Studies in the psychology of sex, volume 4 (of 6) by Havelock Ellis. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Apart from this

character we are probably bound, from a strictly æsthetic point of view,

to regard the male form as more æsthetically beautiful.[139] The female

form, moreover, usually overpasses very swiftly the period of the climax

of its beauty, often only retaining it during a few weeks.

The following communication from a correspondent well brings out

the divergences of feeling in this matter:

"You write that the sex organs, in an excited condition, cannot

be called æsthetic. But I believe that they are a source, not

only of curiosity and wonder to many persons, but also objects of

admiration. I happen to know of one man, extremely intellectual

and refined, who delights in lying between his mistress's thighs

and gazing long at the dilated vagina. Also another man, married,

and not intellectual, who always tenderly gazes at his wife's

organs, in a strong light, before intercourse, and kisses her

there and upon the abdomen. The wife, though amative, confessed

to another woman that she could not understand the attraction. On

the other hand, two married men have told me that the sight of

their wives' genital parts would disgust them, and that they have

never seen them.

"If the sexual parts cannot be called æsthetic, they have still a

strong charm for many passionate lovers, of both sexes, though

not often, I believe, among the unimaginative and the uneducated,

who are apt to ridicule the organs or to be repelled by them.

Many women confess that they are revolted by the sight of even a

husband's complete nudity, though they have no indifference for

sexual embraces. I think that the stupid bungle of Nature in

making the generative organs serve as means of relieving the

bladder has much to do with this revulsion. But some women of

erotic temperament find pleasure in looking at the penis of a

husband or lover, in handling it, and kissing it.

Prostitutes do

this in the way of business; some chaste, passionate wives act

thus voluntarily. This is scarcely morbid, as the mammalia of

most species smell and lick each others' genitals.

Probably

primitive man did the same."

Brantôme (_Vie des Dames Galantes_, Discours II) has some remarks

to much the same effect concerning the difference between men,

some of whom take no pleasure in seeing the private parts of

their wives or mistresses, while others admire them and delight

to kiss them.

I must add that, however natural or legitimate the attraction of

the sexual parts may be to either sex, the question of their

purely æsthetic beauty remains unaffected.

Remy de Gourmont, in a discussion of the æsthetic element in

sexual beauty, considers that the invisibility of the sexual

organs is the decisive fact in rendering women more beautiful

than men. "Sex, which is sometimes an advantage, is always a

burden and always a flaw; it exists for the race and not for the

individual. In the human male, and precisely because of his erect

attitude, sex is the predominantly striking and visible fact, the

point of attack in a struggle at close quarters, the point aimed

at from a distance, an obstacle for the eye, whether regarded as

a rugosity on the surface or as breaking the middle of a line.

The harmony of the feminine body is thus geometrically much more

perfect, especially when we consider the male and the female at

the moment of desire when they present the most intense and

natural expression of life. Then the woman, whose movements are

all interior, or only visible by the undulation of her curves,

preserves her full æsthetic value, while the man, as it were, all

at once receding toward the primitive state of animality, seems

to throw off all beauty and become reduced to the simple and

naked condition of a genital organism." (Remy de Gourmont,

_Physique de l'Amour_, p. 69.) Remy de Gourmont proceeds,

however, to point out that man has his revenge after a woman has

become pregnant, and that, moreover, the proportions of the

masculine body are more beautiful than those of the feminine

body.

The primary sexual characters of man and woman have thus never at any time

played a very large part in sexual allurement. With the growth of culture,

indeed, the very methods which had been adopted to call attention to the

sexual organs were by a further development retained for the purpose of

concealing them. From the first the secondary sexual characters have been

a far more widespread method of sexual allurement than the primary sexual

characters, and in the most civilized countries to-day they still

constitute the most attractive of such methods to the majority of the

population.

The main secondary sexual characters in woman and the type which

they present in beautiful and well-developed persons are

summarized as follows by Stratz, who in his book on the beauty of

the body in woman sets forth the reasons for the characteristics

here given:--

Delicate bony structure.

Rounded forms and breasts.

Broad pelvis.

Long and abundant hair.

Low and narrow boundary of pubic hair.

Sparse hair in armpit.

No hair on body.

Delicate skin.

Rounded skull.

Small face.

Large orbits.

High and slender eyebrows.

Low and small lower jaw.

Soft transition from cheek to neck.

Rounded neck.

Slender wrist.

Small hand, with long index finger.

Rounded shoulders.

Straight, small clavicle.

Small and long thorax.

Slender waist.

Hollow sacrum.

Prominent and domed nates.

Sacral dimples.

Rounded and thick thighs.

Low and obtuse pubic arch.

Soft contour of knee.

Rounded calves.

Slender ankle.

Small toes.

