The Dragon in Medieval East Christian and Islamic Art by Sara Kuehn, Sebastian Günther, et al - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

chapter six

(Rigveda 1 32 11) The word dāsá is translated by

justice 16 In the Avesta the dragon is described

Calvert Watkins as “hostile demon,” “enemy,” but

as three-headed and six-eyed (yasht 14 38 40;

also “non-āryan, barbarian,” as well as “slave ”9

9 8) 17 Another great Avestan dragon-fighter

Indra released the waters “surrounded by the ser-

is Kərəsāspa who slays Azhi Sruuara (or Azhi

pent” (páriṣṭhitā áhinā) and struck down the dāsá

Zairita), “the horned Azhi, the horse-swallow-

(Rigveda 2 11 2) 10 The serpent and the sobriquet

ing, man-swallowing, venomous, yellow-green

in Indo-Iranian may be linked as aǰhi- dāsá-, from

…” (yasna 9 11; cf yasht 19 40) 18 In Zoroas-

which originate the Vedic áhi-dāsá- as well as

trian Pahlawī literature the hero also defeats the

the Iranian name of the dragon Azhi Dahāka 11

sea monster Gandarəβa (Skr gandharvá-) in Lake

Significantly, one of the principal functions

Vārukasha after having offered a sacrifice to the

of the divinity was not necessarily to kill the

goddess Ardvī Sūrā Anāhitā 19 As has been recog-

huge dragon, but rather to destroy an obstacle,

nised long ago, the hymns in both Indic and Ira-

vәrәthra-, which tried to withhold the flow of the

nian traditions relate to a traditional mythology

generative waters, thus to fulfil a cosmogonic

which must be shared Indo-Iranian patrimony 20

task 12 The water-controlling aspect of the dragon

The heroic feats associated with the two ancient

has analogies in the figure of Vṛtra as well as Azhi

Iranian festivals of Nawrūz and Mihragān, respec-

Dahāka who becomes the hominoid Azhdahāk 13

tively, at the spring and autumn equinoxes of the

As has been suggested, the mythological character

solar year are of note The vernal New year festi-

of Azhdahāk may well be older than the Zoro-

val, Nawrūz, the official beginning of the year in

astrian texts which first record his name, since

Sasanian times, was instituted according to legend

figures of anthropomorphised dragons already

by the primordial king Jamshīd (Jim), the legend-

appear in Bronze Age Central Asia 14

ary Kayānid emperor of Iran 21 Al-Bīrūnī records

In the Avestan sources the mortal hero-king

the Iranian tale of a demon called Iblīs22 who had

Thraētaona (Pahl Frēdōn, N Pers Farīdūn, Arm

caused a terrible drought and famine by his evil

Hruden), whose abode was presumably the Cen-

spells and threatened to destroy all life on earth

tral Asian steppes,15 is associated with the feat

Jamshīd marched to the demon’s abode and con-

of conquering the dragon Azhi Dahāka with

quered him, releasing the spell and causing new

his mighty club and thus restoring order and

fertility to burst forth 23 On his victorious return

9

20

Watkins, 1995, p 311

Watkins, 1995, p 314 and n 3

10

21

Idem, pp 311–2

See al-Thaʿālibī, Taʾrīkh Ghurar al-siyar, tr and ed

11 The material on Azhi Dahāka has been comprehen-

Zotenberg, 1900, pp 13–4 Christensen, 1934, pp 146–8;

sively discussed by Skjærvø, “Aždahā I,” EIr

Zaehner, 1961, p 138

12

22

Boyce, 1975, repr 1996, p 64; Gnoli, “Bahrām,” EIr.

The name Iblīs is a Qurʾānic designation for the

13 Watkins, 1995, p 312

devil, although he is referred to as a jinn ( sūra s 18, 50; and

14 Cf Francfort, 1994, figs 3–5; Kuehn, 2009, pp 43–67

55, 15) and occurs less frequently than al-shayṭān which is

15 Boyce, 1975, repr 1996, p 101 The association of the

used to designate the devil in the context of his maleficent

dragon-fighter with that of a solitary figure fighting in a for-

intentions towards man In the Shāh-nāma Iblīs is termed a

eign country is interesting In the Avesta the dragon-fighters,

demon (dīw), capable of transforming himself into another

Thraētaona and Kərəsāspa, are associated with “frontier

being including taking on the form of a dragon; dīw s having

heroes” of the Central Asian steppes, in particular the graz-

a strong pre-Islamic (Zoroastrian) background (going back

ing lands of southeast Afghanistan, Thraētaona being born

to the Old Iranian word daiva and the Avestan daēuua)

