Combined Arms Obstacle Integration by Department of the Army - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

index-125_1.png

FM 90-7

Scatterable Mines

mines is a complex obstacle. The RC

SCATMINEs are laid without regard to clas-

requires that the enemy employ its mechan-

sical pattern and are delivered by aircraft,

ical bridging or blade-breaching assets,

helicopter, artillery, missile, or ground dis-

while the AT mines require that the enemy

penser. SCATMINEs provide the maneuver

use a mine-breaching asset. Together, the

RCs and mines create a better obstacle. The

commander a flexible, responsive, and lethal

key to creating effective complex obstacles is

mine-laying capability to affect the enemy’s

knowing the quantity and capability of the

ability to maneuver. All US SCATMINEs

enemy’s breaching assets.

have a limited active life and self-destruct at

a preset time. The duration of the active life

A complex obstacle should affect low-density

depends on the type of mine and delivery

breaching equipment first; then it should

system.

affect more common breaching equipment.

For example, if the enemy has nine mine

SCATMINEs are not an obstacle cure-all for

plows and three blade tanks, the unit can

inadequate tactical planning. Their use

use an AD and mines to force the enemy to

requires extensive coordination, integra-

use both breaching assets. This increases

tion, and control. Indiscriminate use of

the time required to breach. Moreover, by

SCATMINEs causes a rapid depletion of

putting the AD before the mines, the enemy

valuable assets. More importantly, the

must use its lowest density breaching equip-

poorly planned use of SCATMINEs can

ment first. If friendly forces destroy the

impede friendly movement and cause fratri-

blade tanks, they reduce the probability of

cide. For more detailed information on

the enemy breaching the complex obstacle.

SCATMINEs and systems, refer to Part

Another example of complex obstacles is

Two, FM 20-32.

using AP mines, triple standard concertina,

tanglefoot, and AT mines. The wire and

IMPROVISED OBSTACLES

AP mines strip the enemy’s dismounted

infantry away from assaulting tanks. This

Soldiers and leaders design improvised

makes both more vulnerable and enables

obstacles with imagination and ingenuity

the defending force to concentrate on one

when using available materials and other

type of threat. The AT mines prevent

resources. Possible improvised obstacles

armored vehicles from dashing through the

include the following:

wire unimpeded.

Rubbled masonry buildings.

Controlled fires.

PHONY OBSTACLES

Flooded areas created by opening flood-

gates or breaching levees.

Phony obstacles play a key role in obstacle

protection by helping hide a unit’s actual

Damaged vehicle hulks used as road-

obstacles from the enemy. They can also

blocks.

help a unit compensate for shortages of

obstacle resources. A unit can mix actual

COMPLEX OBSTACLES

obstacles with phony obstacles within an

Units can create complex obstacles to

obstacle group. Naturally, this implies risk,

improve the effectiveness of obstacle groups.

and commanders must ensure that they con-

Complex obstacles are a combination of

sider the risk of using phony obstacles.

different types of individual obstacles.

Commanders must also ensure that the

For example, an RC reinforced with AT

emplacing unit creates a phony obstacle

A-6 Individual Obstacles

FM 90-7

that will have the desired result on the

ARMOR THREAT

enemy. An example is a shallow excavation

Units may need to design minefield for

combined with a loose soil berm to simulate

armor threats other than soviet-style forces.

an AD. Another technique is to use mine-

The next few paragraphs describe some con-

field markings where there are no mine-

siderations for designing minefield based

field. To be successful, this technique

on an enemy with armor companies of 12 to

normally requires that the unit establish a

18 combat vehicles. These are minefield

precedent. Highly visible minefield mark-

that a unit can use as building blocks for

ings in a disrupt obstacle group in forward

obstacle groups in mostly open terrain.

areas provide a visual cue to the enemy con-

cerning minefield. Using the same mark-

Width

ings without minefield in a fix obstacle

group may cause the enemy to assume that

An enemy armored company of 12 to 18 com-

bat vehicles will have a probable frontage of

there is an actual minefield where none

500 meters when deployed. To affect the

exists.

enemy, half the enemy company frontage

(250 meters) should encounter the mine-

INDIVIDUAL OBSTACLE DESIGNS

field. An individual obstacle of 250 meters

frontage is an appropriate-size building

The remainder of this appendix provides

block.