Long second and short fifth toe.

Broad middle incisor teeth.

(Stratz, _Die Schönheit des Weiblichen Körpers_, fourteenth

edition, 1903, p. 200. This statement agrees at most points with

my own exposition of the secondary sexual characters: _Man and

Woman_, fourth edition, revised and enlarged, 1904.) Thus we find, among most of the peoples of Europe, Asia, and Africa, the

chief continents of the world, that the large hips and buttocks of women

are commonly regarded as an important feature of beauty.

This secondary

sexual character represents the most decided structural deviation of the

feminine type from the masculine, a deviation demanded by the reproductive

function of women, and in the admiration it arouses sexual selection is

thus working in a line with natural selection. It cannot be said that,

except in a very moderate degree, it has always been regarded as at the

same time in a line with claims of purely æsthetic beauty. The European

artist frequently seeks to attenuate rather than accentuate the

protuberant lines of the feminine hips, and it is noteworthy that the

Japanese also regard small hips as beautiful. Nearly everywhere else

large hips and buttocks are regarded as a mark of beauty, and the average

man is of this opinion even in the most æsthetic countries. The contrast

of this exuberance with the more closely knit male form, the force of

association, and the unquestionable fact that such development is the

condition needed for healthy motherhood, have served as a basis for an

ideal of sexual attractiveness which appeals to nearly all people more

strongly than a more narrowly æsthetic ideal, which must inevitably be

somewhat hermaphroditic in character.

Broad hips, which involve a large pelvis, are necessarily a characteristic

of the highest human races, because the races with the largest heads must

be endowed also with the largest pelvis to enable their large heads to

enter the world. The white race, according to Bacarisse, has the broadest

sacrum, the yellow race coming next, the black race last. The white race

is also stated to show the greatest curvature of the sacrum, the yellow

race next, while the black race has the flattest sacrum.[140] The black

race thus possesses the least developed pelvis, the narrowest, and the

flattest. It is certainly not an accidental coincidence that it is

precisely among people of black race that we find a simulation of the

large pelvis of the higher races admired and cultivated in the form of

steatopygia. This is an enormously exaggerated development of the

subcutaneous layer of fat which normally covers the buttocks and upper

parts of the thighs in woman, and in this extreme form constitutes a kind

of natural fatty tumor. Steatopygia cannot be said to exist, according to

Deniker, unless the projection of the buttocks exceeds 4

per cent of the

individual's height; it frequently equals 10 per cent.

True steatopygia

only exists among Bushman and Hottentot women, and among the peoples who

are by blood connected with them. An unusual development of the buttocks

is, however, found among the Woloffs and many other African peoples.[141]

There can be no doubt that among the black peoples of Africa generally,

whether true steatopygia exists among them or not, extreme gluteal

development is regarded as a very important, if not the most important,

mark of beauty, and Burton stated that a Somali man was supposed to choose

his wife by ranging women in a row and selecting her who projected

farthest _a tergo_.[142] In Europe, it must be added, clothing enables

this feature of beauty to be simulated. Even by some African peoples the

posterior development has been made to appear still larger by the use of

cushions, and in England in the sixteenth century we find the same

practice well recognized, and the Elizabethan dramatists refer to the

"bum-roll," which in more recent times has become the bustle, devices

which bear witness to what Watts, the painter, called

"the persistent

tendency to suggest that the most beautiful half of humanity is furnished

with tails."[143] In reality, as we see, it is simply a tendency, not to

simulate an animal character, but to emphasize the most human and the most

feminine of the secondary sexual characters, and therefore, from the

sexual point of view, a beautiful feature.[144]

Sometimes admiration for this characteristic is associated with admiration

for marked obesity generally, and it may be noted that a somewhat greater

degree of fatness may also be regarded as a feminine secondary sexual

character. This admiration is specially marked among several of the black

peoples of Africa, and here to become a beauty a woman must, by drinking

enormous quantities of milk, seek to become very fat.

Sonnini noted that

to some extent the same thing might be found among the Mohammedan women of

Egypt. After bright eyes and a soft, polished, hairless skin, an Egyptian

woman, he stated, most desired to obtain _embonpoint_; men admired fat

women and women sought to become fat. "The idea of a very fat woman,"

Sonnini adds, "is nearly always accompanied in Europe by that of softness

of flesh, effacement of form, and defect of elasticity in the outlines. It

would be a mistake thus to represent the women of Turkey in general, where

all seek to become fat. It is certain that the women of the East, more

favored by Nature, preserve longer than others the firmness of the flesh,

and this precious property, joined to the freshness and whiteness of their

skin, renders them very agreeable. It must be added that in no part of the

world is cleanliness carried so far as by the women of the East."[145]

The special characteristics of the feminine hips and buttocks become

conspicuous in walking and may be further emphasized by the special method

of walking or carriage. The women of some southern countries are famous

for the beauty of their way of walk; "the goddess is revealed by her

walk," as Virgil said. In Spain, especially, among European countries, the

walk very notably gives expression to the hips and buttocks. The spine is

in Spain very curved, producing what is termed _ensellure_, or

saddle-back--a characteristic which gives great flexibility to the back

and prominence to the gluteal regions, sometimes slightly simulating

steatopygia. The vibratory movement naturally produced by walking and

sometimes artificially heightened thus becomes a trait of sexual beauty.

