It is pathetic to see that when the media talk about freedom of opinion generally refer to the freedom to indulge the line marked by the great powers, this is because as soon as someone gets out of those parameters you are immediately accused of being antisocial and words are invented to associate your opinion with diseases in order to discredit him. Actually, these people are just opportunists who sail to are current and always associated with the power of his time these if they are traitors to humanity, because it is assumed that every idea should be respected provided that raise peacefully, but when someone leaves the truths established by the powers that arise quickly voices calling for them to tape the mouth. Could it be that they fear citizens to express their right to think freely? These who speak of freedom of expression, but only when it favors what they want, are no better than those who burned scientists to tell the truth during the Middle Ages.
And I say this about those who today persecute those who oppose condescend to the mixing of races or homosexuality, once invented words like xenophobia and homophobia in order to prevent citizens from entering assess the following facts objectively, they are not able to understand that respect is not the same work, and the fact that one respects those who support homosexuality does not mean it's right, and therefore not obliged to cooperate with it. But these opportunists just hope the prize to go in line with the great empire of the United States, that empire which speaks of human rights and at the same time allows for millions of poor in the streets, usually of ethnic minorities, the miscegenation empire that supports only to justify the occupation of the rest of the world and refuses to recognize racial boundaries so as not to recognize the policies. It is true that the Nazis were cruel to ethnic minorities during World War II, but that does not mean we should therefore destroy our own racial and cultural heritage through crossbreeding. All races are entitled to live in
freedom, but that does not mean the interbreeding help to this end but on the contrary, today it is taboo to talk about this issue, the pro miscegenation say it is wrong to oppose the crossing of races because they say they are all part of the same species, but. If the case of discovering a human species most backward on a desert island it would also maintain the barbarous pretense of allowing the crossing of this with today's humanity and thereby destroy the fruit of thousands of years of genetic progress? Because they would oppose recognizing that differences in racial progress are possible, and therefore reject miscegenation is defensible without this implying a desire to harm the other races. So I consider it a mistake to oppose those who advocate peacefully rejection miscegenation or racial superiority, because this wave of support for the current crossbreeding does not pursue more than pandering to a new imperialism that seeks to justify claiming that his rejection of Nazi legitimizes them but actually only pursues the same imperialist aims. also they are mistaken who simply limited to condescend and justify Nazism in the Second World War, because that kind of ideology can only evolve if they are able to get away proposed by Hitler and recognize the right of all races to live freely approach, as the only used the movement for the defense of racial integrity because he believed he could further their nationalist interests, but that does not mean that that line of thinking is in itself bad, the Nazis actually only sought power and create in Germany a dictatorship and did not hesitate to lie and use anything that might put them favor, they were carried away by extremism and that was a big mistake, but that does not mean why were wrong at all, as the victorious powers wanted us to believe . The big mistake that was made after the Second World War was to believe that the defense of humanism and respect for racial rights necessarily implied acceptance of miscegenation, and such is not true.
In fact, every race is different because of their adaptation to different climates of the earth, and only for this reason it is justified to oppose the mixing of them, but it is also necessary to say that it is precisely these harsh climates causing existence best and worst races, because perfection is the result of finding the right balance in everything and the racial question the European
race represents that balance by having developed in the most ideal climate. In the future, all races will end up being the same, but not by exterminations, nor by interbreeding, but because the result of the evolution of these will come a day when the progress of cities will create an ideal climate in all of them and consequently stimulate the development of the races to make them equal, but until that time comes it is absurd to destroy the racial miscegenation heritage. It is necessary to foster fraternal coexistence among all races, but that does not mean it's right that these are mixed. The progress of mankind is based on progress from chaos to order, from darkness to light, and that will only be possible if the decision of nature to divide mankind into different races is respected, since this division also represents progress.
THE DILEMMA OF GERMANY
It is regrettable to see how today the Germans are divided between those who are in favor of the victorious powers of the Second World War and therefore against Nazism, and who declare themselves against the victors of the war and consequently in favor of the Nazis, as both positions are wrong.
There are many people who think that the only way to defend freedom is supporting the Nazis without understanding that it was precisely these that gave their country to foreign powers, praising Hitler as if God were considered unpatriotic to anyone who criticizes him but if you care to know history are taken realize that Hitler was no military genius they believe, their only success during the war was the conquest of France, for everything else were failures and their alleged successes were actually concessions Western nations gave in order to avoid war, but its policy was completely erratic. His first big mistake was to attack England without sufficient means, attempting a sea blockade when had a fleet far below his, and when it became clear his failure attacked Russia in order to cover it up, this was from a strategically military barbarity, for violating the peace treaty was signed with her country condemned to certain failure by putting all major nations against him. If Hitler had stopped the war at that time, probably he would have ended, but his unlimited desire for
power led him to perdition. It is true that the conditions of the Versailles Treaty that ended World War I favored the rise of Nazism, but it is also true that the Nazis had not come to power without the economic crisis of 1929, but it is necessary to consider that Crisis affected not only Germany but the whole world. The Nazis used a strong campaign of mental manipulation in order to convince citizens that they understand them and be able to solve their problems. By putting the Jews as allegedly responsible for all the evils they were used as a means for society could vent their discomfort with them, blaming a minority supported by the remaining majority, so thus ensured the society did not realize that the danger was in them and did not realize that Hitler's hatred of Jews simply was because he did not consider them sufficiently nationalists for supporting these peace treaty in the first world war. Another reason for the persecution against them was the economic motive, because by putting them outside the law could seize their possessions. The Nazis accused Jews of being better off financially than the rest of the Germans, but they did not say is that it was precisely the European laws of the Middle Ages which provoked it, because for a long time forbade Christians to work in banking and make loans, such discrimination in favor of the Jews were the Europeans themselves an example of those who favored economic myopia that antipathy toward them.
The truth is that if a comparison of the results is made Germany was better placed at the end of the First World War to the end of the second, so if you have to look unpatriotic obviously that would have to be Hitler, for his disastrous policies he condemned his country to ruin. Militarism is not always the solution, the pro-Nazi should note that the allied nations against Hitler awarded him almost everything he asked in order to avoid war and yet he was determined to provoke therefore evident his total ignorance of the possibilities that his country had to win the war. Those who today defend the thesis Nazis have to understand that criticizing Hitler is not the same as criticizing Germany and be against Hitler does not imply being against Germany because Hitler can make mistakes like other people. To progress must understand this truth and therefore have to be willing to make a self-criticism and
change those things that are wrong in their ideology. It is essential to accept that defend their race does not have to be linked to abuse others. Actually the Nazis did not invent philosophy towards racial integrity, because he existed before them, but they served this ideology only because they believed that could favor their nationalist ideas, therefore the fact defend these ideas does not imply that have to agree with the necessarily Nazi.
Also are despicable who say everything about the Nazis is bad, because nobody is wrong in all, frivolously hidden in the Versailles Treaty conditions for Germany were excessively harsh, and the desire of the Nazis to unite all territories German culture under one banner was legitimate, but the mistake of the Nazis did not know how to find the right measure to things, because his desire for power was unlimited as demonstrated when they locked themselves in jail his political opponents turning the country into a dictatorship. Nor was nothing wrong with the fact of wanting to defend their race against miscegenation, because for many German and European race was a symbol of identity that had to also defend for the Germans it had special meaning because after the Romans tried to conquer the Germanic territories in the time of emperor Octavian he distrusts the West was higher, and defending race served to reinforce their own identity. In addition, before the war to keep the pure race was considered by all as a symbol of good education and only after the German defeat this changed, because from that moment those who were defending racial purity automatically were considered pro-Nazi and therefore enemies of the victorious powers of war, as if it were the same thing can be against miscegenation but also against the Nazis, they forget that before the outbreak of the difficult war was to find someone who openly support miscegenation, be in favor of keeping the race pure or believe that a race may be more evolved than another does not mean for it being in favor of slavery or the mistreatment of other races, as happened with the Nazis. It is commonly accepted by all that the human species is superior to other animal species, but defend this does not mean that therefore the extermination of other species rests, therefore argue that the white race is more evolved than the rest of races also have to involve the abuse of these rests, as each plays a role
in the earth and each must evolve peacefully and in freedom. It is actually adapting to different climates in some extreme cases what determines the differences between them and why they are necessary, but this adaptation is also because the European race is better and more beautiful to be found in the tract of land with a more balanced climate. It is also important to note that the fact that a race can be considered superior to another does not mean that therefore every individual of the most advanced race has to be considered better than each individual of the other races, because it is only the evolutionary value means what that changes. Racial differences is on aesthetics where more accentuated, but that does not mean you have to be significant differences in other things like the level of intelligence for example, this does occur however when it comes to different species. Perhaps, eventually, all races become equal when the man with his technological advances manages to create an identical artificial climate in cities that do evolve, but in the meantime, crossbreeding is an act of genetic anarchy and mockery of the natural order. At present the white race is causing their own extinction by refusing to take the seed needed to replace its inhabitants and to promote racial miscegenation, this really is a true crime against humanity, but few want to acknowledge so as not question the preset topics.