in Varena and Kərəsāspa coming from the Pishin plain to

Interestingly, among the few ḥadīth in which the name

the south Lōra river (lower Urvadhā) Sarkhosh Curtis and

appears, there is one in which the Prophet speaks of Iblīs as

Stewart, eds , 2005, pp 43–4 Cf Boyce, 1975, repr 1996,

having a throne “on the Waters” thus underlining the con-

p 101 and n 58; Monchi-Zadeh, 1975, p 114 The great

nection of Iblīs with the element of water ( Ṣaḥiḥ Muslim IV,

dragon-fighter of the national Iranian epic, Rustam, is simi-

p 1472; cited after Algar, “Eblīs,” EIr) Azhi Dahāka/Ẓaḥḥāk

larly presented in Firdawsī’s Shāh-nāma as a non-Iranian,

is seen as leader of the demons (dīw s ) that corrupted Jamshīd

coming from outside Iran (Melikian-Chirvani, 1998, p 183),

who thereupon taught men, who were then vegetarians,

and was known as a Central Asian Saka/Scythian, Skythes,

to eat animal meat (whereas the Avesta forbids blood sac-

that is, Sagzī ( idem, 1998, p 193; P’yankov, 2006, p 505 The

rifices), he thence became too proud, lost his purity, giving

term Sagzī was also used of a native of the province of Sīstān,

himself up to profane pleasures, and thus was forsaken by

originally called Sakastān/Sagistān, arabicised to Sijistān Cf

his glory (khvarәnah) Cf Huart [Massé], “Djamshīd,” EI 2 II,

the discussion of the term in Shahbazi, 1993, pp 157–8; also

438b

23

Bailey, 1958, pp 131–54, esp 132)

On the problematic hypothesis that the ancient Indo-

16 Monchi-Zadeh, 1975, pp 103–5; Boyce, 1975, repr

Iranian New year festival contained, among other things, a

1996, p 63

ritual combat between a deity, or a ruler as his representative,

17 Watkins, 1995, p 313

and a dragon that has captured creative parts of nature such

18 Idem, p 319; Nyberg, 1933, pp 336–52, repr 1975,

as rain, cattle or women and thus threatens procreation and

pp 379–95

life as such, see Widengren, 1965, pp 41–9 Cf most recently

19 Cf Monchi-Zadeh, 1975, p 114

Janda, 2010, pp 69–70, 102; also Nylander, 1974, pp 144–6

the dragon in scenes of combat

89

Jamshīd appeared before his people radiating

awesome chaos in order to recreate social real-

like a second sun 24 Thereafter, al-Bīrūnī relates,

ity as Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann have

Jamshīd’s rule was just and prosperous “until the

aptly pointed out:32

time when Bīwarāsp [Ẓaḥḥāk/Dahāk]25 appeared

Al societies are constructions in the face of chaos

who killed [him] and subdued his realm ”26

The constant possibility of anomic terror is actual-

In turn, as al-Bīrūnī reports, the dragon

ized whenever the legitimations that obscure the

Bīwa rāsp/Dahāk is vanquished by the dragon-

precariousness are threatened or col apse And in

fighter Farīdūn (the Avestan Thraētaona) during

such situations, or more regularly in ceremonial y

the festival of Mihragān, which he then insti-

created periods of crisis – literally: separation

tuted to celebrate his victory over the usurping

between two eras, situations, periods – a ‘deep

tyrant, whom he bound in fetters and impris-

legi timacy’ is required, referring to a mythical real-

ity outside ours, ‘the other reality’, lying beyond

oned in Mount Damāwand,27 an extinct volcano

the borders of history and space, an eternal truth

in northern Iran as well as the highest peak in the

that existed before time but still exists behind it

country Significantly, according to various tradi-

and behind our reality, and occasionally mingles

tions, the sun appeared for the first time on the

with ours in ‘periods of exception’

day of Mihragān 28 Al-Bīrūnī further states that

the Persian theologians conceived the prestigious

Zoroastrian myth also influenced Armenian

ancient festival of Mihragān:

leg ends The early dragon-slaying myth of the

Avestan victory god Vәrәthraghna (O Iran

as a sign of resurrection and the end of the

Vṛtraghan, N Pers Bahrām), “the best-armed

world, because at Mihragān that which grows

of the heavenly gods, the strongest in strength,

reaches its perfection 29

the most victorious in victory, the most glo-

The festival was also “a time for ral ying the forces

rious in glory,” may have been conserved in the

of good to oppose the demons of coming winter

Armenian national hero Vahagn (who carries the

and darkness ”30 It is also interesting to note that

epithet vishapakʿagh, “who handles dragons”) 33

the celebration of Mihragān was accorded great

According to the Armenian historian Moses of

importance at the courts of most rulers in the

Chorene, Vahagn fought with and vanquished

Turko-Iranian environment until the Mongol

dragons, his deeds equalling those of Heracles 34

invasion 31 A typology of such festivals shows

The golden aspect of the god is reflected in the

the constant need of society to struggle against

song of the birth of Vahagn, the oldest testimony

marginal situations such as a savage exterior or

of Armenian literature,35 which also survived in

24 Kitāb al-Āthār, tr and ed Sachau, 1876–8, p 202 Cf

Mihragān Fallāḥ Rastgār, pp 431–3, as cited in Bosworth,

Carter, 1974, pp 185–6 and n 64 Al-Bīrūnī ( idem, pp 199–

“Court and courtiers,” EIr Stripped of their original Zoroas-

201) furthermore mentions presents being brought at the

trian religious significance, these traditional festival patterns

New year festival, Nawrūz, which is evidenced by further

had also survived under the ʿAbbasid caliphs, as attested

sources; see Ehrlich, 1930, pp 95–101

by the verses of various contemporary Arabic poets; for

25 See al-Thaʿālibī, Taʾrīkh Ghurar al-siyar, tr and ed

instance, the Nawrūz poem by Ḥusain ibn Ẓaḥḥāk Khalīʿ

Zotenberg, 1900, pp 16–8 In the Bundahishn Dahāk is

and the Mihragān poem attributed to the caliph al-Maʾmūn

referred to as the one “whom they call Biwarāsp” (lit “pos-

(see Masʿūdī, Kitāb murūj al-dhahab, tr and ed Barbier

sessor of ten thousand horses”); cf yasht 5 28–31, in which

de Meynard and de Courteille, 1917, vol 8, pp 277–8,

Azhi Dahāka sacrifices “a hundred stallions, a thousand

340–2) In the sulṭānate of his predecessor, Masʿūd ibn

oxen, and ten thousand sheep” to to the fertility goddess

Maḥmūd of Ghazna, the exchange of customary gifts

Ardvī Sūrā Anāhitā, the yazata (“venerable one”) of all waters

and tribute for this festival was accompanied by much

and fertility, to obtain a wish See al-Ṭabarī, Taʾrīkh al-rusul

drinking of wine (rasm) which was associated with the

wa ’l-mulūk, tr and ed Brinner, 1991, p 18, n 107

celebration of Mihragān since Achaemenid times (Fallāḥ

26 Kitāb ’l-Āthār, tr and ed Sachau, 1876–8, p 202

Rastgār, pp 431–3; Browne, 1920, vol 1, pp 475–6; Clinton,

27 Idem, pp 207–10, 213–4 Also al-Thaʿālibī, Taʾrīkh

1972, p 136; for the verses of Manūchihrī, see also Hanaway,

Ghurar al-siyar, tr and ed Zotenberg, 1900, pp 35–6 See

1988, pp 69–80, as well as Bayhaqī’s Taʾrīkh-i Bayhaqī)

32

Widengren, 1966, pp 435, 439 Cf Shāh-nāma, tr and ed

Berger and Luckmann, 1971, p 121

33

Mohl, 1838–1878, vol 1, pp 111–3, ll 19–528, p 115, l 10

Patmutʿiwn Hayocʿ, tr Langlois, 1872, p 40 and n 1

Zaehner, 1961, p 139; Calmard, “Mihragān,” EI 2 VII, 15a

The dragon-slaying characteristic of Vahagn has also been

28 Calmard, “Mihragān,” EI 2 VII, 15a

interpreted as secondary or due to local elements (Benveniste

29 Kitāb al-Āthār, tr and ed Sachau, 1876–8, p 208 Cf

and Renou, 1934, p 80) While Iran conserved the ancient

Boyce, 1983, p 802

deity, India may have fused the deity with the hero and thus

30 Boyce, 1983, p 802

Indra was associated with the characteristics and functions of

31 Calmard, “Mihragān,” EI 2 VII, 15a According to the

Vṛtraghan; see Gnoli, “Bahrām,” EIr

34

Ghaznawid historian Bayhaqī’s narrative, the Ghaznawid

Patmutʿiwn Hayocʿ, tr Langlois, 1872, p 41 and n 1

35

sulṭān Bahrām Shāh ibn Masʿūd regularly celebrated at court

Cf Russell, 2004, p 357

the two ancient Iranian seasonal festivals of Nawrūz and

90