Precalculus: An Investigation of Functions by David Lippman and Melonie Rasmussen - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Write a formula for each polynomial function graphed.

37.

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

index-197_1.png

index-197_2.png

index-197_3.png

index-197_4.png

index-197_5.png

index-197_6.png

3.3 Graphs of Polynomial Functions 187

Write a formula for each polynomial function graphed.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51. A rectangle is inscribed with its base on the x axis and its upper corners on the

parabola

2

y = 5 − x . What are the dimensions of such a rectangle that has the greatest

possible area?

52. A rectangle is inscribed with its base on the x axis and its upper corners on the curve

4

y =16 − x . What are the dimensions of such a rectangle that has the greatest

possible area?

188 Chapter 3

Section 3.4 Rational Functions

In the last few sections, we have built polynomials based on the positive whole number

power functions. In this section we explore functions based on power functions with

negative integer powers, called rational functions.

Example 1

You plan to drive 100 miles. Find a formula for the time the trip will take as a function

of the speed you drive.

You may recall that multiplying speed by time will give you distance. If we let t

represent the drive time in hours, and v represent the velocity (speed or rate) at which

we drive, then vt = distance . Since our distance is fixed at 100 miles, vt = 100.

Solving this relationship for the time gives us the function we desired:

100

1

t( v) =

100 −

=

v

v

While this type of relationship can be written using the negative exponent, it is more

common to see it written as a fraction.

This particular example is one of an inversely proportional relationship – where one

quantity is a constant divided by the other quantity, like

5

y = .

x

Notice that this is a transformation of the reciprocal toolkit function,

1

f ( x) =

x

Several natural phenomena, such as gravitational force and volume of sound, behave in a

manner inversely proportional to the square of another quantity. For example, the

volume, V, of a sound heard at a distance d from the source would be related by

k

V =

2

d

for some constant value k.

These functions are transformations of the reciprocal squared toolkit function

1

f ( x) =

.

2

x

We have seen the graphs of the basic reciprocal function and the squared reciprocal

function from our study of toolkit functions. These graphs have several important

features.

index-199_1.png

index-199_2.png

3.4 Rational Functions 189

1

f ( x) =

1

f ( x) =

x

2

x

Let’s begin by looking at the reciprocal function,

1

f ( x) = . As you well know, dividing

x

by zero is not allowed and therefore zero is not in the domain, and so the function is

undefined at an input of zero.

Short run behavior:

As the input values approach zero from the left side (taking on very small, negative

values), the function values become very large in the negative direction (in other words,

they approach negative infinity).

We write: as

x → 0 , f ( x) → −∞ .

As we approach zero from the right side (small, positive input values), the function

values become very large in the positive direction (approaching infinity).

We write: as

+

x → 0 , f ( x) → ∞ .

This behavior creates a vertical asymptote. An asymptote is a line that the graph

approaches. In this case the graph is approaching the vertical line x = 0 as the input

becomes close to zero.

Long run behavior:

As the values of x approach infinity, the function values approach 0.

As the values of x approach negative infinity, the function values approach 0.

Symbolically: as x → ±∞ , f ( x) → 0

Based on this long run behavior and the graph we can see that the function approaches 0

but never actually reaches 0, it just “levels off” as the inputs become large. This behavior

creates a horizontal asymptote. In this case the graph is approaching the horizontal line

f ( x) = 0 as the input becomes very large in the negative and positive directions.

Vertical and Horizontal Asymptotes

A vertical asymptote of a graph is a vertical line x = a where the graph tends towards positive or negative infinity as the inputs approach a. As x a , f ( x) → ±∞ .

A horizontal asymptote of a graph is a horizontal line y = b where the graph

approaches the line as the inputs get large. As x → ±∞ , f ( x) → b .

index-200_1.png

index-200_2.png

190 Chapter 3

Try it Now:

1. Use symbolic notation to describe the long run behavior

and short run behavior for the reciprocal squared function.

Example 2

Sketch a graph of the reciprocal function shifted two units to the left and up three units.

Identify the horizontal and vertical asymptotes of the graph, if any.

Transforming the graph left 2 and up 3 would result in the function

1

f ( x) =

+ 3 , or equivalently, by giving the terms a common denominator,

x + 2

3 x + 7

f ( x) =

x + 2

Shifting the toolkit function would give us

this graph. Notice that this equation is

undefined at x = -2, and the graph also is

showing a vertical asymptote at x = -2.