guidelines for individual obstacles. Units use

individual obstacles as building blocks for

Depth

obstacle groups. Standard obstacles allow

rapid estimating for resourcing (time, man-

Minefields must have enough depth to sup-

power, equipment, and materials) that is

port the obstacle effect based on the enemy’s

critical in making the force’s obstacle effort

breaching capability. If the commander

wants a disrupt or fix effect, the minefield

effective, efficient, and timely. They allow

should require the enemy to expend at least

units to train on the installation of individ-

one breaching asset (for example, 100

ual obstacles as drills.

meters if the enemy has a mine-clearing line

FMs 5-34, 5-102, and 20-32 provide details charge (MICLIC)). For the turn-and-block

on specific standard obstacles.

effect, the depth should increase to force the

enemy to expend more breaching assets. For

These standard obstacles are not the only

an enemy not equipped with line charges,

types of obstacles that units should consider.

the depth can decrease. If the enemy has no

Instead, units should consider modifying

mechanical breaching assets, the depth can

standard obstacles or creating their own

decrease even further.

standard obstacles based on METT-T and

other resource availability. For example, the

Antitank Mines

standard minefield in FM 20-32 are focused on a soviet-style tank and motorized infan-The two options are track-width and full-

try threat. These minefield may not be

width fuzed AT mines. Compared to the full-

appropriate for a mixed force of light infan-

width fuzed mines, track-width fuzed mines

try and tanks.

have a lower probability of encounter.

Track-width fuzed mines require a den-

The following paragraphs provide some

sity of 1.0 per linear meter of front; how-

basics for designing minefield based on the

ever, adding one row of full-width fuzed

type of threat.

mines can reduce the resources required

Individual Obstacles A-7

FM 90-7

while increasing the probability of encounter

formation, it has a frontage of 40 to 200

for the minefield. This results in one row of

meters. Using 200 meters as the enemy’s

full-width fuzed mines and two rows of

maximum frontage, the standard minefield

track-width fuzed mines.

must target half of its frontage (100 meters).

Camouflaging the mines and total pattern

Antipersonnel Mines

aids tremendously in increasing the effec-

tiveness of the disrupt and fix minefield.

The minefield focuses on the mounted

threat, so if the enemy has mounted breach-

ing assets, AP mines normally will not make

Depth

much of a difference. However, if the enemy

A 45-meter depth complicates a light infan-

lacks mechanical breaching assets, adding

try’s breaching attempt. A light force

AP mines can help prevent dismounted

employs grapnel hooks, hand-placed explo-

breaching.

sives, bangalore torpedoes, and portable

explosive line charges. The 45-meter depth

Antihandling Devices

requires multiple uses of those assets.

The emplacing unit determines the require-

ment for AHDs based on the threat. Nor-

Antitank Mines

mally, units use AHDs only if they expect

The minefield focuses on the dismounted

covert or other dismounted breaching

threat. Normally, AT mines are useful only

attempts.

if the enemy has vehicles.

Irregular Outer Edges (IOEs)

Antipersonnel Mines

The purpose of IOEs is to confuse the enemy

The M16A1 AP mine provides the best mix

about the orientation of the minefield and to

of lethality and density for the disrupt or fix

increase the probability of an encounter.

minefield. The M18 Claymore mine is

There may be cases where an IOE is desir-

able, such as a fix or block effect. The IOE

another choice. The M14 AP can be used;

does not have to be part of the standard

however, it requires a much higher linear

minefield.

density.

LIGHT THREAT

Antihandling Devices

Designing standard minefield to achieve a

The emplacing unit determines the require-

specific obstacle effect against a light force is ment for AHDs based on the threat. At least

a unique challenge. There are no strict doc-

some mines, especially those on the leading

trinal frontages associated with an enemy

edge of the minefield, should have AHDs.

light infantry company; however, a typical

march formation for a dismounted infantry

company has a frontage of 40 to 200 meters.

Irregular Outer Edges

The following paragraphs describe consider-

The IOE’s purpose is to confuse the enemy

ations for designing standard minefield for

about the orientation of the minefield and to

a light threat.

increase the enemy’s probability of encoun-

ter. Use of the IOE is normal only in rela-

Width

tively open terrain.

An enemy infantry company typically con-

Leaders should not limit their view of

sists of three platoons. In march (column)

reinforcing obstacles only to minefield.

