Blinking Universe: 30 Technical Papers on Theory & Applications by Richard Lighthouse - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

21. Speed of Light Increasing 3 Meters per Second Each Year

 

 

img85.png

 

Richard Lighthouse

 

 

Creative Commons 4.0 International License; 2020 by Richard Lighthouse. 

CC BY 4.0

Please acknowledge source.   RLighthouse.com

img86.png

 

ISBN: 9781370685868

 

 

Original – 16 October 2016

Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Revision 1c – 16 October 2016

 

WARNING:  The NSA has likely placed electronic tracking tags in this document.  Please consider printing for distribution.

 

 

 

Speed of Light Increasing 3 Meters per Second Each Year

 

 

 

Abstract

 

 

Based on the work of NASA scientist, Dr Daniel Gezari, we can conclude that the speed of light, c, is increasing approximately three meters per second each year.  See his publication, “Lunar Laser Ranging Test on the Invariance of c,” available at arxiv dot org.  This amount is a small, yet significant change because it alters our ideas about relativity and Einstein's theory.  If the speed of light is not constant, this changes our fundamental views for all physical constants.  In fact, many physical constants are derived from, or have c “imbedded” within their equations.  Planck's constant and the Gravitational constant are two that would be affected by this new understanding.  Even our fixed value for the length of a meter is based upon a constant speed of light.  We can deduce that the rate of change for the speed of light is also changing, which implies the existence of a newly defined point in geological time, where delta c, momentarily equals zero.  We will call these points in the timeline, “Cardinal Points.”

 

 

Introduction

 

A physical constant is generally believed to be universal in nature and having a constant value over time.  However, for a changing speed of light, we have:

 

∂c  ≅  3 m/sec

∂t            year

 

 

We can deduce this from Seth's quote of the Basic Laws of All Universes.  Namely, the Law of Infinite Changeability.2 Nothing in any universe remains constant.  Even the rate of change, changes.  (This is not merely the ability to change, but the fact that, as a matter of time, all things will change.  See Seth's discussion on - “I am that which changes.”  Session 413, 1968.)

 

We will then, also propose that the rate of change for c, is not constant:

2c  ≠  0

∂t2

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

So we have described some of the properties and attributes of the speed of light and discussed how it may be changing.  We can utilize this information to great advantage by reducing the energy required to make large changes in time, travel, and possibly between dimensions.

 

This document is a living document.  The author reserves the right to make corrections and changes.

     

 

References

 

1.   Daniel Gezari, “Lunar Laser Ranging Test of the Invariance of C,”  National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 2009.  ArXiv.org; https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3934v1.pdf

 

2.  Seth (Jane Roberts); Early Sessions, Session 50, 1964. “Our next law is the law of infinite changeability and transmutation. That is, any given portion of energy has within it the capacity to take on any pattern or to form an infinite number of energy fields, each one giving forth a truly infinite variety of result.”

 

3.  Richard Lighthouse, “Corrections for Einstein's Relativity Theory,” smashwords.com, 2013.

 

4.  Richard Lighthouse, “The Lighthouse Law of Variance,” smashwords.com, 2013

 

5.  Seth (Jane Roberts); Early Sessions, Session 44, 1964. “... the so-called laws of your camouflage physical universe do not apply to the inner universe... However, the laws of the inner universe apply to all camouflage universes... Some of these basic laws have counterparts known and accepted in various camouflage realities.”

 

6.  Seth (Jane Roberts); Deleted Session, November 14, 1977.  “I said that your conventional geological ages were faulty, along with your theories of the age of the earth, for it is far older than is supposed.”

 

7.  Seth (Jane Roberts); Session 721, 1974.  “There is a different kind of gravity that surrounds older objects than that which surrounds younger ones, but we don’t perceive this at the level of our instruments. We can pick it up, however, if we know where to look. Age affects gravity . . . Older objects are heavier. This is ordinary gravity—not some new kind.”

 

 

 

APPENDIX

 

 

Along these lines of thinking, we come to the question of whether the speed of light is always increasing, in terms of time.  Let's consider several possibilities:

 

1.  The speed of light increases for a certain geological cycle and then decreases for a similar cycle. This cycle might be analogous to the shifting of the poles every 25,000 years or so.  If this is the case, then we have a unique point in time, in our terms, that occurs when delta c momentarily has zero slope.  I propose that we call these points in the timeline, “Cardinal Points”:

 

∂c =  0

∂t

 

 

This brief instant in time, in our terms, presents opportunities for exploiting the ability to time travel or distance travel with near zero energy requirements.  It may also present an opportunity to jump between dimensions requiring very little energy.  But also keep in mind that theses unique points in time will “move” or change with respect to our perceived timelines, so we must develop the ability to track their locations.

 

 

2.  The speed of light increases infinitely.  This seems unreasonable if we only consider that, at +3m/sec increase each year – it would appear that the speed of light had no velocity, 100 million years ago.  And any assumed rate of change, would calculate back to the same conclusion, as a matter of time.  According to Seth, “...your universe is far older than your scientists image.”  If we interpret Seth's comment as meaning, the universe is on the order of one trillion years old, in our terms, then regardless of the positive rate chosen – it is difficult to arrive at our current value for c.