After the war the Americans and French used their alleged support of miscegenation to justify their imperialist campaigns, claimed that the fact of allowing miscegenation within its borders gave them the right to invade the territories of other races, so did the opposite of what they were proposing, i.e. invade and exploit those territories, according to them for their sakes, when he moved them truly was greed, as in the invasion of Iraq, which lies to justify it were used and so to appropriate its oil, it is true that democracy is better than dictatorship, but that can not be used as an excuse to do whatever they want and destroy a country, every nation must be respected so that it can evolve by itself without pretentiousness impositions, plus such interference only they serve to give ammunition to extremist groups. With these behaviors condemn the West to lose their culture just by the desire for more money, as if they had no ethical value. Thus
creating greater social tension by trying to impose racial mixtures but without really worrying about human rights. I just would return to reason and give each ethnic minority territory within the United States by the percentage that corresponded and that each race can thus create their own free nation. Ideally worldwide racial boundaries were respected, to avoid the risk that some races may interfere in the affairs of others. But that can only happen when you assume that interbreeding does not help humanity, but promotes the exploitation of some races over others besides destroying the identity of each race.
It is necessary that those who believe in the defense of racial integrity dissociate completely from the Nazi era and understand that the defense of one's own race does not have to be in contradiction with respect for the rights of others. Nor should we forget that the first casualty of war is truth loser, its successes are considered flaws and defects winner are considered virtues, it is necessary to analyze things impartially, without being carried away by the comfortable opportunism of seeing things only for those who win wars, because they may have the power but not the reason.
Actually, not that the power and media change the feelings of people, what changes is the way people think should express these feelings, making power is to direct these feelings towards their own interests by changing the interpretation of the facts are historical or scientific, for this reason after the war Nazi crimes were considered inhumane acts, but the Indian extermination in the United States a legitimate act of self-defense, all about how to raise the facts rather than the facts themselves, even in cases involving similar situations. Is the same mental manipulation which was then used to justify the Iraq war. These governments use both lying and intimidation to achieve their ends, and many citizens tend to agree with them only out of fear, and therefore accept their arguments without analyzing impartially, so the concept of what is prejudice and what It not simply depends on what determine the dominant powers of the time. Much blame for this social confusion lies with the speculators who during the war supported the Nazis and now fervent defenders of miscegenation declare, because such people do not seek the truth, only to profit
harming society. People should ask what would have been his values to win the war the Germans would surely be very different, because it is not the same as saying it is fair to really be, the real challenge is to be able to seek the truth staying out ideological fashions of the times, because all power no matter how great carries a baggage of the same mistakes that hit, and this must know how to recognize. Someday reach a new time when people will no longer accept leadership represented by justice and truth.
RELIGION AND RACE
Since the end of the Second World War the discussion on the preservation of racial and cultural identity of each people became a taboo subject, but it is important to remember that even in the essence of the Christian religion there is a clear tendency to oppose miscegenation of races. It is pathetic to see how society considers as natural defend the existence of all varieties of each animal species, yet since the end of World War II is pursued proponents preservation of human races without mixing, and all because who he lost that war proposed such ideas. Is it that you are so naive to believe that whoever loses has to be wrong war at all? It pursues only one goal which is to consolidate and elevate the winner, which promotes mixing only in order to show different from the Nazis, but that his real intention is to hide while carrying out its own campaign of world domination. You need to understand that each race is the answer to the adaptation of the human species every climate of the earth. They forget that even in the same biblical tradition condemning such practices as abhorrent, but now this truth is muted. Because confused to defend racial identity does not have to involve desire no evil to others. They forget that it was nature itself which divided mankind into different races and are actually different although many insist on denying it. Because there is nothing dishonest in trying to maintain their own race without mixing and the fact that a person who believes in these ideas has committed a dishonest act does not imply that all those who have these ideas also are.
You shall not sow your vineyard two kinds of seed; because all be unclean, sowing seed which the product of the vineyard.
(Deuteronomy 22.09)
It is true that it is wrong to assess the content of the Bible without making constructive criticism, as much that this book can be appreciated for its moral content, that's not a reason to stop using our own reasoning, especially if we that its supposed divine origin is somewhat alleged but not proven, as well as any changes that eventually these writings may have suffered.
But it is also true that anyone who now defends peacefully is morally right to maintain their own race without mixing is immediately silenced for not being in line with the prevailing power of the moment and that is also an opportunist act against freedom.
It is also important to emphasize that racial differences are primarily the result of the adaptation of each race to different climates of the earth and the fact that this adaptation determined that some races may be better than others, it should not be used as a pretext for pretend to have advantage over others because although the mixing can be considered a mistake, that does not change the fact that we are all human beings with the same right to be happy and to live in freedom.
ISLAMIST EXTREMISM
It is striking to see how the extremist Islamic groups show an increasing cruelty, and it is also striking that the number of supporters of these terrorist groups seems to gradually increase, it is unfortunate that this happens because their ideological approaches are manifestly contrary to respect for human rights and freedom of expression, i.e. are generally the worst elements of society who end up forming such groups and their ambition for power seems limitless.
However it is also necessary to remember that it is the greedy Western policy towards the Muslim world the main driver of these groups, as systematically whenever the UN poses a sanction against Israel for its policy of occupation and extermination of the
Palestinian people United States blocks it, when Israel kills its bombing hundreds of Palestinians most of them are civilians the Western world considers a simple news story, but when an Islamic terrorist group kills a Western all scandalized by saying it is an act against freedom and fraternity. Do they mean that the life of a Muslim is irrelevant, but an Israeli or an American not? The United States wants to show to the world how a judge and Lord impartial. But how fair you can consider who slaughters a million Iraqis leaving the country destroyed, claiming to seek weapons of mass destruction when they know perfectly well that do not exist?
Because what they really wanted was to control its oil while providing nuclear weapons to Israel, in addition to finance his army, even knowing that this country takes decades illegally occupying Palestinian territory. At the end gives the impression of being true to say Islamist groups that we are witnessing a new covert crusade, because US policy is to provide all necessary means for Israel to steal more and more territories to the Islamic world through their settlements, and if a war is declared to have the possibility of exterminating their nuclear weapons, i.e. it can be assumed that the United States prefers to be Jews rather than Muslims who control the territories considered religious significance for Christians, but this It shows that in any case its policy has nothing impartially and continuous source of conflict between the Islamic world and the West. But the most unfortunate thing is that Israel is using the Palestinian people with the same policy of extermination that the Nazis used against them. Do they not learned anything from what happened in the Second World War? And if not so, why not return freedom to the occupied territories? The Western world is losing this issue a great opportunity to demonstrate freedom and fraternity that both preaches. It is true that extremists seek to impose the world a mentality of the stone age of modern times, but the saddest thing of all is that those countries the forefront of progress believe that cruelty to the world Islamic they are favoring the rise of such groups, they are causing the citizens of those countries confuse extremism freely.
INERTIA MASSES
It is regrettable to see how the masses tend to have a single thought, it's like they do not want the trouble of analyzing things to have an evolved opinion. From the moment an idea or ideological current becomes assumed by most seem as if a mental black hole that tends to attract people to him preventing such abandon dogma was formed. But worst of all is that when someone tries to move away from such beliefs hyenas of society i.e. speculators are poured over attacking them mercilessly, these speculators interpret that departure as an opportunity to take advantage by distancing these people the truths or beliefs politically accepted by the majority, then speculators appear to others as supposed defenders of the mass when in fact only seek personal gain. These kinds of people do not seek the truth and are characterized in each period for trying to take advantage of the political spurts always going with the flow, they are the same as during the Nazi era extolled the regime and from the end of the war vigorously they pursued those who defended racial purity peacefully. Speculators were also those who supported McCarthy, who in the United States, tried to obtain political advantage scaring citizens against those who merely exercised their right to think differently. Another example is the ideological rigidity of political parties in this system misnamed democracy, since different ideas to the dogmas of the initial orthodoxy are persecuted so that they end up considering that the members of each party have to take their postulates as set in stone, turning the rough parties have unable to progress adequately. Just as you try to manipulate the minds of his followers that it is said that all the evils correspond to the opposition parties and all the virtues to himself. This will not end until society realizes that it is necessary to pass from voting parties to vote on ideas. Another similar example is religious dogmas, the leaders of such organizations proclaim the infallibility of its principles to create a mental dictatorship, pretending to citizens who think freely is an attack against God or religion, but do not say it what matters is less good or truth and only used such arguments to their advantage, making believe that citizens doubt the dogma is wrong. These rascals pretend representatives considered only serve God when Satan,
and intended to consider the truth as an exclusively his property without room for any difference of opinion. People should look at things objectively and unmask those speculators who scare people with lies and thus achieve a truly free society.