A-8 Individual Obstacles

index-128_1.png

index-128_2.png

index-128_3.png

index-128_4.png

index-128_5.png

FM 90-7

Note that throughout this manual, individ-

possible obstacle arrays to support specific

ual obstacles are depicted as shaded rectan-

effects.

gles, unless a specific variety of obstacle is

It also is important to fit standard obstacles

discussed. Those shaded rectangles repre-

to the terrain. For example, units do not

sent individual obstacles. The actual type of

need to lay row minefield in a straight line.

individual obstacle depends on METT-T,

They must array the obstacle based on the

Leaders should consider the full range of

weapon systems and the terrain to achieve a

individual obstacle varieties when installing

specific effect. Figures A-6 through A-8,

individual obstacles. Leaders have as many

pages A-10 and A-11, show some examples

options as their imaginations allow.

of how to use standard obstacles in different

arrays to achieve an obstacle effect.

Standard obstacles enable planners at all

INDIVIDUAL OBSTACLE ARRAY

echelons to estimate resource requirements

based on linear obstacle requirements. Like

The standard row minefield in FM 20-32

all planning factors, they provide a base for

are classified as disrupt, fix, turn, and block.

estimating requirements and must be

Although these minefield are classified that

adjusted to the factors of METT-T. Produc-

way, the array of individual obstacles is

tion rates decrease because of limited visi-

what supports the obstacle effect. Units may

bility; nuclear, biological, and chemical

use any of these minefield or other obstacles

(NBC) threat environment; reduced troop

to achieve an obstacle effect if the array

strength or proficiency; and adverse weather

supports the desired effect. Figure A-5 shows

conditions.

Individual Obstacles A-9

index-129_1.png

FM 90-7

A-10 Individual Obstacles

index-130_1.png

FM 90-7

Individual Obstacles A-11

index-131_1.png

FM 90-7

Appendix B

Obstacle Numbering, Reporting,

Recording, and Tracking

This appendix describes the obstacle num-

The designation for the HQ is a letter fol-

bering system and the requirements for

lowed by three numbers. For example, XVII

obstacle reporting and recording.

Corps is shown as Z017; 23d Armored Divi-

sion is shown as A023; and the 103d Air-

borne Division is shown as I103.

OBSTACLE NUMBERING

Obstacle zones are indicated by a single let-

The obstacle numbering system shown in

ter starting with “A” and continuing in

Table B-1, page B-2, consists of 11 alphanu-sequence. Obstacle Zone A in XVII Corps is

meric characters and an obstacle status sym-

distinguished from Obstacle Zone A in 77th

bol character. This number is compatible

ID by the HQ designation (Z017-A versus

with the Tactical Engineer Command and

1077-A). The second obstacle zone in 77th

Control System (TECCS) that augments the

ID would be Obstacle Zone B (I077-B).

Maneuver Control System (MCS). An obsta-

Obstacle belts are indicated with a single

cle number provides the following informa-

digit following the obstacle zone designator

tion concerning an individual obstacle:

starting with “l” and continuing in

HQ that established the obstacle zone in

sequence. For example, the first obstacle

which the obstacle is located.

belt in Obstacle Zone C of the 5th Cavalry

Obstacle zone designation (if any).

Division is shown as C005-C1.

Obstacle belt designation within the

Obstacle groups are depicted by a single let-

obstacle zone (if any).

ter starting with “A” and continuing in

Obstacle group designation within the

sequence. For example, the first obstacle

obstacle belt.

group in Obstacle Belt 2 of Obstacle Zone B

Individual obstacle type.

in the 77th ID is I077-B2A.

Individual obstacle number.

The individual obstacle type is expressed by

Obstacle status.

one or two letters as shown in Table B-2,

If units do not use obstacle zones and belts, pages B-3 and B-4. For example, AD obsta-or if the HQ directs obstacles outside an

cles in I077-B2A are shown as I077-B2A-

obstacle zone or belt, an asterisk is used in AD. Standard block minefield in the same place of the obstacle zone or belt designator.

group are shown as I077-B2A-MB.