As x

2−

→ − , f ( x) → −∞ , and as

x

2+

→ − , f ( x) → ∞

As the inputs grow large, the graph appears

to be leveling off at output values of 3,

indicating a horizontal asymptote at y = 3.

As x → ±∞ , f ( x) → 3 .

Notice that horizontal and vertical asymptotes get shifted left 2 and up 3 along with the

function.

Try it Now

2. Sketch the graph and find the horizontal and vertical asymptotes of the reciprocal

squared function that has been shifted right 3 units and down 4 units.

In the previous example, we shifted a toolkit function in a way that resulted in a function

x +

of the form

3

7

f ( x) =

. This is an example of a more general rational function.

x + 2

3.4 Rational Functions 191

Rational Function

A rational function is a function that can be written as the ratio of two polynomials,

P(x) and Q(x).

2

P( x)

p

a + a x + a x ++ a x

0

1

2

f ( x)

p

=

=

2

Q( x)

q

b + b x + b x ++ b x

0

1

2

q

Example 3

A large mixing tank currently contains 100 gallons of water, into which 5 pounds of

sugar have been mixed. A tap will open pouring 10 gallons per minute of water into the

tank at the same time sugar is poured into the tank at a rate of 1 pound per minute. Find

the concentration (pounds per gallon) of sugar in the tank after t minutes.

Notice that the amount of water in the tank is changing linearly, as is the amount of

sugar in the tank. We can write an equation independently for each:

water = 100 + t

10

sugar = 5 + t

1

The concentration, C, will be the ratio of pounds of sugar to gallons of water

5 + t

C t() =

100 + t

10

Finding Asymptotes and Intercepts

Given a rational function, as part of investigating the short run behavior we are interested

in finding any vertical and horizontal asymptotes, as well as finding any vertical or

horizontal intercepts, as we have done in the past.

To find vertical asymptotes, we notice that the vertical asymptotes in our examples occur

when the denominator of the function is undefined. With one exception, a vertical

asymptote will occur whenever the denominator is undefined.

Example 4

2

+

Find the vertical asymptotes of the function

5 2

k( )

x

x =

2

2 − x x

To find the vertical asymptotes, we determine where this function will be undefined by

setting the denominator equal to zero:

2

2

x x = 0

(2 + x 1

)( − x) = 0

x = − ,

2 1

index-202_1.png

index-202_2.png

192 Chapter 3

This indicates two vertical asymptotes, which a

look at a graph confirms.

The exception to this rule can occur when both the numerator and denominator of a

rational function are zero at the same input.

Example 5

Find the vertical asymptotes of the function

x 2

k( x) =

.

2

x − 4

To find the vertical asymptotes, we determine where this function will be undefined by

setting the denominator equal to zero:

2

x − 4 = 0

2

x = 4

x = 2,

− 2

However, the numerator of this function is also

equal to zero when x = 2. Because of this, the

function will still be undefined at 2, since 0 is

0

undefined, but the graph will not have a vertical

asymptote at x = 2.

The graph of this function will have the vertical

asymptote at x = -2, but at x = 2 the graph will

have a hole: a single point where the graph is not

defined, indicated by an open circle.

Vertical Asymptotes and Holes of Rational Functions

The vertical asymptotes of a rational function will occur where the denominator of the

function is equal to zero and the numerator is not zero.

A hole might occur in the graph of a rational function if an input causes both numerator

and denominator to be zero. In this case, factor the numerator and denominator and

simplify; if the simplified expression still has a zero in the denominator at the original

input the original function has a vertical asymptote at the input, otherwise it has a hole.

3.4 Rational Functions 193

To find horizontal asymptotes, we are interested in the behavior of the function as the

input grows large, so we consider long run behavior of the numerator and denominator

separately. Recall that a polynomial’s long run behavior will mirror that of the leading

term. Likewise, a rational function’s long run behavior will mirror that of the ratio of the

leading terms of the numerator and denominator functions.

