29. Classification System for Parallel Universes
Richard Lighthouse
Creative Commons 4.0 International License; 2020 by Richard Lighthouse.
CC BY 4.0
Please acknowledge source. RLighthouse.com
ISBN: 9781370054503
Original – 1 December 2016
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Revision 1a – 1 December 2016
WARNING: The NSA has likely placed electronic tracking tags in this document. Please consider printing for distribution.
Classification System for Parallel Universes
Abstract
The vast field of parallel universes involves a near-infinite number of probabilities, but we can begin to organize and understand these probabilities by categorizing how close, in terms of energy, these realities are to our own universe. This proposed system of classification is one method. By organizing the nearest parallel universes in terms of mass, charge, and spin, we can better comprehend these relationships and the energy required to access them. In general, we can say that, the more similar a parallel field is to our own universe, the less energy it will require to transit the “distance” or range (Amp x sec) between the two universes, in our terms. This classification system is intended for typical 4-dimensional physical universes, but can be extended to other dimensions as well.
Introduction
The vast field of parallel universes, involves a near-infinite number of probabilities, but we can begin to organize our understanding of these vast probabilities by classifying and organizing the ideas. The field of probabilities includes 1024 elementary particles and it can be stated that close parallel universes will have a substantially similar field of 1024 particles. By organizing in terms of mass, charge, and spin, we can classify these relationships.
In general, we can state that, the more similar a particle field is to our own set, it will require less energy to transit the "distance" between the two universes. It should be noted that the vast majority of parallel universes will not have any elementary particles in common with our own universes. They are vastly different and we can expect it to require significantly more energy to reach these destination universes. And it should also be noted that this classification system will only apply to 4-dimensional physical universes, however, we can extend this system to other dimensional systems as well, i.e., 2D, 4D, 8D, 16D etc
Let's review the simple mathematics for parallel universes:
E = mc^2 = Volts x (Amps x sec)
Volts is proportional to physical mass, in our terms and
where (Amps x Sec) represents the “distance” or range between the two universes.
Figure 1. Helicopter with glass ball/camera system. The glass ball is electrically vibrated at the blinking frequency of our universe and charged electrically (Amp*sec) to place it into a parallel universe.
Figure 2. Periodic Table for Elementary Particles, showing all 16 mass groups. This is the new standard model. Note how the particles appear in groups of four. This is typical of a QAM or wifi signal. They are arranged by mass groups in a natural pattern. This is the simple math that is used for wifi signals and it also relates all elementary particles. It provides compelling evidence that our universe is literally blinking, off and on, at a high frequency. Note that the pattern of quarks and leptons can be “filled-in” from the previously available known data. Although it may need some minor corrections from what is shown in this table, the pattern is basically predictable. Zoom in to see the details.
Some definitions can explain the basic concept:
Mass Classification
Class 0 - any parallel universe which has the same particle masses as our own universe.
Class 4 - any parallel universe which is different by exactly 4 particle masses.
Class 8 - any parallel universe which is different by exactly 8 particle masses.
Class 12 - any parallel universe which is different by exactly 12 particle masses.
Class 16 - different by 16 particle masses.
Class 20 - different by 20 particle masses.
Class 24 - different by 24 particle masses.
Class 28 - different by 28 particle masses.
Class 32 - different by 32 particle masses.
Class 36 - different by 36 particle masses.
Class 40 - different by 40 particle masses.
Class 44 - different by 44 particle masses.
Class 48 - different by 48 particle masses.
Class 52 - different by 52 particle masses.
Class 56 - different by 56 particle masses.
Class 60 - different by 60 particle masses.
Class 64 - different by 64 or more particle masses.
If it is different by 64 particle masses – then none are the same.
Charge Classification
Charge Class A - any parallel universe which has all 4 charge states that are the same as our own universe.
Charge Class B - any parallel universe which has 3 charge states that are the same as our own universe. (1 is different)
Charge Class C - any parallel universe which has 2 charge states that are the same as our own universe. (2 are different)
Charge Class D - any parallel universe which has 1 charge state that are the same as our own universe. (3 are different)
Charge Class E - any parallel universe which has all charge states different than our universe.
Spin Classification
Spin Class Alpha (α ) - any parallel universe which has all 4 spin states that are the same as our own universe.
Spin Class Beta (β ) - any parallel universe which has 3 spin states that are the same as our own universe.
Spin Class Gamma(γ ) - any parallel universe which has 2 spin states that are the same as our own universe.
Spin Class Delta (δ) - any parallel universe which has 1 spin state that is the same as our own universe.
Spin Class Epsilon (ε ) - any parallel universe which has all spin states different than our universe.
So a specific example gives us:
(1) Class 8Cα parallel universe - would have 8 particle mass differences, 2 different charge states, and the same spin states as our universe.
This classification system gives us the opportunity to discuss broad categories of parallel universes in academic terms. For example, we can state that, all Spin Class Beta parallel universes will have 75% particle commonality with our own universe. Or theorize that, there is a entire subset of Class 64 parallel universes that exist, and that have no common particle masses with our universe, but have the same charge and spin states.
Conclusions
So we have described a classification system for categorizing parallel universes. The follow up technical paper to this subject will include a discussion of “harmonic” parallel universes, and their relationship with our us. Readers are encouraged to research these ideas and form their own opinions.
This document is a living document. The author reserves the right to make corrections and changes.
References
1. Richard Lighthouse, “New Standard Model for Elementary Particles” smashwords.com and lulu.com, 2014.
2. Richard Lighthouse, “The Discovery of Parallel Universes” smashwords.com and lulu.com, 2013.
3. Richard Lighthouse, “Preliminary Model for Grand Unified Theory (GUT)” smashwords.com and lulu.com, 2013.
4. Seth (Jane Roberts), Early Sessions, Session 248, 1966: “It goes without saying that the inhabitants of these other probable systems are every much as real as the inhabitants of your own system. They would consider your own system as a probable universe. They dream as you dream. They utilize atoms and molecules as you do. The systems are divided, but not separated by space or time.”