The world has become a great facade in which the important thing is not democracy but pretend that there is democracy, what matters is not justice but to pretend that there is justice. But you can not solve this without assuming a certain amount of self-criticism, because in reality a country always has the government it deserves, because the low moral disposition of the political class is merely the symptom of poor moral mood of the society It is representing and in many cases have voted for him.
MILITARY INERTIA
It is regrettable to see how the great nations tend to lean too easily to war and imperialism, an example of this is seen in the excessive tendency of the United States to seek wars with which to pay for arms companies by major economic support received during election campaigns. When these parties funded enterprises came to power arms they return the favor provoking wars to justify military spending.
At the beginning of the Cold War the United States considered appropriate allying with Israel in its confrontation with the Soviet Union for world domination and that resulted in many of the Islamic countries became enemies to be at odds with Israel's policy theft of land to the Palestinians and Islamic countries became a field to create appropriate test to justify wars with arms spending.
On the other hand the United States was fixated on creating a circle of allied countries around Russia with which to strangle his influence, hence its interest attract the governments of the Baltic and Ukrainian republics, also carried out a policy of continuous interference in the internal policies of the countries of the middle East using the pretext that only wanted to impose democratic models for their sake, but could not hide their interest in mastering their internal policy to assist and control the oil business.
After that, it went to fund Islamist guerrillas to overthrow governments that were not favorable to them in Afghanistan and Syria without considering that these guerrillas derive in many cases anti-Western terrorist groups.
After the destruction of Iraq in the two Gulf wars this country was so weak he could not contain the entry of terrorist groups such as the Islamic state, in a way also funded by the US to overthrow the Syrian government, and all this not for promote democracy but to take support Russia in its fight for world domination. For this reason I believe the recent policy towards the Middle East by the United States is a serious mistake because Islamic countries have the perception that only a relationship with them arises through force and intimidation, while Israel is allows land theft and destruction of Palestinians finally after all are Muslims.
CITIZEN HOLIDAYS
Formerly, the city councils of people regularly organized parties because of the difficulty of citizens to make them individually today in modern cities there are plenty of nightclubs prepared for it. For this reason, it is incomprehensible that municipalities frequently blocked with normal activity of cities to organize parties, because it represents a clear violation of citizens' rights to rest and silence. It is regrettable that human beings store both doing things en masse, as if responding to a hypnotic pulse that forces you to do, condescends to the shows organized by municipalities even knowing that they are nothing more than a display of alcohol and consumerism. This behavior resembles more a herd of wildebeest in the jungle a group of intelligent people. The same goes for the fireworks, it is surprising that the population be interested something that is essentially nothing more than a simple succession of more like a bombing explosions at a party, especially if we consider that there is a part of the population such as young children or animals are cruelly tormented by these explosions without anyone seems to care.
Therefore, it is reasonable that society applies in this issue some sanity and decides to perform noisy activities only in the soundproof rooms created for it. Municipalities have a duty to be neutral and refuse to turn the streets into simple taverns or nightclubs, albeit temporarily, their duty is to consider public health and the rights to rest as their priorities and not mere profit motive that these scandals represent. An evolved society is characterized by knowing that the interests of one party does not have to impose on others.
THE FALSE ENVIRONMENTALISTS
Today we are used to seeing many environmentalists demonstrations but how many of those environmentalists assumptions prove with facts and not just with words? Because it is very easy to accuse politicians of all, but it is more difficult to prove what they say with facts.
How many of those attending the demonstrations continually buy clothes that do not need and then throw the used and still in good condition, or torn clothes are bought when it would be more logical to buy new and abrade with use?
How many of them abuse the food, while there are so many hungry people in the world? These people have already discovered the pleasure of eating, now have to discover the pleasure of eating only what is necessary, because that is also an art.
How many of them throw food simply by not repeating the same thing the next day?
How many of them despise the sunlight coming day and sleeping at night?
How many of them live at home with their parents and even taking work refuse to help with expenses or household chores and spend everything you earn in useless vices? If you have the same compassion for their parents than they have for their pets the world would be much better.
How many of them use the car to take a person, when it would be much more environmentally friendly use public transportation?
How many of them catch the car to go to town every weekend, even knowing the great pollution that will cause? Because a car consumes in each of those trips as much oxygen as it spends a human being in his life. It will always be more logical and clean stroll through the city park.
How many of them collect garbage when they eat in the field or the beach?
How many of them live in cities with dogs and have no qualms about allowing dirty streets with urine and feces? It will always be more logical to have children and not dogs and animals return to nature which is where they belong instead of living as mere slaves of people.
It is clear that many of those who call themselves
"environmentalists" are nothing but a whited sepulchres who looks very nice in the pictures out of newspapers insulting politicians when they should be a thorough analysis of self-criticism. They do not understand that the world is in a state of decline precisely because people do not like to think, much less change. Apparently they believe is much better look at the speck in your neighbor's eye but forget the beam in their own.
THE ABSURDITY OF FASHIONS
It is sad to see so many people dominated by the obsession to look cool and the worst is that often that fashion is not followed by choice but by not contradict most, because in fact the main reason for people to follow it is fear. Fads are not very different from the group to use the same customs or the same jackets tattoos, usually those who join these groups follow fads or what they want is to feel safe protected by the mass of people acting the same way. The trouble is when fashion dominates people and not people to fashion, because then the barbarous traditions that still exist today as sexual mutilation or torture and auto other ridiculous as wearing torn clothing or using occur tie, although infinity that exist because many people when deciding whether to do something just set in whether it is fashionable or not, because
when they believe that a habit is common to think that joining she found herd protected by the same group that uses its symbols. I do not mean here that this evil have common customs or similar clothing, what is objectionable is as usual habit especially among young people to do something only function is fashionable and not their common sense, because in doing so only favor the development of absurd customs.
THE HIPPIES
It would be desirable to think that the hippies were a peace movement as they normally tend to believe, but the truth is that the movement and the Vietnam War have a direct relationship, because the alleged pacifism attributed to them is nothing more than a rejection reaction to participate in a war that anyway had little social support, because this was not a defensive but clear aggression against a foreign country war and therefore it was logical that many citizens opposed to risk their lives in that war or accept forced recruitment. The truth is that the hippies were just a bunch of degenerates and promiscuous drug addicts who simply proclaimed themselves pacifists only in order to avoid participating in the war, thus ended once this movement also disappeared. These types of groups or sects are the ideal breeding ground for fraudsters who only seek evil try to get a role they do not deserve, presented to others as pacifists and say preach the good when they carry within more than selfishness and lust for power. These undesirable sex call it love because what they want is sex and no love when they are two very different things, can have sex but love is not the same as they would have us believe.
LAW AND JUSTICE
Usually it tend to think that law and justice are the same but such a thing is a mistake because the law should do justice but it is not always the case, because the law primarily represents the interests of the government that is not always in line with the interests of the citizen. An example of this is in the dry law enacted in the United States in the early twentieth century with the law it was
supposed to promote public health but back to the views of citizens. This means that instead of convincing society of the harmful use of alcohol, they chose to threaten and coerce sanctions, this caused a rift between the government and citizens who disregarded this requirement. As a result, there was a great development of mafias and illegal alcohol market. One could say then that the expansion of mafia organizations rather than being merit of them is the consequence of the lack of respect for the rule to civil rights, because in some ways represent the right of society to exercise their free will and so both these illegal companies were doing justice to offer people what the state forbade them arbitrarily, therefore in this case the classic definition of who represented good and who represented evil is confusing, because there is no clear answer . The most reasonable thing would have been to create an information campaign to explain the harm that drug use represented while respecting the decision of citizens. In the end the state relented and the dry law was abolished, with this demonstrated that the power of governments can not do everything and that although the end is just can not be imposed in violation of the freedom of choice of society, because very honorable so that it does not have to justify the means employed to achieve it and the duty of governments is to respect the free will of citizens when it comes to deciding on his own life. From that moment the state and citizens came to classify alcohol and drugs snuff as good simply because these were the most traditional and therefore began to persecute the others. This was an act of blatant hypocrisy, because alcohol is the drug that causes more deaths, but to make such a distinction somehow seemed moral citizens remain intact, the blame for all the ills to other drugs. The state should end this situation and promote the eradication of drugs, but peacefully and without coercion, for example using measures such as stop considering drunkenness an extenuating circumstance for crimes committed, as now happens in some countries, since such more measures to help eradicate consumption is what they do favor it is clear that only when the state and citizens call things by their name this may change. With these measures, the mafia would disappear and many people who are wrongfully imprisoned would come out of it, because if we
apply existing laws to all those who peddle drugs, then all owners of bars or factories where it produces or sells alcohol should being in prison. It is true that drugs must be fought, but only in the field of moral education and the elimination of any legal advantage for those who use drugs.
Another example of the distance that sometimes exists between law and justice is like some criminal codes establish the right of criminals to obtain compensation for injuries they might suffer during the commission of a crime, in this case the bad faith is evident the law, because its duty is to do everything necessary to discourage the offender to commit crimes and not to encourage it.