There are three distinct outcomes when this analysis is done:

Case 1: The degree of the denominator > degree of the numerator

x +

Example:

3

2

f ( x) =

2

x + 4 x − 5

In this case, the long run behavior is

3

3

( )

x

f x

= . This tells us that as the inputs grow

2

x

x

large, this function will behave similarly to the function

3

g( x) = . As the inputs grow

x

large, the outputs will approach zero, resulting in a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

As x → ±∞ , f ( x) → 0

Case 2: The degree of the denominator < degree of the numerator

2

x +

Example:

3

2

f ( x) =

x − 5

2

In this case, the long run behavior is

3

( )

x

f x

= 3 x . This tells us that as the inputs

x

grow large, this function will behave similarly to the function g( x) = 3 x . As the inputs grow large, the outputs will grow and not level off, so this graph has no horizontal

asymptote.

As x → ±∞ , f ( x) → ±∞ , respectively.

Ultimately, if the numerator is larger than the denominator, the long run behavior of the

graph will mimic the behavior of the reduced long run behavior fraction. As another

5

2

example if we had the function

3

( )

x

x

f x =

with long run behavior

x + 3

5

3 x

4

f ( x) ≈

= 3 x , the long run behavior of the graph would look similar to that of an

x

even polynomial, and as x → ±∞ , f ( x) → ∞ .

Case 3: The degree of the denominator = degree of the numerator

2

x +

Example:

3

2

f ( x) =

2

x + 4 x − 5

194 Chapter 3

2

In this case, the long run behavior is

3

( )

x

f x

= 3 . This tells us that as the inputs grow

2

x

large, this function will behave like the function g( x) = 3, which is a horizontal line. As x → ±∞ , f ( x) → 3 , resulting in a horizontal asymptote at y = 3.

Horizontal Asymptote of Rational Functions

The horizontal asymptote of a rational function can be determined by looking at the

degrees of the numerator and denominator.

Degree of denominator > degree of numerator: Horizontal asymptote at y = 0

Degree of denominator < degree of numerator: No horizontal asymptote

Degree of denominator = degree of numerator: Horizontal asymptote at ratio of leading

coefficients.

Example 6

In the sugar concentration problem from earlier, we created the equation

5 + t

C t() =

.

100 + t

10

Find the horizontal asymptote and interpret it in context of the scenario.

Both the numerator and denominator are linear (degree 1), so since the degrees are

equal, there will be a horizontal asymptote at the ratio of the leading coefficients. In the

numerator, the leading term is t, with coefficient 1. In the denominator, the leading

term is 10 t, with coefficient 10. The horizontal asymptote will be at the ratio of these

values: As t → ∞ ,

1

C( t) →

. This function will have a horizontal asymptote at

10

1

y =

.

10

This tells us that as the input gets large, the output values will approach 1/10. In

context, this means that as more time goes by, the concentration of sugar in the tank will

approach one tenth of a pound of sugar per gallon of water or 1/10 pounds per gallon.

Example 7

Find the horizontal and vertical asymptotes of the function

( x − 2)( x + )

3

f ( x) =

( x − )(

1 x + 2)( x − )

5

First, note this function has no inputs that make both the numerator and denominator

zero, so there are no potential holes. The function will have vertical asymptotes when

the denominator is zero, causing the function to be undefined. The denominator will be

zero at x = 1, -2, and 5, indicating vertical asymptotes at these values.

3.4 Rational Functions 195

The numerator has degree 2, while the denominator has degree 3. Since the degree of

the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, the denominator will grow

faster than the numerator, causing the outputs to tend towards zero as the inputs get

large, and so as x → ±∞ , f ( x) → 0 . This function will have a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

Try it Now

3. Find the vertical and horizontal asymptotes of the function

(2 x − )(

1 2 x + )

1

f ( x) =

( x − )(

2 x + )

3

Intercepts

As with all functions, a rational function will have a vertical intercept when the input is

zero, if the function is defined at zero. It is possible for a rational function to not have a

vertical intercept if the function is undefined at zero.

Likewise, a rational function will have horizontal intercepts at the inputs that cause the

output to be zero (unless that input corresponds to a hole). It is possible there are no

horizontal intercepts. Since a fraction is only equal to zero when the numerator is zero,

horizontal intercepts will occur when the numerator of the rational function is equal to

zero.

Example 8

x

x +

Find the intercepts of

(

)(

2

)

3

f ( x) =

( x − )(

1 x + 2)( x − )

5