27. Corrections for Einstein's Relativity Theory
Richard Lighthouse
Creative Commons 4.0 International License; 2020 by Richard Lighthouse.
CC BY 4.0
Please acknowledge source. RLighthouse.com
ISBN: 9781311642011
Revision 2e--
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
22 March 2014
WARNING: The NSA has likely placed electronic tracking tags in this document. Please consider printing for distribution.
Corrections for Einstein's Relativity Theory
Abstract
Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a benchmark in science, in that it completely altered our view of the universe and ourselves. His mathematics have led to the development of nuclear power and precise orbital calculations for satellites. To say the least, his ideas changed our world. Unfortunately, there are a number of flaws in the theory's assumptions and its conclusions. This short technical paper discusses three flaws with General Relativity, and provides explanations for their correction and use. Each reader must comprehend that our universe literally blinks off and on, approximately 1 trillion times every second (THz).
Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a benchmark in science, in that it completely altered our view of the universe and ourselves.[1], [2] His mathematics have led to the development of nuclear power and precise orbital calculations for satellites. To say the least, his ideas changed our world. Unfortunately, there are a number of flaws in the theory's assumptions and its conclusions.
1) The speed of light is not a constant.
Although this idea has been promoted by numerous scientists since Einstein, it is not correct. For additional details, please see references [3] and [4]. The speed of light, and all physical constants, will gradually change over time, in our terms. There is no such thing as a physical constant.
The partial derivative of c with respect to time, does not equal zero.
The second derivative of c with respect to time, also does not equal zero.
2) The speed of light is not a absolute limit.
This idea too, has been promoted since the first researchers attempted to measure the value of c.[5], [6] The speed of light seems to be a difficult boundary to breach, however, it too is an illusion. In the Electrical Universe, there is no such thing as time, distance, or velocity. These concepts only have meaning in a physical universe, and are not limits – only energy boundaries. A better way to think about this limit is in terms of energy or an electromagnetic wave - in the Electrical Universe, the speed of light can easily be surpassed.[6]
3) The fabric of spacetime does not “warp” in the presence of a gravitational field.
Even though some experimental evidence seems to support this idea, it is false. There is no fabric to spacetime primarily because time itself is an illusion. Our physical universe literally blinks off and on, approx 1 trillion times every second. Therefore, the passage of time is an illusion that only exists in our minds.
Figure 1. General Relativity leads us to believe that the fabric of spacetime warps in the presence of a gravitational field, thereby causing a satellite to orbit about a planet. This is a false idea.
Further, time is not a dimension, it is an illusion. Mass is the 4th dimension, in our terms, in addition to the three dimensions of x, y, and z space. Mass is not just a property of matter, it is a dimension.
Figure 2. Fundamental Forces do not govern the motion of matter. Fundamental Forces create the masses that we perceive in a physical-discrete universe. The apparent orbiting rotation is caused by Quantum Steps made by fundamental forces each time the universe blinks.
Fundamental forces do not govern the motion of matter, rather fundamental forces create mass.[7] The new construction of mass as a dimension occurs approximately 1 trillion times every second. In reality, fundamental forces and masses are the same thing, in our terms.[8] The errors of our conclusions have come about due to our perceptions within a physical-discrete universe.
A Quantum Step is the forward progression of a fundamental force each time the universe blinks, in our terms. It is approximately:
QS = 360/1024 = 0.35 degrees = .006 radians (this is a very rough estimate)
Figure 3. The four fundamental forces are constantly changing, in our terms, each time the universe blinks.
So we have defined at least three flaws with the assumptions and conclusions of Relativity. However, we can continue to use the equations of relativity to solve problems, while also understanding the limits of their use. This would not be unlike using Newton's equations of motion to solve a problem, while also understanding their limitations.
This document is a living document. The author reserves the right to make corrections and changes.
1. Albert Einstein (1905) "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper", Annalen der Physik 17: 891; English translation “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” by George Barker Jeffery and Wilfrid Perrett (1923).
2. Albert Einstein, Relativity, The Special and the General Theory, Tr. by Robert W. Lawson; Crown Publishers, Inc., New York, N. Y., 1961.
3. Daniel Gezari, Lunar Laser Ranging Test of the Invariance of C, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 2009. [Value of c determined to be 299,792,658 +/- 10 m/sec.]
4. Richard Lighthouse, “The Lighthouse Law of Variance,” smashwords.com, 2013.
5. Richard Lighthouse, “Faster Than Light Travel: The Basic Mechanics,” smashwords.com, 2013.
6. Richard Lighthouse, “The Speed of Light in the Electrical Universe,” smashwords.com, 2013.
7. Richard Lighthouse, “Mathematical Solution Unifying the Four Fundamental Forces in Nature,” smashwords.com, 2013.
8. Richard Lighthouse, “Preliminary Model for Grand Unified Theory,” smashwords.com, 2013.
9. Seth (Jane Roberts); The Unknown Reality, Vol. 1, Session 701, 1974. “Einstein traveled within, and trusted, his own intuitions, and used his inner senses. He would have discovered much more had he been able to trust his intuitions even more, and able to leave more of the so-called scientific proof of his theories to lesser men, to give himself more inner freedom.”
10. Seth (Jane Roberts); The Unknown Reality, Vol. 1, Session 701, 1974. “...(Einstein) was able to quite naturally identify himself with various “functions” of the universe. He was able to listen to the inner voice of matter. He was intuitively and emotionally led to his discoveries. He leaned against time, and felt it give and wobble.”
11. Seth (Jane Roberts); The Unknown Reality, Vol. 1, Session 701, 1974. “If Einstein had been a better mathematician, he would not have made the breakthroughs that he did. He would have been too cowed... Often you take it for granted that intuitive knowledge is not practical, will not work, or will not give you diagrams.”
APPENDIX
Interesting “Coincidences”:
1) Einstein knew what he was looking for, before developing the mathematical solution. I experienced the same process.
2) Einstein developed a specific, special-case solution before developing a general theory. I experienced the same process.
3) Einstein was 26 years old at the time he published the Special Theory of Relativity. I was 52 when many of my technical papers were published.
4) Einstein knew he would receive at least one Nobel Prize for his efforts.
5) Einstein used his intuition to direct his efforts, not the intellect. I also did the same.
6) Einstein was a good mathematician, however by comparison, Gauss, Euler, and Newton were great mathematicians. He would have been intimidated by the challenge of the problem, had he been more experienced. I also feel the same, and was very “rusty” at math after 20 years in the business world.
7) I had a number of similar dreams where Einstein advised me, “not to make the same mistake that I made,” i.e., do not wait for others to prove your theory correct. Push forward in your direction, without waiting for the world to catch up.
8) Rob Butts passed away on 26 May 2008 – my birthday. There are no coincidences. If he intended this as a “passing of the torch,” it would be a great gesture, although I could never fill his shoes. He was a great man and accomplished far more than he knows, and he was an inspiration to me. I had the unique privilege of visiting at his home in October 2002, with some friends. It was true honor to have met him.
9) Having been familiar with the Seth Material, it altered the way I approached any problem. This will be true for other readers as well. Unknown Reality, Volume 1 & 2, will be the future source of many Nobel Prizes.
These examples are intended for future researchers to find common elements that may prove helpful in optimizing the process that research is managed and supported.