Because if the argument of the law to justify this measure is that the victim's act of defense had caused injury to the aggressor higher than justified, then it is logical to hold accountable the victim for their excess, but in no case allow an offender can be rewarded for injuries they might suffer during their criminal activity.
It is unfortunate that often when a crime, the law or do nothing or take a position clearly in favor of the offender, just not wanting to take measures involving public spending occurs. Clearly the weakness and neglect in many of the penal codes of these false democracies, because not only refuse to do justice, but in many cases collude with criminals.
DECENT POLITICAL
It is a pity to see how the educational system itself is inculcated children who live in a democracy, it seems that what really seeking is to create a society of faithful servants obedient. But how can be considered a democratic system that allows only thing is to elect political leaders, but no option to directly decide the laws that govern us? Clearly what is trying to convince citizens that have a democracy, even knowing that such a thing is false.
But the most outrageous of all is that those politicians who call themselves decent, are the same as applaud when a politician thief is pardoned after serving a ridiculous part of his sentence without having returned the stolen, those politicians who act this may not be considered rather than as accomplices of others to such
behavior. As you can believe in the political agenda of those proposing the release of serial murderers or rapists after serving only a fraction of their sentences, and this systematically, they include in their criminal codes the release of criminals in a short time regardless of the seriousness of their crimes Could it be that identify with them? Clearly, what they do is prepare the penal code when they apply to them. These rascals politicians talk about being humanitarian with criminals, but they refer to patronizing criminals or thieves like them, never do justice to the victims, which they despise, as only they consider them mere funding of their parties . These hypocritical politicians, then Say 'Justice has been done! They have served their sentences! But they know that this statement is false because the laws are designed so that impunity is standard. Most politicians call themselves decent but how many of them are in favor of removing their privileges? They measure with which society must judge put. These rascals political friends say criminals quickly The jail is for reinserting!
But such a statement is false because the prison primarily aims to remove from society those who do not deserve to be in it, and whether the severity of their sentences to life imprisonment determines that the right is met. Always it is reasonable to release in the case of finding evidence of his innocence, but otherwise the priority has to be the victim not the criminal. Sometimes Say
'Criminals have repented! But is there any criminal who does not say repenting immediately after entering prison? These friends of criminals, with whom they identify, they forget that who takes a life of intentional and premeditated need not decide on his own, and if society believes that the fair payment is an example keeping you in prison then it is entitled to apply. Reinsertion is always desirable, but for criminals who deserve it, but who takes a life can not expect society to stop thinking about your tastes or if you have repented or not, because for those who have a conviction for centuries that You need not apply. Logically it would correct a reduction of sentence for good behavior, but a reduction is not an annulment, because the crimes are not canceled, and therefore it is reasonable that such a reduction is a minority percentage of the total, if what is looking for justice. It is also fair prisoners to work because they are not hotels, so they can
pay compensation to their victims and expenses which might arise during their stay in prison.
These politicians, false democrats, do not hesitate to use the threat to citizens to participate in the electoral system, because there are many countries in which fines those who refuse to collaborate with deceit by refusing to vote or participate in the tables election.
They are wrong who think that the system can be changed from within, as if it is a false democratic model the only solution is to reject and refuse to participate in it, until those in power give the hint, participate in the game parties is to fall into deception.
Clearly, when the thief is the one who makes the laws can not be expected to do justice.
Actually existing political systems are nothing more than a mere imitation of Greek models of the V century BC, left-wing parties claim to care about workers but by supporting illegal immigration all they do is promote a slave society like the yellowish Athens.
Right-wing parties have no obsession that perpetuate the privileges of the rich slave-like Sparta. That game left and right to bring the parties want is nothing but a fiction, the truth is neutral and not subject to any party. The world needs a new way of conceiving democracy, a system by which laws are directly elected by citizens, only then this kind of political tricksters and thieves can be eradicated from society permanently.
ASYMMETRICAL SOCIETY
Today it is striking to see how society seems to become increasingly important to an asymmetric approach to life, art for example is expressed increasingly through the deformity, incoherence and absurdity, an example of this is at the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao, in which both his supposed works of art, like architecture of the building, all this represents the asymmetry and deformity. This is an example of how a society aimless expresses its definition of art, or what he thinks is art. This is a society without God, but not because God has abandoned them, but because they have turned their back on God.
Is not it true perhaps that in nature all things usually follow a symmetrical shape? The roundness of the planets, the shape of our bodies, that symmetry is actually the expression of order and logic which is one of the factors that connect man with God. But this current society feels omnipotent with technological development, it is believed invincible and no doubt repeat the mistakes of the past, this society forgets people and just think about the mere economic productivity, this society goes increasingly quickly towards a model based on slavery and miscegenation, causing asymmetry and social disunity only by the profit motive of companies. But what is the talk of business growth or high per capita income, if people are unhappy with this situation of miscegenation and crime that causes uncontrolled immigration. The growth is not the only thing that counts, also order and social integration that same culture and race represent, but society does not want to see that this sea beast that is the United States to do so led to believe, is presented to the world as the great defender of freedom, but its policy is based on imperialism and submission of the world to their interests, this empire no doubt when you are interested in supporting dictators or overthrowing only democracies so that their companies can deplete the world's resources it is only necessary to see the average income of an American and a citizen of Africa to discover their deception, even within the United States itself social inequalities are outrageous and successive governments do not do anything about it, meanwhile in international politics make propaganda in favor of miscegenation but only as a strategy to promote world domination, day after day advertise how bad f hey were the Nazis, but only for people not offer resistance to domination they seek to impose, because they are now the new dictators disguised as democrats, what is the difference between being dominated by the Nazis or by a country of sodomites mestizos? that is what has become the United States. We try to
make people believe that this is an ideal situation, but only pursue world domination, this shows that in the world everything is relative and the concept of democracy is no different. The truth is that current political systems are far from real democracy, but do not hesitate to use this as an excuse to justify interference in the affairs of other states, but not in order to promote democracy, but to support their selfish interests, as was done during the Roman empire. Really is not that the US government supports miscegenation as an end, it just tries to take advantage of his victory against the Nazis, as if they were trying to dominate the world with a racist policy, then they to get the same need to use policy pro miscegenation as a way for that citizens do not realize that pursue the same goals of the Nazis, but at the cost of destroying the social order. Words that appear inside and outside its borders support miscegenation but only to gain time until their goal is submission of the world to their interests. But society increasingly feel more dissatisfied with this situation, but worst of all is that you do not know the remedy, does not understand that the first casualty in war is truth loser, does not understand that the racial question the Nazis were right and to achieve a developed society this must be based on a stable order, whereby each live in peace and harmony in the world but not mixed race, because each race was made by nature to live in different climates, society must understand that being in favor of respect for the rights of all races does not mean you have to support miscegenation, because in fact that miscegenation only serves as a vehicle to bring more disorder and social inequality. But this society aimlessly is just repeating the same mistakes of ancient Rome, to bet on a model of mixed and slave society, now no longer it called slavery, but from a comparative point of view the economic situation of these people far from it. Because the best way to guarantee the rights of each race is that each has a recognized territory, which is not possible
interference from other races in their own affairs, thus genuine freedom itself would have.
THE SUBHUMANS
It is surprising to see how these subhuman try to seize power in the world would have us believe that care workers when all they do is agree in the shade with murderers and terrorists, those subhuman seeking partnerships with all the world's dictators to seize power and whose sole political objective is the submission of society to his dictatorship. These populist subhuman would have us believe that communism is a solution when failure is evident even in those countries that developed it. They intended to give us lessons of economy when their only project is the waste of public resources, proposed borrowing as a solution to all problems, but how are you going to go into debt a country that is already in debt? It is that for them the balanced management of the economy has no meaning? Because a model country is one that depends on its own resources no resources of others, because these guys what actually plan is asking for money and then not return it and that's a mean-spirited conduct unbecoming of what you can expect from a government. It is true that a country can borrow, but only as part of a low debt situation, because that money will gladly want to ask to return and of course with interest, but this is not populist tell citizens. For an equal government that a person when he is honored, find the solution to their problems arranging their internal imbalances without trying to convey their problems to others through borrowing as this solution can only be exceptional but never a way of life, because it is only fair that a nation depends on what it produces and not what others produce. It is therefore necessary to review those things that are wrong in the economy to work depending on their own resources, particularly avoiding unnecessary corruption and wastefulness. An example of this is in the present public health fraud, it is not the same earmark money to care for the sick to make sure that money really goes to the purpose for which it was intended, since in many cases is lost in an unjustified
overvaluation of treatments, or the monopoly of the intermediaries involved in healthcare. This is a health system too interested in buying drugs, but little interested in curing diseases.
They intended to propose themselves as a substitute for religion when he has never been a nation where the political model has benefited its citizens, rely on populist statements claiming seek the good of the workers but only covet the power to create a dictatorship they destroy everything they touch because all that is in their intentions is selfishness. Because there is no more despicable than robbing a poor thing and that is precisely what they do. These individuals claim to be concerned about human rights, but at the same time calling for serial murderers sentenced to life imprisonment meet only a fraction of their sentences, it is clear that when they speak of rights do not relate to the victims.