Outside of Europe such vibration of the flanks and buttocks is more

frankly displayed and cultivated as a sexual allurement.

The Papuans are

said to admire this vibratory movement of the buttocks in their women.

Young girls are practiced in it by their mothers for hours at a time as

soon as they have reached the age of 7 or 8, and the Papuan maiden walks

thus whenever she is in the presence of men, subsiding into a simpler gait

when no men are present. In some parts of tropical Africa the women walk

in this fashion. It is also known to the Egyptians, and by the Arabs is

called _ghung_.[146] As Mantegazza remarks, the essentially feminine

character of this gait makes it a method of sexual allurement. It should

be observed that it rests on feminine anatomical characteristics, and that

the natural walk of a femininely developed woman is inevitably different

from that of a man.

In an elaborate discussion of beauty of movement Stratz

summarizes the special characters of the gait in woman as

follows: "A woman's walk is chiefly distinguished from a man's by

shorter steps, the more marked forward movement of the hips, the

greater length of the phase of rest in relation to the phase of

motion, and by the fact that the compensatory movements of the

upper parts of the body are less powerfully supported by the

action of the arms and more by the revolution of the flanks. A

man's walk has a more pushing and active character, a woman's a

more rolling and passive character; while a man seems to seek to

catch his fleeing equilibrium, a woman seems to seek to preserve

the equilibrium she has reached.... A woman's walk is beautiful

when it shows the definitely feminine and rolling character, with

the greatest predominance of the moment of extension over that of

flexion." (Stratz, _Die Schönheit des Weiblichen Körpers_,

fourteenth edition, p. 275.)

An occasional development of the idea of sexual beauty as associated with

developed hips is found in the tendency to regard the pregnant woman as

the most beautiful type. Stratz observes that a woman artist once remarked

to him that since motherhood is the final aim of woman, and a woman

reaches her full flowering period in pregnancy, she ought to be most

beautiful when pregnant. This is so, Stratz replied, if the period of her

full physical bloom chances to correspond with the early months of

pregnancy, for with the onset of pregnancy metabolism is heightened, the

tissues become active, the tone of the skin softer and brighter, the

breasts firmer, so that the charm of fullest bloom is increased until the

moment when the expansion of the womb begins to destroy the harmony of the

form. At one period of European culture, however,--at a moment and among a

people not very sensitive to the most exquisite æsthetic sensations,--the

ideal of beauty has even involved the character of advanced pregnancy. In

northern Europe during the centuries immediately preceding the Renaissance

the ideal of beauty, as we may see by the pictures of the time, was a

pregnant woman, with protuberant abdomen and body more or less extended

backward. This is notably apparent in the work of the Van Eycks: in the

Eve in the Brussels Gallery; in the wife of Arnolfini in the highly

finished portrait group in the National Gallery; even the virgins in the

great masterpiece of the Van Eycks in the Cathedral at Ghent assume the

type of the pregnant woman.

"Through all the middle ages down to Dürer and Cranach," quite

truly remarks Laura Marholm (as quoted by I. Bloch, _Beiträge zur

Ætiologie der Psychopathia Sexualis_, Teil I, p.

154), "we find a

very peculiar type which has falsely been regarded as one of

merely ascetic character. It represents quiet, peaceful, and

cheerful faces, full of innocence; tall, slender, young figures;

the shoulders still scanty; the breasts small, with slender legs

beneath their garments; and round the upper part of the body

clothing that is tight almost to the point of constriction. The

waist comes just under the bosom, and from this point the broad

skirts in folds give to the most feminine part of the feminine

body full and absolutely unhampered power of movement and

expansion. The womanly belly even in saints and virgins is very

pronounced in the carriage of the body and clearly protuberant

beneath the clothing. It is the maternal function, in sacred and

profane figures alike, which marks the whole type--

indeed, the

whole conception--of woman." For a brief period this fashion

reappeared in the eighteenth century, and women wore pads and

other devices to increase the size of the abdomen.

With the Renaissance this ideal of beauty disappeared from art. But in

real life we still seem to trace its survival in the fashion for that

class of garments which involved an immense amount of expansion below the

waist and secured such expansion by the use of whalebone hoops and similar

devices. The Elizabethan farthingale was such a garment.

