "leads to better results than any prescribed attempt at

coitus." For even when such attempt is successful, it is not usually

possible to regard the results with much satisfaction.

Not only is the

acquisition of the normal instinct by an invert very much on a level with

the acquisition of a vice, but probably it seldom succeeds in eradicating

the original inverted instinct.[257] What usually happens is that the

person becomes capable of experiencing both impulses,--

not a specially

satisfactory state of things. It may be disastrous, especially if it leads

to marriage, as it may do in an inverted man or still more easily in an

inverted woman. The apparent change does not turn out to be deep, and the

invert's position is more unfortunate than his original position, both for

himself and for his wife.[258]

It may be observed in the Histories brought forward in chapter iii that

the position of married inverts (we must, of course, put aside the

bisexual) is usually more distressing than that of the unmarried. Among my

cases 14 per cent. are married. Hirschfeld finds that 16

per cent. of

inverts are married and 50 per cent. are impotent; he is unable to find a

single cure of homosexuality, and seldom any improvement, due to marriage;

nearly always the impulse remains unaffected. The invert's happiness is,

however, often affected for the worse, and not least by the feeling that

he is depriving his wife of happiness. An invert, who had left his country

through fear of arrest and married a rich woman who was in love with him,

said to Hirschfeld: "Five years' imprisonment would not have been worse

than one year of marriage."[259] In a marriage of this kind the homosexual

partner and the normal partner--however ignorant of sexual matters--are

both conscious, often with equal pain, that, even in the presence of

affection and esteem and the best will in the world, there is something

lacking. The instinctive and emotional element, which is the essence of

sexual love and springs from the central core of organic personality,

cannot voluntarily be created or even assumed.[260]

For the sake of the possible offspring, also, marriage is to be avoided.

It is sometimes entirely for the sake of children that the invert desires

to marry. But it must be pointed out that homosexuality is undoubtedly in

many cases inherited. Often, it is true, the children turn out fairly

well, but, in many cases, they bear witness that they belong to a neurotic

and failing stock;[261] Hirschfeld goes so far as to say that it is always

so, and concludes that from the eugenic standpoint the marriage of a

homosexual person is always very risky. In a large number of cases such

marriages prove sterile. The tendency to sexual inversion in eccentric and

neurotic families seems merely to be nature's merciful method of winding

up a concern which, from her point of view, has ceased to be profitable.

As a rule, inverts have no desire to be different from what they

are, and, if they have any desire for marriage, it is usually

only momentary. Very pathetic appeals for help are, however,

sometimes made. I may quote from a letter addressed to me by a

gentleman who desired advice on this matter: "In part, I write to

you as a moralist and, in part, as to a physician.

Dr. Q. has

published a book in which, without discussion, hypnotic treatment

of such cases was reported as successful. I am eager to know if

your opinion remains what it was. This new assurance comes from a

man whose moral firmness and delicacy are unquestionable, but you

will easily imagine how one might shrink from the implantation of

new impulses in the unconscious self, since newly created

inclinations might disturb the conditions of life.

At any rate,

in my ignorance of hypnotism I fear that the effort to give the

normal instinct might lead to marriage without the assurance that

the normal instinct would be stable. I write, therefore, to

explain my present condition and crave your counsel.

It is with

the greatest reluctance that I reveal the closely guarded secret

of my life. I have no other abnormality, and have not hitherto

betrayed my abnormal instinct. I have never made any person the

victim of passion: moral and religious feelings were too

powerful. I have found my reverence for other souls a perfect

safeguard against any approach to impurity. I have never had

sexual interest in women. Once I had a great friendship with a

beautiful and noble woman, without any mixture of sexual feeling

on my part. I was ignorant of my condition, and I have the bitter

regret of having caused in her a hopeless love--

proudly and

tragically concealed to her death. My friendships with men,

younger men, have been colored by passion, against which I have

fought continually. The shame of this has made life a hell, and

the horror of this abnormality, since I came to know it as such,

has been an enemy to my religious faith. Here there could be no

case of a divinely given instinct which I was to learn to use in

a rational and chaste fashion, under the control of spiritual

loyalty. The power which gave me life seemed to insist on my

doing that for which the same power would sting me with remorse.

If there is no remedy I must either cry out against the injustice

of this life of torment between nature and conscience, or submit

to the blind trust of baffled ignorance. If there is a remedy

life will not seem to be such an intolerable ordeal.

I am not

pleading that I must succumb to impulse. I do not doubt that a

pure celibate life is possible so far as action is concerned. But

I cannot discover that friendship with younger men can go on

uncolored by a sensuous admixture which fills me with shame and

loathing. The gratification of passion--normal o