It is true that a developed nation is characterized by caring for all its citizens including those who are in a disadvantaged situation, but these populist what they want is not help but use that argument as an excuse to seize power at the same time They are destroying their own country. For an economy progresses is one that rewards work and not vagrancy and therefore it is essential that as much as possible contributory aid are returned to the state by citizens, by creating a work program.
It is also true that trying to recover an economy by reducing wages is a ridiculous solution and especially highlights the lack of talent of the political class, because reducing the salaries of those who earn the least causing a contraction economy, considering that those with the lowest wages generally spend everything they earn and therefore this measure can only lead to a reduction in business. Therefore, the best remedy for an economy to function is to assume without fear of an economic model that rewards work instead excessively in favor of grants, and therefore the economy is more oriented towards full employment to dependence state. Because when an economy tends to solve everything with subsidies, such as work absences are covered by paying workers less missing in the end what occurs is an injustice to them, it is not that the system can not create insurance to cover such absences, which does not make sense is that the emphasis is on those most work. Therefore, the perfect social model is one
that helps those in need, but demanding also lose your part and responsibility for work absences are shared equally between the company and the worker in order that this is not used as a pretext for laziness or lack of work unjustified. Therefore a perfect economy is one that rewards work, but at the same time helping those in need by requiring an effort to change, to return the favor received. Because an economy can only be competitive when he is grateful to those who strive to develop, otherwise only leads to unemployment and lack of competitiveness, because in the end who end up paying these efforts really are the same workers holding companies.
It is also essential to fight corruption, fomented by the politicians themselves, but that will not end until the penal code to be modified and the political class no longer get away with judicial proceedings in which it is processed, the problem is that when the thief it is the law that makes it very difficult to solve.
THE LAST WAR
The world is getting closer to his last battle, but not a war between nations but a battle between good and evil, light and darkness, ignorance and knowledge, a war that is not done with tanks and rifles but exists within each person, because the moral development is really the last stage in the process of evolution of humanity. That process has been delayed continuously by the fact that the philosophical progress is at odds with economic progress, as to make possible their development is necessary to have time have privacy to meditate, because it is through meditation as it progresses philosophy and the deeper the highest concentration is the usefulness of the results. But human life through history has been a continuous struggle for survival that has left very little opportunity to develop inner awareness, but that awareness is what differentiates an evolved another that is not. Arguably philosophy is food for the spirit and who thinks he can live without principles is wrong, as are those principles that help us relate to the universe in a fruitful way, so the man of the future consider his inner development as its greatest value, and the defense of right and justice as the core of their behavior.
THE AUTHENTIC ART
Today we see anything called art, it seems that people have lost the ability to distinguish what is beautiful from what is not, are not able to understand that true art it is the result of effort and sacrifice and not the trivial whims, because art arises when something is created in harmony with nature, something that has a logic and a result. Because there is much more art in the design of an engine or the architecture of a building, which in those vulgar drawings what they call abstract art. People are not able to understand that those who call themselves artists are but a redoubt of vague and pretentious that generally lack talent, because before any criticism they simply say I just do not understand my art! It's that you are ignorant! But would have to see if those artists call themselves are able to do something that requires talent as an old portrait or engineering design, sure to fail, because it is easier to give a few strokes on a canvas and then call it art, do something that requires difficulty. This is not to say that it can make sense to abstract art, but when it is not based on absurd drawings, because its true meaning is to use recognizable symbolic figures but in situations other than its normal form, i.e. they are able to suggest something more important and logical to observe it, but that requires talent and know how to draw something that impostors would find it impossible to get, but the worst part is that this present society, which is believed so developed, something as basic as this will be difficult to understand. We live in a society without order or moral society whose God is the only commodity production, so it is logical that this band is capable of developing impostors. It is regrettable that when those individuals who call themselves artists of the abstract are promoted by an art gallery, become treated as being deified and their absurd drawings are seeking twisted justifications and cultural value undeserving and everything in order promote the gallery and get money, citizens should not easily accept the arguments of those false artists, because in this present degenerate society all are selfish interests and needs an objective analysis to arrive at the truth and not be
easily carried away by the means or beliefs of the masses can be manipulated easily. Only in a society without order or moral existence of such impostors it explained, because when a world lacks direction is very difficult to produce true artists, therefore it tends to elevate those undesirable and fiction is created that their works are just great because they want to look in the mirror and understand the decadent world in which they live. People should ask who and why they are interested in promoting an art without direction or sense, perhaps deep fear that society wake up and demand the changes that they are not interested.
THE FLOOD
The legend of the Great Flood is present in many cultures, this belief may have its origin in the events that occurred after the end of the last glaciation occurred about twelve thousand years ago, at that time much of the earth's surface was covered by ice, this caused the sea level was tens of meters lower than today. In those days the main centers of civilization were located in desert areas today but in those days had extensive vegetation, mainly in the regions of Egypt and Mesopotamia. The beginning of the thaw caused a growing flood in the river beds and an elevation in the level of the coast, this in the mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers it must have caused major flooding. Climate change not only occurred in that region, because everyone was affected, the Channel had a layer of ice that connected France with England, defrost the sea penetrated and definitely separated. Many large islands were reduced to insignificant islets. But where it could be the most dramatic change is in the Mediterranean area, because the increased sea level this penetrated from the Atlantic through the Strait of Gibraltar flooding throughout the region. Increasing the Earth's temperature turned what was once a green oasis in a desert regions like the Sahara in Egypt and Mesopotamia, gradually changing the sphere of political power in Africa and the Middle East to Europe. Probably the events in ancient times as a result of the end of glaciation were passed in the ancient stories like a great flood, the mistakenly believed it was caused by rain and not by the melting of large amounts of water.
THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO SAPIENS
Formerly, some thirty thousand years ago, Europe was covered by ice of the last glaciation, because of this continent was practically deserted but inhabited by Neanderthals. Meanwhile Africa at that time enjoyed a much more pleasant climate similar to today's Mediterranean climate. This situation caused the Homo sapiens settled in Africa had a long time and an ideal climate to evolve.
As the global temperature increased homo sapiens began moving to Europe and was replacing the Neanderthals, did not it was a necessarily violent replacement, because being the homo superior sapiens was evolutionarily able to extract food from the best environment that man Neanderthal. Some cases of interbreeding between the two species were also given, but the result was a human version less than Homo sapiens. Eventually this version was disappearing as the superior genes were predominating over the lower, however, at present a small number of genes of Neanderthals, are still preserved in the homo sapiens probably because they are responsible for the adaptation to cold European climate, although it is also true that the crossing does not occur these genes were acquired just a process of natural evolution. In any case, the migration of Homo sapiens to the north was not the result of adaptation to Europe, but Europe adapts to it, because the cause of this was that the European climate was becoming warmer and therefore more like him who had the Homo sapiens in Africa.
This shows that living in an ideal climate favoring racial improvement, but currently this is an issue that can not talk unless it is to deny it, but not scientific but political reasons. Therefore, I find despicable those who accept the existence in the past of species with different levels of development, but at the same time deny the possibility that there may be better breeds than others today, because given the time to pro crossbreeding in which we live since the end of world war II is clear that although these tests are known certainly will not be announced.
The reality is that there are no single species or races better than others, but even within the same race can be found these
differences. Proof of this is the different amount of body hair that people have, because although most people have little, however there are exceptions to this rule, the explanation is simple and is that since humans started wearing clothes body hair began to disappear to produce better human version, eventually people with long hair certainly disappear, but not because nothing is done against them, but the selection process that nature has been doing for thousands of years.
This is an example of the difference in the genetic quality of people, but the most striking of all is the most beautiful of European race over the other. This may be obvious, but it will certainly be rejected by many, but not because they have reasons for it, but because when prejudices are conditioning our mind then people will be able to call night to day and day to night so not to recognize the obvious.
What we call races, is nothing but an accumulation of large enough genetic differences to be differentiable, but each person is the sum of thousands of different genes a more evolved and more primitive, therefore the progress of the genetics is not only that may arise from the differences that may exist between different races but above all for the gradual elimination of backward diseased genes or carried out by natural selection itself or also by the action of human science.
Actually, it is as if each person were a race miniature with a different genetic load due to natural selection in the end only the best versions prevail and that will cause future physical differences or character are less than now. Because although we do not realize our body there early genes that are in the process of disappearing and each new generation are less present in the world, however there are other superior genes that are in the process of expansion, this process can take thousands of years and causes the appearance of better people.
The truth is that progress has been in balance and the white race is found in the part of the Earth with the most balanced climate, therefore, for the story was the most evolved of all. Living in an ideal climate not only favors the appearance of a more beautiful race but also more spiritual, because the extreme heat hinders the development of these dimensional aspects. It is also important to
remember that civilization was moving from south to north along the story exactly as did the weather, i.e. when these civilizations existed, both race and the climate that there were, they were more like the European today than they have right now. In fact, chances are that in those days blacks did not exist, as a result of the low temperatures that the Earth was due to glaciation. The truth is that the policy of pro miscegenation is from an evolutionary point of view a serious mistake, because as communism gives priority to quantity over quality.