Obstacle Numbering, Reporting, Recording, and Tracking B-1

index-132_1.png

index-132_2.png

FM 90-7

The individual obstacles in an obstacle group The obstacle status symbol is the last charac-are indicated by a two-digit number starting ter of the obstacle number. The status sym-with “01” and continuing in sequence. There- bol shows whether the obstacle is—

fore, the first block minefield in obstacle group Planned (/)

I077-B2A is I077-B2A-MB01. The second

Being prepared (-).

block minefield in the group is I077-B2A-

Prepared, but not executed (+).

MB02. If the obstacle group consists of a sin-

Executed or completed (x).

gle obstacle, it is also shown as I077-B2A-

MB01.

For example, if the first of the block mine-

field discussed in the previous paragraph is

If the corps or division orders the emplace- completed, the obstacle number is I077-B2A-ment of an obstacle group outside an obstacle MB01X. If the corps reserve obstacle dis-zone, then there is no obstacle zone or belt cussed in the previous paragraph is pre-designator. Instead, units replace the obstacle pared, the obstacle number is Z017-**A-zone and belt designators with asterisks (*). BA01(+).

For example, if XVII Corps orders the demoli-

tion of a bridge (abutment only) as a corps Obstacle numbering for protective obstacles reserve obstacle and this is the first such may require procedures that vary slightly obstacle, then the obstacle is indicated as from those described. Units should report Z017-**A-BA01. If the 1st Brigade, 77th ID, protective obstacles; however, identifying the orders an ADAM/RAAM scatterable minefield individual obstacles is difficult using the in Obstacle Zone B and outside all obstacle obstacle numbering guidelines without guid-belts, the designation is I077-B*A-SF01.

ance from the higher HQ. A technique is for

B-2 Obstacle Numbering, Reporting, Recording, and Tracking C1, FM 90-7

Table B-2. Obstacle type abbreviations.

M—Minefield/Munition Field

W—Wire Obstacle

MB

Block

WA

Double-apron

MC

Chemical

WC

Concertina

MD

Disrupt

WF

Tanglefoot

MF

Fix

WG

General-purpose, barbed tape

MH

Hasty protective

WN

Nonstandard

MN

Nonstandard

WR

Roadblock

MO

Point

WT

Triple-standard

MP

Protective

S—Scatterable Minefield/Munition Field

MQ

Nuisance

SB

Gator

MS

Standard-pattern

SF

ADAM and RAAM

MT

Turn

SM

MOPMS

MU

Dummy/decoy

SV

Volcano

A—Miscellaneous

SW

Scatterable mines (generic)

AB

Abatis

H—Hand-Emplaced Munitions

AC

Chemical by explosives

HC

Claymore

AD

AT ditch

HH

Hornet/WAM

AF

Thermobaric or flame

HO

Other

AH

Log hurdle

HS

SLAM

AL

Log crib or log obstacle

I—Improvised Explosive Devices

AM

Movable obstacle (car, bus)

ID

Directional, special-purpose explosive

hazard

AN

Expedient nonstandard obstacle

AP

Post obstacle (hedgehog, tetrahedron) IO

Omnidirectional, special-purpose

explosive hazard

AR

Rubble

Obstacle Numbering, Reporting, Recording, and Tracking B-3

C1, FM 90-7

Table B-2. Obstacle type abbreviations (continued).

AT

AT ditch with AT mines

B—Bridge Demolition

BA

Abutment

AW

Earthwork

(berms, parapets, dunes, pits)

BC

Abutment and span

T—Booby Traps

BS

Span

TA

Booby-trapped area

R—Road Crater

TB

Booby-trapped bodies

RD

Deliberate

TE

Booby-trapped equipment

RH

Hasty

TM

Booby-trapped material

RM

Mined

U—Unexploded Ordnance

TP

Booby-trapped passage/

confined space

UC

Chemical UXO hazard area

TS

Booby-trapped structure

UH

UXO hazard area

TV

Booby-trapped vehicle

UN

Nuclear hazard area

units to assign default obstacle zone,

linked directly to specific company teams.

belt, and group designators for protective ob-

The first protective minefield that Team A,

stacles outside control measures. For exam-

TF 1-2 emplaces has the obstacle number

ple, 77th ID assigns W, X, Y, and Z (it is

I077-W1A-MP01X.

unlikely that the division will ever have

enough actual obstacle zones to require

OBSTACLE REPORTING

these letters) as default obstacle zone desig-

nators for subordinate units as follows:

An obstacl