The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

epilogue

the transformation of the Ilkhanids into an

Even before Hetʿum’s travel to the Ilkhanids

Islamic dynasty, perhaps in an effort to secure

in 1295, depictions of dragons in Armenian man-

their power in relation to the Mamlūks in Egypt

uscripts had acquired stylistic aspects that are

and to relate themselves historically, ethnically

characteristic of Chinese and Chinese-inspired

and linguistically to their Muslim subjects

Mongol art, reflecting the influence of represen-

Ghāzān underlined the independent status he

tations on Chinese silks and other works of art

intended to take by using the title Khān 110 yet in

that were imported to Cilicia 117 Visual evidence

spite of having thus become more independent

of the relations between the Mongol court and

from the Mongol empire, the Ilkhans seem to

their Armenian vassals can already be clearly

have continued to pledge their loyalty at least

detected at least a decade earlier in the example

nominally to the Mongol institution of the yasa,

of the illuminated lectionary ordered by Hetʿum

the tribal laws of the Mongols as codified by

II and copied and illustrated in Cilicia in 1286 118

Genghis Khān, a system that was of singular his-

The spandrels of the trilobed arch of the headpiece

torical significance to the Mongols even though

of folio 334 are filled with a dragon-and-phoenix

with the introduction of Islamic law it had de

motif (fig 193) The dragon is here shown incor-

facto lost its validity 111

porating some Chinese-derived conventions such

The conversion of the Ilkhans to Islam dealt,

as the formidable paws with four unsheathed

however, a heavy blow to the hitherto friendly

claws and the undulating tail tucked under one

relations of the Mongols with Cilician Armenia

of the hind legs The soaring phoenix is rendered

In the year of Ghāzān Khān’s ascension to the

with outspread wings with delineated plumage

throne, the Cilician king Hetʿum II travelled for

and slender fanned tail, its head portrayed with

nearly two months to the Ilkhanid capital

the distinctive curved beak turned upwards to

Marāgha, an important centre of Christianity

face the dragon’s head Paired together the myth-

during the Mongol period, in the Azerbaijan

ical creatures became symbols of imperial sover-

region of present-day Iran, to meet the Ilkhan

eignty in yuan China and were as such probably

ruler at his ordu (imperial encampment)112 in

deemed appropriate symbols for members of the

order to receive investiture and, in turn, to pres-

Armenian imperial family, perhaps Hetʿum’s par-

ent “great gifts ” He was warmly welcomed and

ents, Levon and Keran 119 The depiction also

received a gift of royal apparel, which “advertised

reflects the fascination with imaginary animals

[his] right to act on behalf of the sovereign,”113

of Far Eastern derivation An example of the

an example of gift exchange or reciprocity as trib-

direct appropriation of the image of the Chinese

ute which was central to Mongol imperial soci-

dragon can be seen in the donor portrait of Arch-

ety 114 He also successfully petitioned for the

bishop John (yovhannes), the half-brother of the

rescinding of an order to demolish all Christian

Cilician king Hetʿum I, in the Gospel he commis-

churches 115 The kingdom of Cilicia had friendly

sioned in 1289 The lower hem of his tunic carries

relations and maintained regular contact with the

an appliquéd piece of cloth embellished in gold

Mongol court in Qaraqorum and later in

with a standing Chinese dragon, the head with

Khānbāliq from the mid-thirteenth century Dip-

gaping mouth in profile, all outlined in red on a

lomatic relations included several journeys of

white background 120 Sirarpie Der Nersessian sur-

Armenian princes and kings to the Mongol and

mises that the textile represents a Chinese silk

Ilkhanid courts and lasted until Ghāzān Khān’s

which may have been brought by one of John’s

death in 703/1304 116

brothers who had visited the Mongol court or an

name, Ghāzān Maḥmūd, written in Arabic between the lines

116 Early Armenian missions include the visit of Smbat,

See Phillips, 1969, p 121, fig 32 (drawing) and pl 38g

constable of Armenia, in 1247 to 1250, to the Mongol court

( British Museum)

of Qaraqorum, followed three years later by that of his

110 Spuler, 1939, repr 1955, pp 225–6

brother, king Hetʿum I, in 1253 to 1255 Hetʿum I and his

111 Idem, pp 220–3, 312 Cf Allsen, 2001, p 22

son Levon II paid several visits to the Ilkhanid rulers Hülegü,

112 Hetʿum II had set out to meet the Ilkhanid ruler

Abāqā and Arghūn from the 1250s to 1280s See Kouymjian,

Baidu, but when Ghāzān Khān wrested power from the latter

2006, pp 305–8

and ascended to the throne, he paid his respects to the new

117 Der Nersessian and Agemian, 1993, vol 1, pp 124–5

sovereign

118 yerevan, Matenadaran Ms 979, fol 334 See eidem,

113 Allsen, 1997, pp 93–4

vol 1, p 124 and vol 2, fig 517

114 Idem, pp 27–70 and 99–106, and idem, 2001,

119 Cf Kouymjian, 2006, p 321

pp 31–50

120 yerevan, Matenadaran Ms 197, fol 141v, Archbishop

115 The Chronography of Gregory Abû ’l-Faraj, tr and ed

John ordaining a priest; see Der Nersessian and Agemian,

Budge, vol 1, 1932, pp 505–6

1993, vol 2, fig 645