THE NEW YEAR
Since ancient times, all civilizations tried to measure time and it realized the usefulness of using the solstices to measure the seasons and the passing years. Then they began to make buildings such as Stonehenge to determine the largest solar inclination and thus to fix at this time the beginning of the year, because there is only one winter or summer solstice each year.
It would therefore be desirable for the year again start with the winter solstice on Dec. 22, when starting in antiquity, because it makes sense as understood by the old the new year begins at the moment when the sun begins to rise and the days are getting longer, doing so would be the most natural way to classify the years was actually the Catholic church that envy of the festival is traditionally celebrated at that time he decided to set the birth of Jesus just a few days later, on December 25, with malicious order to wrest this party its true meaning. Indeed the Catholic Church is completely unaware of the actual date of Jesus' birth or even the year, so its bad faith in this regard is clear, and there was this his only invention, because in reality everything related to childhood Jesus and subsequent stories about his miracles were invented such falsehoods not we owe attributed to Jesus, for we must not forget that the Catholic church was not founded by him but by the Roman empire as a last resort to prevent its collapse. Therefore, it is good that society recover the winter solstice as the date to establish the beginning of the year and thus getting back tune with nature. In addition, institutions should review the history and unmask the falsehoods propagated by religious organizations,
because we can not accept that simple hypotheses are proposed citizens as unquestionable truths.
ORDER IN THE COUPLE
In any organized system there needs to be clear leadership to make possible the order in marriage this is equally important, because both spouses are two people with two ways of thinking different, so it is necessary to establish a control command by which it is possible to stabilize the couple. In my opinion, this function is better than exercising man, because if we look at nature this is how the sun works in the animal world, also in the cosmos as a male element exerts the presidential function in the solar system to be at the center and coordinate the other planets.
Furthermore, as regards the human being is and has traditionally been throughout history and although it is true that in the past have done wrong things, it would be unfair to say that they have only suffered by women because evolution was difficult for everyone. Therefore, I consider it logical that the man who holds the office of president that gives meaning to the family.
This in any case have to be confused with a dictatorship, for man must only perform the function of commanding a democratic manner, without imposing his will, i.e. its leadership role should be only administrative taking into account the views of others and be fair and benevolent in its deliberations. Of course the right of withdrawal must always be recognized for both, because as I said the leadership of the husband in no case should be a dictatorship.
It is also true that the fact that the man holds the office of president of the family does not prevent it from having some obligations to them and therefore does not meet its commitments would be fair to him reproach for it, because the duty of man it is to lead the marriage but only to serve you. It is necessary that each spouse understand that each gender was made by nature to specialize in different functions therefore need not wonder that these functions are also different in marriage, but it is also true that such specialization does not have to prevent right of both spouses to be equally happy. For this reason the law also has to act accordingly and in case of separation recognize both spouses
equal right to care for their children except that they can demonstrate a clear guilt of one, i.e. that both spouses they could live with their children the same time until they were older or share the common housing in equal time periods.
In order to obtain the vote for women in some countries politicians raised family relationships only as feminist topics, so felt that the fault was always the man in case of separation, or were denied custody of their children saying I could not serve them well. Injustice to establish that virtually all the goods of marriage happen to women, is the floor, children, and even an important part of the salary husband was so committed, this made the separation in a lynching, but with the backing of law, forgetting their duty to be fair and impartial and condemning the man to misery. This type of laws rather than regulate the separation they do is induce her, by clearly privileging one spouse, it is assumed that the man was rich and therefore able to dispose of their property without suffering no consequence.
The truth is that because of feminism many women are not ready for marriage, because since childhood has taught them that their duty is to confront men in the workplace instead of serving as mothers, so motherhood pose as a hindrance in carrying out such topics and in many cases only come to have a child which is totally insufficient for generational change, thus feminism becomes a real threat to bring society to its own destruction.
Political feminist proposed by immigration as a solution, but that does not stop the problem is the lack of birth and is only half a solution by shifting the problem to others. In addition, this measure caused a genuine racial and cultural disorder, turning the working class as a social group of partial slavery, because the massive influx of immigrants causes the lowering of the minimum wage. I do not mean by this that women can not enter the labor market, but it would be logical that first fulfill their duty as mothers ensuring generational change and from there can be made in other activities.
But most surprising is to see how feminists intend to raise as illogical the fact that women are the ones that should be responsible primarily for the care of children, especially in childhood, because if we look at the example of how the animals
care for their young can see how it is the females who usually deal with their offspring in a more direct way. Does that mean then that all animals are sexist? In humans adjectives like sexism or feminism are used, but it would be stupid to apply such epithets to animals, as these are much more conditioned by nature in their behavior that we, because if anyone should be accused of macho would have to be nature itself or God and not animals. But if the question to consider is who has more wisdom whether feminists or nature I am inclined to the second, for it is nature that decided through evolution separate the animals into sexes, and it was nature that determined that were women who will become pregnant and suckle their children, not men. This is because he felt it was better gender specialization and separation of functions that have no advantage of one over the other but for the good of all. So, how wrong it is considered that the separation in different functions equals one underestimation of women, for this separation in no way entitles the mistreatment of one sex over the other as both have the same obligation to respect and cooperate in the development family and both have the same right to be happy.
At the end gives the impression that many of these feminist movements actually are led by unfeminine women but with great ambition for power, which is actually what they are trying is to use the other women to not know what they really want it is to live a life of men, but not because it is good for women but because they do not feel women.
THE BIPOLARITY OF THE COSMOS
Arguably the cosmos most things have a positive or negative, which should not be confused with good or bad, as both are benign, this bipolarity is born with the nature of the cosmos, polar defined as essentially began with the that the subject is the opposite of vacuum and vacuum is the opposite of the art, both are the same but in reverse since it can not exist without the other, since the vacuum without matter could no comparison, because the vacuum is nothingness. Matter represents the existence and nonexistence and void both exist outside of time because the universal laws are the same as always, the time change represents
the evolutionary movement of matter but within those laws.
Consequently arise calls polarities arising for example the sexes or the magnetic poles, but is immense amount of things that are defined polar form. In the universe the two polarities are equally important, but that does not mean that it fulfilled the same functions, so lamentable is the current confrontation between the sexes, because it is not understood that the fact that both are equally necessary does not mean that they have to do the same things.
VALUES ARE MEN
The sun relative to the earth, salt, heat, red, the galactic core, circle, power, government, the crest in a sling, the pleasure derived from the technique, the positive magnetic pole, the day, the vertical line, the minority, the exception, the numbers one, two, four, five, seven and eight.
FEMININE VALUES ARE
The planets from the sun, the stars about the galactic core, sugar, philosophy, cold, blue, square, night, the valley in a sling, the horizontal line, water, sea, the negative magnetic pole, the majority, the numbers zero three, six and nine.
There are actually male or female values in all, this is not a contradiction, the key is expressed in different planes.
GOOD AND EVIL
GOOD
It represents good light, white, justice, truth, intelligence, wisdom, knowledge, right, progress, above.
EVIL
Evil represents ignorance, darkness, error, down the mistake, the black color.
Do not confuse the positive or negative values in the cosmos in most things good and evil, for positive or negative values are all benign and necessary, while misrepresents what is unacceptable and wrong . Good and evil have in common with the values that have polarity that are opposites like them, but unlike them it does not mean that both are desirable, because in fact evil only represents that which is never desirable and therefore something that we should stay away. Good then represents the right and acceptable, wrong and wrong and wrong, are opposite each other, but only one represents what makes sense to do. Actually evil could be defined as the percentage of accidents is inevitable in the evolution of the cosmos, for it has no sense to look for evil intended, therefore err who adhere to sects based on evil, it is as if identified with ignorance, stupidity or would delay those arising evil objective end up being unhappy, then lie in an unstable position who becomes antisocial and unable to relate to others in a balanced way. Evil is the result of the inevitable return of the cosmos to the ignorance that is derived from its restart. The same universe that people also have to die to be renewable, with this renewal comes forgetfulness and oblivion comes the error, but also the shock of the new, yet the suffering caused the error is not a goal in itself but it is a necessary evil if the universe wants to renew, why are mistaken who think that evil is desirable as good, for what the universe needs is to start again and forget to be renewable, but evil is not more than the suffering caused by the error, the result of that renewal. Evil is not a goal in itself, what is needed is to renew the cosmos and return to ignorance to be able to recycle, evil is undesirable consequence of this renewal and therefore all the effort of progress is based on the fight to avoid the mistake that makes us suffer and represents evil, a constant struggle from darkness into light. Evil is the error, and obviously no one wants to be wrong, however renew the universe needs to be able to forget, and it is because of forgetfulness as ignorance, error and evil arises. Evil in human behavior stems from a mistaken view of reality, so those who so behave believe that a permanent attitude of confrontation with their peers they will serve useful, but such a thing is an error derived get carried away
a petty and despotic approach to things, but that makes them unhappy who so behave, because it is wrong and unbalanced behavior, it is necessary to understand that in human relations good and peaceful coexistence must be the cornerstones behavior in order to be happy. One of the possible explanations of evil in human behavior would be a deviation in the natural aggressiveness caused by excessive consent from parents on the whims of their children, this causes children to believe they can do whatever they want without caring the consequences, this attitude eventually results in a mean-spirited behavior as a common pattern in adulthood is very difficult to correct, children need to learn that their rights end where they begin those of others, therefore it is essential to teach moral values from the childhood.