This was

originally a Spanish invention, as indicated by the name (from

_verdugardo_, provided with hoops), and reached England through France. We

find the fashion at its most extreme point in the fashionable dress of

Spain in the seventeenth century, such as it has been immortalized by

Velasquez. In England hoops died out during the reign of George III but

were revived for a time, half a century later, in the Victorian

crinoline.[147]

Only second to the pelvis and its integuments as a secondary sexual

character in woman we must place the breasts.[148] Among barbarous and

civilized peoples the beauty of the breast is usually highly esteemed.

Among Europeans, indeed, the importance of this region is so highly

esteemed that the general rule against the exposure of the body is in its

favor abrogated, and the breasts are the only portion of the body, in the

narrow sense, which a European lady in full dress is allowed more or less

to uncover. Moreover, at various periods and notably in the eighteenth

century, women naturally deficient in this respect have sometimes worn

artificial busts made of wax. Savages, also, sometimes show admiration for

this part of the body, and in the Papuan folk-tales, for instance, the

sole distinguishing mark of a beautiful woman is breasts that stand

up.[149] On the other hand, various savage peoples even appear to regard

the development of the breasts as ugly and adopt devices for flattening

this part of the body.[150] The feeling that prompts this practice is not

unknown in modern Europe, for the Bulgarians are said to regard developed

breasts as ugly; in mediæval Europe, indeed, the general ideal of feminine

slenderness was opposed to developed breasts, and the garments tended to

compress them. But in a very high degree of civilization this feeling is

unknown, as, indeed, it is unknown to most barbarians, and the beauty of a

woman's breasts, and of any natural or artificial object which suggests

the gracious curves of the bosom, is a universal source of pleasure.

The casual vision of a girl's breasts may, in the chastest youth,

evoke a strange perturbation. (Cf., e.g., a passage in an early

chapter of Marcelle Tinayre's _La Maison du Péché_.) We need not

regard this feeling as of purely sexual origin; and in addition

even to the æsthetic element it is probably founded to some

extent on a reminiscence of the earliest associations of life.

This element of early association was very well set forth long

ago by Erasmus Darwin:--

"When the babe, soon after it is born into this cold world, is

applied to its mother's bosom, its sense of perceiving warmth is

first agreeably affected; next its sense of smell is delighted

with the odor of her milk; then its taste is gratified by the

flavor of it; afterward the appetites of hunger and of thirst

afford pleasure by the possession of their object, and by the

subsequent digestion of the aliment; and, last, the sense of

touch is delighted by the softness and smoothness of the milky

fountain, the source of such variety of happiness.

"All these various kinds of pleasure at length become associated

with the form of the mother's breast, which the infant embraces

with its hands, presses with its lips, and watches with its eyes;

and thus acquires more accurate ideas of the form of its mother's

bosom than of the odor, flavor, and warmth which it perceives by

its other senses. And hence at our maturer years, when any object

of vision is presented to us which by its wavy or spiral lines

bears any similitude to the form of the female bosom, whether it

be found in a landscape with soft gradations of raising and

descending surface, or in the forms of some antique vases, or in

other works of the pencil or the chisel, we feel a general glow

of delight which seems to influence all our senses; and if the

object be not too large we experience an attraction to embrace it

with our lips as we did in our early infancy the bosom of our

mothers." (E. Darwin, _Zoönomia_, 1800, vol. i, p.

174.)

The general admiration accorded to developed breasts and a developed

pelvis is evidenced by a practice which, as embodied in the corset, is all

but universal in many European countries, as well as the extra-European

countries inhabited by the white race, and in one form or another is by no

means unknown to peoples of other than the white race.

The tightening of the waist girth was little known to the Greeks of the

best period, but it was practiced by the Greeks of the decadence and by

them transmitted to the Romans; there are many references in Latin

literature to this practice, and the ancient physician wrote against it in

the same sense as modern doctors. So far as Christian Europe is concerned

it would appear that the corset arose to gratify an ideal of asceticism

rather than of sexual allurement. The bodice in early mediæval days bound

and compressed the breasts and thus tended to efface the specifically

feminine character of a woman's body. Gradually, however, the bodice was

displaced downward, and its effect, ultimately, was to render the breasts

more prominent instead of effacing them. Not only does the corset render

the breasts more prominent; it has the further effect of displacing the

breathing activity of the lungs in an upward direction, the advantage from

the point of sexual allurement thus gained being that additional attention

is drawn to the bosom from the respiratory movement thus imparted to it.

So marked and so constant is this artificial respiratory effect, under the

influence of the waist compression habitual among civilized women, that

until recent years it was commonly supposed that there is a real and

fundamental difference in breathing between men and women, that women'