The universe when it restarts again ignorance of the error drift and error derives evil, but that does not mean that evil is the goal of cosmic renewal but rather an inevitable consequence, therefore from the same time the cosmos begins to evolve the effort of every living creature is to progress from darkness to light and from ignorance to knowledge. Therefore the universe to renew and forget not looking for evil, but again reliving the same emotions as if for the first time. For this reason those worlds that reach a high level of evolution definitively banish evil represented by vanity and ignorance.
THE BLACK AND WHITE COLOR
As I said these colors are benign and necessary essence, however they can also represent good or evil, but secondary, these colors can represent both masculine values such as female depending on the plane in which they are.
WHITE COLOR
White represents the horizontal line in planes and vertical in others, also the truth, goodness, justice, the day, progress, white light, sugar, intelligence, philosophy, above the divine, the
backbone of the universe, universal laws, most in some planes represents the masculine and other feminine.
THE COLOR BLACK
The black color represents the night, seriousness, in a deep valley, rest, renewal, minority, sometimes evil, error or ignorance in some planes represents the feminine and the masculine other.
It is clear then that the existence of positive and negative values in the cosmos are both equally necessary and benign and should not be confused with the evil of the error, and is only the result of the renewal of the cosmos, it is true that to give rise to this renewal is also provided that evil appears, but is not a goal in itself, but an inevitable consequence, renewed and re ignorance is necessary when the universe has aged, it allows live again emotions as if they were new, the suffering caused by the error and represents evil is just the price to pay for this renewal. For this reason all evolved society must have the right and justice as fundamental philosophical principles.
THE TOTAL JUSTICE AND EXCEPTIONS
In principle, any evolved society needs a code of moral values to establish justice as principal rule of conduct, otherwise it would be impossible to create a stable social order, in my opinion ideally defend the full justice as the only way to raise the moral behavior, full justice means the fair and without exception as the only acceptable behavior. However it is also possible to believe in an approach to fair behavior admitting exceptions, this is the reason for writing this article that is trying to give a logical sense to define it as in the case of sense.
First let me say that admitted the possibility of considering unfair behaviors as valid only make sense if raised as exceptional, meaning that although it is believed that both justice and injustice are necessary or justifiable to be considered as part of a set of different polarities but equally important, however should be expressed in different dimensions or planes but organized as majority and minority. That is that justice should be raised as the
norm of behavior and injustice as the exception, in this sense the right behavior should be normal moral form present in the human mind as both dimensions must always be separated, be ambiguous about can only cause harm to those who confuse it, i.e. the pursuit of good and justice should be the main driver of behavior and possible unfair behaviors they appear only casually and indirectly.
This means that even considering to justice and injustice as two equal and necessary forces in a generic sense not behave in practice, it would be distributed as if in them a force of gravity that would separate distributed in the form of majority is applied and minority, this does not mean underestimating the minority force, as a relative size is not the same as an absolute value, we can find in the cosmos examples to prove, such as the distribution of the solar system, in this case the sun represents the except it is in the center of the system and the different star of others, and planets represent the norm because they are more numerous, yet the sun still being only one and different is so important in organizing the solar system as planets it is larger and more massive than all the planets together and is the source of energy in the cosmos.
Another example is how the political system is distributed in an organized society, in this case government members represent the exception and all other citizens the norm, but the exception in this case is who runs the state but always in direct connection with society. This shows that the separation of the majority and minority
dimensions
need
not
be
interpreted
as
an
underestimation of the concept of minority. It could be said that the key would be in the potential, meaning that although the right behavior should be the protagonist of our lives in terms of our habitual behavior, exceptional cases of injustice would have greater importance may be associated frequently political or economic power, this does not mean that those in power have to be necessarily unfair, but the power it easy.
Arguably from a symbolic point of view that injustice is like the sun, something exceptional and energy but separate from the norm and stability represented by justice and planets, therefore whoever touches can burn. To avoid unpleasant consequences need not play with this issue and uphold justice as the norm of our
usual moral conduct, and that basically every action has a consequence and who questions the rights of others you risk the reaction it represents the self-defense.
In this case the sun is expressed in a vertical and minority and symbolized by the red plane, could also represent injustice or central government, the planets in this case the horizontal line represent good and white. We must differentiate in this case the injustice of tyranny, injustice would be represented by the color red and from this point of view it would make sense sometimes exceptionally. Tyranny instead would be represented by the black color and would always be rejected because it is a variant of injustice but out of place and sense. This means that evil could be said to injustice when it abandons its balanced attitude to become the norm of habitual behavior is what makes tyranny, it could also be defined as a disease of the spirit when it loses the notion of reality and therefore is always wrong and reprehensible behavior.
Needless to say black in this case has a negative meaning but this does not have to be necessarily so, because the colors are essentially benign and malignant approach depends on the circumstances, since in the background evil and tyranny They are the result of ignorance and this is precisely one of the meanings of black color, i.e. it is the inability to see the white light of truth and knowledge.
Although the wrongful conduct might make sense sometimes, you never should be sought routinely, because it is logical that alone is something exceptional and would not be the dominant element in our mind. Precisely what is defined as demon is when someone ignores this and becomes evil in its raison d'etre, this alone can hurt him, because he becomes incapable antisocial relate to anyone except those degenerate like him, it is therefore necessary to teach moral behavior from children to understand the consequences of antisocial behavior a can have.
Another way to explain why justice should be the moral principle of conduct is that from an energy standpoint justice represents the horizontal and stable line, while injustice would be energetically unstable vertical line, for this reason it healthy and safe life is to consider taking justice as a way of normal behavior. As I said definitions of vertical and horizontal planes are not fixed and in
other circumstances justice is expressed vertically as the backbone of the universe, and representing the divine, the truth and the white light. As I said the fact define evil black or injustice red does not mean that therefore these colors should be considered negative, as these interpretations are only one of the secondary variants that may be associated these colors, since all colors are benign essentially the same can be said with respect to numbers.
So it could be said that although justice and injustice were considered as two acceptable forces in generic terms, the perfect balance in human behavior only find separating these concepts into one majority and a minority, being therefore just conduct the normal way of our being and just having this clear our minds can find your balance.
To explain more clearly the theory of the exceptions of justice would arguably be a square scheme X in which the lines would go from top left to bottom right and from top right to bottom left, on the right triangle and white justice would be found and the left and red triangle injustice would be found, this would represent the absolute generic values, but in practice justice occupy most of the horizontal surface and injustice minimal but with more height because They are expressed in the form of majority and minority, arguably is as two schemes, one square with an X in the center, are expressed only the absolute values, in the other rectangular, or also oval as the shape of a galaxy the way in which it is normally expressed as percentages does so by majority and minority shown. However when we refer to the ratio between good and bad it would be the same approach but in this case the scheme would be rotated reaching the wrong black on the bottom and the fine white on top, in this case is different because unlike evil injustice would always be rejected without exception, being a wrong behavior. Therefore in the case of logic considering the theory of justice exceptions it should be raised as the usual moral norm, the possible exceptions would exceptionally and evil as we have always said it would be rejected.
It can be said then that although the right and wrong have equal absolute values in practice be distributed in completely different and separate planes defined in this case injustice in a vertical
plane and justice in a horizontal plane, but depend on the circumstances as the case may occur in reverse, because if we change the dimensional plane and turn the above scheme placing injustice as horizontal element and justice as vertical element passed to the plane of good and evil, in this case the fine would be located above symbolizing white light and progress, and evil would be located below representing the black color and ignorance. In this case the evil would always be objectionable because it represents the suffering caused by the error, however the universe needs to continuously recycled and one consequence of this is again ignorance is not ignorance and suffering caused by it they are a goal in itself but rather an unavoidable evil.
This means that although exceptions justice were deemed acceptable, however would always be objectionable petty and despotic behavior, true expression of evil, because these behaviors are always harmful to those who use them, for evil represents the deviation of justice exceptions to the vanity and tyranny, leaving the moderate attitude is always a mistake, so it is always reprehensible without exception. The true meaning of the phrase, selling his soul to the devil, is that when someone comes to a miserly attitude thinking about profit ends up losing more than winning, because evil is in itself a wrong action because it represents the abandonment by the spirit of the necessary attitude of moderation that is necessary for life, people who act like they never feel happy about many things that have, because happiness does not depend solely on the goods, but the attitude one have towards life. Therefore, in the case considered certain exceptions theory of justice would be best to teach children philosophy of justice as fundamental without more, because trying to explain the exceptions too soon could lead to unnecessary errors. This means that evolved worlds could be given justified cases of injustice as those related to the advantages of power or compensation of salaries, but disappear completely petty behavior as tyranny, vanity or despotism, which are the true expressions of evil. This means that the exceptions of justice only exist legally, linked mainly to the business benefits but not criminal behavior.
The good is light, and light is knowledge and progress, it is therefore necessary that the meaning of life is always to good,
although sometimes could be considered justified inequitable conduct, because evil and injustice not are exactly the same, evil is not something that the universe needs, it is rather the price you have to pay for recycled and returned to ignorance, because it is derived from it, but ignorance is the result of regenerating and reliving universal life again.
In this case we have analyzed how would a philosophy of moral attitude considered justified admit exceptions just conduct necessary for coexistence, however since it is true that most life issues exceptions are considered logical, of according to this rule could also be considered logical to admit in this case an exception and consider that justice must be total and if exceptions could not be considered as a contradiction to the necessary search of moderate balance and intermediate usually is the most right, because in this case would be considered unjust acts always wrong and reprehensible and therefore outside the rules of the exceptional use of things. In the universe all things are possible have to be acceptable, even as an exception, it all depends on that make sense, so the path of progress can only be one, evolve from darkness and ignorance representing evil toward the light that represents knowledge and justice.
Philosophy in favor of full justice also has its complexity, as it is to consider as true the assumption of eternal life of the spirit and the repetition of the cosmos indefinitely until all beings live through reincarnation all possible lives, i.e. that time would be repeated but in each new repetition would live a different role from the previous cosmic cycle, then it would no longer felt to be unfair to others, living oneself one day those same lives.
Moreover, in the case of make sense exceptions theory of justice would not be to question this, but considering that these future assumptions would not be important enough to alter the present circumstances. However although in the future the full justice as the best option is considered, the theory of exceptions justice will always serve to explain the way in primitive worlds its relationship with justice arising from a moral point of view, it is the way that people usually behave, perhaps not understanding the eternal and cyclical nature of the cosmos. In any case, my opinion is that full justice is best, because when the mind is engaged only
live justly potential concentration is greater by not having to worry about the consequences of your actions and consequently the results of life they are better.
PYRAMID OF KNOWLEDGE
Arguably the scale ideal values would be like a pyramid that would justice located at its highest point, i.e. all moral values that have to conform our mind this would be the most important because it is essential to create a society organized, i.e. the defense of peace and justice would be the essential value but not the only, because only represent a fraction of the total sum of the values required, but it would be the most important and the coordinator of all element.
Although it is difficult to determine what values would be more important could be seen as defending the race would be second, because it is through the race as evolution has given to us the progress of the genes, nature determined that each climate corresponded him a race and thus defend the existence of all of them without mixing is a moral obligation. The order should happen to chaos so that there is progress and miscegenation only involves disorder, only the best climate of the earth can produce the best and most beautiful race is the white race. All races have the right to exist and to be free, but it is our duty to reject the abomination of miscegenation represents the lack of progress on this. Today on miscegenation is being used as an imperialist weapon primarily by the United States, for failing to recognize racial boundaries believed in the right to invade and interfere in the internal affairs of other races, try to obtain a material benefit from his victory militate against the Germans in the second world war, but keep in mind that what we fought in that war were nations not ideas. It is therefore a serious mistake to believe that the fact that the Germans lost the war implying that have to be wrong at all. At present there are only material interests in this matter, it is striking to note that before the war always was considered as a depraved conduct and tawdry favor miscegenation and instead now supported, but only with military and political purposes and is clearly the power to dignity takes precedence.
Third on the order of values could put birth control, because it is absolutely necessary that every country has the number of inhabitants that their economy is able to sustain, it is fallacious to pretend trivialize this matter as do (NGOs) to affirm that developed countries should maintain free population growth in underdeveloped because without effective birth control will never solve the problem of hunger. But (NGOs) do not pursue combat hunger, because the poor are their business and source of income, more could be considered as parasitic of them as their allies, and for this reason they do nothing to make poverty disappear, only propose get more food even knowing that without a birth control this will lead to more poverty, if we really to worry of the poor is in birth control which would put their effort, that do not do shows where impostors are.
Fourth on the scale ideal values would defend social justice, meaning that in a world evolved in which there was a fixed number of inhabitants, the law should ensure that all inhabitants had secured a job and housing upon reaching adulthood, thus the lives of many young people as it is today is not wasted, this is only possible when governments assume by law birth control, determining that each couple can have only two children maximum and in some cases three when circumstances permit. In this way every child from birth would have secured a job, and housing would be given to him by the state in the form of rent for life upon reaching the age of majority. In any case while it reaches the state should guarantee every citizen unemployed the right to a subsidy minimum survival, although more than minimal subsidies would be fair that there were minimal work in exchange for subsidies, thus bums and parasites social work who would not could not benefit from them.
Fifth place could stand to defend real democracy which is the authentic expression of justice in the political arena and not the false that there is now but a system in which the laws were elected directly and individually by all citizens but that does not interest the current politicians who are only interested in allowing the election of leaders and parties in order to ensure their privileges.
STIFF THE UNIVERSE
Many people wonder far came the conquests of science, or anything you can imagine is possible. In my opinion, the achievements that are possible through science arguably represent half between everything and nothing, i.e. that the process of evolution of the cosmos possible is necessary that this has some strong laws and unmovable which will serve as a starting point and a framework for development of subsequent options.
From the existence of this group of unremovable basic laws would be the existence of a large number of variables options, i.e.
we could find many differences in the universe but whenever they were not in contradiction with the basic laws, because absence such laws the universe would be meaningless and would not be possible to build an organized cosmos. So to the question that you may get in the process of universal evolution, the answer is that everything that does not contradict the primary basic laws, which could also be called laws of nature or God.
It is as if the universe had two basic dimensions in relation to its laws, and other elastic rigid vertical and horizontal. Vertical be stable that determine the pace of progress and universal horizontal would be those that are subject to our personal tastes. It should be borne in mind that universal laws are not owned by anyone nor give anyone the ability to exercise control over others exclusively or indefinitely, because these laws are simply the consequence of the essential and inescapable truth that all beings must submit equally and in the development of these laws sometimes we all participate more directly and sometimes not, but no one can be considered owner of them.
From here the question is: So what are these primordial laws? The answer is simple these laws exist and are in touch with them constantly but how difficult is to be sure of what and what not, what are the true cosmic values and what false, because nature allows us to choose between different options, but if wrong we suffer the consequences when colliding with these cosmic laws that are necessary for the universe works. Therefore we must seek the truth and not be obsessed with topical or preconceived ideas, it is necessary to doubt everything and reason all matters including the most deeply rooted religious beliefs and not because
those beliefs are why be wrong, but by the fact that they may be.
When a man stands something that makes sense but because a religious leader said the resignation antiquity to their own will and his judgment. Not forget that although the religious leader had good intentions does not guarantee that their beliefs are true at all, the affirmation as used by religious organizations is a divine being and therefore infallible is only a presumption and not a test and is used by them as a form of coercion to acquire power trying to impede the ability of analysis and discussion of citizens.
Therefore, we must use the capacity that nature gives us to seek the truth, doubting religious topics in order to improve them, but not because they believe that those beliefs are in their false essence, but to correct their mistakes and adapt a more evolved society.
CIRCLES OF EVOLUTION
It could be defined evolution as a series of circles placed one inside the other, the inner circles represent the earlier stages of evolution and outer circles the most advanced in this phase.
Around each circle a series of points that actually represent the keys necessary to overcome each circle would meet. It could be said that evolution would be a line starting in the center and continue through each circle passing through each point of knowledge, once each circle completed a jump to the next level would then beginning to go the next circle. These theoretical assumptions can be experienced frequently in daily life to be necessary to discover numerous keys in simple principle to make a major breakthrough to pass at a different level of knowledge.
Another example would be the tectonics, because first a gradual accumulation of stress on the plates ending in an abrupt and sudden displacement in the form of earthquake, or the slow process of accumulation of scientific knowledge in the last ten thousand years occurs that he ended in a sudden evolutionary leap in the twentieth century and still continues. It is that evolution is the way through a circle or evolutionary level that is necessary to discover all the characteristics of that circle keys to move to the next. The process of discovering knowledge point around the
circle is slow, but once the journey of discovery of the keys over the jump to the next level occurs suddenly and quick to join the momentum that gives knowledge of all keys that circle, you can say then that evolution is not something that occurs slowly or quickly, but most of the time evolves slowly, but once the route of each level of knowledge over a sharp jump occurs and quick to reach the next level of evolution. Once the world reach full self-realization at the technological level will return to a slow pace of change similar to ancient times, but without losing the achievements, then rapid progress is no longer necessary because mankind will have everything you might need.